brilliant! thanks very much for your help :)
On 13 July 2010 21:47, Jonathan Rochkind <rochk...@jhu.edu> wrote: >> i'm hoping that -- faceting simply calculates+returns the counts for docs >> that >> have the field present while results may still contain documents that don't >> have the facet field (i.e. the field faceted on)? > > Yes, that's exactly what happens. You can use facet.missing to get a count > for documents with no value in the facet field too, if you want. > > Jonathan
