.
Thanks,
Sumit
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Single-Core-or-Multiple-Core-tp501748p4004254.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
of price range to retrieve product ids.These product ids
need to pass to solr to filter on the basis of brand and location.This
might not be good idea because ids may be in million as well.Please suggest
what is the best way to handle these scenarios?
Looking forward for your help.
Thank you..
dexes created by both the approaches ?
2. Is there any major performance gain in the case of using predefined index
instead of using SolrJ ?
3. Does solr persist these indexes differently and does that has any impact on
the Query efficiency ?
Thanks
Sumit Purohit
Thanks Erick for the helpful explanations.
thanks
sumit
From: Erick Erickson [erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 4:58 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Difference in indexing using config file vs client i.e SolrJ
1
lr 5.0.0, sorlj5.0.0 spark-core_2.10_2.12.jar
Thanks for the help.
Sumit Purohit
UTC 2015 (1427484036453)
mzxid=110
pzxid=32
dataLength=2
children_count=0 seems related to "no node" error.
thanks
sumit
From: Timothy Potter [thelabd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 2:18 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subj
Thanks Tim,
i had to make some changes in my local spark-solr clone to build it for sorl5.
If its ok, i can commit these to github.
thanks
sumit
From: Timothy Potter [thelabd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 2:27 PM
To: solr-user
t;xxxSolrClient" . did you do something similar.
If you plan to push it to github, i can grab that and compare with my
environment.
Thanks for you prompt response(s).
thanks
sumit
From: Timothy Potter [thelabd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2
One development difference is that i am trying to use it in a scala project.
I compile "spark-solr" as jar and use it in my scala project.
Do you think this might be a reason.
thanks
sumit
From: Purohit, Sumit
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 3:19 P
quot; or "Puppet" to configure solr on
production level cluster.
Does this group has any suggestion about what is the best way to set it up?
Thanks
Sumit Purohit
to me and I wanted to sought community's suggestion.
Thanks
Sumit
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 4:43 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to setup solr in cluster
You really have to tell us more
Sorry for this second email, but another problem of mine is :
when I copy sorl folder on each node and start them, should I run it as 1 node
cluster on each node and use the same name for collection ? OR I have to create
individual Shard on each node.
Thanks for your help.
Thanks
sumit
First I will explain my problem-
My Solr Db schema is as follows
*(SNo,Id,Name,Date,Metadata1,Metadata2.Metadata30)*.
/Here Id field is not unique. /
Data Set Example:-
<"1","1","Alex","20/1/2017","blah1","blah2"...>
<"2","1","Alex","12/1/2017","blah1","blah2"...>
<"3","2","Amanda","14/1/201
Hi all,
I have exactly the same problem as mentioned in this thread. I would assume
that handling the stale write lock should be automatically handled by this
feature of add replica automatically. Can anyone provide inputs on what is
missing (in configuration or otherwise) for auto add replicas t
Hi Amit,
This excel sheet will help you estimating the index size.
size-estimator-lucene-solr.xls
<http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4111365/size-estimator-lucene-solr.xls>
-
Sumit Arora
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index-s
Hi All,
Problem Description
I'm trying to implement a custom algorithm to match user provided
free-text input, a company name such as "Ford Motor", against a
reference data source consisting of 1.4 million company names.
The algorithm executes following steps:
Step 1) Performs an "Exact Match",
- Forwarded Message -
From: Sumit Sen
To: Solr List
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:53 PM
Subject: Problem with SpliBy in Solr 3.4
Hi All:
I have a very silly problem. I am using Solr 3.4. I have a data import handle
for indexing which is not Spliting a field data by
Please follow guidelines from :
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html
<http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html>/Sumit
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:25 AM, ankita shinde
wrote:
> Hello,
> I am new to solr.
> Can anyone please guide me how to install and use solr?
>
I have set of Articles and then Comments on it, so in database I have two
major tables one for Articles and one for Comments, but each Article could
have many comments (One to Many).
If One Article will have 20 Comments, then on DB to SOLR - Index - Sync :
Solr will index 20 Similar Documents wit
If I denormalize this all three Table :
CandidateProfile_Table - 1 Row for Sumit
CandidateEducation_Table - 5 Rows for Sumit
Employers_Table - 5 Rows for Sumit
If these three tables will go to Index in Solr , It will create 25 Documents
for one row.
In this Case What Should be My Approach :
DeNorm
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Ephraim Ofir wrote:
> Why not define the comment field as multiValued? That way you only index
> each document once and you don't need to collapse anything...
>
> Ephraim Ofir
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sumit Aro
RegexTransformer - use something like:
>
> query="...see above..."
>transformer="RegexTransformer" >
>
> splitBy="\|"/>
> splitBy="\|"/>
>
>
> The SQL probably doesn't fit your DB schema, but it's jus
stry%2Ccompany%2Cexactly_looking&version=1.2&q=id%3A
*cp_4*&start=0&rows=100&*fq=cp_*
*
*
*
*
*How I can effectively use FilterQuery and MoreLikeThis ?*
*
*
*/Sumit*
*
*
*
*
; http://192.168.1.4:8983/solr/select/?mlt=true&mlt.fl=job_title%2Ccareer_summary%2Cindustry%2Ccompany%2Cexactly_looking&version=1.2&q=id%3A
> *cp_4*&start=0&rows=100&*fq=cp_*
> *
> *
> *
> *
> *How I can effectively use FilterQuery and MoreLikeThis ?*
> *
> *
Suppose i wanted to search for red dress and i want to get facet count for
term size-medium, size-large... Basically i wanted to get facet count for
some predefined terms in result set. How can i do it?
once i got facet count now i want result set for red dress and size-medium.
i hope i can achive
edium.
> i hope i can achive this using facet filter query.
>
Thanks,
Sumit
facet.prefix=['small','large','macys.com'](here number of facet
terms are more than one)
Can you please give some in sight...
Thanks,
Sumit
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Bill Au wrote:
> You can use a facet query. Here is an example from the Solr W
all result matched as "red dress"
on right section and i should get count of small, large, versace, Marc
Jacobs. considering i am having all information in a single field as
descp index field... After that if i select "large" i should get result
matching as both "red d
ion for getting data or should we use embedded
solr server.
Thanks,
Sumit
Hi Shalin,
Sorry for the confusion but i dont have separate index fields. I have all
information in only one index field descp. Now is it possible what you
explained.
Thanks,
Sumit
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1
based partitioning and each entity
can have total index size more than 10GB so i need another partitioning
inside entity like based on no of document in an index inside entity. How
can i do this? Unfortunately solr wiki does not says much on partitioning..
--
Cheers
Sumit
I forgot to mention i already have a partitioning to 3 different servers for
each entity based on some unique int value.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Sumit Aggarwal wrote:
> I was trying to implement entity based partitioning using multiple core
> feature.
> So my solr.xm
different
applications theoritically
Does solr provides any good support for index partitioning.
Thanks,
Sumit
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Sumit Aggarwal >wrote:
>
> > I was tryin
Shalin,
at a time i will be doing search only on one entity... Also data will be
indexed only to corresponding entity.
Thanks,
Sumit
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Sumit Aggarwal wrote:
> Hi Shalin,
> Yes i want to achieve a logical separation of indexes for performance
> reason
/solr/IndexPartitioning ?
My actual concern is performance irrespective of implementation
design considering a good scaling logic also for future .
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Sumit Aggarwa
our custom search
server.
--
Cheers
Sumit
this in solr payload search.
Now can you please explain little more how can we do payload search using
solr. I mean we will need to set some payload term using BoostingtermQuery
how we will be doing it in solr. How we will be passing such search to solr?
- Sumit
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 8:54 PM,
earch query to do payload search. Do we need to add
a new Requesthandler for making such custom searches? Please provide a
sample code if have any...
--
Cheers
Sumit
e
Query Parsers.**"*
Now can any one provide any custom code to do what grant mentioned.
Thanks,
Sumit
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> That doesn't require payloads. I was doing that with Solr 1.1. Define two
> fields, stemmed and exact, with different an
Hey Nobel,
Any comments on Grant suggestion.
Thanks,
-Sumit
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Sumit Aggarwal
wrote:
> Hi Walter,
> I do have a search server where i have implemented things using payload
> feature itself. These days i am evaluating solr to get rid of my own search
>
it possible to do in solr somehow?
Thanks,
Sumit
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> The TokenFilterFactory side is trivial for the DelimitedPayloadTokenFilter.
> That could be in for 1.4. In fact, there is an automated way to generate
> the stubs that should
Cron Job kind of stuff ? Or Use Data Import Handler ?
(Several ways could be ?)
Is there any one who can provide his comments or share his experience If
some one gone though from similar situation ?
Thanks,
-Sumit
a great help if someone provide me a clue. Please let me know
if more details are needed to analyze.
Thanks & Regards
Sumit Pal
=-=-=
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain
confidential or privileged information. I
43 matches
Mail list logo