You're not going to be able to look at field boosts by themselves to judge
relevancy because it's very much a data-driven optimization problem. For
example, if you only sell iPhone cases but no iPhones, a search for "black
iphone" should show a bunch of black iPhone cases at the top of the
results. But if you do sell iPhones themselves, you'll likely see them rank
low in the results because they typically have names like "Apple iPhone 6s
Plus 64 GB - Black" and your cases just have "iPhone Case - Black". More of
the search terms match the shorter field value and so it scores better.

Approach the problem methodically and collect data. There are several
evaluation metrics that will not only help you quantify the problem but
also gauge how much your tuning efforts have improved things. MRR and DCGS
are good places to start.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Information_retrieval_evaluation

Also take a look at Quepid (full disclosure: my company makes it). It'll
let the business folks rank the results for searches and you'll be able to
do search regression tests against those judgement lists as you tweak
things.


k/r,
Scott

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Robert Brown <r...@intelcompute.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I currently have an index of ~50m docs representing shopping products:
> name, description, brand, category, etc.
>
> Our "qf" is currently setup as:
>
> name^5
> brand^2
> category^3
> merchant^2
> description^1
>
> mm: 100%
> ps: 5
>
> I'm getting complaints from the business concerning relevancy, and was
> hoping to get some constructive ideas/thoughts on whether these boosts look
> semi-sensible or not, I think they were put in place pretty much at random.
>
> I know it's going to be a case of rounds upon rounds of testing, but maybe
> there's a good starting point that will save me some time?
>
> My initial thoughts right now are to actually just search on the name
> field, and maybe the brand (for things like "Apple Ipod").
>
> Has anyone got a similar setup that could share some direction?
>
> Many Thanks,
> Rob
>
>


-- 
Scott Stults | Founder & Solutions Architect | OpenSource Connections, LLC
| 434.409.2780
http://www.opensourceconnections.com

Reply via email to