wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have few parent index without child, what would wold be the query for
> those to get?
>
> Thanks,
> Novin
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
A/B/C and all permutations are found
> (using e.g. type=text is not an option since a term could occur in a
> different entry of the multivalued field) or trigger an alphabetical
> sorting of incoming queries.
>
> Thanks a lot for your feedback, best regards
>
> Johannes
>
&g
gt;> "edismax" parser.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-achieve-exact-string-match-query-which-includes-spaces-and-quotes-tp4250402p4250405.html
> >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Binoy Dalal
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
> are and how can I trigger their call? Any suggestion that does not imply to
> divide the code on Tokenizer/Filters?
>
> Thank you very much in advance,
> Roxana
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
om/Multi-lingual-search-tp4254398.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
0282933
> after 555448ms
> INFO - 2016-01-28 22:25:44.808; [ UNCLASS]
> org.apache.solr.util.FSHDFSUtils; recoverLease=false, attempt=11 on
>
> file=hdfs://nameservice1:8020/solr5.2/UNCLASS/core_node14/data/tlog/tlog.0282933
> after 617168ms
> INFO - 2
down the other
> node and upgrade it? Or are there caveats to consider?
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
Best regards,
> Vincenzo
>
> --
> Vincenzo D'Amore
> email: v.dam...@gmail.com
> skype: free.dev
> mobile: +39 349 8513251
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
andom.
>
> I know it's going to be a case of rounds upon rounds of testing, but maybe
> there's a good starting point that will save me some time?
>
> My initial thoughts right now are to actually just search on the name
> field, and maybe the brand (for things like "
---
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Benedetti Alessandro
> >>>>> > Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > "Tyger, tyger burning bright
> >>
>From what I can tell, each component processes the request sequentially. So
how can I see an Elapsed Time of 750ms (SolrJ client) and a Process Total
Time of 1300ms? Does the Process Total Time add up the amount of time each
leaf reader takes, or some other concurrent things?
Thank you,
Scott
Process Total
> : Time of 1300ms? Does the Process Total Time add up the amount of time
> each
> : leaf reader takes, or some other concurrent things?
>
>
> -Hoss
> http://www.lucidworks.com/
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
and
> could clean up to share on GitHub if there is much interest.
>
> I asked in the IRC about a SolrCloud supervisor utility but wanted to
> extend that question to this list. are there any more "full featured"
> supervisors out there?
>
>
> -renning
>
--
e still been returned in results.
> > >>
> > >> q=ServiceName:(Searched Service)
> > >>
> > >> That'll look in just one field.
> > >>
> > >> Remember changing indexed to false doesn't impact the stuff
pattern="[\s,;:
> \-\']"/>
> splitOnNumerics="0"
> generateWordParts="1"
> generateNumberParts="0"
> catenateWords="0"
> catenateNumbers="0"
> catenateAll="0"
> splitOnCaseChange="0"
> preserveOriginal="1"
> types="wdfftypes.txt"
> />
>
>
> pattern="^(.{20})(.*)?" replacement="$1" replace="all"/>
>
>
>
> Is it a problem in our configuration or a known bug ?
> Regards
> Jérôme
>
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
>
> This problem only happens in content field, and not in any other fields.
> Does anyone knows what could be causing the issue?
>
> I'm using jieba-analysis-1.0.0, Solr 5.3.0 and Lucene 5.3.0.
>
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
--
Scott S
uget package. Not sure if this could be also implemented to check if a
> zookeeper is running.
>
> Any thoughts on anyone using a script to perform this?
>
> Regards,
> Adrian
>
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
al characters using class="solr.MappingCharFilterFactory"
> mapping="mapping-ISOLatin1Accent.txt"/>
>
> Jérôme
>
>
> Le 13/10/2015 07:46, Scott Stults a écrit :
>
>> My guess is that the boundary scanner isn't configured right for your
>&
gt; >>>>>>>>>> I'm
> >>>
> >>>> not
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> sure
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> there's a huge amount you can do to improve performance.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The term frequency is a number that is used often, so it is
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> stored
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> the index pre-calculated. Perhaps, if your data is not
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> changing,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> optimising your index would reduce it to one segment, and
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> thus
> >>>
> >>>> might
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ever so slightly speed the aggregation of term frequencies,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> but I
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> doubt
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> it'd make enough difference to make it worth doing.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Upayavira
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015, at 03:37 PM, Aki Balogh wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Jack. I did some more research and found similar
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> results.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> In our application, we are making multiple (think: 50)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> concurrent
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> requests
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to calculate term frequency on a set of documents in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> "real-time". The
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> faster that results return, the better.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Most of these requests are unique, so cache only helps
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> slightly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> This analysis is happening on a single solr instance.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Other than moving to solr cloud and splitting out the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> processing
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> onto
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> multiple servers, do you have any suggestions for what
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> might
> >>>
> >>>> speed up
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> termfreq at query time?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Aki
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Jack Krupansky
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Term frequency applies only to the indexed terms of a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> tokenized
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> field.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> DocValues is really just a copy of the original source
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> text
> >>>
> >>>> and is
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> tokenized into terms.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you could explain how exactly you are using term
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> frequency in
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> function queries. More importantly, what is so "heavy"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> your
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> usage?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Generally, moderate use of a feature is much more
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> advisable to
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> heavy
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> usage,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> unless you don't care about performance.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Jack Krupansky
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Aki Balogh <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> a...@marketmuse.com>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In our solr application, we use a Function Query
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (termfreq)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> very
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> heavily.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Index time and disk space are not important, but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> we're
> >>>
> >>>> looking to
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> improve
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> performance on termfreq at query time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been reading up on docValues. Would this be a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> way to
> >>>
> >>>> improve
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> performance?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had read that Lucene uses Field Cache for Function
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Queries, so
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> performance may not be affected.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And, any general suggestions for improving query
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> performance
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Function
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Queries?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aki
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > --
> > Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
> > Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
> > <
> https://t.yesware.com/tl/506312808dab13214164f92fbcf5714d3ce38c6b/92f5492fd055692ff7f03b2888be3b50/7a8fd1f72b93af5d79583420b3483a7d?ytl=http%3A%2F%2Fsematext.com%2F
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
as for
> searching on two collections with same schema ? is it affected at all ?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-collection-alias-how-rank-is-affected-tp4236776.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at N
hether it be parameters (fl, facet.fields, terms, etc) … or even deny any
> request in which fieldname occurs …
>
> Is there someway someone might obscure a fieldname in a request?
>
> Kind Regards & thanks in davacne,
> Douglas
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
e.g. dedup=true) to 2013 and
> > 2014 content, keeping 2015 (the latest release) untouched. During query
> > time, I'll add a filter which will exclude contents tagged with "dedup".
> >
> > Just wondering if this is achievable by perhaps extending
> > U
y, adding security through obscurity. My question therefore
> would
> >> be what is the definitive list of query parameters that one must filter
> to
> >> ensure a particular field is not exposed in the query response? Am I
> >> missing in the following?
>
more towards making Solr apis/resources
> secure not towards securing/controlling data during search.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Authentication+and+Authorization+Plugins
>
>
> Please share your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Susheel
>
--
Scot
nux. Now what I don't get is this: what happens when the system is
> shutting down? How does Solr knows to shutdown gracefully when there is
> noting on that page talks about issuing a "stop" command on system
> shutdown? Can someone shed some light on this? Like I said, I&
ICE
> This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or have
> received this e-mail in error, please inform the sender immediately and
> delete this e-mail (including any attachments) from your computer, and you
> must not use, disclose to anyone else or copy this e-mail (including any
> attachments), whether in whole or in part.
> This e-mail and any reply to it may be monitored for security, legal,
> regulatory compliance and/or other appropriate reasons.
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
;> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Nov 19, 2015, at 3:46 PM, Steven White
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Hi everyone
> > > >>&
>
> >>> > > >>> > > positionIncrementGap="100">
> >>> > >
> >>> > > >>> > > segMode="SEARCH"/>
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >
SAME field. Because there
> are no differences for the index. E.g. by creating a SearchComponent to
> have something like solr/mySelect for queries with my similarity and the
> usual solr/select for the default similarity?
> How could I achive this, has anybody a hint?
>
> Cheers,
&
quot;false"/>
>
>
>
> maxGramSize="15"/>
>
>
>
>
>
> segMode="SEARCH"/>
>
>
>
>
>
> words="org/apache/lucene/analysis/cn/smart/stopwor
> I'm not sure why those results are returned.
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
>
> On 4 December 2015 at 01:03, Scott Stults <
> sstu...@opensourceconnections.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Edwin,
> >
> > Is this related to what's described in SOLR-833
the
> > > > default value is 51200, and I have documents that are much larger
> than
> > > > 51200 characters. Although this method works, but, when I increase
> this
> > > > value, the performance of the search and highlight drops. It can drop
> > > from
> > > > less than 0.5 seconds to more than 10 seconds.
> > > >
> > > > Would like to check, is this method of increasing the value of the
> > > > hl.maxAnalyzedChars the best method to use, or is there other ways
> > which
> > > > can solve the same purpose, but without affecting the performance
> much?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Edwin
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
aging
> project, we build hadoop, spark, solr, hbase and so on in rpm/deb format,
> and supply puppet provisioners along with vagrant recipse for testing.
>
> --
> jay vyas
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
e relevant links so that i can try it out.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Radhakrishnan
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
ize is
> 18 GB.
>
>
>
> *Indexation **(SolrCloud infrastructure)*
>
>
>
> The commits *aren’t* triggered by the application described before. The
> hardcommit/softcommit interval are configured in Solr:
>
>
>
> - *HardCommit:* every 15 minutes (with open
ing a load balancer for indexing, but we have all our Rest
> Query services through an HAProxy (using 'leastconn' algorithm). The Rest
> Query Services performs queries using the CloudSolrClient.
>
> Thanks for your reply,
> if you need any further information don't
; <
> requestHandler name="/update" class="solr.UpdateRequestHandler" > name=
> "defaults"> dedupe
>
> Thanks for your reply :)
>
> - Dani
>
> 2017-08-24 14:49 GMT+02:00 Scott Stults >:
>
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> &
(from few seconds to minutes) with no appreciable improvements :(
>
> Thanks for your reply!
>
> - Daniel
>
> 2017-08-25 6:45 GMT+02:00 Scott Stults >:
>
> > Hi Dani,
> >
> > It seems like your use case falls into the Index-Heavy / Query-Heavy
> > ca
..
> (The number of item_id is maybe over than one million)
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
it will be easy to extend
>
> variables
> ---
>
> longMax
>
> doubleMax
>
> columnName
>
>
> and
>
> methods
>
> ---
>
> init
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Radhakrishnan D
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
gt; Otherwise, is it possible to put in the same request start to min value
> and end to max value.
> Thank you.
> Regards,NKI.
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
It looks like this only takes a single host as its value, whereas the
zkHost environment variable for Solr takes a comma-separated list.
Shouldn't the client also take a comma-separated list?
k/r,
Scott
tried a comma-separated list or are you going by documentation?
> It should work.
> --
> Mark Miller
> about.me/markrmiller
>
> On April 26, 2014 at 1:03:25 PM, Scott Stults (
> sstu...@opensourceconnections.com) wrote:
>
> It looks like this only takes a single host as its
We've been using a slightly older version of this script to start Solr in
server environments:
https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/conf/cassandra-env.sh
The thing I especially like about it is its ability to dynamically cap
memory usage, and the garbage collection log section is a grea
Hello!
SpellingQueryConverter "parses" the incoming query in sort of a quick and
dirty way with a regular expression. Is there a reason the query string
isn't parsed with the _actual_ parser, if one was configured for that type
of request? Even better, could the parsed query object be added to the
e actual query parser into
> spellcheck, consider opening a jira & contributing the code, even if what
> you end up with isn't in a final polished state for general use.
>
> James Dyer
> Ingram Content Group
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stults [
t of all failed docs. *
> Please can anyone suggest a way to do this?
>
> Regards
> Sankalp Gupta
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multi-words-query-tp4185625p4185922.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
> > return highlighted
> > results.
>
> Highlighter does not recognize Surround Query. It must be re-written to
> enable highlighting in o.a.s.search.QParser#getHighlightQuery() method.
>
> Not sure this functionality should be added in SOLR-2703 or a separate
> ji
I'm going to be building a Solr cluster and I want to have a rolling set of
slices so that I can keep a fixed number of days in my collection. If I
send an update to a particular slice leader, will it always hash the unique
key and (probably) forward the doc to another leader?
Thank you,
Scott
Thanks guys. Yeah, separate rolling collections seem like the better way to
go.
-Scott
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4237
Part of this is a rant, part is a plea to others who've run successful
production deployments.
Solr is a second-class citizen when it comes to production deployment. Every
recipe I've seen (RPM, DEB, chef, or puppet) makes assumptions that in one way
or another run afoul of best-practices when
Thanks for jumping in guys. I agree the SolrJetty page needs just a little
updating -- I commented at the bottom of SOLR-3159 about that.
Michael and Paul, are your chef and ant recipes generic enough to share? My
next install is going to be on RHEL 6, so I can take a crack at an install
script th
shell
> and chef.
>
> Michael: The problem with adding a dependency on Jetty in your chef recipe
> is that it's going to grab whatever version of Jetty was blessed by the
> distro maintainers on your target platform.
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
are making our logs impossible to read, but worse, I assume indicate
> that something is wrong.
>
> Thanks for any help!
>
> Joe Lerner
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
tic/?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
ver in debug mode?
> Thanks. Regards
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
0" multiValued="true">
>
>
>
>
>
>ignoreCase="true"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ignoreCase="true" synonyms="synonyms.txt"/>
>
>
>
>ignoreCase="true"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> thanks
>
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
idator.PKIXValidator.engineValidate(PKIXValidator.java:302)\n\tat
> > sun.security.validator.Validator.validate(Validator.java:260)\n\tat
> >
> sun.security.ssl.X509TrustManagerImpl.validate(X509TrustManagerImpl.java:324)\n\tat
> >
> sun.security.ssl.X509TrustManagerImpl.checkTrusted(X509TrustManagerImpl.java:229)\n\tat
> >
> sun.security.ssl.X509TrustManagerImpl.checkServerTrusted(X509TrustManagerImpl.java:124)\n\tat
> >
> sun.security.ssl.ClientHandshaker.serverCertificate(ClientHandshaker.java:1496)\n\t...
> > 53 more\nCaused by:
> > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to
> find
> > valid certification path to requested target\n\tat
> >
> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilder.build(SunCertPathBuilder.java:141)\n\tat
> >
> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilder.engineBuild(SunCertPathBuilder.java:126)\n\tat
> > java.security.cert.CertPathBuilder.build(CertPathBuilder.java:280)\n\tat
> >
> sun.security.validator.PKIXValidator.doBuild(PKIXValidator.java:392)\n\t...
> > 59 more\n",
> >
> > "code":500}}
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Sathish.
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
gt;/solr_metrics.log"
> filePattern="<%= @solr_logs %>/solr_metrics.log.%i" >
>
>
> %d{-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS} %-5p (%t) [%X{collection} %X{shard}
> %X{replica} %X{core}] %c{1.} %m%n
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
rything seems fine.
>
>
> My question is why this would happen? Or are there any documents about how
> SolrCloud manages the cluster behind the scenes?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Teddie
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
uti
> --
> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
e of duration column. Thanks for your quick
> help.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Pradeep
>
> +917204007740
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
>
> ignoreCase="true" synonyms="synonyms.txt"/>
> ignoreCase="true"/>
>
> pattern="([-a-z])\.com" replacement="$1"/>
>
> protected="protwords.txt"/>
read with it.The label and label status
> should be displayed as percentage.
>
>
> 2. Need to paginate the record along with the implementation 1
>
>
> Display will be as mentioned below
>
>
> 1. domain name : @ subject:hello from addredd: abcd@i
>
> inbox percentage : 20% spam percentage : 80%
> read percentage : 30% unread percentage : 70%
>
> 2. domain name : @ subject:hi from addredd: abcd@i
>
> inbox percentage : 20% spam percentage : 80%
> read percentage : 30% unread percentage : 70%
>
>
> 3. domain name : @ subject:where from addredd: abcd@i
>
> inbox percentage : 20% spam percentage : 80%
> read percentage : 30% unread percentage : 70%
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
us *
> > Bachelor of Science
> > Consultant SAP Development Workbench
> >
> >
> > *FIS Informationssysteme und Consulting GmbH *Röthleiner Weg 1
> > 97506 Grafenrheinfeld
> >
> > P +49 (9723) 9188-667
> > F +49 (9723) 9188-200
> > E j.ge
; Fernando Otero
>
> Sr Engineering Manager, Panamera
>
> Buenos Aires - Argentina
>
> Email: fernando.ot...@olx.com
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
g
> > Subject: Solr Cloud on Docker?
> >
> > Does anyone have experience running a big Solr Cloud cluster on Docker
> > containers? By “big”, I mean 35 million docs, 40 nodes, 8 shards, with 36
> > CPU instances. We are running version 6.6.2 right now, but could upgrade.
> >
> > If people have specific things to do or avoid, I’d really appreciate it.
> >
> > I got a couple of responses on the Slack channel, but I’d love more
> > stories from the trenches. This is a direction for our company
> architecture.
> >
> > We have a master/slave cluster (Solr 4.10.4) that is awesome. I can
> > absolutely see running the slaves as containers. For Solr Cloud? Makes me
> > nervous.
> >
> > wunder
> > Walter Underwood
> > wun...@wunderwood.org
> > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> >
> >
>
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
eld with that
> information (as ratio of matched-terms/total-terms)
>
> *Ask:* Is it possible to get back the terms of the query and the matched
> state ?
>
> I tried
>
>- debug=query option (with the default select handler)
>- with terms in the debug response I co
ut that
doesn't seem to deal with CRUD operations on the monitor queries
themselves.
So has anyone built this or given some thought about how to incorporate the
monitor index into SolrCloud?
Thank you,
Scott
--
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections,
r the sole use of the
> intended recipient and may contain confidential and privileged information.
> Any unauthorized view, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
> email and destroy all copies of the
71 matches
Mail list logo
