Have a look:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2271600/elasticsearch-sphinx-lucene-solr-xapian-which-fits-for-which-usage
http://karussell.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/elasticsearch-vs-solr-lucene/
Regards,
Peter.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-vs
ays
(performace, accesibility, way of good programming, using the whole
features of lucene - like tagging, facetting and so on...)
We are thankful of every suggestions :)
Thanks,
Peter
, correct?
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> There is no HA with a single replica for each shard. Replication factor
> must be at least 2 for HA.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Peter Tan wrote:
>
> > Hi Jack, What hap
ookeeper nodes, then yes, you should
> have HA.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015, at 05:48 PM, Peter Tan wrote:
> > Hi Jack,
> >
> > Appreciate you helping me to clear this up.
> >
> > For replicationFactor = 1, that means only keeping one copy of
int, since I have not seen any
documentation nor configuration settings for this feature, I am ready to take
it as truth that Solr does NOT include this functionality. However, I thought I
should ask the mailing list to see if I've missed something.
Thank you!
Peter S. Lee, Software Enginee
first time Apache makes
the slightest change to the structure of the spell check index.
If anyone has any insights to offer I'd appreciate it.
Thanks.
Peter S. Lee
izing
Solr to receive credentials and use them for authentication to remote
instances - SOLR-1861 is an old implementation for a previous release, and
there has been some significant refactoring of SearchHandler since then,
but the concept works well for distributed queries.
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Ju
Try adding the "start" call in your jetty.xml:
Realm Name
/etc/realm.properties
5
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:53 PM, O. Klein wrote:
> Yeah I can't get it to work on Jetty 9 either on Linux.
>
> Just trying to password protect the admin pages.
>
>
nt in webdefault.xml - this tells jetty which apps are using
which realms:
A web application name
/*
default-role
Your realm.properties should then have user account entries for the role
similar to:
admin: some-cred, default-role
Hope this helps,
Peter
O
ies file as described in:
http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/9.2.7.v20150116/configuring-logging.html
.
A 404 would suggest that Solr hasn't loaded, possibly due to missing
mappings in the xml. You can run netstat -a on your Windows box to see if
Solr is listening on port 8983.
Thanks,
P
>From my reading of the solr docs (e.g.
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Collapse+and+Expand+Results
>and https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Result+Grouping), I've
>been under the impression that these two methods (result grouping and
>collapsing query parser) can
he same shard. The typical approach for this is to use
> composite Id routing to ensure that documents with the same collapse
> field land on the same shard.
>
> We should make this clear in the documentation.
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
> On Mon,
e values for
'users' are in which group. If the number of doc hits is very large (can
easily be in the 100's of thousands) it's not practical to iterate through
the docs looking for unique values.
This Use Case necessitates the unique values within each group, rather than
the total doc hits.
Is this possible with grouping, or inconjunction with another module?
Many thanks,
+Peter
e values for
'users' are in which group. If the number of doc hits is very large (can
easily be in the 100's of thousands) it's not practical to iterate through
the docs looking for unique values.
This Use Case necessitates the unique values within each group, rather than
the total doc hits.
Is this possible with grouping, or inconjunction with another module?
Many thanks,
+Peter
Hi,
Thanks for your response.
I did have a look at pivots, and they could work in a way. We're still on
Solr 4.3, so I'll have to wait for sub-facets - but they sure look pretty
cool!
Peter
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Alessandro Benedetti <
benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> w
ould be
an impediment to nested facets, but I don't know enough about them to know
for sure.
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Alessandro Benedetti <
benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> wrote:
> mmm let's say that nested facets are a subset of Pivot Facets.
> if pivot face
Great - can't wait to try this out! Many thanks for your help on pointing
me towards this new faceting feature.
Thanks,
Peter
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Alessandro Benedetti <
benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It will not be an impediment, if you have a flat docume
Hi Jack, What happens when there is only one replica setup?
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> Solr Cloud provides HA when you configure at least two replicas for each
> shard and have at least 3 zookeepers. That's it. No deck or detail document
> is needed.
>
>
>
> -- Jack
eads obviously to
Invalid path string
\"/configs/newspapers//netapp/dokubase/seeval/dicts/stopwords/stopwords_de.txt\"
caused by empty node name specified @20"
Is there any way to prevent Zookeeper from doing so?
Thanks in advance,
best regards
Peter
I've got an exception below running
curl --data-urlencode
'expr=search(EventsAndDCF,q="*:*",fl="AccessPath",sort="AccessPath
asc",qt="/export")' "http://localhost:8983/solr/EventsAndDCF/stream";
Solr responce:
{"result-set":{"docs":[
{"EXCEPTION":null,"EOF":true}]}}
My collection EventsAndDCF exi
seems solr tries to use the datasource named "web" (the BinURLDataSource)
instead of the configured "db" datasource (the JdbcDataSource). am I doing
something wrong, or is this a bug ?
--
CUL8R, Peter.
www.desk.nl
Your excuse is: Communist revolutionaries taking over the ser
t seem to matter,
but now it certainly does. thx :)
--
CUL8R, Peter.
www.desk.nl
Your excuse is: It is a layer 8 problem
I need to improve user experience on facets calculation.
Let’s assume we’ve got a time partitioned collections.
Partition1, Partition2, Partition3 …..
AliasAllPartitions unify all partitions together.
Running facets on AliasAllPartitions is very heavy synchronous operation,
user have to wait a lot
document has a field
"price_owner_float" then use that, otherwise use the field
"price_customer_float").
This gives a syntax error:
fq=if(exists(price_owner_float),price_owner_float,price_customer_float):[100 TO
200]
Thanks,
Peter
like Solr, it's easier to
accidentally 'let it run free'. If you're using Solr for db rather than
search, you will need a secure front-end.
Joy and good will to all, regardless of what tool you choose!
Peter
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Walter Underwood
wrote:
> I read t
hen I ingest data I don't see data appearing on the follower in the log.
It really seems like the data isn't being sent from the leader. As I said it
could easily be something stupid that I've done along the way but I can't see
what it is.
Thanks again,
Peter.
-Original
s far as I know you've been able to have different similarities per field in
solr for a while now. https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Similarity
Cheers,
Peter Lancaster.
-Original Message-
From: Webster Homer [mailto:webster.ho...@sial.com]
Sent: 08 August 2017 20:39
To:
I am looking for lessons learned or problems seen when building a Solr index
from AEM using a Solr cluster with content passing through an ELB.
Our configuration is AEM 6.1 indexing to a cluster of Solr servers running
version 4.7.1. When building an index with a smaller data set - 4 million
it
quot;field2" then use "field2:[1 TO 100];
but if there is no "field2", then use "field3:[1 TO 100].
Something like:
?q=*:*&fq=if(exists(field1),field1:[1 TO 100],if(exists(field2),field2:[1 TO
100], field3:[1 TO 100]))
But is this does not work.
Is it even possible?
Thanks,
Peter
heers,
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: ruby [mailto:rshoss...@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 November 2017 19:29
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Phrase suggester - field limit and order
I'm using the BlendedInfixLookupFactory to get phrase suggestions. It returns
the entire field content.
Hi Ruby,
The documentation says that threshold is available for the
HighFrequencyDictionaryFactory implementation. Since you're using
DocumentDictionaryFactory I guess it will be ignored.
Cheers,
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: ruby [mailto:rshoss...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 November
Hi,
We'be been using JPRofiler (www.ej-technologies.com) for years now.
Without a doubt, the most comprehensive and useful profiler for java.
Works very well, supports remote profiling and includes some very neat heap
walking/gc profiling.
Peter
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Walter Unde
hi all:
I was using solr 3.6 and tried to solve a recall-problem today , but
encountered a weird problem.
There's doc with field value : 均匀肤色, (just treated that word as a symbol
if you don't know it, I just want to describe the problem as exact as
possible).
And below was the analysis
Hi Joel,
Although I solved this issue with a custom CollectorFactory, I also have a
solution that uses a PostFilter and and optional ValueSource.
Could you take a look at SOLR-5831 and see if I've got this right?
Thanks,
Peter
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
&g
D%20\(E%20%26amp%3B%20F\)
(where I try to escape the special characters) does not find the products in
this category, and actually finds other unrelated categories.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Peter
gs - could be an idea to strip
out the "special characters".
I'm working on the search side of things.
/Peter
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: 8. april 2014 16:15
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Ahmet Arslan
Subject: Re: Solr sp
there a way to change this behavior?
2. If instead, the commits were done in parallel by a separate client via a
GET to each Solr instance, how would this client get the host/port values
for each Solr instance from zookeeper? Are there any downsides to doing
commits this way?
Thanks,
Peter
Are distributed commits also done in parallel across shards?
Peter
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Inline responses below.
> --
> Mark Miller
> about.me/markrmiller
>
> On April 15, 2014 at 2:12:31 PM, Peter Keegan (peterlkee...@gmail.com)
> wrote:
&
>Are distributed commits also done in parallel across shards?
I meant 'sequentially' across shards.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Peter Keegan wrote:
> Are distributed commits also done in parallel across shards?
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:50 PM,
Hello,
i am trying to import data from my db into solr.
in db i have two tables
- orders [order_id, user_id, created_at, store]
- order_items [order_id, item_id] (one - to - many relation )
i would like to import this into my solr collection
- orders [user_id (unique), item_id (multivalue) ]
i s
se where a timeout value needs to be increased
somewhere? If so, which one?
Thanks,
Peter
removing the extra ResultContext a
reasonable solution to this problem? It just seems a little brittle to me.
Thanks,
Peter
the
replication begins, while the index files are being copied, I am able to
query the index on the replica and see q=*:* find all of the documents.
But, from the core admin screen, numDocs = 0, and in the cloud screen the
replica is in 'recovering' mode. How can this be?
Peter
index copy,
which doesn't seem right. I'll have to figure out why it does this before
the replica is really active.
Peter
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> I don’t know offhand about the num docs issue - are you doing NRT?
>
> As far as being able to query the
see if the
logical shard is active, not the specific 'this' replica, which is in
'recovering' state. I'll post a patch once I figure out the zookeeper api.
Thanks,
Peter
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:03 PM, wrdrvr wrote:
> Try querying the recovering core with distrib=false, y
teria is
'score desc, myfield asc', I would expect 'myfield' to break score ties
from the second pass after rescoring.
Is this a bug or the intended behavior?
Thanks,
Peter
n
> AND
> and using the original sort?
>
> At the end, you have your original list in it's original order, with
> (potentially) some
> documents removed that don't satisfy the secondary query.
>
> Or I'm missing the boat entirely.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
oking to reimplement the ScaleScoreQParser PostFilter
plugin with RankQuery, and would need to implement the behavior of the
DelegateCollector there for handling multiple sort fields.
Peter
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> The ReRankingQParserPlugin uses the Lucene QueryRescorer,
ticed this? It
seems like a bug to me. (yes, I do have firstSearcher and newSearcher event
listeners in solrconfig.xml)
Peter
I entered SOLR-6326 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6326>
thanks,
Peter
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> It seems like a bug to me, too. Please file a JIRA ticket if you can
> so that someone can take it.
>
> Koji
> -
update a dummy document during each commit interval to
force a new searcher.
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Providing SOLR-6326 is about a bug in ExternalFileFieldReloader, I'm asking
> here:
>
>
> Guido.
>
>
> On 11/10/13 15:48, Peter Schmidt wrote:
>
>> no it is 64bit and just a development VM. In production the solr will use
>> multicore, also 64bit and some gb ram.
>>
>>
>> 2013/10/11 Guido Medina
>>
>> If your single core i
It is necessary to configure the update-alternatives for Oracle Java JDK 7.
Afterwards i can use the -server flag
2013/10/14 Peter Schmidt
> I downloaded the Linux 64bit version jdk-7u40-linux-x64.tar.gz
>
>
> 2013/10/11 Guido Medina
>
>> Then I think you downloaded th
But the flag is not listed under the Dashboard->Args in Solr Admin
Interface.
2013/10/14 Peter Schmidt
> It is necessary to configure the update-alternatives for Oracle Java JDK
> 7. Afterwards i can use the -server flag
>
>
> 2013/10/14 Peter Schmidt
>
>> I downloa
But it's used, it's in the JAVA_OPTIONS listet by service jetty check
2013/10/14 Peter Schmidt
> But the flag is not listed under the Dashboard->Args in Solr Admin
> Interface.
>
>
> 2013/10/14 Peter Schmidt
>
>> It is necessary to configure the update-
arihinde Michael Sokolov <
> msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> adlı kullanıcı şöyle yazdı:
> > On 10/8/13 6:51 PM, Peter Keegan wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there a way to configure Solr 'defaults/appends/invariants' such that
> >> the product of the 'st
Have you tried this old trick to warm the FS cache?
cat ...//data/index/* >/dev/null
Peter
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:31 AM, michael.boom wrote:
> Thank you, Otis!
>
> I've integrated the SPM on my Solr instances and now I have access to
> monitoring data.
> Could yo
I found this warming to be especially necessary after starting an instance
of those m3.xlarge servers, else the response times for the first minutes
was terrible.
Peter
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:39 AM, François Schiettecatte <
fschietteca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To put the file data
line 1, column 58. Was expecting one of: "TO" ...
... ...
Can I not use { or } in an fq?
Thanks,
Peter
Sorry, that was just a typo.
/ search?q=*:*&fq=catid:{123}
Gives me the error.
I think that { and } must be used in ranges for fq, and that's why I can't use
them directly like this.
/Peter
-Original Message-
From: Upayavira [mailto:u...@odoko.co.uk]
Sent: 23. okto
ash or enclose the entire term in quotes:
catid:\{123\}
catid:"{123}"
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Peter Kirk
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:57 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: fq with { or } in Solr 4.3.1
Sorry, that was just a typo.
/ s
down live:true
(repeats every minute)
Is it valid to simply delete the 'data' directory, or does a znode have to
be modified, too?
What's the right way to reinitialize and re-synch a core?
Peter
using the scale function seems to work, but you have to use
fq to eliminate results with score=0. It seems this is somewhat expensive,
since the scaling can't be done until all results have been collected to
get the max score. Then, are the results resorted? I haven't looked
closely, yet.
I've done this by adding an attribute to the entity element (e.g.
myconfig="myconfig.xml"), and reading it in the 'init' method with
context.getResolvedEntityAttribute("myconfig").
Peter
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Ramesh wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
>
Why does this function query return docs that don't match the embedded
query?
select?qq=text:news&q={!func}sum(query($qq),0)
7, 2013, at 7:26 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> > Function queries score (all) documents, but don't filter them. All
> documents effectively match a function query.
> >
> > Erik
> >
> > On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Peter Keegan wrote:
> >
> >> Why does this function query return docs that don't match the embedded
> >> query?
> >> select?qq=text:news&q={!func}sum(query($qq),0)
> >
>
>
func}sum(product(0.75,$scaledQ),product(0.25,field(myfield)))&fq=$qq
What is the proper syntax?
Thanks,
Peter
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Peter Keegan wrote:
> I'm trying to used a normalized score in a query as I described in a
> recent thread titled "Re: How to get
Thanks
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Peter Keegan
> wrote:
> > fq=$qq
> >
> > What is the proper syntax?
>
> fq={!query v=$qq}
>
> -Yonik
> http://heliosearch.com -- making solr shine
>
field(myfield)))&fq={!query v=$qq}
Is there any way to speed this up? Would writing a custom function query
that compiled all the function queries together be any faster?
Thanks,
Peter
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Peter Keegan wrote:
> Thanks
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at
anQuery$BooleanWeight cannot be cast to
org.apache.lucene.queries.function.valuesource.ScaleFloatFunction$ScaleInfo
thanks,
peter
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : So, this query does just what I want, but it's typically 3 times slower
> : than the ed
Instead of using a function query, could I use the edismax query (plus some
low cost filters not shown in the example) and implement the
scale/sum/product computation in a PostFilter? Is the query's maxScore
available there?
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Peter Keegan
advice?
Thanks,
Peter
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Peter Keegan wrote:
> Instead of using a function query, could I use the edismax query (plus
> some low cost filters not shown in the example) and implement the
> scale/sum/product computation in a PostFilter? Is the query'
ad and
> thus the invalid case exception occurs. The NoOp multiplication works
> because it puts an "different" ValueSource between the query and the
> ScaleFloatFunction such that this.source (in ScaleFloatFunction) != this
> (in QueryValueSource).
>
> This should be
In my previous posting, I said:
"Subsequent calls to ScaleFloatFuntion.getValues bypassed
'createScaleInfo and added ~0 time."
These subsequent calls are for the remaining segments in the index reader
(21 segments).
Peter
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Peter Keegan wr
this patch is no longer in dev.
Is there any other dev. being done on adding custom sorting (after
collection) via a plugin?
Thanks,
Peter
>But for your specific goal Peter: Yes, if the whole point of a function
>you have is to wrap generated a "scaled" score of your base $qq, ...
Thanks for the confirmation, Chris. So, to do this efficiently, I think I
need to implement a custom Collector that performs the sc
g the main dismax query.
As you mention, it is a slightly intrusive design and requires that I
manage my own PriorityQueue (and a local duplicate of HitQueue), but should
work. I think a better design would hide the PQ from the plugin.
Thanks,
Peter
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Joel Bernstein wr
Quick question:
In the context of a custom collector, how does one get the values of a
field of type 'ExternalFileField'?
Thanks,
Peter
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Peter Keegan wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> This is related to another thread on function query matching (
> h
x27; needs a QParser, which isn't available.
And I can't create a QParser without a SolrQueryRequest, which isn't
available.
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> Peter,
>
> It sounds like you could achieve what you want to do in a PostFi
ield eff = (ExternalFileField)field.getType();
fieldValues = eff.getFileFloatSource(field, dataDir);
And then read the values in 'setNextReader'
Peter
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Peter Keegan wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> I thought about using a PostFilter, but the problem is that the 'scal
This is what I was looking for, but the DelegatingCollector 'finish' method
doesn't exist in 4.3.0 :( Can this be patched in and are there any other
PostFilter dependencies on 4.5?
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> Here is one ap
Thanks very much for the guidance. I'd be happy to donate a working
solution.
Peter
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> SOLR-5020 has the commit info, it's mainly changes to SolrIndexSearcher I
> believe. They might apply to 4.3.
> I think as long
Regarding my original goal, which is to perform a math function using the
scaled score and a field value, and sort on the result, how does this fit
in? Must I implement another custom PostFilter with a higher cost than the
scale PostFilter?
Thanks,
Peter
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Peter
es is
excellent (will have to see how it compares to your outlined solution).
Thanks,
Peter
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> The sorting is going to happen in the lower level collectors. You need a
> value source that returns the score of the document being collecte
ay to
get this precomputed value or do I have to duplicate the logic from
SolrIndexSearcher?
Thanks,
Peter
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> Thanks, I agree this powerful stuff. One of the reasons that I haven't
> gotten back to pluggable collectors is that
,
Peter
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Peter Keegan wrote:
> In order to size the PriorityQueue, the result window size for the query
> is needed. This has been computed in the SolrIndexSearcher and available
> in: QueryCommand.getSupersetMaxDoc(), but doesn't seem to be avail
es",Map ?
Also, what is the reason for passing score=0 for documents that aren't in
the PriorityQueue? Will these docs get filtered out before a normal sort by
score?
Thanks,
Peter
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> The sorting is going to happen in the lowe
In my case, the final function call looks something like this:
sum(product($k1,score()),product($k2,field(x)))
This means that all the scores would have to scaled and passed down, not
just the top N because even a low score could be offset by a high value in
'field(x)'.
Thanks,
Pete
Is there a simple way to output the result number (ordinal) with each
returned document using the 'fl' parameter? This would be useful when
visually comparing the results from 2 queries.
Thanks,
Peter
returned in the same order as specified in the 'fl'
parameter. Can the order be overridden?
Thanks,
Peter
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Or just use the internal document ID: fl=*,[docid]
>
> Granted, the docID may change if a segment merge
: The bottom line for Peter is still the same: using scale() wrapped arround
: a function/query does involve a computing hte results for every document,
: and that is going to scale linearly as the size of hte index grows -- but
: it it is *only* because of the scale function.
Another problem
There's also: http://www.tanukisoftware.com/
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Nazik Huq wrote:
>
>
> From your email I gather your main concern is starting zookeeper on server
> startups.
>
> You may want to look at these non-native service oriented options too:
> Create a script( cmd or bat)
How do you disable leading wildcards in 4.X? The setAllowLeadingWildcard
method is there in the parser, but nothing references the getter. Also, the
Edismax parser always enables it and provides no way to override.
Thanks,
Peter
Removing ReversedWildcardFilterFactory had no effect.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Can you remove any occurrence of ReversedWildcardFilterFactory in
> schema.xml? (even if you don't use it)
>
> Ahmet
>
>
>
> On Frid
e the
default behavior. Is there a way to override the IndexWriter rollback?
Thanks,
Peter
I created SOLR-5630.
Although WildcardQuery is much much faster now with AutomatonQuery, it can
still result in slow queries when used in multiple keywords. From my
testing, I think I will need to disable all WildcardQuerys and only allow
PrefixQuery.
Peter
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 4:17 AM
it a
bit harder to detect the failure via the admin interface.
Thanks,
Peter
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Peter Keegan wrote:
> I have a custom data import handler that creates an ExternalFileField from
> a source that is different from the main index. If the import fails (in m
also
occur in the 'init' call, so exceptions have to be caught there, too.
Thanks,
Peter
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can you try using onError=skip on your entities which use this data source?
>
> It'
Hmm, this does get a bit complicated, and I'm not even doing any writes
with the DIH SolrWriter. In retrospect, using a DIH to create only EFFs
doesn't buy much except for the integration into the Solr Admin UI. Thanks
for the pointer to 3671, James.
Peter
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 a
I'm indexing data with a SolrJ client via SolrServer. Currently, I parse
the schema returned from a HttpGet on:
localhost:8983/solr/collection/schema/fields
What is the recommended way to read the schema with CloudSolrServer? Can it
be done with a single HttpGet to a ZK server?
Thanks,
Peter
1 - 100 of 879 matches
Mail list logo
