On both queries, set "spellcheck.extendedResults=true" and also "spellcheck.collateExtendedResults=true", then post the full spelling response. Also, how long does each query take on average with spellcheck turned off?
James Dyer Ingram Content Group (615) 213-4311 -----Original Message----- From: SandeepM [mailto:skmi...@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 2:02 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: DirectSolrSpellChecker : vastly varying spellcheck QTime times. James, Thanks. That was very helpful. That helped me understand count and alternativeTermCount a bit more. I also have the following case as pointed out earlier... My query: http://host/solr/select?q=&spellcheck.q=chocolat%20factry&spellcheck=true&df=spell&fl=&indent=on&wt=xml&rows=10&version=2.2&echoParams=explicit In this case, the intent is to correct "chocolat factry" with "chocolate factory" which exists in my spell field index. I see a QTime from the above query as somewhere between 350-400ms I run a similar query replacing the spellcheck terms to "pursut hapyness" whereas "pursuit happyness" actually exists in my spell field and I see QTime of 15-17ms . Both query produce collations correctly and picking the first suggestions and applying them as collation find what I am looking for but there is order of magnitude difference in QTime. There is one edit per term in both cases or 2 edits in each query. The length of words in both these queries seem identical. I'd like to understand why there is this vast difference in QTime. Also "Chocolate factory" and "Pursuit happyness" both are spellcheck indexed as is. I would appreciate any help with this since I am not sure how I can get any meaningful performance numbers and attribute the slowness to anything in particular. Thanks. Regards, -- Sandeep -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DirectSolrSpellChecker-vastly-varying-spellcheck-QTime-times-tp4057176p4058048.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
