All,
We had a requirement in our solr powered application where customers want
to see all the documents that have a blank value for a field. So when they
facet on a field, if the field has null values, they should be able select
that facet value and see all documents. I thought facet.missing=true w
Hoss,
We rely heavily on facet.mincount because once a user has selected a facet,
it doesn't make sense for us to show that facet field to him and let him
filter again with the same facet. Also, when a facet has only one value, it
doesn't make sense to show it to the user, since searching with that
I have recently enabled facet.missing=true in solrconfig.xml which gives
null facet values also. As I understand it, the syntax to do a faceted
search on a null value is something like this:
&fq=-price:[* TO *]
So when I want to search on a particular value (for example : 4) OR null
value, I would
Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/6/2013 12:28 PM, Rahul R wrote:
>
>> I have recently enabled facet.missing=true in solrconfig.xml which gives
>> null facet values also. As I understand it, the syntax to do a faceted
>> search on a null value is
Thank you for the Clarification Shawn.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Yes, it SHOULD! And in the LucidWorks Search query parser it does. Why
> doesn't it in Solr? Ask Yonik to explain that!
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message---
Hello,
Since Apache Solr is governed by Apache License 2.0 - does it mean that all
jar files bundled within Solr are also governed by the same License ? Do I
have to worry about checking the License information of all bundled jar
files in my commercial Solr powered application ?
Even if I use them
Hello,
I am using solr 1.3 with jdk 1.5.0_14 and weblogic 10MP1 application server
on Solaris. I use embedded solr server. More details :
Number of docs in solr index : 1.4 million
Physical size of index : 640MB
Total number of fields in the index : 700 (99% of these are dynamic fields)
Total numbe
Hello,
A related question on this topic. How do I programmatically find the total
number of documents across many shards ? For EmbeddedSolrServer, I use the
following command to get the total count :
solrSearcher.getStatistics().get("numDocs")
With distributed search, how do i get the count of all
facet.field=F_P1946367030&facet.field=S_P1406453569&facet.field=S_P2017662626&facet.field=S_P1406389978&facet.field=F_P1946367024
My primary question here is, can Solr handle this kind of queries with so
many facet fields. I have tried using both enum and fc for facet.method and
there i
3 GB sounds like it might not be enough for such heavy use of faceting. It
> is probably not the 50-70 number, but the 440 or accumulated number across
> many queries that pushes the memory usage up.
>
> When you hit OOM, what does the Solr admin stats display say for
> FieldCa
ts.) Just to see how close you are to "the
> edge" even before a volume of queries start coming in.
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Rahul R
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 1:28 AM
>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re:
y I can improve faceting performance with all my fields as
multiValued fields ?
Appreciate any help on this. Thank you.
- Rahul
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Rahul R wrote:
> Jack,
> Sorry for the delayed response:
> Total memory allocated : 3GB
> Free Memory on startup of appl
Hello,
I am trying to understand how I can size the caches for my solr powered
application. Some details on the index and application :
Solr Version : 1.3
JDK : 1.5.0_14 32 bit
OS : Solaris 10
App Server : Weblogic 10 MP1
Number of documents : 1 million
Total number of fields : 1000 (750 strings, 2
Hello,
We are trying to get Solr to work for a really huge parts database. Details
of the database
- 55 million parts
- Totally 3700 properties (facets). But each record will not have value for
all properties.
- Most of these facets are defined as dynamic fields within the Solr Index
We were getti
e:
>
> On Jul 31, 2009, at 2:35 AM, Rahul R wrote:
>
> Hello,
>> We are trying to get Solr to work for a really huge parts database.
>> Details
>> of the database
>> - 55 million parts
>> - Totally 3700 properties (facets). But each record will not hav
to around 10 seconds.
This really helped. Thanks a lot !
Regards
Rahul
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> On Jul 31, 2009, at 7:17 AM, Rahul R wrote:
>
> Erik,
>> I understand that caching is going to improve performance. Infact we did a
>> PSR run wi
;Erik
>
>
> On Jul 31, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Rahul R wrote:
>
> In a production environment, having the caches enabled makes a lot of
>> sense.
>> And most definitely we will be enabling them. However, the primary idea of
>> this exercise is to verify if lim
I am trying to track memory utilization with my Application that uses Solr.
Details of the setup :
-3rd party Software : Solaris 10, Weblogic 10, jdk_150_14, Solr 1.3.0
- Hardware : 12 CPU, 24 GB RAM
For testing during PSR I am using a smaller subset of the actual data that I
want to work with. D
Philip,
I cannot answer your question, but I do have a question for you. Does
aggregation happen at the primary shard ? For eg : if I have three JVMs
JVM 1 : My application powered by Solr
JVM 2 : Shard 1
JVM 3 : Shard 2
I initialize my SolrServer like this
SolrServer _solrServer = *new* CommonsHt
the
request is first sent to the server (with which SolrServer is initialized)
and from there it is sent to all the other shards ?
Regards
Rahul
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Rahul R wrote:
&g
Shalin, thank you for the clarification.
Philip, I just realized that I have diverted the original topic of the
thread. My apologies.
Regards
Rahul
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Rahul
ng with the JVM here. :)
>
> Try jmap -histo:live PID-HERE | less and see what's using your memory.
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext is hiring -- http://sematext.com/about/jobs.html?mls
> Lucene, Solr, Nutch, Katta, Hadoop, HBase, UIMA, NLP, NER, IR
>
>
>
> -
s a try and see how it goes. Thanks for your input.
Rahul
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Gunnar Wagenknecht
wrote:
> Rahul R schrieb:
> > I tried using a profiling tool - Yourkit. The trial version was free for
> 15
> > days. But I couldn't find anything of significanc
t least!)
>
>
> I didn't notice any memory leaks after I started to use 16Gb RAM for SOLR
> instance (almost a year without any restart!)
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rahul R [mailto:rahul.s...@gmail.com]
> Sent: August-13-09 1:25 AM
> To: solr-u
l catches "Throwable":
>
>} catch (Throwable e) {
> SolrException.log(log,e);
> sendErr(500, SolrException.toStr(e), request, response);
>} finally {
>
>
>
>
>
> Rahul R wrote:
> >
> > Otis,
> > Thank you for your response. I k
elds are empty for most of documents...
> Applicable to non-tokenized single-valued non-boolean fields only, Lucene
> internals, FieldCache... and it won't be GC-collected after user log-off...
> prefer dedicated box for SOLR.
>
> -Fuad
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From
Hello,
Can somebody give me some pointers on the Solr objects I need to clean
up/release while doing a logout on a Solr Application. I find that only the
SolrCore object has a close() method. I typically do a lot of faceting
queries on a large dataset with my application. I am using Solr 1.3.0.
Re
n one of many users (of
> another
> >> application) logs off?
> >>
> >> Usually one needs to clean up only user-session specific objects (such
> as
> >> non-persistent shopping cart)...
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
>
*"release any SOLR resources" - no need.*
My query is answered. Thank you.
Regards
Rahul
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
> Truly correct:
>
> - SOLR does not create HttpSession for user access to Admin screens (do we
> have any other screens of UI?)
> - SolrCore is shared
Hello,
I am trying to measure the benefit that I am getting out of using the filter
cache. As I understand, there are two major parts to an fq query. Please
correct me if I am wrong :
- doing full index queries of each of the fq params (if filter cache is
used, this result will be retrieved from th
Thank you Martijn.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Martijn v Groningen <
martijn.is.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
>
> Yes you are understanding is correct, but it is not possible to
> monitor these actions separately with Solr.
>
> Martijn
>
> 2009/9/1 Rahul R
Hello,
I have a few questions regarding the copyField directive in schema.xml
1. Does the destination field store a reference or the actual data ?
If I have soemthing like this
then will the values in the 'name' field get copied into the 'text' field or
will the 'text' field only store a referenc
Would appreciate any help on this. Thanks
Rahul
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Rahul R wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a few questions regarding the copyField directive in schema.xml
>
> 1. Does the destination field store a reference or the actual data ?
> If I have soemthing like
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Rahul R wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I have a few questions regarding the copyField directive in schema.xml
> >
> > 1. Does the destination field store
Thank you Shalin.
Regards
Rahul
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Rahul R wrote:
>
> > Shalin,
> > Can you please elaborate a little more on the third response
> > *You
Hello,
A rather trivial question on omitNorms parameter in schema.xml. The
out-of-the-box schema.xml uses this parameter during both within
the tag and tag and If we define the omitNorms during
the fieldType definition, will it hold good for all fields that are defined
using the same fieldType.
Hello,
I am trying to measure why some of my queries take a long time. I am using
EmbeddedSolrServer and with logging statements before and
after the EmbeddedSolrServer.query(SolrQuery) function, I have found the
time to be around 16s. I added the debugQuery=true and the timing component
for this r
documents are you retrieving? Reading stored fields for
> documents can be slow if they aren't cached by the OS since it's often
> a disk seek per document read for a large index.
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 3:41
878&facet.field=S9156&facet.field=S0369&facet.field=S9926&facet.field=S1421&facet.field=S8990&facet.field=S6881&facet.field=S3552&debugQuery=true
Other information
Solr 1.3, JDK 1.5.0_14
regards
Rahul
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Mon,
can look to improve accordingly. Thank you.
Regards
Rahul
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Rahul R wrote:
> Sorry for the delayed response
> **
> *How big are your documents?*
> I have totally 1 million documents. I have totally 1950 fields in the
> index. Every document woul
Hello,
In our application we have a catch-all field (the 'text' field) which is
cofigured as the default search field. Now this field will have a
combination of numbers, alphabets, special characters etc. I have a
requirement wherein the WordDelimiterFilterFactory does not work on numbers,
especial
Hello,
Would really appreciate any inputs/suggestions on this. Thank you.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Rahul R wrote:
> Hello,
> In our application we have a catch-all field (the 'text' field) which is
> cofigured as the default search field. Now this field will have
rds to "0", the way term texts are created
for ".355" does not change.
Thank you for your time.
Regards
Rahul
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
>
> On 11/26/2009 at 12:53 AM, Rahul R wrote:
> > Is there a way by which I can
Hello all,
I have a few questions w.r.t the caches and the IndexSearcher available in
solr. I am using solr 1.3.
- The solr wiki states that the caches are per IndexSearcher object i.e if I
set my filterCache size to 1000 it means that 1000 entries can be assigned
for every IndexSearcher object. Is
Mitch,
Thank you for your response. A few follow up questions for clarification :
<>
In my case, I have an index which will not be modified after creation. Does
this mean that in a multi-user scenario, I can have a static IndexSearcher
object that can be shared by multiple users ?
<>
If the Index
<>
I have an application deployed on an application server (Weblogic). This
application uses solr to query an index. Users (sessions) will log in to the
application, query and then log out. This login and logout has nothing to do
with solr but the application manages them separately. I am using
Emb
Thank you I found the API to get the existing SolrIndexSearcher to be
present in SolrCore:
SolrCore.getSearcher().get()
So if now the Index changes (a commit is done) in between, will I
automatically get the new SolrIndexSearcher from this call ?
Regards
Rahul
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:25
Chris,
I am using SolrIndexSearcher to get a handle to the total number of records
in the index. I am doing it like this :
int num =
Integer.parseInt((String)solrSearcher.getStatistics().get("numDocs").toString());
Please let me know if there is a better way to do this.
Mark,
I can tell you what I
48 matches
Mail list logo
