Re: [SM-USERS] Sendmail MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN

2003-06-23 Thread kalpesh thakkar
Hello Mr. Jon Thanks for showing int. in my problem - Original Message - From: "Jon Angliss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "kalpesh thakkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 7:00 PM Subject: Re: [SM-USERS] Sendmail MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN > Hello Kalpesh,

Re: [SM-USERS] Problem setting up vlogin plugin

2003-06-23 Thread pdontthink
> What is your recommendation for the IMAP server that allows > [EMAIL PROTECTED] type of login? I'm currently using uw-IMAP that came with > RH8.0 > (imap-2001a-15). Does this version of IMAP server allows fully qualified > email address as a login, and if so is there an instruction how I can > co

[SM-USERS] Defaults

2003-06-23 Thread Jose
Hi there, I would like to suggest a very minor improvement that IMO might be quite helpful to users. When selecting --> Options --> Display Preferences There are three options Theme, Custom Stylesheet and Language that have a Default option. I would suggest that the Default option is written li

Re: [SM-USERS] Date a time

2003-06-23 Thread Jose
Hi there, > Hello Jose, > On Monday, June 23, 2003, Jose wrote... > >> If this is doable, per a user basis, could someone point me how to go about doing exactly that? Thanks. > > -> Options > -> Personal Preferences > -> TimeZone > > That work? Not really. I have Personal Information, Display

Re: [SM-USERS] Date a time

2003-06-23 Thread Jon Angliss
Hello Jose, On Monday, June 23, 2003, Jose wrote... > If this is doable, per a user basis, could someone point me how to > go about doing exactly that? Thanks. -> Options -> Personal Preferences -> TimeZone That work? -- Jon Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ---

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: [SM-DEVEL] FW: SecurityFocus Linux Newsletter #137 - Squirrelmail issues

2003-06-23 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 09:44:07PM +0200, Marc Groot Koerkamp wrote: > I'm not sure it's up to SM to fix this because if we fix it ( == not > returning imap server messages in case of NO responses ) users can still > access /etc/passwd by a simple telnet session. It's entirely possible that the im

Re: [SM-USERS] Problem setting up vlogin plugin

2003-06-23 Thread Aladar, The Dinosaur
Got it! What is your recommendation for the IMAP server that allows [EMAIL PROTECTED] type of login? I'm currently using uw-IMAP that came with RH8.0 (imap-2001a-15). Does this version of IMAP server allows fully qualified email address as a login, and if so is there an instruction how I can confi

Re: [SM-USERS] Date a time

2003-06-23 Thread Jose
While on this subject, shouldn't SM take the time from the computer you are working on instead of that of the server? I can imagine that this could bring a number of problems if the person using SM happens to have the time/time zone completely bogus in their machine. If nothing else, couldn't this

Re: [SM-USERS] Problem setting up vlogin plugin

2003-06-23 Thread pdontthink
> Maybe I don't understand the whole logic. What I would like to do is > login to the squirrelmail as [EMAIL PROTECTED] and send the outbound mail > as [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, the current behavior is that I'm logging in > as [EMAIL PROTECTED], but squirrelmail sends the mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [SM-USERS] Date a time

2003-06-23 Thread Jeremy Thompson
Jimmy, Not quite sure if I understand your problem, but I'll give it a bash. So you have two boxes: a main win2k server and a second server running the SM server? What setup does it have? As far as time is concerned this is how I understand SM to work: - The clock in the top left is running off

Re: [SM-USERS] List OK

2003-06-23 Thread Troy Settle
> I haven't been receiving many messages from the list in the last few days. > In fact, only a hand full appeared this morning. Has the traffic been > steady or is there something going screwing at my end? > > -- > Gerry > > "The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne" Chaucer > > It's aliv

Re: [SM-USERS] Netscape 4.73 and composing

2003-06-23 Thread pdontthink
> I have a problem when composing a message using Netscape 4.7 > (squirrelmail 1.4.0). When the compose window is "resized" everything > in the window is lost. This happens with and without the compose in new > window option. Any suggestions? if memory serves correctly... this is unavoidable in

[SM-USERS] Re: [SM-DEVEL] FW: SecurityFocus Linux Newsletter #137 - Squirrelmail issues

2003-06-23 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello David, On Monday, June 23, 2003, David Rees wrote... > I verified the exploits on 1.2.11. They don't appear to work on 1.4.0: > http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7952/exploit/ Well apart from the the privalages escilation at the bottom, these errors have NOTHING to do with squirrelmail at

Re: [SM-USERS] SquirrelMail with HTTPS and IMAPS

2003-06-23 Thread pdontthink
> Hi ! > I'm using redhat8 and I'm trying to set Squirrelmail with my pops/imaps > already functional server. > Now I have two questions. > First of all I would like to permit the webmail access only via https, > eg, any http://webmail.my.domain should redirect automatically to > https://webmail.m

[SM-USERS] Re: [SM-DEVEL] FW: SecurityFocus Linux Newsletter #137 -Squirrelmail issues

2003-06-23 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
David Rees zei: > Marc Groot Koerkamp said: > >>> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7952 >> >> Ok I inpected the exploit and in SM 1.4 the exploit isn't there. I don't >> have SM 1.2.x anymore so i didn't check the older versions. >> >> The exploit had to do with setting move_messages GET vars. Curr

[SM-USERS] Re: [SM-DEVEL] FW: SecurityFocus Linux Newsletter #137 -Squirrelmail issues

2003-06-23 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
David Rees zei: > I verified the exploits on 1.2.11. They don't appear to work on 1.4.0: > > http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7952/exploit/ > > Looks bad! > > -Dave Depends of the definition of bad. Why does a user wants to delete his own mailbox by modifying the uri ??? If the user does that he

[SM-USERS] Re: [SM-DEVEL] FW: SecurityFocus Linux Newsletter #137 - Squirrelmail issues

2003-06-23 Thread David Rees
Marc Groot Koerkamp said: >> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7952 > > Ok I inpected the exploit and in SM 1.4 the exploit isn't there. I don't > have SM 1.2.x anymore so i didn't check the older versions. > > The exploit had to do with setting move_messages GET vars. Current > Squirrelmail versio

[SM-USERS] Re: [SM-DEVEL] FW: SecurityFocus Linux Newsletter #137 -Squirrelmail issues

2003-06-23 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
Brian G. Peterson zei: > I saw this in the linux rollup of the weekly Bugtraq messages. I thought > someone should check it out and respond, as well as making sure that SM > 1.4.0 and the STABLE and DEVEL branches are not affected. > > I looked though my bugtraq archive, and searched online, and c

[SM-USERS] Netscape 4.73 and composing

2003-06-23 Thread Lorene Evans
I have a problem when composing a message using Netscape 4.7 (squirrelmail 1.4.0). When the compose window is "resized" everything in the window is lost. This happens with and without the compose in new window option. Any suggestions? Thanks in Advance Lorene --

[SM-USERS] Virtual Host setup

2003-06-23 Thread Steve Murphy
I'm trying to setup virtual host logons and after debugging I found that the plug-in does not find the right domain name to use per user. I'm using Postfix style virtual hosting and I'm a little confused as to where I tell squirrelmail which domain to user for which user. Any help would be great.

Re: [SM-USERS] Hi

2003-06-23 Thread Seth Randall
This doesn't seem to be a problem with SquirrelMail, but rather with PHP. PHP < 4.3 has several problems with Turkish (uppercase/lowercase i conversion). More information can be found here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=690625&group_id=311&atid=100311 http://www.topoli

Re: [SM-USERS] Bug reports

2003-06-23 Thread Klavs Klavsen
On man, 2003-06-23 at 15:33, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > Hello Klavs, > On Monday, June 23, 2003, Klavs Klavsen wrote... > > > I have not gotten confirmation, but I was hoping too. > > > IMHO this is a bug: > > > danish characters (and I suspect anything but US-characters - ie. I18N > > support) d

[SM-USERS] Error while editing addressbook

2003-06-23 Thread Ted Meisky
I sent this to the list once before and haven't heard anything, so I thought I'd try one more time. Whenever I try to edit an entry in my addressbook (file based, not LDAP) I get an error that says "ERROR: You can only edit one address at the time" I get this even though I have only checked one a

[SM-USERS] will pay for solution

2003-06-23 Thread James
I am looking for my palm to sync with my squirrelmail cal. Email me for details. Thank you in advance. James --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicate

[SM-USERS] Date a time

2003-06-23 Thread Jimmy Alexander Cortes
My SM system always seems to have a different date and time. I set up the system with the same time and date from the server but just shows the time. Any idea? I have win200 server in my PC server. thank you --- This SF.Net email is sponsor

Re: [SM-USERS] Issues with RH 9.0

2003-06-23 Thread pete
We're running it, and it works great. No problems so far. Pete On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 08:00:51AM -0400, Kerry Blalock wrote: > Has anyone encountered any problems with squirrelmail and latest upgrade > to Redhat 9.0? I am hesitating on doing the upgrade to 9.0 at this point. > I believe I am on

[SM-USERS] Problem with attachments size

2003-06-23 Thread Douglas Conrad
Helo! I use the Squirrelmail version 1.4.0 and don't obtain to send email's with 204k more than. How I change this? -- Douglas Conrad #-- Se criam escravos com doações e guerreiros com armas. Então pegamos nossas armas e espedaçamos as doações , pois aqui não se formam escravos! Eu uso softwa

Re: [SM-USERS] Problem setting up vlogin plugin

2003-06-23 Thread Aladar, The Dinosaur
Maybe I don't understand the whole logic. What I would like to do is login to the squirrelmail as [EMAIL PROTECTED] and send the outbound mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, the current behavior is that I'm logging in as [EMAIL PROTECTED], but squirrelmail sends the mail as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is ther

Re: [SM-USERS] Bug reports

2003-06-23 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hello Klavs, On Monday, June 23, 2003, Klavs Klavsen wrote... > I have not gotten confirmation, but I was hoping too. > IMHO this is a bug: > danish characters (and I suspect anything but US-characters - ie. I18N > support) doesn't work when used as the identity name - when an email is > send, t

RE: [SM-USERS] webmail

2003-06-23 Thread Troy Settle
The easiest way, is to rename the directory: $ mv squirrelmail webmail But, that doesn't always work. See, by default, installing Squirrelmail from the FreeBSD ports collection puts it as /usr/local/squirrelmail (which is an AWESOME place to put it). So, I end up with the following in my http

[SM-USERS] Issues with RH 9.0

2003-06-23 Thread Kerry Blalock
Has anyone encountered any problems with squirrelmail and latest upgrade to Redhat 9.0? I am hesitating on doing the upgrade to 9.0 at this point. I believe I am on version 1.2 of squirrelmail. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Atte

[SM-USERS] webmail

2003-06-23 Thread MD Raziuddin Haqqani
Hi,     I want to configure squirrelmail as webmail i.e, http://mydomain.com/webmail instead of http://mydomain.com/squirrelmial. How should I do this i am relatively new to the squirrelmail.   Thanks   Haq

Re: [SM-USERS] unable to send attach and/or download attachments from IE

2003-06-23 Thread itsbruce
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 12:31:20AM -0700, Ovidiu Motpan wrote: > > I have an intranet with Windows machines and a server > RH9 Linux with Sendmail PHP and Squirrelmail. > > If I use Squirrelmail from the server with X and > Mozila, everithing works fine but the problems comes > when I work on

[SM-USERS] Error: "SUBSCRIBE failed: Can't append to subscription database"

2003-06-23 Thread Lucian Constantin
Hi All,    I have a problem after I do an "inplace" upgrade from an SquirellMailversion 1.2.9 on RedHat 7.3 to the version 1.2.10 shipped with RedHat 9.    The only thing I copied from the old linux box were the .pref's and.abook's and /home directories for each user. And now begin the prob

[SM-USERS] Forwarded message not showing "CC" adresses in the mesage description

2003-06-23 Thread Rahul
Hello, We are using the Squirrel mail.If we send some message to few people by putting address in "cc" .Now when we forward that message to other people,the message just shows the the person which was put in the "TO" header.While the addresses which were in the "cc" header are not displayed in t

[SM-USERS] SquirrelMail with HTTPS and IMAPS

2003-06-23 Thread david carvalho
Hi ! I'm using redhat8 and I'm trying to set Squirrelmail with my pops/imaps already functional server. Now I have two questions. First of all I would like to permit the webmail access only via https, eg, any http://webmail.my.domain should redirect automatically to https://webmail.mydomain

[SM-USERS] Bug reports

2003-06-23 Thread Klavs Klavsen
Hi guys, I have not gotten confirmation, but I was hoping too. IMHO this is a bug: danish characters (and I suspect anything but US-characters - ie. I18N support) doesn't work when used as the identity name - when an email is send, the character is replaced with f.ex. Lisbeth Ammitzb=?iso-8859-

[SM-USERS] unable to send attach and/or download attachments from IE

2003-06-23 Thread Ovidiu Motpan
I have an intranet with Windows machines and a server RH9 Linux with Sendmail PHP and Squirrelmail. If I use Squirrelmail from the server with X and Mozila, everithing works fine but the problems comes when I work on my intranet. >From a Win98 PC with IE I'm unable to send attach and/or downl