why you have to
delete the "data" dir when you restart. With a little background information,
maybe someone can help.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Rah1x [mailto:raheel_itst...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 5:47 AM
To:
I would investigate Hoss's suggestion and look at warming queries. In some
cases I've seen "maxCollationTries" in warming queries to cause a hang. Unless
you're trying to build your spellcheck dictionary during warming, you can
safely turn spellcheck off for all war
e
"spellcheck.collateParam.fq=Product:Book".
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.collate and
following sections.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Gastone Penzo [mailto:gastone.pe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 20
table ${delta.subquery}
When it is a delta import, pass the pass the paremeter: delta.subquery=where
blah in (select blah from parent_table ...)
This will cause it to cache only the entries needed for that delta import.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: david.r.la
the job. See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Transformer
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Prasi S [mailto:prasi1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 5:26 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr DIH call a java
Bill,
I do not believe there is any way to tell it to use a different datasource for
the parent delta query.
If you used this approach, would it solve your problem:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerDeltaQueryViaFullImport ?
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
Shamik,
Are you using a request handler other than "/select", and if so, did you set
"shards.qt" in your request? It should be set to the name of the request
handler you are using.
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent?#Distributed_Search_Support
James Dyer
, if you solve the issue entirely, a patch would be much appreciated.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: alx...@aim.com [mailto:alx...@aim.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 12:45 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: strange behaviour of
very little) back maybe it would be
tolerable? Then once a viable fix is devised you can remove the extra code
from your application.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: alx...@aim.com [mailto:alx...@aim.com]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 12:5
shard's process() returns the correct
result, just as you get with your hand-done testing. But somehow finishStage()
does not properly combine the responses when grouping is involved. It might be
that the responses come back just a little differently and finishStage() cannot
cope, or somet
With MS SqlServer, try adding "selectMethod=cursor" to your conenction string
and set your batch size to a reasonable amount (possibly just omit it and DIH
has a default value it will use.)
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: ko
Just a little note: batchSize goes on the tag, not on . I really don't think tweaking batchSize is going to fix this though.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: kobe.free.wo...@gmail.com [mailto:kobe.free.wo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 201
You do not need "deltaQuery" unless you're doing delta (incremental) updates.
To configure a full import, try starting with this example:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#A_shorter_data-config
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Messa
lue. (See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.alternativeTermCount)
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: skmirch [mailto:skmi...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 12:19 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr M
ou can
specify "spellcheck.collateParam.q.op=AND" . In either case this will require
that every term in the collations are required for hit-checking purposes. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.collateParam.XX
Does this solve your issue?
James Dyer
Ingram Con
pellcheck.maxResultsForSuggest
to read about the subtle difference between setting "0" and omitting this
parameter entirely.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: vsl [mailto:ociepa.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 6:30 AM
To:
find their queries are getting
spell-corrected to strange, far-flung, even comical things.
You might also want to look into using an aggressive stemmer or even a phonetic
analyzer in your analysis chain to get these matches without resorting to
spellcheck.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615
olr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.LengthFilterFactory
.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Rohan Thakur [mailto:rohan.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:42 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: how to avoid single character to
ttp://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.alternativeTermCount
for both parameters. Also, you might find the discussion from when this was
developed helpful: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2585 .
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: skmi
te an
IndexBasedSpellChecker dictionary then delete the dummy document(s). (but be
sure to lock down "spellcheck.build", possibly by putting it in the
"invariants" section of all your request handlers so that you don't accidently
overlay it).
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
spellcheck-only
request without grouping when queries return with 0 hits.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: davers [mailto:dboych...@improvementdirect.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 1:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
ry to evalutate than the main query (but that can still give valid
collations). Also, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3240 which is
an optimization for this feature.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: SandeepM [mailto:skmi...@hot
t 35?!) hits.
As I mentioned, SOLR-3240 does have promise of speeding this feature up so
maybe we won't have to talk about these kinds of trade-offs so much in the
future.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: SandeepM [mailto:skmi...@hotmail.c
On both queries, set "spellcheck.extendedResults=true" and also
"spellcheck.collateExtendedResults=true", then post the full spelling response.
Also, how long does each query take on average with spellcheck turned off?
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-
nding there are not
enough hits, it then tries the collation query to see how many hits that will
return. Could it be that these two queries just are less/more expensive and
that difference gets magnified by running each twice?
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Me
If you enable debug-level logging for class
org.apache.solr.spelling.SpellCheckCollator, you should get a log message for
every collation it tries like this:
Collation: will return zzz hits.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: SandeepM
s why "distance"
is the default and not "freq".
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: SandeepM [mailto:skmi...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 12:13 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: DirectSolrSpel
". DIH
will now pull down your entire "member" table in 1 query and cache it in
memory, then it can do fast hash joins against "item".
But if your "member" table is too big to fit into memory, then you need to use
a disk-backed cache instead of SortedMa
writing your own update
program.
If you still think you need to write something custom, see this:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj#Adding_Data_to_Solr
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: xiaoqi [mailto:belivexia...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25
yes, I misspoke.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: xiaoqi [mailto:belivexia...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:37 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Using another way instead of DIH
Thanks for help .
"data-config.xml
batch the updates so everything can fit in-memory. Doing it this way, the
SolrJ code was very straightforward and quick & easy to write.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: xiaoqi [mailto:belivexia...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 5:10
This sounds like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3791, which was
resolved in 3.6.2 / 4.0.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: srinalluri [mailto:nallurisr...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 11:41 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
If I remember correctly, 3.6 DIH had bugs related to CachedSqlEntityProcessor
and some were fixed in 3.6.1, 3.6.2, but some were not fixed until 4.0. You
might want to use a 3.5 DIH jar with your 3.6 Solr. Or, post your
data-config.xml and maybe someone can figure something out.
James Dyer
So if some other
document contains "hot", it won't try to suggest for it. On the other hand,
having no documents with "hit" results in suggestions.
"spellcheck.alternativeTermCount" tells it to offer suggestions even if the
term is in the dictionary.
J
d it seems to really work.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 5:41 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Negative Boosting at Recent Versions of Solr?
Solr does s
lts, your application can check for collations and re-issue a
collation query. If there are both results and collations returned, you can
give the user results with "did-you-mean" suggestions.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Ding
Good point, Jason. In fact, even if you use WorkBreakSpellChecker "wall mart"
will not correct to "walmart". The reason is the spellchecker cannot both
correct a token's spelling *and* fix the wordbreak issue involving that same
token. So in this case a synonym is t
The Word Break spellchecker will incorporate the broken & combined words in the
collations. Its designed to work seamlessly in conjunction with a "regular"
spellchecker (IndexBased- or Direct-).
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From:
sn't resolve correctly). These are likely caused by SOLR-4086 (version
4.1). If you give details about what is not resolving correctly, someone might
be able to propose a workaround.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Keith Naas [mailto:keit
lation automatically. Your application
would have to re-issue the query.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Via Rural [mailto:car...@viarural.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 10:53 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Spellchecke
il you can figure out the feature or combination thereof
that causes the problem. Then, try to remove everything extra besides the
thing(s) that cause it to fail. If we can isolate what triggers this bug that
would be helpful.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Mess
s would be to create a disk-backed cache Impl (or use the ones at
SOLR-2613 or SOLR-2948) and specify it on "cacheImpl". It would still create 3
identical caches, but they would be disk-backed and could scale beyond what
in-memory can handle.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 2
from SQL. So its more flexible this way
rather than the older CachedSEP.
Here's the wiki link with an example:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#CachedSqlEntityProcessor
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: O. Olson [mailto:olson_...@ya
First remove the "where" condition from the child entities, then use the
"cacheKey" and "cacheLookup" parameters to instruct DIH how to do the join.
Example:
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#CachedSqlEntityProcessor ,
particularly the 3rd con
There was a mistake in my last reply. Your child entities need to SELECT on
the join key so DIH has it to do the join. So use "SELECT SKU, CategoryName..."
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: O. Olson [mailto:olson_...@yahoo.it]
Sent: Tu
That would be a worthy enhancement to do. Always nice to give the user a
warning when something is going to fail so they can troubleshoot better...
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Matheis [mailto:matheis.ste...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday
Can you give instructions on how to reproduce problem?
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Rounak Jain [mailto:rouna...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 7:36 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Bug in spellcheck.alternativeTermCount
I
ed to the 4x
branch for inclusion in an eventual 4.4 release. This will make the time to do
collation tries growth less than linear, possibly making it more suitable for
suggest.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Andy Lester [mailto:a...@petdan
operly or if the
queries just naturally take that long to run over and over again.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Andy Lester [mailto:a...@petdance.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 4:22 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why do FQs m
ionTries" to have it generate collations that only pertain the
what the user actually searched against. This is less efficient and may not
work well (or at all) with Suggest.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Wilson Passos [mailto:wrpas...@gmail.
out half of "spellcheck.count" (but at least 10 if using IndexBased- or
FileBased spell checkers).
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Fellows [mailto:n...@djdownload.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 11:06 AM
To: solr-use
It has been in the wiki, more or less. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.count and following
sections.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar [mailto:shalinman...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29
ouldn't be terribly hard, but
haven't looked either.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch [mailto:arafa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 6:08 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DIH] Using SqlEntity to
Working to setup SolrCloud in Windows Azure. I have read over the solr Cloud
wiki, but am a little confused about some of the deployment options. I am
attaching an image for what I am thinking we want to do. 2 VM's that will have
2 shards spanning across them. 4 Nodes total across the two ma
ses of better
> cache management).
>
> Internally SolrCloud will round-robin distribute requests to other shards
> once a query begins execution. But you do need an entry point externally to
> be defined through your load balancer.
>
> Hope this is useful!
>
> Jason
&
them is down, searches will still work, but updates
will fail.
Best
Erick
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:39 AM, James Dulin wrote:
>
> Thanks, I think that the load balancer will be simple enough to set up in
> Azure. My only other current concern is having the zookeepers on the same
>
llcheck.maxCollationTries" from the
request and see if it returns "provinical court" as expected.
If this isn't it, then give us the full query request and also the full
spellcheck response for your failing case.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
For each fot he 4 cases listed below, can you give your query request string
(q=...fq=...qt=...etc) and also the spellchecker output?
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Raheel Hasan [mailto:raheelhasan@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 10
Are you using IE? If so, you might want to try using Firefox.
-Original Message-
From: sathish_ix [mailto:skandhasw...@inautix.co.in]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 6:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Sole instance state is down in cloud mode
Hi,
When i start a core in sol
This may help:
http://docs.lucidworks.com/display/solr/Shards+and+Indexing+Data+in+SolrCloud
--- See "Document Routing" section.
-Original Message-
From: sathish_ix [mailto:skandhasw...@inautix.co.in]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 5:27 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How to st
h/cloudera-search-documentation-v1-latest.html
-- see the user guide pdf, " update-conflict-resolver" parameter
James
-Original Message-
From: anirudh...@gmail.com [mailto:anirudh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Anirudha
Jadhav
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 10:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.ap
This page has some good information on custom document routing:
http://docs.lucidworks.com/display/solr/Shards+and+Indexing+Data+in+SolrCloud
-Original Message-
From: Rishi Easwaran [mailto:rishi.easwa...@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:40 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
S
d have gotten a lot more results if they had spelled it correctly.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.maxResultsForSuggest
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Shreejay [mailto:shreej...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 8:38
e to experiment
to see what works best for your environment.
-- James
-Original Message-
From: Learner [mailto:bbar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 1:07 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: ConcurrentUpdateSolrserver - Queue size not working
I am using Concurr
e to flag it as
"contrib - Dataimporthandler".
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Constantin Wolber [mailto:constantin.wol...@medicalcolumbus.de]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 3:21 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sub
Seems to work fine for me on 4.3.0, maybe you can try a newer version.
4.3.1 is available.
-Original Message-
From: Elodie Sannier [mailto:elodie.sann...@kelkoo.fr]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 8:54 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
Subject: SolrCloud: no
added to the product
so any feedback you can give is appreciated. Thanks.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: O. Klein [mailto:kl...@octoweb.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 8:45 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Context-Se
You will need get the source, apply the patch and build solr for yourself.
There are some instructions at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute .
It would be great if you could try this out and provide feedback.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
not return anything if re-queried.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Kudzanai [mailto:kudzanai.vudzij...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 6:03 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: SpellCheck Print Multiple Collations
set it at
least to whatever value you've got for "maxCollations", possibly a few higher.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Kudzanai [mailto:kudzanai.vudzij...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 9:20
ow would I change the index config to make it match "Auckland"?
Cheers
James
wow awesome hahaha thanks!
On Oct 6, 2011 8:36 AM, "Gora Mohanty" wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:55 AM, James Lin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I got an area index which only has one area name field, the field type is
>> using the "text_en_splitting"
ary. Another workaround is to use "onlyMorePopular",
although this has its own problems. See the discussion for SOLR-2585
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2585), which aims to solve these
problems.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
case. Perhaps it would make it so you wouldn't have to
entirely re-index each month or so. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing for more information.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Tiernan OToole [mai
ery across the 2 fields and get spell suggestions like this:
q=query goes here&qt=search_abstract_and_subject
Of course if this is the first query since startup/commit, unless you're
building automatically somehow, add:
&spellcheck.build=true
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram
ght get different collations than one without it.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Mark Swinson [mailto:mark.swin...@bbc.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 5:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Using spellcheck comp
you go to the same folder in linux and run it.
How to do in Linux?
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:49 PM, 刘浪 wrote:
>
> Hey,
> In windows: D:\solr\example\exampledocs>java -Durl=
> http://localhost:8080/solr/updata -Dcommimt=yes -jar post.jar
> demo-doc*.xml.
> How to do in Linux?
>
go into the "spellchecker"
directory after you run your first query and see if it built the dictionary.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Dali [mailto:medalibenmans...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 5:45 A
of work and it would take a lot of thought to make it perform well,
etc.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski [mailto:tomasz.wegrzanow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 10:52 PM
To: solr-user@l
not having the overhead of needing to build an external dictionary.
Unfortunately this is only an option if you're willing to upgrade to Trunk/4.0 .
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Wegrzanowski [mailto:tomasz.wegrza
so a cache implementation. We're
using the BDB-JE cache from SOLR-2613 in production. There is also one backed
with a Lucene index (SOLR-2948).
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Brent Mills [mailto:bmi...@uship.com]
Sent: Tuesday, De
Just committed to Solr 3.5 is a "numberToKeep" parameter which lets you tell it
to automatically delete the older backups. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#HTTP_API , under which is a short
quip about this.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615
it is currently supported. You might be able to
work around this if you could get your dictionary terms in the index and then
use the "index-based" option instead.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Pravin Agrawal [mailto:pravin
it can be frustrating at times
to get Eclipse to get the dependencies right. In this case look at the "Java
EE Module Dependencies" screen in Eclipse. I often resort to hand-editing the
"org.eclipse.wst.common.component" file in the project's ".settings" directory.
able to get "-F
solr.body=" or "-F stream.body=" to work. Good luck.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: dsy99 [mailto:ds...@rediffmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 11:27 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.
is a good solution only for rapid
development but other solutions (DIH or SolrJ) will be better for the long
haul.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: dsy99 [mailto:ds...@rediffmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 7:17 AM
To:
qual parts, we
just turned auto-commit off in DIH and then do one big commit at the end once
all 8 DIH's are done running.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2
thing to consider:
- If the "misspelled" word exists in your index, the spellchecker won't try to
correct it. This is true even if you're omitting words from the dictionary
(for intance, by using "thresholdTokenFrequency")
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingr
r each of the fields you're searching and let
the CSSC combine the results & generate collations, etc.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: David Radunz [mailto:da...@boxen.net]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 11:42 PM
To: solr-user@l
You need to find "apache-solr-solrj-4.0.jar" from your distribution and put it
in the classpath somewhere. Perhaps the easiest thing is to include it in your
core's "lib" directory.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Origin
rtant difference between the two spellcheck
impls.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: O. Klein [mailto:kl...@octoweb.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 7:22 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Improving Solr Sp
an up
the extra directories and doesn't sometimes? In any case, I've found whenever
it happens its ok to go out and delete the one(s) not being used, even if that
means deleting "index".
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Messag
ped directory is
explained here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#What_if_I_add_documents_to_the_slave_or_if_slave_index_gets_corrupted.3F
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Rochkind [mailto:rochk...@jhu.edu]
Sent: Thursday,
orthy enhancement to provide a way to
selectively override individual query parameters for cases like this.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: O. Klein [mailto:kl...@octoweb.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 7:26 AM
To: solr-us
use "AND" but not if you prefix all the terms with
plus-signs.
example:
q=mispelt werds&defType=edismax&mm=0&spellcheck.q=mispelt AND werds ... {other
spellcheck parameters}
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
F
d be
helpful to track our comments in JIRA and get visibility on the dev-list also,
where discussions about unincorporated patches usually occur.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: David Radunz [mailto:da...@boxen.net]
Sent: Sun
The page
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5890401/sunspot-solr-queries-ending-with-logical-operators-and-or-not-result-in-error
led me to the solution.
James
-Original Message-
From: asi123 [mailto:orly_ot...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 10:41 AM
To: solr
separate spellchecker is
added that just corrects wordbreak (or is it "word break"?) problems, then a
"ConjunctionSolrSpellChecker" combines the results from the main spellchecker
and the wordbreak spellcheker. I could see a next step beyond this being to
support per-field dic
uot;;
My testing shows this solves your problem. The caution is to test it against
all your use cases because obviously someone thought we should ignore leading
digits from keywords. Surely there's a reason why although I can't think of it.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram
If you could, let me know how your testing goes with this change. I too am
interested in having the Collate work as good as it can. It looks like the
code would be better with this change but then again I don't know what the
original author was thinking when this was put in.
James D
201 - 300 of 881 matches
Mail list logo
