We are using 1.3.0. Thanks for the suggestion. Will see if I can try one of the ngihtly builds.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Erik Hatcher <[email protected]>wrote: > What version of Solr? Try a nightly build if you're at Solr 1.3 or > earlier and you'll be amazed at the difference. > > Erik > > > On Jul 31, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Rahul R wrote: > > In a production environment, having the caches enabled makes a lot of >> sense. >> And most definitely we will be enabling them. However, the primary idea of >> this exercise is to verify if limiting the number of facets will actually >> improve the performance. >> >> An update on this. I did verify and looks like although I set >> indexed=false >> for most of the properties, I have not blocked them from participating in >> the query. I now enabled only 7 properties for faceting. Now at any given >> time only a maximum of 7 facets will participate in the query. Performance >> has now improved from an erstwhile 60 seconds to around 10 seconds. >> >> This really helped. Thanks a lot ! >> >> Regards >> Rahul >> >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Erik Hatcher <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> >>> On Jul 31, 2009, at 7:17 AM, Rahul R wrote: >>> >>> Erik, >>> >>>> I understand that caching is going to improve performance. Infact we did >>>> a >>>> PSR run with caches enabled and we got awesome results. But these >>>> wouldn't >>>> be really representative because the PSR scripts will be doing the same >>>> searches again and again. These would be cached and there would be >>>> virtually >>>> no evictions. This is not a practical case. >>>> >>>> >>> I don't understand how this is not practical. Why wouldn't having the >>> caches warmed and filled with the facets be practical for your needs? >>> >>> Erik >>> >>> >>> >
