Hi All,
I am planning to use the eDismax query parser in SOLR to give boost to
documents that have a phrase in their fields present. Now there is a mm
parameter in the edismax parser query , since the query typed by the user
could be of any length (i.e. >=1) I would like to set the mm value to 1 .
t match on the top level of a query.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: S.L
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 2:25 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: eDismax parser and the mm parameter
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am planning to use the eDismax query
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+
> Extended+DisMax+Query+Parser
>
> The focus on mm may indeed be a classic "XY Problem" - a premature focus
> on a solution without detailing the problem.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: S
ion before the problem is understood.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: S.L
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 6:14 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: eDismax parser and the mm parameter
>
> Jacks Thanks Again,
>
> I am searching C
;t make a lot of sense to prematurely focus
> on a solution when you haven't clearly defined your use cases.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: S.L
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 9:13 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: eDismax parser and
t, and
> boost pf3 higher than pf2.
>
> You could try using the complex phrase query parser for the third case.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: S.L
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 12:08 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re:
<
> simpleliving...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It only works for a single word search term and not multiple word search
> term.
>
> Sent from my HTC
>
> - Reply message -
> From: "William Bell"
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Subject: eDi
:12 PM, S.L wrote:
> Thanks Ahmet, I would definitely look into this . I appreciate that.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>> Yes, it has spellcheck.collate parameter. I mean it has lots of
>> parameters and with correct combination of paramete
Hi All,
I want to suggest the correct phrase if a typo is made while searching and
then search it using eDismax parser(pf,pf2,pf3), if no typo is made then
search it using eDismax parser alone.
Is there a way I can combine these two components , I have seen examples
for eDismax and also for Spell
Hello fellow Solr users,
I am using the default select request handler to search a Solr core , I
also use the eDismaxquery parser.
1.
I want to integrate this with the spellchecker search component so that
if a search request comes in the spellchecker component also gets called
and I
; solve this with Solrj?
>
> Thanks;
> Furkan KAMACI
>
>
> 2014-04-12 18:34 GMT+03:00 S.L :
>
> > Hello fellow Solr users,
> >
> > I am using the default select request handler to search a Solr core , I
> > also use the eDismaxquery parser.
> >
>
direction of your question but it is really
> good, secure and flexible to do such kind of things at your client (a java
> client or not). On the other *if *you let people to access your Solr
> instance directly it causes some security issues.
>
> Thanks;
> Furkan KAMACI
>
>
I am using Solr wordbreak spellchecker and the issue is that when I search
for a term like "mob ile" expecting that the wordbreak spellchecker would
actually resutn a suggestion for "mobile" it breaks the search term into
letters like "m o b" I have two issues with this behavior.
1. How can I ma
Anyone ?
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 5:21 PM, S.L wrote:
>
> I am using Solr wordbreak spellchecker and the issue is that when I search
> for a term like "mob ile" expecting that the wordbreak spellchecker would
> actually resutn a suggestion for "mobile" it break
combine or break words in one shot. That is, it cannot
> detect that "mob lie" should become "mobile".
>
> James Dyer
> Ingram Content Group
> (615) 213-4311
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: S.L [mailto:simpleliving...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Satu
Perhaps someone here will know what the
> problem is.
>
> James Dyer
> Ingram Content Group
> (615) 213-4311
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: S.L [mailto:simpleliving...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 12:36 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
&g
Hi All,
I have a small test index of 400 documents , it happens to have an entry
for "wrangler", When I search for "wranglr", I correctly get the collation
suggestion as "wrangler", however when I search for "wrangle" , I do not
get a suggestion for "wrangler".
The Levenstien distance between wr
Anyone ?
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:33 AM, S.L wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a small test index of 400 documents , it happens to have an entry
> for "wrangler", When I search for "wranglr", I correctly get the collation
> suggestion as "wrangler", h
you’re looking for, or
> is it deemed correctly spelled?
>
> Have you tried another spellChecker impl, for troubleshooting purposes?
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Sat, M
e of it in the index should'nt
Solr suggest me "wrangler" ?
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:00 PM, S.L wrote:
> I do not get any suggestion (when I search for "wrangle") , however I
> correctly get the suggestion wrangler when I search for wranglr , I am
> using the Direc
.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:06 PM, S.L wrote:
>
> > OK, I just realized that "wrangle" is a proper english word, probably
> thats
&g
the exact
> query you are using? How is the spellcheck field analyzed? If you're
> using stemming, then "wrangle" and "wrangler" might be stemmed to the same
> word. (by the way, you shouldn't spellcheck against a stemmed or otherwise
> heavily-analyzed fie
Hi Folks,
I recently started using the spellchecker in my solrconfig.xml. I am able to
build up an index in Solr.
But,if I ever shutdown tomcat I am not able to restart it.The server never
spits out the server startup time in seconds in the logs,nor does it print any
error messages in the cata
Next time always make back up.
> On Jun 4, 2014 7:55 PM, "S.L" wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I recently started using the spellchecker in my solrconfig.xml. I am able
> > to build up an index in Solr.
> >
> > But,if I ever shutdown tomcat I am not a
Anyone folks?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:25 AM, S.L wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I recently started using the spellchecker in my solrconfig.xml. I am able
> to build up an index in Solr.
>
> But,if I ever shutdown tomcat I am not able to restart it.The server never
> spits o
race the process if you`re running on Unix or changed
> the
> > log level in Solr to get more information logged
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: S.L [mailto:simpleliving...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: June-06-14 2:33 PM
> >
I am not sure if that is doable , I think it needs to be taken care of at
the indexing time.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Gharbi Mohamed <
gharbi.mohamed.e...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Solr for searching magento products in my project,
> I want to know, is it possible for solr to
Hi All,
I am using the Direct Spell checker component and I have collate =true in
my solrconfig.xml.
The issue that I noticed is that , when I have a search term with upto two
words in it and if both of them are misspelled I get a collation query as
a suggestion in the spellchecker output, if I
Hello All
If I set fetcher.threads.per.queue property to more than 1 , I believe the
behavior would be to have those many number of threads per host from Nutch, in
that case would Nutch still respect the Crawl-Delay directive in robots.txt and
not crawl at a faster pace that what is specified i
Hi All,
I am running a single Solr instance with version 4.4 with Apache
Tomcat 7.0.42 ,I am aslo running a Nutch instance with about 20
threads and each thread is committing a document in the Solr index
using the Solrj API , the version of Solrj API I
use is 4.3.1 , can anyone please let me know
I have a 8GB machine , and I commit for each and every document that is
added to Solr, not sure if I am missing anything here , but it seems I
could use auto commit from your response , in that case do I not need to
call the commit call , can you please point me to a resource that explains
this ?
T
Hi All,
I get "No Live SolrServers available to handle this request" error
intermittently while indexing in a SolrCloud cluster with 3 shards and
replication factor of 2.
I am using Solr 4.7.0.
Please see the stack trace below.
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: No live SolrServe
Hi All,
We recently moved from a single Solr instance to SolrCloud and we are using
pysolr , I am wondering what options (clients) we have from Python to
take advantage of Zookeeper and load balancing capabilities that SolrCloud
provides if I were to use a smart client like Solrj?
Thanks.
Right , but my query was to know if there are any Python clients which
achieve the same thing as SolrJ , or the approach one should take when
using Python based clients.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014, at 08:47 PM, S.L wrote:
> > Hi
client been
zookeeper aware?
Also for indexing ,which is not done from a Python client but is done using
Solrj, I will avoid the load balancers and do the indexing it via the
Zookeeper route.
Thanks.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/1/2014 2:29 PM, S.L wr
That makes perfect sense , thanks again!
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/1/2014 7:08 PM, S.L wrote:
> > Thanks ,load balancer seems to be the preferred solution here , I have a
> > topology where I have 6 Solr nodes that support 3 shards with
Hi All,
I am trying to query a 6 node Solr4.7 cluster with 3 shards and a
replication factor of 2 .
I have fronted these 6 Solr nodes using a load balancer , what I notice is
that every time I do a search of the form
q=*:*&fq=(id:9e78c064-919f-4ef3-b236-dc66351b4acf) it gives me a result
only
, pointing it at successive
> nodes.
>
> Where is the first place problems show up?
>
> My _guess_ is that your load balancer isn't quite doing what you think, or
> your cluster isn't set up the way you think it is, but those are guesses.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
>
search
is just failing as whole intermittently .
Also ,the collection is being actively indexed as I query this, could that
be an issue too ?
Thanks.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:24 PM, S.L wrote:
> Erick,
>
> Thanks for your reply, I tried your suggestions.
>
> 1 . When not using
ndexing" anyway? How are documents being fed
> to your system?
>
> Best,
> Erick@PuzzledAsWell
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:32 PM, S.L wrote:
> > Erick,
> >
> > I would like to add that the interesting behavior i.e point #2 that I
> > mentioned in m
dmin/cloud page.
And let's see your soft and hard commit settings please.
Best,
Erick
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:48 PM, S.L wrote:
> Eirck,
>
> 0> Load balancer is out of the picture
> .
> 1>When I query with *distrib=false* , I get consistent results as expected
>
eed to do to keep these in synch, so
> if you can capture what happened when things got out of synch we'll
> fix it. But a lot has changed in the last several months, so the first
> thing I'd do if possible is to upgrade to 4.10.1.
>
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On
true
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Not, I'm not guaranteeing that it'll actually cure the problem, just
> that enough has changed since 4.7 that it'd be a good place to start.
>
> Things have been reported off and on, but they
rote:
> Try adding shards.info=true and debug=track to your queries ... these will
> give more detailed information about what's going behind the scenes.
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:11 PM, S.L wrote:
>
> > Erick,
> >
> > I have upgraded to SolrCloud 4.10
anyone please let me know , how to solve this issue of intermittent no
results for a query ?
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:15 PM, S.L wrote:
> Tim,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion.
>
> I have rerun the query by adding shards.info=true and debug= track. I
> have included the xml
I use the select request
handler ,so I cannot replace it with anything else , is that a problem ?
Thanks.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 9:26 PM, S.L wrote:
>
>> Look at the logging information I provided below , looks like the results
>>
lusive* , , I did not find even a single common id in
those lists , I tried at least 15 manually ,it looks like to me that the
replicas are disjoint sets.
Thanks.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 10:24 PM, S.L wrote:
>
>> Yes , I tried those two
active",
"core":"dyCollection1_shard3_replica2",
"node_name":"server1.mydomain.com:8082_solr",
"base_url":"http://server1.mydomain.com:8082/solr";,
"leader":"true"},
Shawn,
Just wondering if you have any other suggestions on what the next steps
whould be ? Thanks.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:12 PM, S.L wrote:
> Shawn ,
>
>
>1. I will upgrade to 67 JVM shortly .
>2. This is a new collection as , I was facing a similar issue in 4.7
&g
lr/home1/dyCollection1_shard2_replica1/data/index.2014101839463;
maxCacheMB=48.0 maxMergeSizeMB=4.0),segFN=segments_88t,generation=10685}
471904907 [RecoveryThread] INFO org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore – newest
commit generation = 10685
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:12 PM, S.L wrote:
> Shawn,
>
&
Folks,
I have posted previously about this , I am using SolrCloud 4.10.1 and have
a sharded collection with 6 nodes , 3 shards and a replication factor of 2.
I am indexing Solr using a Hadoop job , I have 15 Map fetch tasks , that
can each have upto 5 threds each , so the load on the indexing si
erwhelming your cluster-nodes. Have you checked
> various metrics to see if that is the case?
>
> Otis
> --
> Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
> Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
>
>
>
> > On Oct 26, 2014, a
the case?
> > >
> > > Otis
> > > --
> > > Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management
> > > Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Oct 26, 2014, at 9:59 PM,
gest ?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
> > > > otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > You may simply be overwhelming your cluster
Oct 27, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:40 PM, S.L wrote:
>
> > One is not smaller than the other, because the numDocs is same for both
> > "replicas" and essentially they seem to be disjoint s
rate of requests from the incoming multiple
threads.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Will Martin wrote:
> 2 naïve comments, of course.
>
>
>
> - Queuing theory
>
> - Zookeeper logs.
>
>
>
> From: S.L [mailto:simpleliving...@gmail.com]
> Sent: M
hope it doesn't disappear
> altogether.
>
> G'luck
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: S.L [mailto:simpleliving...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 9:25 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Heavy Multi-threaded indexing and SolrCloud 4.10.1
tune your Hadoop
> implementation to match what your Solr installation is capable of.
>
> On 10/28/14 12:39, S.L wrote:
>
>> Will,
>>
>> I think in one of your other emails(which I am not able to find) you has
>> asked if I was indexing directly from MapReduce
d
> if you don't, you then have to make sure to appropriately tune your Hadoop
> implementation to match what your Solr installation is capable of.
>
> On 10/28/14 12:39, S.L wrote:
>
>> Will,
>>
>> I think in one of your other emails(which I am not able to fi
I am curious , how many shards do you have and whats the replication factor
you are using ?
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:27 PM, AJ Lemke wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have a SOLR cloud instance that has been humming along nicely for
> months.
> Last week we started experiencing missing records.
>
> Admin
Hi All,
As I previously reported due to no overlap in terms of the documets in the
SolrCloud replicas of the index shards , I have turned off the replication
and basically have there shards with a replication factor of 1.
It obviously seems will not be scalable due to the fact that the same core
, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:18 PM, S.L wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As I previously reported due to no overlap in terms of the documets in the
> SolrCloud replicas of the index shards , I have turned off the replication
> and basically have there shards with a replication factor of 1.
>
> It
Hi All,
I am seeing interesting behavior on the replicas , I have a single
shard and 6 replicas and on SolrCloud 4.10.1 . I only have a small
number of documents ~375 that are replicated across the six replicas .
The interesting thing is that the same document has a different id in
each one of
d as the key as you feed
> documents in, and you know that the uuid values you’re creating are unique,
> just change the field name and unique key name from ‘id’ to ‘uuid’. Or
> change the key name you send in from ‘uuid’ to ‘id’.
>
> On Nov 11, 2014, at 7:18 PM, S.L simpleliving...@gmail.c
in case of SolrCloud with out
using the uuid type or not having a per replica unique id?
The uuid in question is of type .
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:20 PM, S.L wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> So the issue here is I already have a doctorId
> defined in my schema.xml.
>
> If along with that
Hi All,
We know that _version_field is a mandatory field in solrcloud schema.xml,
it is expected to be of type long , it also seems to have unique value in a
collection.
However the query of the form
http://server1.mydomain.com:7344/solr/collection1/select/?q=*:*&fq=%28_version_:14846325489443800
er if there's something wonky going on with searching on large longs
> here.
>
> Feels like an XY problem to me though.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:45 AM, S.L wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We know that _version_field is a mandatory fi
is sent to the destination shard, it should be fine.
>
> Have you checked that out? I'm at a conference, so I can't
> check it out too thoroughly right now...
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:18 AM, S.L wrote:
> > Here is why I want to do th
, or
try and generate a unique id filed for each document.
For the later option UUID is not behaving as expected in SolrCloud and
_version_ field seems to be serving the need .
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/12/2014 10:45 PM, S.L wrote:
> > We
create a unique field, and configure the “dedupe”
> Processor to handle that.
>
>
> > On Nov 13, 2014, at 12:02 PM, S.L wrote:
> >
> > I am not sure if this a case of XY problem.
> >
> > I have no control over the URLs to deduce an id from them , those are
> f
Hi All,
I have a situation where I need to boost the score of a query if a field
(imageURL) in the given document is non empty , I am using edismax so I
know that using bq parameter would solve the problem. However the field
imageURL that I am trying to boost on is not indexed , meaning (stored =
I have two documents doc1 and doc2 and each one of those has a field called
phoneName.
doc1:phoneName:"Details about Apple iPhone 4s - 16GB - White (Verizon)
Smartphone Factory Unlocked"
doc2:phoneName:"Apple iPhone 4S 16GB for Net10, No Contract, White"
Here if I search for
q=iphone+4s+16gb&qf
Anyone ?
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:45 AM, S.L wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a situation where I need to boost the score of a query if a field
> (imageURL) in the given document is non empty , I am using edismax so I
> know that using bq parameter would solve the problem. Ho
Name:"iphon 4 s 16 gb"~1
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> It's worth to look into to check particular scoring values. But
> for most suspect is the reducing precision when float norms are stored in
> byte vals.
> grained and flexible control over it.
>
> Ahmet
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 12:22 PM, S.L
> wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> Mikhail Thanks , I looked at the explain and this is what I see for the two
> different documents in questions, they have identical scores
Mikhail,
Thank you for confirming this , however Ahmet's proposal seems more simpler
to implement to me .
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
>
> S.L,
>
> I briefly skimmed Lucene50NormsConsumer.writeNormsField(), my
all about multivalued fields.
>
> I guess, A simple javascript that splits on whitespace and returns the
> produced array size would do the trick :
> StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory
>
>
>
> At this point you have a int field named word count.
> boost=div(1,wordC
to be taken for cloud setup. Please note that for both
> solutions, re-index is mandatory.
>
> Ahmet
>
>
>
> On Thursday, December 11, 2014 12:15 PM, S.L
> wrote:
> Ahmet,
>
> Thank you , as the configurations in SolrCloud are uploaded to zookeeper ,
> are there
Hi All,
I am using SolrCloud 4.10.1 and I have 3 shards with replication factor of
2 , i.e is 6 nodes altogether.
When I query the server1 out of 6 nodes in the cluster with the below query
, it works fine , but any other node in the cluster when queried with the
same query results in a *HTTP Sta
and tail the logs on all the servers. What we're looking for here is
> whether the sub-queries even make it to Solr or whether the problem
> is in your container.
>
> 3> If the sub-queries do NOT make it to the Solr logs, what is the query
> that the container sees? Is it
omehow 5 of your servers are configured to
> > expect a different character than the server that works. I'm afraid
> > I don't know Tomcat well enough to direct you there, but take a
> > look here:
> > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat
> >
> > Sorry I can't
Hi All,
I have a question regarding distrib=false on the Solr query , it seems that
the distribution is restricted across only the shards when the parameter
is set to false, meaning if I query a particular node with in a shard with
replication factor of more than one , the request could go to an
you send.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 8:14 AM, S.L wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have a question regarding distrib=false on the Solr query , it seems
> that
> > the distribution is restricted across only the shards when the parameter
>
Hi All,
I have a use case where I need to group documents that have a same field
called bookName , meaning if there are a multiple documents with the same
bookName value and if the user input is searched by a query on bookName ,
I need to be able to group all the documents by the same bookName to
I am trying to use the DocExpirationUpdateProcessorFactoryfactory in Solr
4.10.1 version.
I have included the following in my solrconfig.xml
id
timestamp
30
ttl
expire_at
Thanks for giving multiple options , I ll try them out both ,but last time
I checked, having "+60SECONDS" as the default value for ttl was giving me
an invalid date format exception, I am assuming that would only be the
case if I use it with the default mechanism in schema.xml, but not when we
Great, this is the first example I have seen so far, I wish we could
include this in the Wiki. Thanks again!
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
> :
> : Thanks for giving multiple options , I ll try them out both ,but last
> time
> : I checked, having "+60SECONDS" as the defau
Folks,
Is there a way to implement the trending functionality using Solr , to give
the results using a query for say the most searched terms in the past hours
or so , if the most searched terms is not possible is it possible to at
least the get results for the last 100 terms?
Thanks
and make a proper SOLR contribution
> :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
>
> On 08.02.15 05:26, S.L wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Is there a way to implement the trending functionality using Solr , to
>> give
>> the results using a query for
nal Message -
> From: "Shawn Heisey"
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Sunday, February 8, 2015 11:03:33 AM
> Subject: [MASSMAIL]Re: Trending functionality in Solr
>
> On 2/7/2015 9:26 PM, S.L wrote:
> > Is there a way to implement the trending functiona
90 matches
Mail list logo
