Hello,
I read about the possibility to have nested documents with solr
block-join since version 4.5.
I’m wondering if I can change an existing index to use this new
opportunity. Right now I’m having an index which stores informations
about a journal and each of its articles. For example
Zitat von Mikhail Khludnev :
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:25 PM, wrote:
So, my question now: can I change my existing index in just adding a
is_parent and a _root_ field and saving the journal id there like I did
with j-id or do I have to reindex all my documents?
Absolutely, to use block-j
Hello again,
I'm using the solr block-join feature to index a journal and all of
it's articles.
Here a short example:
527fcbf8-c140-4ae6-8f51-68cd2efc1343
Sozialmagazin
8
2008
0340-8469
.
Zitat von Mikhail Khludnev :
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:17 PM, wrote:
I know that I can't just make a query like this: {!parent
which=is_parent:true}+Term, most likely I'll get this error: child query
must only match non-parent docs, but parent docID= matched
childScorer=class org.apache
Zitat von Mikhail Khludnev :
nesting query parsers is shown at
http://blog.griddynamics.com/2013/12/grandchildren-and-siblings-with-block.html
try to start from the following:
title:Test _query_:"{!parent which=is_parent:true}{!dismax
qf=content_de}Test"
mind about local params referencing eg
Hello,
I'm trying to index a large number of documents in different languages.
I don't know the language of the document, so I'm using
TikaLanguageIdentifierUpdateProcessorFactory to identify it.
So, this is my configuration in solrconfig.xml
class="org.apache.solr.update.processor.Tik
Thx, I'll try this approach.
Zitat von Alexandre Rafalovitch :
Have you looked at edismax and the 'qf' fields parameter? It allows you to
define the fields to search. Also, you can define those parameters in
solrconfig.xml and not have to send them down the wire.
Finally, you can define severa
Hi,
I'm indexing pdf documents to use full text search with solr.
To get the number of the page where the result was found, I save every
page separately and group the results with a field called doc_id.
(See this topic:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201303.mbox/%3c
Hello,
I'm building a web application where users can search for pdf
documents and view them with pdf.js. I would like to display the
search results with a short snippet of the paragraph where the search
term where found and a link to open the document at the right page.
So what I need is
Is it possible to write a plugin that is converting each page
separately with Tika and saving all pages in one document (maybe in a
dynamic field like "page_*")? I would like to have only one document
stored in SOLR for each pdf (it fit's better to the way my web
application is managing the
Here are some screen shots of our Solr Cloud cluster via Newrelic
http://postimg.org/gallery/2hyzyeyc/
We currently have a 5 node cluster and all indexing is done on separate
machines and shipped over. Our machines are running on SSD's with 18G of
ram (Index size is 8G). We only have 1 shard at t
g the average response for an add
> > operation, which generally returns very quickly and due to sheer number
> are
> > averaging out the response time of your queries. New Relic should break
> > out requests based on which handler they're hitting but they don't s
high number of
> concurrent queries than sharding may not be of any help at all.
>
> Otis
> --
> Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
> Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Software Dev >wrote:
Here is a screenshot of the host information:
http://postimg.org/image/vub5ihxix/
As you can see we have 24 core CPU's and the load is only at 5-7.5.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Software Dev wrote:
> If that is the case, what would help?
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014
ring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
> Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Software Dev >wrote:
>
> > Here is a screenshot of the host information:
> > http://postimg.org/image/vub5ihxix/
> >
&
We have 2 collections with 1 shard each replicated over 5 servers in the
cluster. We see a lot of flapping (down or recovering) on one of the
collections. When this happens the other collection hosted on the same
machine is still marked as active. When this happens it takes a fairly long
time (~30
a:182)
at org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpGenerator.flushBuffer(HttpGenerator.java:838)
... 51 more
,code=500}
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Software Dev
wrote:
> We have 2 collections with 1 shard each replicated over 5 servers in the
> cluster. We see a lot of flapping (down or recoverin
reporting as
well as some relevant portions of our SolrConfig.xml. Any
thoughts/comments would be greatly appreciated.
http://postimg.org/gallery/4t73sdks/1fc10f9c/
Thanks
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/22/2014 1:23 PM, Software Dev wrote:
>> We have 2 collect
In 3.5.0 we have the following.
If we searched for "c" with highlighting enabled we would get back
results such as:
cdat
crocdile
cool beans
But in the latest Solr (4.7) we get the full words highlighted back.
Di
Bump
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Software Dev wrote:
> In 3.5.0 we have the following.
>
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
> maxGramSize="30"/>
>
>
>
>
&
I see that by default in SolrCloud that my collections are
replicating. Should this be disabled in SolrCloud as this is already
handled by it?
>From the documentation:
"The Replication screen shows you the current replication state for
the named core you have specified. In Solr, replication is fo
Thanks for the reply. Ill make sure NOT to disable it.
Can anyone else chime in? Thanks
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Software Dev
wrote:
> Shawn,
>
> Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. After consulting the
> above document I *think* that the problem may be too large of a heap
> and which may be affecting GC colle
One other question. If I optimize a collection on one node, does this
get replicated to all others when finished?
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Software Dev
wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. Ill make sure NOT to disable it.
Ehh.. found out the hard way. I optimized the collection on 1 machine
and when it was completed it replicated to the others and took my
cluster down. Shitty
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Software Dev
wrote:
> One other question. If I optimize a collection on one node, does this
&g
So its generally a bad idea to optimize I gather?
- In older versions it might have done them all at once, but I believe
that newer versions only do one core at a time.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/25/2014 11:59 AM, Software Dev wrote:
>>
>> Ehh.
"In older versions it might have done them all at once, but I believe
that newer versions only do one core at a time."
It looks like it did it all at once and I'm on the latest (4.7)
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Software Dev
wrote:
> So its generally a bad idea to
Same problem here:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-x-EdgeNGramFilterFactory-and-highlighting-td4114748.html
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Software Dev wrote:
> Bump
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Software Dev
> wrote:
>> In 3.5.0 we
What are the main contributing factors for Solr Cloud generating a lot
of disk IO?
A lot of reads? Writes? Insufficient RAM?
I would think if there was enough disk cache available for the whole
index there would be little to no disk IO.
Is this a known bug?
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Software Dev wrote:
> Same problem here:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-x-EdgeNGramFilterFactory-and-highlighting-td4114748.html
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Software Dev
> wrote:
>> Bump
>>
&
We have a collection named "items". These are simply products that we
sell. A large part of our scoring involves boosting on certain metrics
for each product (amount sold, total GMS, ratings, etc). Some of these
metrics are actually split across multiple tables.
We are currently re-indexing the co
Certainly I am not the only user experiencing this?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Software Dev wrote:
> Is this a known bug?
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Software Dev
> wrote:
>> Same problem here:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-x-Ed
, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Software Dev
> wrote:
>> Certainly I am not the only user experiencing this?
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Software Dev
>> wrote:
>>> Is this a known bug?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Software Dev
&g
In 3.5.0 we have the following.
If we searched for "c" with highlighting enabled we would get back
results such as:
cdat
crocdile
cool beans
But in the latest Solr (4.7.1) we get the full words highlighted back.
Sorry about the confusion. I meant I created my config via the ZkCLI and
then I wanted to create my core via the CollectionsAPI. I *think* I have it
working but was wondering why there are a crazy amount of core names under
the admin "Core Selector"?
When I create X amount of shards via the bootst
n Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/7/2013 2:52 PM, Software Dev wrote:
>
>> Sorry about the confusion. I meant I created my config via the ZkCLI and
>> then I wanted to create my core via the CollectionsAPI. I *think* I have
>> it
>> workin
We are testing our shiny new Solr Cloud architecture but we are
experiencing some issues when doing bulk indexing.
We have 5 solr cloud machines running and 3 indexing machines (separate
from the cloud servers). The indexing machines pull off ids from a queue
then they index and ship over a docume
e culprit.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Software Dev
> wrote:
> > We are testing our shiny new Solr Cloud architecture but we are
> > experiencing some issues when doing bulk indexing.
> >
> > We have 5 solr cloud machines running
We also noticed that disk IO shoots up to 100% on 1 of the nodes. Do all
updates get sent to one machine or something?
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Software Dev wrote:
> We commit have a soft commit every 5 seconds and hard commit every 30. As
> far as docs/second it would guess arou
4.6.0
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> What version are you running?
>
> - Mark
>
> On Jan 20, 2014, at 5:43 PM, Software Dev
> wrote:
>
> > We also noticed that disk IO shoots up to 100% on 1 of the nodes. Do all
> > updates get
What is the process for completely removing a node from Solr Cloud? We
recently removed one but t its still showing up as "Gone" in the Cloud
admin.
Thanks
How is this accomplished? We currently have an empty solr.xml
(auto-discovery) so I'm not sure where to put this value?
solr/CoreAdmin#UNLOAD.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Software Dev >wrote:
>
> > What is the process for completely removing a node from Solr Cloud? We
> > recently removed one but t its still showing up as "Gone" in the Cloud
> > adm
Any other suggestions?
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Software Dev wrote:
> 4.6.0
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
>> What version are you running?
>>
>> - Mark
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2014, at 5:43 PM, Software Dev
>> wr
is a change.
> How much system RAM ? JVM Heap ? Enough space in RAM for system disk cache
> ?
> What is the size of your documents ? A few KB, MB, ... ?
> Ah, and what about network IO ? Could that be a limiting factor ?
>
>
> André
>
>
> On 2014-01-21 23:40, Software De
t consequences:
>
>
> http://searchhub.org/2013/08/23/understanding-transaction-logs-softcommit-and-commit-in-sorlcloud/
>
> I suspect (but, of course, can't prove) that you're over-committing
> and hitting segment
> merges without meaning to...
>
> FWIW,
> E
Also, any suggestions on debugging? What should I look for and how? Thanks
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Software Dev wrote:
> Thanks for suggestions. After reading that document I feel even more
> confused though because I always thought that hard commits should be less
> freq
/search-lucene.com/?q=maxWriteMBPerSec&fc_project=Solr
>
> Otis
> --
> Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics
> Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Software Dev >wrote:
>
> >
Can someone clarify what the following options are:
- updatesToLeaders
- shutdownLBHttpSolrServer
- parallelUpdates
Also, I remember in older version of Solr there was an efficient format
that was used between SolrJ and Solr that is more compact. Does this sill
exist in the latest version of Solr
Is there a way to disable commit/hard-commit at runtime? For example, we
usually have our hard commit and soft-commit set really low but when we do
bulk indexing we would like to disable this to increase performance. If
there isn't a an easy way of doing this would simply pushing a new
solrconfig t
shards in
> parallel rather than with a single thread. Can really increase update
> speed. Still not as powerful as using CloudSolrServer from multiple
> threads, but a nice improvement non the less.
>
>
> - Mark
>
> http://about.me/markrmiller
>
> >
> > I&#
ds, or if
> you need more fine grained responses, use the single add from multiple
> threads (though bulk add can also be done via multiple threads if you
> really want to try and push the max).
>
> - Mark
>
> http://about.me/markrmiller
>
> On Jan 31, 2014, at 3:50 PM, S
Also, if we are seeing a huge cpu spike on the leader when doing a bulk
index, would changing any of the options help?
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Software Dev wrote:
> Out use case is we have 3 indexing machines pulling off a kafka queue and
> they are all sending individual u
Can anyone point me in the right direction. I'm trying to duplicate the
functionality of the analysis request handler so we can wrap a service
around it to return the terms given a string of text. We would like to read
the same schema.xml file to configure the analyzer,tokenizer, etc but I
can't se
Thanks Shawn.
If Solr writes this info to Disk as soon as possible (which is what I am
seeing) then ramBuffer setting seems to be misleading.
Anyone else has any thoughts on this?
-Saroj
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 8/28/2011 11:18 PM, roz dev wrote:
>
I am not sure if current version has this, but DIH used to reload
connections after some idle time
if (currTime - connLastUsed > CONN_TIME_OUT) {
synchronized (this) {
Connection tmpConn = factory.call();
clos
take care, "running 10 hours" != "idling 10 seconds" and trying again.
Those are different cases.
It is not dropping *used* connections (good to know it works that
good, thanks for reporting!), just not reusing connections more than
10 seconds idle
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Gora Mohanty
watch out, "running 10 hours" != "idling 10 seconds" and trying again.
Those are different cases.
It is not dropping *used* connections (good to know it works that
good, thanks for reporting!), just not reusing connections more than
10 seconds idle
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Gora Mohanty
probably stupid question,
Which Directory implementation should be the best suited for index
mounted on ramfs/tmpfs? I guess plain old FSDirectory, (or mmap/nio?)
probably stupid question,
Which Directory implementation should be the best suited for index
mounted on ramfs/tmpfs? I guess plain old FSDirectory, (or mmap/nio?)
Hi
As per this document, http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase,
omitNorms and termVectors have to be "explicitly" specified in some cases.
I am wondering what is the default value of these settings if solr schema
definition does not state them.
*Example:*
In above case, will Solr
Hi All
Solr has different types of caches such as filterCache, queryResultCache and
document Cache .
I know that if a commit is done then a new searcher is opened and new caches
are built. And, this makes sense.
What happens when commits are happening on master and slaves are pulling all
the delt
Hi All
I am sure that q vs fq question has been answered several times.
But, I still have a question which I would like to know the answers for:
if we have a solr query like this
q=*&fq=field_1:XYZ&fq=field_2:ABC&sortBy=field_3+asc
How does SolrIndexSearcher fire query in 1.4.1
Will it fire q
Hi All
We are getting this error in our Production Solr Setup.
Message: Element type "t_sort" must be followed by either attribute
specifications, ">" or "/>".
Solr version is 1.4.1
Stack trace indicates that solr is returning malformed document.
Caused by: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrSer
dev wrote:
> Hi All
>
> We are getting this error in our Production Solr Setup.
>
> Message: Element type "t_sort" must be followed by either attribute
> specifications, ">" or "/>".
> Solr version is 1.4.1
>
> Stack trace indic
just looking for hints where to look for...
We were testing single threaded ingest rate on solr, trunk version on
atypical collection (a lot of small documents), and we noticed
something we are not able to explain.
Setup:
We use defaults for index settings, windows 64 bit, jdk 7 U2. on SSD,
machi
g locally
>
> Out of curiosity, how big is your ramBufferSizeMB and your -Xmx?
> And on that 8-core box you have ~8 indexing threads going?
>
> Otis
>
> Sematext is Hiring -- http://sematext.com/about/jobs.html
>
>
>
>
>>
&g
Just to bring closure on this one, we were slurping data from the
wrong DB (hardly desktop class machine)...
Solr did not cough on 41Mio records @34k updates / sec., single threaded.
Great!
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 9:18 PM, eks dev wrote:
> just looking for hints where to look for...
>
t; >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
> >
> > There's really not much to go on here.
> >
> > Best
> > Erick
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:13 PM, roz dev wrote:
> >> Hi All
> >>
> >> We are getting
Re. "I have little experience with VM servers for search."
We had huge performance penalty on VMs, CPU was bottleneck.
We couldn't freely run measurements to figure out what the problem really
was (hosting was contracted by customer...), but it was something pretty
scary, kind of 8-10 times slowe
Hi All,
We are using Solr 1.4.1 in production and are considering an upgrade to
newer version.
It seems that Solr 3.x requires a complete rebuild of index as the format
seems to have changed.
Is Solr 4.0 index file format compatible with Solr 3.x format?
Please advise.
Thanks
Saroj
on the latest trunk, my schema.xml with field type declaration
containing //codec="Pulsing"// does not work any more (throws
exception from FieldType). It used to work wit approx. a month old
trunk version.
I didn't dig deeper, can be that the old schema.xml was broken and
worked by accident.
--
Thanks Robert,
I've missed LUCENE-3490... Awesome!
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:34 AM, eks dev wrote:
>> on the latest trunk, my schema.xml with field type declaration
>> containing //codec="Pulsing"//
Hi All,
I need community's feedback about deploying newer versions of solr schema
into production while existing (older) schema is in use by applications.
How do people perform these things? What has been the learning of people
about this.
Any thoughts are welcome.
Thanks
Saroj
if your index is read-only in production, can you add mapping
unique_id-Lucene docId in your kv store and and build filters externally?
That would make unique Key obsolete in your production index, as you would
work at lucene doc id level.
That way, you offline the problem to update/optimize phase
gram Content Group
> (615) 213-4311
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: roz dev [mailto:rozde...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 6:33 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: can we configure spellcheck to be invoked after request
> processing?
>
Hi All
I am wondering if there is a way to alter term frequency of a certain field
as 1, even if there are multiple matches in that document?
Use Case is:
Let's say that I have a document with 2 fields
- Name and
- Description
And, there is a document with data like this
Document_1
Name = Blu
s huge and the reason for Solr upgrade or schema
> change is to fix a bug, not to use new functionality.
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
>
> On 24. jan. 2012, at 01:51, roz dev wrote:
Hi all,
I am a bit confused with IndexSearcher refresh lifecycles...
In a master slave setup, I override postCommit listener on slave
(solr trunk version) to read some user information stored in
userCommitData on master
--
@Override
public final void postCommit() {
// This returnes "stale"
licates can appear) are there any "IndexWriter"
listeners around?
Thanks again,
eks.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Post commit calls are made before a new searcher is opened.
>
> Might be easier to try to hook in with a new searcher listener?
>
And drinks on me to those who decoupled implicit commit from close...
this was tricky trap
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:10 PM, eks dev wrote:
> Thanks Mark,
> Hmm, I would like to have this information asap, not to wait until the
> first search gets executed (depends on user) . Is solr
with the master.
>
> What are you expecting a BeforeCommitListener could do for you, if one
> would exist?
>
> Kind regards,
> Em
>
> Am 21.02.2012 21:10, schrieb eks dev:
>> Thanks Mark,
>> Hmm, I would like to have this information asap, not to wait until the
We started observing strange failures from ReplicationHandler when we
commit on master trunk version 4-5 days old.
It works sometimes, and sometimes not didn't dig deeper yet.
Looks like the real culprit hides behind:
org.apache.lucene.store.AlreadyClosedException: this IndexWriter is clos
Davon, you ought to try to update from many threads, (I do not know if
DIH can do it, check it), but lucene does great job if fed from many
update threads...
depends where your time gets lost, but it is usually a) analysis chain
or b) database
if it os a) and your server has spare cpu-cores, you
out of curiosity, trying to see if new cloud features can replace what
I use now...
how is this (batch) update forwarding solved at cloud level?
imagine simple one shard and one replica case, if I fire up DIH
update, is this going to be replicated to replica shard?
If yes,
- is it going to be sen
te our commit point to the right dir
> solrCore.getUpdateHandler().commit(new CommitUpdateCommand(req, false));
>
> That should allow the searcher that the following commit command prompts to
> see the *new* IndexWriter.
>
> On Feb 22, 2012, at 10:56 AM, eks dev wrote:
>
>> W
thin.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 8:47 AM, eks dev wrote:
> thanks Mark, I will give it a go and report back...
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>> Looks like an issue around replication IndexWriter reboot, soft commits and
>> hard commits.
>>
>>
Hi All,
I am trying to understand features of Solr Cloud, regarding commits and
scaling.
- If I am using Solr Cloud then do I need to explicitly call commit
(hard-commit)? Or, a soft commit is okay and Solr Cloud will do the job of
writing to disk?
- Do We still need to use Master
used to.
>
> There aren't really masters/slaves in the old sense any more, so
> you have to get out of that thought-mode (it's hard, I know).
>
> The code is under pretty active development, so any feedback is
> valuable
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On M
that gets
> flushed depending on the requests coming through and the buffer size.
>
> - Mark Miller
> lucidimagination.com
>
> On Feb 28, 2012, at 3:38 AM, eks dev wrote:
>
>> SolrCluod is going to be great, NRT feature is really huge step
>> forward, as well as centra
ation you have that restricts how far to expand the
> search?
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Venu Gmail Dev
> wrote:
>> I don't think Spatial search will fully fit into this. I have 2 approaches
>> in mind but I am not satisfied with ei
hmm, loks like you are facing exactly the phenomena I asked about.
See my question here:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.solr.user/61326
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With auto-committing disabled we can now index many millions of documents in
I am here on lucene as a user since the project started, even before
solr came to life, many many years. And I was always using trunk
version for pretty big customers, and *never* experienced some serious
problems. The worst thing that can happen is to notice bug somewhere,
and if you have some rea
Hi All,
I am working on an application which makes few solr calls to get the data.
On the high level, We have a requirement like this
- Make first call to Solr, to get the list of products which are
children of a given category
- Make 2nd solr call to get product documents based on a l
Hi All
>
> I have an index which contains a Catalog of Products and Categories, with
> Solr 4.0 from trunk
>
> Data is organized like this:
>
> Category: Books
>
> Sub Category: Programming
>
> Products:
>
> Product # 1, Price: Regular Sort Order:1
> Product # 2, Price: Markdown, Sort Order:2
>
uot;products which are on markdown, are at
> the bottom of the documents list"
>
> But in your examples, products on "markdown" are intermingled
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 3:36 AM, roz dev wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> >>
&
ubt very much given your
> problem description.
>
> So with a corpus that size, I'd "just try it'.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 7:12 PM, roz dev wrote:
> > Thanks Erik for your quick feedback
> >
> > When Products are assigned to
I think that there is no way around doing custom logic in this case.
If indexing process knows that documents have to be grouped then they
better be together.
-Saroj
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Nitesh Nandy wrote:
> Martijn,
>
> How do we add a custom algorithm for distributing documents
Hi All
We are using SolrJ client (v 1.4.1) to integrate with our solr search
server.
We notice that whenever SolrJ request does not match with Solr schema, we
get Bad Request exception which makes sense.
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Bad Request
But, SolrJ Client does not provide any clu
Hi,
Use case I am trying to figure out is about preserving IDs without
re-indexing on duplicate, rather adding this new ID under list of
document id "aliases".
Example:
Input collection:
"id":1, "text":"dummy text 1", "signature":"A"
"id":2, "text":"dummy text 1", "signature":"A"
I add the first
1 - 100 of 302 matches
Mail list logo
