get away with changing this:
to this:
This assumes, of course, for these pdf documents the "fake_id" should always be
the same as the "id".
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: anarchos78 [mailto:rigasathan
1.6 or 1.7 JDK
(the default JDK on some linux distributions is often inadequate) Issue "javac
-version" from the command line as an insanity check.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: mechravi25 [mailto:mechrav...@yahoo.c
nd up with
strange conditions like the one you're getting? It could be a case where your
data has grown just over the limit your setup can handle under such an
unfortunate circumstance.
Let me know if this solves it. If so, we probably should open a bug report and
get this fixed in DIH
the Maven repository.
Possibly your internet connection was down or you're behind a proxy that
doesn't allow it?
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: mechravi25 [mailto:mechrav...@yahoo.co.in]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 7
But the approach taken in the link Jack sites below does work. Its a pain to
set it up though.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 10:21 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject:
Shawn,
Do you think this behavior is because, while the indexing is paused, you reach
some type of timeout so either your db or the jdbc cuts the connection? Or, ar
you thinking something in the DIH/JDBCDataSource code is causing the connection
to drop under these circumstances?
James Dyer
E
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Special_Commands and the
$docBoost pseudo-field name.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: geeky2 [mailto:gee...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 2:12 PM
To: solr-user
ELSE null END as '$docBoost',
...other fields... from some_table, etc
Either way I wouldn't expect it to make the indexing be noticably slower.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: geeky2 [mailto:gee...@hotmail.co
chSize%28int%29
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: pla [mailto:patrick.archib...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:10 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: problem on running fullimport
Thanks Alexey Serba. I
ue you set). You can verify the correctness
of this by setting "spellcheck.maxCollationTries" to zero (no checking) and
then re-trying the collation(s) it suggests by hand (with the same "fq" params,
etc).
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-
t.
Someday it'll be nice if we can come up with a better way than this to
programitically interact with DIH...
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: geeky2 [mailto:gee...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 2:43 PM
To: solr
ally changes it to "Integer.MIN_VALUE".
According to the wiki this is to fix this error.) The value of "batchSize" is
used on the java.sql.Statement objects with "setFetchSize(batchSize)".
example:
see: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Configuring_
a-config.xml, then go ahead and double-check spelling and
case in all your config files. Besides a typo somewhere, I'm not sure what
else would cause this not to map.)
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Taboada [mailto:kalim
Try setting it to 0 or -1. Or check the Mysql JDBC driver documentation about
valid values for "Statement.setFetchSize()" I think someone else recently
asked on this same list about problems with the latest Mysql driver and fetch
sizes, so this driver may be particularly finicky.
one, I'd
definitely try it without multiple mappings to see if it fixes it.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 10:34 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
ELECT with "AS" clauses.
- in cases the columns are the same in SELECT as what you have in schema.xml,
omit the tags (see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#A_shorter_data-config)
These are shot-in-the-dark guesses. I wouldn't expect this to matter but you
might as w
o remove them
from the dictionary). For that there is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2585 which is part of Solr 4. The
only other workaround is "onlyMorePopular" which has its own issues. (see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.alternativeTerm
essor:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_6/solr/contrib/dataimporthandler/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/dataimport/SolrEntityProcessor.java
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Lance Norskog [mailto
29
. Also, the Packt Solr book (Smiley&Pugh) has a nice section about boosting
scores based on page-rank or popularity type fields. In the old first edition
its chapter 5, "enhanced searching".
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Mess
he least caused
some log warnings, and it wouldn't work at all without readOnly=false. Not
sure abour PostgreSql.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Jasper Floor [mailto:jasper.fl...@m4n.nl]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 8
?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2993 Shortly after the initial
commit of this feature, a bug similar to the one you're reporting was later
fixed with these subsequent revisions.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From:
t. I guess if anyone has a story of how they had
difficulty with SOLR and the container it ran and having Support helped, or if
you wish you had Support and didn't, I'd like to hear it.
I appreciate your feedback and advice. Thanks.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
e process. However, I have it running fairly fast by
partitioning the data by a modulus of the primary key and then running several
jobs in parallel. The trick is not to get I/O bound. Things run fast if you
can set it up to maximize CPU.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615)
our old system, we had to do something like
this:
contrib: dyer, james|author|123
contrib: smith, sam|editor|456
But Lucene/Solr will guanantee that multivalued fields return in exactly the
same order you put them in. So with SOLR we can do this:
contrib_name: dyer, james
contrib_n
There's also one "gotcha" we've experienced when searching acrosse multi-valued
fields: SOLR will match across field occurences. In the example below, if you
were to search q=contrib_name:(james AND smith), you will get this record back.
It matches one name from one con
Dennis,
If you need to search a key/value pair, you'll have to put them both in the
same field, somehow. One way is to re-index them using the key in the
fieldname. For instance, suppose you have:
contributor: dyer, james
contributor: smith, sam
role: author
role: editor
...but you
The phrase solution works as does escaping the space with a backslash:
fq=Product:Electric\ Guitar ... actually a lot of characters need to be escaped
like this (amperstands and parenthesis come to mind)...
I assume you already have this indexed as "string", not "text&qu
t always insert the operator (as in examples
6 & 7). However, this is an extra burden on our clients that I'd like to avoid
if at all possible.
See below for more configuration information. Any ideas are appreciated.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
Snippets from schema.xml:
...
...
_SI}faith") , using the
technique found at
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/03/31/nested-queries-in-solr/
Is there any way to do this? I'm using version 1.4.1
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
eturns an instance of "BooleanQuery", right?
Any more advice anyone can give is appreciated! For the client I'm responsible
for, I'm just inserting explicit operators between all of the user's queries.
But for the client I'm not responsible for I would love to h
1 as a patch. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2010
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: taimurAQ [mailto:taimur_qure...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:20 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subj
stemming gets applied regardless. But stop words do not.
Does anyone have ideas on what is going on? Is this a feature or possibly a
bug? Any known workarounds? Any advice is appreciated.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
asking the mail list!
It looks like the only workarounds I have is to either filter out the stopwords
in the client when this happens, or enable stop words for all the fields that
are used in "qf" with stopword-enabled fields. Unless...someone has a better
idea??
James Dyer
E-Commerce
(e)dismax had a flag you could set that would tell it
that if any analyzers removed a term, then that term would become optional for
any fields for which it remained? I'm not sure what the development effort
would perhaps it would be a nice way to circumvent this problem in a future
rele
on the
component's wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.collate
This feature is committed to 3.x and 4.x and is available as a patch for 1.4.1
(here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2010).
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-
st of the time.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: satya swaroop [mailto:satya.yada...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 10:32 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: spellchecking even the key is true
Hi All,
g "spellcheck.q" in this case in order to get
the analysis right. I'm not sure if this is the solution but I thought I'd
mention it. I never tried spell checking this way because it seemed very
limited and possibly quite expensive.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Syst
mirrors them internally or via a downstream
project)
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:04 PM
To: java-u...@lucene.apache.org; solr-user@lucene.apache.org
astException
on the float value:
text_spelling
spellchecker
Spelling_Dictionary
text_spelling
true
.001
I have it on my to-do list to look into this further but haven't yet. If you
decide to try it and can get it to work, please let me know how you do it.
James Dyer
E
"solrconfig.xml". But I primed it by giving it its config file
in-sync to start with.
I ended up going the same-config-file-everywhere route though because we're
using our master to handle requests when its not indexing (one less server to
buy)...
James Dyer
E-Commerce Syst
H will honor it. Also see the unit test
"TestPluginEnable.java", which seems to show that the StandardRequestHandler
will honor it.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu]
Sent: Monday, Februar
Hi Guys,
came across this sorting query
query ({!v="category: 445"}) desc
I understand it is sorting on exact match of category = 445, I don't quite
understand the syntax, could someone please elaborate a bit for me? So I can
reuse this syntax in the future.
Regards
James
AWESOME, thanks for your time!
Regards
James
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 6:14 PM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) <
dsmi...@mitre.org> wrote:
> Hi. Where did you find such an obtuse example?
>
> Recently, Solr supports sorting by function query. One such function is
> named "que
" pauses during CMS much shorter:
-XX:+CMSParallelRemarkEnabled
We use these in conjunction with CMS/ParNew and a 22gb heap (64gb total on the
box), with a 1.2G newSize/maxNewSize.
In case anyone else is having similar issues, we thought we would share our
experience with these newer options.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
all depends on your situation and you need to test.
In our case, this flag solved a real problem we were having. Whoever wrote
the JRocket book you refer to no doubt had other scenarios in mind...
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From:
tps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2462 for information.) This does
not affect Solr 1.4 unless you've applied SOLR-2010.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: sivaprasad [mailto:sivaprasa...@echidnainc.com]
Sent: Th
the actual score even the results all matches area_id 78153
I am getting results like this
Area 2, score 0.21
Area 3, score 0.38
Area 4, score 0.23
but the result should be like this
Area 3, score 0.38
Area 4, score 0.23
Area 2, score 0.21
Thanks heaps in advanced.
Regards
James
egment, you can get it to apply the change to
"PossibilityIterator.java", which is all that is necessary to fix the bug.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: roySolr [mailto:royrutten1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04,
I also should mention that solr-2010 is incorporated in Solr 3.1, so if you can
upgrade you won't need a patch. Note, however, that you will still want to
apply the fix in solr-2462 regardless of the version as this fix hasn't been
committed anywhere.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Syst
Hi All,
I have solr and tika installed and am happily extracting and indexing
various files.
Unfortunately on some word documents it blows up since it tries to
auto-generate a 'title' field but my title field in the schema is single
valued.
Here is my config for the extract handler...
class
Luker wrote:
Hi Emyr,
You could try using the "extractOnly=true" parameter [1]. Of course,
you'll need to repost the extracted text manually.
--jay
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler#Extract_Only
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Emyr James wrote:
Hi All,
more
popular" terms. To my knowledge, there is no way to get the spellchecker to do
that currently.
On the other hand, if you're pretty sure "man" is not in the dictionary, try
upping spellcheck.count to something higher than the default (20 maybe?)...
James Dyer
E-Commerc
n help you for the meta data fields.
References-
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Dynamic_fields
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler#Input_Parameters
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TikaExtractOnlyExampleOutput
Regards,
Anuj
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Emyr James wrote:
;group.main=true", then the response will
come back with a normal SolrDocumentList and you won't need code like above.
One caveat to this is my testing showed a significant performance and/or memory
usage hit from using these two parameters. I didn't dig any deeper to try and
fig
ionTries") you should apply SOLR-2462
first (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2462 for information & a
patch). It is likely this (or a similar fix) will eventually get committed and
included in the next bug-fix release, should there be one.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Sys
y only
needs minor tweaking.
The jira ticket is here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2492
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rocco [mailto:alel...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 12:54 PM
To: solr-us
Great. I wasn't aware of the other issue. I put a link on the 2 issues in
JIRA so people can know in the future.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rocco [mailto:alel...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011
ry. Create a new field
and "copyField" the values into it. Base your uber-dictionary on this new
field.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: roySolr [mailto:royrutten1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 3:24 AM
T
the position of the next
occurrence by the positionIncrementGap value, this will effectively prevent
Lucene/Solr from matching across occurences.
The downside to this workaround is that wildcards are not permitted in phrase
searches. So if you need wildcard support also, then you're o
llation queries and testing
them against the index prior to returning them. SOLR-2010 (included in 3.1)
got us part of the way there but there is still more work to do.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: roySolr [mailto:royrutten1..
ling_Dictionary
text
./spellchecker
.01
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Tanner Postert [mailto:tanner.post...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 6:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellcheck Phrases
s the quality of our spell suggestions, now that
I know how to use it properly.
Sorry about the mis-information earlier.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Dyer, James
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 3:02 PM
To: solr
Demian,
If you omit "spellcheckIndexDir" from the configuration, it will create an
in-memory spelling dictionary.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Demian Katz [mailto:demian.k...@villanova.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, June
might not work at all )
... I also didn't do anything with encodings but I'm not sure this will be an
issue either...
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Helmut Hoffer von Ankershoffen [mailto:helmut...@googlemail.com]
Sen
t might be your best hope if
this is a feature you've absolutely got to have.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: O. Klein [mailto:kl...@octoweb.nl]
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 8:11 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subjec
ution...
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Markus Jelsma [mailto:markus.jel...@openindex.io]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 10:13 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Dyer, James
Subject: Re: Spellcheck compounded words
This will wor
ons" to something higher. Just keep in mind that with
"maxCollationTries" at zero, the collations aren't guaranteed to return any
hits.
- I'm not so sure shingles will work with the collation feature at all.
- I've heard that when using shingles, you have to put
to try and figure out if this
is a bug and if so, then try and fix it.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: O. Klein [mailto:kl...@octoweb.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 11:37 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Spellcheck
sn't look like a possibility.
If you are able to figure anything more out on this yourself, then please post.
If this is a real bug, then we ought to get it fixed.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: O. Klein [mailto:kl...@oct
have to run the deltas using "command=full-import
/ clean=false" as shown here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerFaq#fullimportdelta
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.
You need to index the field you want to facet on.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Mark juszczec [mailto:mark.juszc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 3:50 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: field with repeated
"Lucid reference guide". These are both excellent
detailed tutorials and should help you get up-to-speed pretty fast.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Mark juszczec [mailto:mark.juszc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, Jul
y long as you please (and
commit) on the new core. At the stroke of midnight the next day, swap cores.
This way you can control (nearly) the exact moment the new data becomes public.
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin#SWAP
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615)
r than the commit, so
you want to avoid doing one if you can. You still won't be able to guarantee
the new documents are available right at the stroke of midnight be you can
probably usually be close. If you need to be precise, you'll probably want to
use 2 cores.
James Dyer
E-Com
ictionary, Solr's spellchecker
will not try to correct it. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2585 for a potential solution to
this problem.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: tamanjit.bin...@yahoo.co.in [mailto
be
Solaris. In Windows, there is a definite advantage for using MMapDirectory on
a 64-bit system.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Li Li [mailto:fancye...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 4:09 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apac
If you would rather use a scripting language such as javascript instead of
writing your Transformer in java, see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#ScriptTransformer .
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Christian Bordi
he
person who opened the issue reported this for 3.3.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Valentin [mailto:igorlacro...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 9:05 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SolR : eDisma
Daniel,
This looks like a good usecase for FieldCollapsing (see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing). Perhaps try something like:
&group=true&group.field=documentId&group.limit=1&group.sort=version desc
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
Field Collapsing than what was committed so it might
not be 100% accurate.
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/148ba23aec5ee2d8/solrquery_api_for_adding_group_filter
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Skiles
Yes:
solrquery.add("group.main", true);
solrquery.add("group.format", "simple");
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Skiles [mailto:daniel.ski...@docfinity.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August
o know how many hits each collation will return, also
specify "spellcheck.collateExtendedResults=true"
- See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.maxCollations
for more information
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Me
won't work in 1.4 without
the SOLR-2010 patch.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Herman Kiefus [mailto:herm...@angieslist.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 4:55 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr spellch
If you use "spellcheck.q", you also still need to specify "q" for the
queryhandler, otherwise you'll get an NPE. Not sure that's your problem but
its one thing to check.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Origin
ot;");
}
Not sure this is what you're after, but maybe it'd be helpful. Like I say, I
wish [I knew of|there was] a better way to do this...
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.o
s in fixed-width or
delimited format.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: kiran kumar [mailto:kirankumarsm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 11:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: LineEntityProcessor Usage
Hello
rks out for you. Any more feedback you can provide on
the newer spellcheck features you're using is appreciated. Thanks.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Carrie Coy [mailto:c...@ssww.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012
batching isn't your answer. But DIH isn't designed at all to work well with
NRT either...
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Klostermeyer, Michael [mailto:mklosterme...@riskexchange.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03,
pellcheck.collateParam.mm=100%", if your original query had a
very low "mm" value. This will make the collations returned more meaningful to
the user.
- maybe specify "spellcheck.alternativeTermCount" to something >0 if you want
the spellchecker to consider that the
Yes, "maxCollationTries" tests the new (collation) queries with all the same
parameters as the original query. Most notably, it uses the same "fq"
parameters so it will take in account any filters you were using.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-
I'm also certain that it would apply to both "oncommit" and "onoptimize".
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: geeky2 [mailto:gee...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:48 AM
To: solr-user@
lds as multi-valued automatically. I
guess your approach leads to a lot fewer rows getting sent from your db to Solr
though.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Pranav Prakash [mailto:pra...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, Ju
the client, along with some type of notation that the result
is actually an automatically-applied spellcheck response. Then there's the
added complexity of doing this all in a distributed setup.
It would be a nice feature to have though.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
ese
really need to be fixed so any testing help would be much appreciated.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: mechravi25 [mailto:mechrav...@yahoo.co.in]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 8:04 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject
nfigured and there could be somethat that was
broken that I have not uncovered myself. Any issues that may exist with
SOLR-2382 need to be identified and fixed in the 4.x branch as soon as possible.
I apologize for the late response. I was away the past week.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
You might just be missing .
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#TemplateTransformer
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Kiran Jayakumar [mailto:kiranjuni...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:54 PM
To
variable is not resolving to anything so your database gets:
where blah=''
...and for some reason it doesn't like being passed an empty string like that.
Just a shot in the dark here but maybe?
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message
No, it should process all of the files that get listed. I'm taking a look at
the issue you opened, SOLR-3779. This is also similar to SOLR-3307, although
that was reported as a bug with "threads" in 3.6, which is no longer a feature
in 4.0.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingra
ecial_Commands for more
info on this technique.
Finally, you will want to be aware of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2492 , a bug which was fixed in Solr
3.4. DIH doesn't automatically do a commit in some cases if your import only
does deletes. You need to issue a commit man
ecure/Dashboard.jspa
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Mikhail Khludnev [mailto:mkhlud...@griddynamics.com]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 12:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: DIH problem
Gian,
The only way to handle it
401 - 500 of 881 matches
Mail list logo
