Anyone able to help with the question below? Yonik, I couldn't find the issues you speak of can you point me in the right direction?
Thanks Tim -----Original Message----- From: Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-SC)[PEROT SYSTEMS] [mailto:timothy.j.har...@nasa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:36 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; yo...@lucidimagination.com Subject: RE: fl parameter If I were to add that capability, could I do it simply by registering my own RequestHandler and subclassing StandarRequestHandler? Or would I have to add an enhancement to Solr? -----Original Message----- From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 11:22 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: fl parameter On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-SC)[PEROT SYSTEMS] <timothy.j.har...@nasa.gov> wrote: > Since SOLR uses variable fields per record it would be useful to not only be > able to specify which fields to return in a query via the fl parameter, but > to also specify which fields to *not* return in the query. Especially if you > use dynamic fields as there may be no way to tell ahead of time what the > field names are and you may not want all the fields. > > Is there a way to do this? Not yet, but it's not a bad idea. fl=*,-big_field There are issues open for wildcarding in field lists too. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
