erly, at least in
some cases.
From: Flowerday, Matthew J mailto:matthew.flower...@gb.unisys.com> >
Sent: Saturday, January 9, 2021 4:44 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org <mailto:solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Query over migrating a solr database from 7.7.1 to 8.7.0
H
e-mail and its
attachments from all devices.
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/unisys><http://twitter.com/unisyscorp>
<http://www.youtube.com/theunisyschannel>
<http://www.facebook.com/unisyscorp> <https://vimeo.com/unisys>
<http://blogs.unisys.com/>
Fro
only by the intended recipient. If you received this
in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its
attachments from all devices.
-Original Message-
From: Flowerday, Matthew J
Sent: 15 January 2021 11:18
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Query over migrat
Hi There
I have been checking out the latest (8.8.0) SolrCloud database (using
Zookeeper 3.6.2) against our application which talks to Solr via the Solr
API (I am not too sure of the details as I am not a java developer
unfortunately!). The software has Solr 8.7.0/ZooKeeper 3.6.2 libraries
'emb
Hi There
I just came across a situation where a unified highlighting search under
solr 8.8.0/8.8.1 can take over 20 mins to run and eventually times out. I
resolved it by a config change - but it can catch you out. Hence this email.
With solr 8.8.0 a new unified highlighting parameter &hl.f
ments.
Hi,
Whoa, thanks for the heads-up! You may just have saved me from a whole lot
of trouble. Did you file a JIRA ticket already?
Thanks,
Ere
Flowerday, Matthew J kirjoitti 1.3.2021 klo 14.00:
> Hi There
>
> I just came across a situation where a unified highlighting search
> unde
Hi,
Is it possible to remove from search results the multivalued fields that
don't pass the search criteria?
My schema is defined as:
And example docs are:
++--+++
| id | name | town | date |
++
wrote:
Yes, denormalizing the index into separate (name,town) pairs is the
common design for this problem.
2010/7/8 "Alex J. G. Burzyński":
Hi,
Is it possible to remove from search results the multivalued fields that
don't pass the search criteria?
My schema is defined as
of your multi valued fields that you can display in the
UI, allowing the user to drill down the results further.
Chantal
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 10:26 +0200, "Alex J. G. Burzyński" wrote:
Hi,
So if those are separate documents how should I handle paging? Two
separate queries?
Firs
Is there a way to set a minimum score requirement so that matches below a given
score are not return/included in facet counts.
values.
It would help if you described exactly what problem you're trying to solve.
-Simon
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Donald J. Organ IV
I've recently started looking at using the updateRequestProcessorChain to
ensure the presence of certain fields in our solr records. The reason for
doing so is that we have records from several different sources, that are
processed in different ways, and by adding the field via the
updateRequ
es that are needed to
maintain your field mappings are blowing up memory.
If that’s that case, you need an alternative design because your
performance will be unacceptable.
May be off base, if so we can dig further.
Best,
Erick
> On Feb 5, 2020
Hi,
What analyzer, tokenizer, filter factory would I need to use to get wildcard
matching to match where:
Value:
XYZ123
Query:
XYZ1*
I have been messing with solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory splitOnNumerics and
oreserveOriginal in both the analyzer and the query. I also noticed it is
different
This was the definition I was last working with (I've been playing with setting
the various parameters).
-Original Message-
From: AHMET ARSLAN [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
That did it, thanks!
I thought that was how it should work, but I guess somehow I got out of sync or
something at one point which led me to dive deeper into it than I needed to.
-Original Message-
From: AHMET ARSLAN [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 12:52 PM
To:
Assuming you have written the SolrInputDocument to the server, you would next
query. See ClientUtils.escapeQueryChars. Also you need to be cognizant of
URLEncoding at times.
-Original Message-
From: ptomb...@gmail.com [mailto:ptomb...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paul Tomblin
Sent: Monday,
The rows parameter would prevent you from getting all docs back. It is set by
default to 10 I believe.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Schraeder [mailto:mschrae...@btsb.com]
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 2:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Query not working as expected
I'm a
I could be off base here, maybe using textTight as unique key is a common SOLR
practice I don't know. But, It would seem to me that using any field type that
transforms a value (even if it is just whitespace removal) could be
problematic. Maybe not the source of your issue here, but I'd be wo
suggestions. I can tell you that the document I ran the
second time was the same document run the first time -- so any questions of
field value shouldn't be a concern.
Thanks
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-SC)[PEROT SYSTEMS]
[mailto:timothy.j.har...@nasa.gov]
Hi all,
I have an J2EE application using embedded solr via solr4j. It seems the
logging that SOLR produces has a mind of its own, and is not changeable via my
log4j.properties. In fact I know this because I wired in a Log4J config
listener in my web.xml and redirected all my logs to a custom l
How could I get a count of distinct terms for a given query? For example:
The Wiki page
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters
has a section "Facet Fields with No Zeros"
which shows the query:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=ipod&rows=0&facet=true&facet.limit=-1&facet.field=cat&face
Since SOLR uses variable fields per record it would be useful to not only be
able to specify which fields to return in a query via the fl parameter, but to
also specify which fields to *not* return in the query. Especially if you use
dynamic fields as there may be no way to tell ahead of time w
: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 11:22 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: fl parameter
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-SC)[PEROT
SYSTEMS] wrote:
> Since SOLR uses variable fields per record it would be useful to not only be
> able to specify which fields to retur
I'd be curious to hear someone explain the mechanics of a String field. I'm
not entirely sure but I believe a String field is not tokenized and thus only
exact matches work. I think in your case you should be searching on your
"name" field and faceting on the "actor" field.
-Original Mess
Anyone able to help with the question below?
Yonik, I couldn't find the issues you speak of can you point me in the right
direction?
Thanks
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-SC)[PEROT SYSTEMS]
[mailto:timothy.j.har...@nasa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009
I began a similar thread under the subject "Distinct terms in facet field".
One thing I noticed though is that your fields seem to have a lot of controlled
values, or lack free text. Are you sure SOLR is what you should be using?
Perhaps a traditional RDB would be better and then you would hav
Is there a limit on the size ( in bytes ) of a query you send to Solr?
Either through HTTP URL request or through SolrJ?
What is the behavior if a limit is reached?
I use dynamic fields heavily in my SOLR config. I would like to be able to
specify which fields should be returned from a query based on a pattern for the
field name. For instance, given:
I might be able to construct a query like:
http://localhost:8080/solr/select?q=Bool_*:true&r
I don't have experience with migrating, but you should consider using the
example schema.xml in the distro as a starting basis for creating your schema.
-Original Message-
From: Abin Mathew [mailto:abin.mat...@toostep.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 8:42 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.ap
Hi all,
I tried creating a case-insensitive string using the values provided to a
string, via CopyField. This didn't work, since copyField does it's job before
the analyzer on the case-insensitive string field is invoked.
Is there another way I might accomplish this field replication on the ser
Hi I have a field:
With type definition:
, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-TI)[PEROT
SYSTEMS] wrote:
> Hi I have a field:
>
> multiValued="true" />
>
> With type definition:
>
> sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms=&quo
>From the query
http://localhost:8080/solr/select?q=idxPartition%3ASOMEPART%20AND%20srcANYSTRStrCI:%22mixcase%20or%20lower%22&debugQuery=on
Debug info attached
-Original Message-
From: Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-TI)[PEROT SYSTEMS]
[mailto:timothy.j.har...@nasa.gov]
Sent: We
The value in the srcANYSTRStrCI field is "miXCAse or LowER" according to Luke.
-Original Message-
From: Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-TI)[PEROT SYSTEMS]
[mailto:timothy.j.har...@nasa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 11:31 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: case-i
ue as case preserved in both the string field and the string_ci
field support this?
-Original Message-
From: Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-TI)[PEROT SYSTEMS]
[mailto:timothy.j.har...@nasa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 11:35 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: case-insensitive s
That seems to work.
But why? Does string type not support LowerCaseFilterFactory? Or
KeywordTokenizerFactory?
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 11:51 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: case-insensitive strin
Thanks, I know I read that sometime back but I guess I thought that was because
there were no tags defined on the string field in the schema. I
guess cause I'm still kind of a noob - I didn't take that to mean that it
couldn't be made to have analyzers. A subtle but important distinction I gu
Hi,
I am trying termVectorComponents in SOLR. Per wiki I am trying to define
component and handler. I define it so:
true
tvComponent
...
But when I qu
Hi,
I'm trying to see if I can use termVectors for a use case I have. Essentially
I want to know is: where in the indexed value does the query hit occur? I
think either tv.positions or tv.offsets would provide that info but I don't
really grok the result. Below I've pasted the URL and part of
Hi,
If I have a multiValued field type of text, and I put values
[cat,dog,green,blue] in it. Is there a way to tell when I execute a query
against that field for dog, that it was in the 1st element position for that
multiValued field?
Thanks!
Tim
If a simple "no" is the answer I'd be glad if anyone could confirm.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-TI)[PEROT SYSTEMS]
[mailto:timothy.j.har...@nasa.gov]
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 2:53 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: determ
s.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-TI)[PEROT
SYSTEMS] wrote:
> If a simple "no" is the answer I'd be glad if anyone could confirm.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-TI)[PEROT SYSTEMS]
> [ma
Hi,
I have a query where the query matches the document but no highlighting info is
returned. Why? Normally, highlighting returns correctly. This query is
different from others in that it uses a phrase like "CR1428-Occ1"
Field:
query:
http://localhost:8080/solr/select?q=destSpan%3A%28%22CR1
: abcCR1428 Data: abcCR1428
-Original Message-
From: Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-TI)[PEROT SYSTEMS]
[mailto:timothy.j.har...@nasa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 10:42 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: doc with missing highlight info
Hi,
I have a query where the query
301 - 345 of 345 matches
Mail list logo
