Great - can't wait to try this out! Many thanks for your help on pointing me towards this new faceting feature. Thanks, Peter
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Alessandro Benedetti < benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> wrote: > It will not be an impediment, if you have a flat document with single > valued field interested, you can use Pivot Facets and apply stats over the > facets as well. > Take a look to the modern Json faceting approach Yonik introduced. > Since I start using it I strongly recommend it, it's amazingly clear to > define your faceting structure, store it in a file in Json and use it at > query time ! > > I am a strong supporter of this approach, it is young but already powerful. > Pretty sure it will help you. > > Cheers > > [1] http://yonik.com/json-facet-api/ > [2] http://yonik.com/solr-facet-functions/ > [3] http://yonik.com/solr-subfacets/ > > On 14 October 2015 at 22:12, Peter Sturge <peter.stu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yes, you are right about that - I've used pivots before and they do need > to > > be used judiciously. > > Fortunately, we only ever use single-value fields, as it gives some good > > advantages in a heavily sharded environment. > > Our document structure is, by it's very nature always flat, so it could > be > > an impediment to nested facets, but I don't know enough about them to > know > > for sure. > > Thanks, > > Peter > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Alessandro Benedetti < > > benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > mmm let's say that nested facets are a subset of Pivot Facets. > > > if pivot faceting works with the classic flat document structure, the > sub > > > facet are working with any nested structure. > > > So be careful about pivot faceting in a flat document with multi valued > > > fields, because you lose the relation across the different fields > value. > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > On 13 October 2015 at 18:06, Peter Sturge <peter.stu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for your response. > > > > I did have a look at pivots, and they could work in a way. We're > still > > on > > > > Solr 4.3, so I'll have to wait for sub-facets - but they sure look > > pretty > > > > cool! > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Alessandro Benedetti < > > > > benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Can you model your business domain with Solr nested Docs ? In the > > case > > > > you > > > > > can use Yonik article about nested facets. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > On 13 October 2015 at 05:05, Alexandre Rafalovitch < > > arafa...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Could you use the new nested facets syntax? > > > > > > http://yonik.com/solr-subfacets/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Alex. > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter: > > > > > > http://www.solr-start.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11 October 2015 at 09:51, Peter Sturge < > peter.stu...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Been trying to coerce Group faceting to give some faceting back > > for > > > > > each > > > > > > > group, but maybe this use case isn't catered for in Grouping? : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So the Use Case is this: > > > > > > > Let's say I do a grouped search that returns say, 9 distinct > > > groups, > > > > > and > > > > > > in > > > > > > > these groups are various numbers of unique field values that > need > > > > > > faceting > > > > > > > - but the faceting needs to be within each group: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > -------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > Benedetti Alessandro > > > > > Visiting card - http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti > > > > > Blog - http://alexbenedetti.blogspot.co.uk > > > > > > > > > > "Tyger, tyger burning bright > > > > > In the forests of the night, > > > > > What immortal hand or eye > > > > > Could frame thy fearful symmetry?" > > > > > > > > > > William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > -------------------------- > > > > > > Benedetti Alessandro > > > Visiting card - http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti > > > Blog - http://alexbenedetti.blogspot.co.uk > > > > > > "Tyger, tyger burning bright > > > In the forests of the night, > > > What immortal hand or eye > > > Could frame thy fearful symmetry?" > > > > > > William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England > > > > > > > > > -- > -------------------------- > > Benedetti Alessandro > Visiting card - http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti > Blog - http://alexbenedetti.blogspot.co.uk > > "Tyger, tyger burning bright > In the forests of the night, > What immortal hand or eye > Could frame thy fearful symmetry?" > > William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England >
