AWESOME, thanks for your time!
Regards
James
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 6:14 PM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) <
dsmi...@mitre.org> wrote:
> Hi. Where did you find such an obtuse example?
>
> Recently, Solr supports sorting by function query. One such function is
> named "query" which takes a query and uses the score of the result of that
> query as the function's result. Due to constraints of where this query is
> placed within a function query, it is necessary to use the local-params
> syntax (e.g. {!v=...}) since you can't simply state "category:445". Or,
> there could have been a parameter dereference like $sortQ where sortQ is
> another parameter holding category:445. Any way, the net effect is that
> documents are score-sorted based on the query category:445 instead of the
> user-query ("q" param). I'd expect category:445 docs to come up top and all
> others to appear randomly afterwards. It would be nice if the sort query
> could simply be "category:445 desc" but that's not supported.
>
> Complicated? You bet! But fear not; this is about as complicated as it
> gets.
>
> References:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#sort
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#query
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Author: https://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/book
>
> -----
> Author: https://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/book
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/noobie-question-sorting-tp2685250p2685617.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
