I am using solr3.6.2 and I found the default highlight does not work like
solr1.4.1 or FastVectorHighlighter.
Is it a bug?
I use 2gram tokenizer.
example:
text:testabctest123456testabc
index:te es st ta ab bc ct te es st t1 12 23 ・・・
query:test
parameters:
hl=true
hl.fragsize=200
hl.simple.pre={
I found someone had customised the solr1.4 default highlight before I joined
the team.
so It is not a bug.
The standard solr1.4 default highlighter works like solr3.6.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/defaultHighLight-of-solr3-6-does-not-work-tp4138817p414002
Hi, All
When I did AtomicUpdate on SolrCloud by the following setting, it does
not work properly.
---
---
When changed as follows and made it work, it became as expected.
---
---
The later setting and the way of using post-processor could make the
same result, I though,
but u
Hi All
Sorry, above settings are contrary with each other.
Actually, following setting does not work properly.
---
---
And follows is working as expected.
---
---
Thanks,
Yoshiaki
2020年7月17日(金) 16:32 yo tomi :
> Hi, All
> When I did AtomicUpdate on SolrCloud
Hi Jörn & shown
"does not work properly" means pre-processors
(TrimFieldUpdateProcessorFactory and
RemoveBlankFieldUpdateProcessorFactory) don't trim and remove blank for
string fields.
example:
When the following schema:
---
---
update following documents with "Documents" of solr admin:
-
