Ahh.. its including the add operation. That makes sense I then. A bit silly on NR's part they don't break it down.
Otis, our index is only 8G so I don't consider that big by any means but our queries can get a bit complex with a bit of faceting. Do you still think it makes sense to shard? How easy would this be to get working? On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Otis Gospodnetic < otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I think NR has support for breaking by handler, no? Just checked - no. > Only webapp controller, but that doesn't apply to Solr. > > SPM should be more helpful when it comes to monitoring Solr - you can > filter by host, handler, collection/core, etc. -- you can see the demo - > https://apps.sematext.com/demo - though this is plain Solr, not SolrCloud. > > If your index is big or queries are complex, shard it and parallelize > search. > > Otis > -- > Performance Monitoring * Log Analytics * Search Analytics > Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/ > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:17 PM, ralph tice <ralph.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think your response time is including the average response for an add > > operation, which generally returns very quickly and due to sheer number > are > > averaging out the response time of your queries. New Relic should break > > out requests based on which handler they're hitting but they don't seem > to. > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Software Dev <static.void....@gmail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > Here are some screen shots of our Solr Cloud cluster via Newrelic > > > > > > http://postimg.org/gallery/2hyzyeyc/ > > > > > > We currently have a 5 node cluster and all indexing is done on separate > > > machines and shipped over. Our machines are running on SSD's with 18G > of > > > ram (Index size is 8G). We only have 1 shard at the moment with > replicas > > on > > > all 5 machines. I'm guessing thats a bit of a waste? > > > > > > How come when we do our bulk updating the response time actually > > decreases? > > > I would think the load would be higher therefor response time should be > > > higher. Any way I can decrease the response time? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > >
