Thanks Ahmet, I would definitely look into this . I appreciate that.

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Ahmet Arslan <iori...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Yes, it has spellcheck.collate parameter. I mean it has lots of parameters
> and with correct combination of parameters
> it can suggest "White Siberian Ginseng" from "Whte Sberia Ginsng"
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Spell+Checking
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, April 3, 2014 1:57 AM, "simpleliving...@gmail.com" <
> simpleliving...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ahmet.
>
> Thanks I will look into this option . Does spellchecker support multiple
> word search terms?
>
> Sent from my HTC
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Ahmet Arslan" <iori...@yahoo.com>
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
> Subject: eDismax parser and the mm parameter
> Date: Wed, Apr 2, 2014 10:53 AM
>
> Hi SL,
>
> Instead of fuzzy queries, can't you use spell checker? Generally Spell
> Checker (a.k.a did you mean) is a preferred tool for typos.
>
> Ahmet
>
> On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 4:13 PM, "simpleliving...@gmail.com" <
> simpleliving...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It only works for a single word search term and not multiple word search
> term.
>
> Sent from my HTC
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "William Bell" <billnb...@gmail.com>
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
> Subject: eDismax parser and the mm parameter
> Date: Wed, Apr 2, 2014 12:03 AM
>
> Fuzzy is provided use ~
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:04 PM, S.L <simpleliving...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Jack ,
> >
> > Thanks a lot , I am now using the pf ,pf2 an pf3  and have gotten rid of
> > the mm parameter from my queries, however for the fuzzy phrase queries ,
> I
> > am not sure how I would be able to leverage the Complex Query Parser
> there
> > is absolutely nothing out there that gives me any idea as to how to do
> that
> > .
> >
> > Why is fuzzy phrase search not provided by Solr OOB ? I am surprised
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Jack Krupansky <j...@basetechnology.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > The pf, pf2, and pf3 parameters should cover cases 1 and 2. Use q.op=OR
> > > (the default) and ignore the mm parameter. Give pf the highest boost,
> and
> > > boost pf3 higher than pf2.
> > >
> > > You could try using the complex phrase query parser for the third case.
> > >
> > > -- Jack Krupansky
> > >
> > > -----Original Message----- From: S.L
> > > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 12:08 AM
> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: eDismax parser and the mm parameter
> > >
> > > Thanks Jack , my use cases are as follows.
> > >
> > >
> > >   1. Search for "Ginseng" everything related to ginseng should show up.
> > >   2. Search For "White Siberian Ginseng" results with the whole phrase
> > >   show up first followed by 2 words from the phrase followed by a
> single
> > > word
> > >   in the phrase
> > >   3. Fuzzy Search "Whte Sberia Ginsng" (please note the typos here)
> > >   documents with White Siberian Ginseng Should show up , this looks
> like
> > > the
> > >   most complicated of all as Solr does not support fuzzy phrase
> searches
> > .
> > > (I
> > >   have no solution for this yet).
> > >
> > > Thanks again!
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Jack Krupansky <
> > j...@basetechnology.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >  The mm parameter is really only relevant when the default operator is
> OR
> > >> or explicit OR operators are used.
> > >>
> > >> Again: Please provide your use case examples and your expectations for
> > >> each use case. It really doesn't make a lot of sense to prematurely
> > focus
> > >> on a solution when you haven't clearly defined your use cases.
> > >>
> > >> -- Jack Krupansky
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message----- From: S.L
> > >> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 9:13 PM
> > >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: eDismax parser and the mm parameter
> > >>
> > >> Jack,
> > >>
> > >> I mis-stated the problem , I am not using the OR operator as default
> > >> now(now that I think about it it does not make sense to use the
> default
> > >> operator OR along with the mm parameter) , the reason I want to use pf
> > and
> > >> mm in conjunction is because of my understanding of the edismax parser
> > and
> > >> I have not looked into pf2 and pf3 parameters yet.
> > >>
> > >> I will state my understanding here below.
> > >>
> > >> Pf -  Is used to boost the result score if the complete phrase
> matches.
> > >> mm <(less than) search term length would help limit the query results
> >  to
> > >> a
> > >> certain number of better matches.
> > >>
> > >> With that being said would it make sense to have dynamic mm (set to
> the
> > >> length of search term - 1)?
> > >>
> > >> I also have a question around using a fuzzy search along with eDismax
> > >> parser , but I will ask that in a seperate post once I go thru that
> > aspect
> > >> of eDismax parser.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks again !
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Jack Krupansky <
> > j...@basetechnology.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>  If you use pf, pf2, and pf3 and boost appropriately, the effects of
> mm
> > >>
> > >>> will be dwarfed.
> > >>>
> > >>> The general goal is to assure that the top documents really are the
> > best,
> > >>> not to necessarily limit the total document count. Focusing on the
> > latter
> > >>> could be a real waste of time.
> > >>>
> > >>> It's still not clear why or how you need or want to use OR as the
> > default
> > >>> operator - you still haven't given us a use case for that.
> > >>>
> > >>> To repeat: Give us a full set of use cases before taking this XY
> > Problem
> > >>> approach of pursuing a solution before the problem is understood.
> > >>>
> > >>> -- Jack Krupansky
> > >>>
> > >>> -----Original Message----- From: S.L
> > >>> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2014 6:14 PM
> > >>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > >>> Subject: Re: eDismax parser and the mm parameter
> > >>>
> > >>> Jacks Thanks Again,
> > >>>
> > >>> I am searching  Chinese medicine  documents , as the example I gave
> > >>> earlier
> > >>> a user can search for "Ginseng" or Siberian Ginseng or Red Siberian
> > >>> Ginseng
> > >>> , I certainly want to use pf parameter (which is not driven by mm
> > >>> parameter) , however for giving higher score to documents that have
> > more
> > >>> of
> > >>> the terms I want to use edismax now if I give a mm of 3 and the
> search
> > >>> term
> > >>> is of only length 1 (like "Ginseng") what does edisMax do ?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Jack Krupansky <
> > j...@basetechnology.com
> > >>> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>  It still depends on
>

Reply via email to