Here is my query:
http://127.0.0.1:/solr/JOBS/select/??q=Apache&wt=xslt&tr=example.xslt
The response I get is the following. I have example.xslt in the /conf/xslt
path. What is wrong here? Thanks!
HTTP ERROR 500
Problem accessing /solr/JOBS/select/. Reason:
getTransformer fails in
Anyone found a solution to the getTransformer error. I am getting the same
error.
Here is my output:
Problem accessing /solr/JOBS/select/. Reason:
getTransformer fails in getContentType
java.lang.RuntimeException: getTransformer fails in getContentType
at
org.apache.solr.response.X
hi li,
i looked at doing something similar - where we only index the text
but retrieve search results / highlight from files -- we ended up giving
up because of the amount of customisation required in solr -- mainly
because we wanted the distributed search functionality in solr which
meant making
hi,
> So, can I index and facet these fields, without describe then in my schema?
>
> I will first try with dynamic fields, but I'm not sure it's going to work.
we do all our facet fields in this way, with just general string field
for single/multivalued
fields:
and faceting
hi,
you shouldn't have two fq parameters -- some solr params work like
that, but fq doesn't
> http://172.20.1.33:8983/solr/select/?q=*:*&start=0&fq=EMAIL_HEADER_FROM:t...@mail.de&fq=EMAIL_HEADER_TO:t...@mail.de
you need to combine it into a single param i.e. try putting it as an
"OR" or "AND" if
oops - i thought you couldn't put more than one - ignore my answer then :)
On 12 July 2010 17:20, Rebecca Watson wrote:
> hi,
>
> you shouldn't have two fq parameters -- some solr params work like
> that, but fq doesn't
>
>> http://172.20.1.3
Hi,
earlier this week i started messing with getting wildcard queries to
be analysed
i've got some weird analysers doing stemming/lowercasing and writing
in the same rules into a custom queryparser didn't seem logical given
i just want the analysers to apply as they do at index time
i ca
hi,
sorry realised i had a typo:
> of course, non of this is going to sort out trying to match against the query
> "co?mput?r" because you've probably stemmed "computer" to "comput" or
> something
> at index time -- but if you add in a copyfield to an extra field that
> isn't stemmed
> at query
shut down your solr server first... if its not important! :)
On 13 July 2010 16:47, ZAROGKIKAS,GIORGOS wrote:
> I found it but I can not delete
> Any suggestion???
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuval Feinstein [mailto:yuv...@answers.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 11:39 AM
> To: solr
hi,
has anyone had experience with faceting over a field where the field
is not present
in all documents within the index?
i'm hoping that -- faceting simply calculates+returns the counts for docs that
have the field present while results may still contain documents that don't
have the facet fiel
brilliant! thanks very much for your help :)
On 13 July 2010 21:47, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
>> i'm hoping that -- faceting simply calculates+returns the counts for docs
>> that
>> have the field present while results may still contain documents that don't
>> have the facet field (i.e. the field
hi mark,
jayf and i are working together :)
i tried to apply the patch to the trunk, but the ant tests failed...
i checked out the latest trunk:
svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk
patched it with SOLR-1873, and put the two JARs into trunk/solr/lib
ant compile in the
hi,
would faceting work?
http://www.lucidimagination.com/Community/Hear-from-the-Experts/Articles/Faceted-Search-Solr
if you have a field for rootId that is multivalued + facet on it -- you'll get
value+count pairs back (top 100 i think by default)
bec :)
On 16 July 2010 16:07, Ninad Raut wrot
Hi,
When indexing large amounts of data I hit a problem whereby Solr
becomes unresponsive
and doesn't recover (even when left overnight!). I think i've hit some
GC problems/tuning
is required of GC and I wanted to know if anyone has ever hit this problem.
I can replicate this error (albeit taking
we've just started using awstats - as suggested by the solr 1.4 book.
its open source!:
http://awstats.sourceforge.net/
On 12 August 2010 18:18, Jay Flattery wrote:
> Thanks - splunk looks overkill.
> We're extremely small scale - were hoping for something open source :-)
>
>
> - Original Me
t; the source) which is 100k documents an hour without breaking a sweat.
>
>
>
> On 8/12/10, Rebecca Watson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When indexing large amounts of data I hit a problem whereby Solr
>> becomes unresponsive
>> and doesn't recover (even w
ing Solr.
i'm not sure if we would either if we posted as we created the
index.xml format...
but because we post 500+ documents a time (one article file per LCF post) and
LCF can post these files quickly i'm not sure if I need to try and slow down
the post rate!?
thanks for your repli
each file to Solr so i'll email an
update about this.
if this works ok i'm then going to try using only one auto-commit
setting rather than two and see
if this works ok.
thanks :)
bec
On 13 August 2010 00:24, Rebecca Watson wrote:
> hi,
>
>> 1) I assume you are doing batch
hi,
I am running solr 1.4.1 and java 1.6 with 6GB heap and the following
GC settings:
gc_args="-XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
-XX:+CMSClassUnloadingEnabled -XX:NewSize=2g -XX:MaxNewSize=2g
-XX:CMSInitiatingOccupancyFraction=60"
So 6GB total heap and 2GB allocated to eden space.
I have caching, autoco
flexible indexing in
Lucene) OR
to increase the term index interval so I will try one/both of these and see if
this means I can increase the number of documents I can index given my current
hardware (6GB RAM) where these docs have a lot of unique terms!
thanks :)
bec
On 13 August 2010 19:15, R
ine the results i'm returned and create my own facet
order from it, but I thought this might be useful for others. I don't
know my way around Solr's source, so I though dropping a note to the
list would be faster than code spelunking with no light.
--
Cory 'G' Watson
http://www.onemogin.com
Hello,
I have been developing a new search application based on Solr (Very
nice!) using dismax. We are using query-time boosts to provide better
search results for user queries and index-time boosts to promote
certain documents over others.
My question is about the latter: We have a "position" f
If you want documents returned in the same order as a field, it's
easy... you sort!
If you want the value of a field to influence a score, not determine
the exact sort order, you can use FunctionQuery (currently hacked into
the query parser as _val_:myfield)
That seems like what I want -- boost
t to fetching data from the facets based on the page of
documents I'm showing. Thanks for the discussion, it helped! :)
Cory G Watson
http://www.onemogin.com
24 matches
Mail list logo