On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:15:44 -0700
"Robert Petersen" wrote:
> Thanks all, I figured there would be more talk about daemontools if there
> were really a need. I appreciate the input and for starters we'll put two
> slaves behind a load balancer and grow it from there.
>
Robert,
not taking away f
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:20:37 -0400
Joel Nylund wrote:
> Well I tried removing those 2 letters from stopwords, didnt seem to
> help, I also tried changing the field type to "text_ws", didnt seem to
> work. Any other ideas?
Hi Joel,
if your stop word filter was applied on index, you will have
hi there,
my use case : I want to be able to match documents when only a partial word is
provided. ie, searching for 'roc' or 'ock' should match documents containing
'rock'.
As I understand, the way to solve this problem is to use the nGram tokenizer @
index time and the nGram analyser @ sear
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:23:55 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi there,
> my use case : I want to be able to match documents when only a partial word
> is provided. ie, searching for 'roc' or 'ock' should match documents
> containing &#
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> When you add &debugQuery=true to the request, what does your query look like
> after parsing?
Hi Otis,
sorry, i should have sent this before too.
With minGramSize = 3 , same data, clean server star
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:23:14 -0700
Jon Drukman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok well let's say that i can live without john/jon in the short term.
> what i really need today is a case insensitive wildcard search with
> literal matching (no fancy stemming. bobby is bobby, not bobbi.)
>
> what ar
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> When you add &debugQuery=true to the request, what does your query look like
> after parsing?
>
>
BTW, I've tested same data + similar config using EdgeNGramTokenizer and this
works properly -
Hi all,
I'm curious , what is the cost (memory / processing time @ load? performance
hit ? ) of having several unused fieldTypes defined in schema.xml ?
cheers,
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Egotism is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of stupidity."
Frank Leahy
hi all,
( I'm using 1.3 nightly build from 15th June 08.)
Is there some documentation about how analysers + tokenizers are applied in
fields ? In particular, my question :
- If I define 2 tokenizers in a fieldtype, only the first one is applied, the
other is ignored. Is that because the 2nd tok
hi everyone,
if I define a field as
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:14:57 -0700
Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> best docs are here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
yes, I've been reading that already , thanks :)
>
> > - If I define 2 tokenizers in a fieldtype, only the first one is
> > applied, t
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 04:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One tokenizer is followed by filters. I think this all might be a bit
> clearer if you read the chapter about Analyzers in Lucene in Action if you
> have a copy. I think if you try to break down that "the re
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:10:58 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
> Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > When you add &debugQuery=true to the request, what
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:04:24 +0100
Dave Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the moment I have an index of forum messages (each message being a
> separate doc). Results are displayed on a per message basis, however, I would
> like to group the results via their thread. Apart from using a facet
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:34:44 +0100
Dave Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am currently storing the thread id within the message index, however,
> although this would allow me to sort, it doesn't help with the grouping of
> threads based on relevancy. See the idea is to index message data in
hi,
I'm trying to understand why a search on a field tokenized with the nGram
tokenizer, with minGramSize=n and maxGramSize=m doesn't find any matches for
queries of length (in characters) of n+1..m (n works fine).
analysis.jsp shows that it SHOULD match, but /select doesn't bring anything
back. (
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:17:58 -0700
Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also, check the LukeRequestHandler
>
> if there is a document you think *should* match, you can see what
> tokens it has actually indexed...
right, I will look into that a bit more.
I am actually using the lukeall.
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:37:35 +0200
Brian Carmalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a plugin for jetty: http://webtide.com/eclipse. Insert this as
> and update site and let eclipse install the plugin for you You can then
> start the jetty server from eclipse and debug it.
Thanks Brian, good i
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:17:58 -0700
Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also, check the LukeRequestHandler
>
> if there is a document you think *should* match, you can see what
> tokens it has actually indexed...
>
hi Ryan,
I can't see the tokens generated using LukeRequestHandler.
I c
Hi,
where can I find these sources? I have the binary jars included with the
nightly builds,but I'd like to look @ the code of some of the objects.
In particular,
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/
doesnt have any reference to 2.4, and
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/trunk/src/
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:22:06 -0400
Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note, also, that the Manifest file in the JAR has information about
> the exact SVN revision so that you can check it out from there.
>
>
> On Jun 25, 2008, at 12:37 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> > trunk is the late
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:37:09 -0300
"Jonathan Ariel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been trying to use the NGramTokenizer and I ran into a problem.
> It seems like solr is trying to match documents with all the tokens that the
> analyzer returns from the query term. So if I index a document with
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:44:32 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:37:09 -0300
> "Jonathan Ariel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've been trying to use the NGramTokenizer and I ran into a problem.
> > It s
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:15:34 -0300
"Jonathan Ariel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. Played a bit more with that.
> So I had a difference between my unit test and solr. In solr I'm actually
> using a solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory when querying. Tried to add
> that to the test, and it fai
Hi there,
Short and sweet :
Is SCRH intended to honour qt= ?
longer...
I'm testing the newest SCRH ( SOLR-572), using last night's nightly build.
I have defined a 'dismax' request handler which searches across a number of
fields. When I use the SCRH in a query, and I pass the qt=dismax param
Hi there,
I am using the an almost default, config of spellcheck component ( details @
very end of email). I have the 3 spellcheckers defined, 'default',
'jarowinkler' and 'file'.
I tried adding spellcheck.name=jarowinkler&spellcheck.build=true , and with
spellcheck.reload=true as well , but
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:44:38 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using the an almost default, config of spellcheck component ( details @
> very end of email). I have the 3 spellcheckers defined, 'default',
> 'jarowinkler' and 'fil
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:25:46 -0500 (CDT)
"Geoffrey Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> it seems like it ought to work as a component of your dismax handler. this
> works for me:
>
[]
ah i see now. cool. too bad about the crash.
I don't know what the policy is for opening bugs in JIRA...
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:25:46 -0500 (CDT)
"Geoffrey Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well *almost* - it works most excellently with q=$term but when I add
> spellchecker.q=$term things implode:
>
> HTTP Status 500 - null java.lang.NullPointerException at
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.Spel
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:40:44 -0300
"Hugo Barauna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having problems with a stored field. The problem is that field is not
> being stored as I need it to be. It has a tokenizer
> class="solr.HTMLStripWhitespaceTokenizerFactory", but when it is stored,
> that tokenize
hi there,
when defining a field type, i understand the meaning of 'analyzer type="index"'
, or type="query". What does it mean when the type is missing? does it apply at
both index and query ?
This can be found in the example's schema.xml :
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:52:33 -0400
Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, that's exactly what it means.
>
> Erik
great, thanks for the clarification.
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"A dream you dream together is reality."
John Lennon
I speak for mys
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:04:07 +0530
Jacob Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a).
> Add jetty to a group called jetty
> Somehow get jetty6 to use that group
> Create another user (solr) and add it to the group jetty
> Let it run the snapshooter
This seems the best option.
B
___
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 10:39:28 -0300
"Alexander Ramos Jardim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3. "Did you mean" feature
> 3.1. Does Solr implements that?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"And that's one reason we like to believe
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 10:20:15 -0300
"Hugo Barauna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I already haved aked this, but I didn't get any good answer, so I will try
> again. I need to pre-process a stored field before it is saved. Just like a
> field that is gonna be indexed. I would be good to apply
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 21:10:51 +0530
"Shalin Shekhar Mangar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also note that you'll need to specify spellcheck.build=true only on the
> first request when it will build the spell check index. The subsequent
> requests need not have spellcheck.build=true.
as a matter of fa
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:05:45 -0400
Willie Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the snapshooter will work fine for creating the indexes and then I
> can use the multicore capabilities to make them available to users one
> final question though, after snapshot has been created is there a w
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 08:48:35 +0530
"Shalin Shekhar Mangar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, SOLR-350 added that capability. Look at
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultiCore for details.
ahh loving SOLR more every day :P
thx
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
I used to hate
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 19:51:45 +0530
"Noble Paul _ __" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can put it into a 'string' field directly
if we refer to the default string field , you won't be able to search for the
contents of the XML (unless you search for the whole t
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:36:01 +0530
"Noble Paul _ __" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2. We're assuming we'll have thousands of users with independent data; any
> > good way to partition multiple indexes with solr? With Lucene we could
> > just save those in ind
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:55:55 -0600
"Galen Pahlke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could this perhaps be because a date field has so many possible unique
> values? I don't know how to find out exactly, but I'd guess there are
> at least a few million unique dates in the index. Would increasing the
>
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:22:35 +
sundar shankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently was looking to find details of 1.3 specific analysers and filters
> in the solr wiki and was unable to do so. Could anyone please point me to a
> place where I can find some documentation of the same.
>
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:52:35 +
sundar shankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Hoss,
> I was talking about classes like EdgeNGramFilterFactory,
> PatterReplaceFilterfactory etc. I didnt find these in the 1.2 Jar. Where do I
> find wiki for these and Specific classes introduced fo
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:25:25 +
sundar shankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks for your patient response. I dont wanna know the classes changed,
> but I wanna get a hand on the wiki page for the same. I tried to search for
> these classes in the solr wiki. I was getting a page does not
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:15:41 +0530
"Sunil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) I don't want duplicate content.
SOLR uses the field you define as the unique field to determine whether a
document should be replaced or added. The rest of the fields are in your hands.
You could devise a setup whereby the
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:48:14 +0200
Jarek Zgoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 2) I don't want to overwrite old content with new one.
> >>
> >> Means, if I add duplicate content in solr and the content already
> >> exists, the old content should not be overwritten.
> >
> > before inserting a n
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:07:43 +0530
"Preetam Rao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I say filter, I meant q=fish&fq=type:idea
btw, this *seems* to only work for me with standard search handler. dismax and
fq: dont' seem to get along nicely... but maybe, it is just late and i'm not
testing it pro
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:19:49 +
sundar shankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation mark. The reason I had it as 512 max was cos
> earlier the data file was just about 30 megs and it increased to this much
> for of the usage of EdgeNGramFactoryFilter for 2 fields. Thats gre
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
briand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have documents in SOLR such that each document contains one to many points
> (latitude and longitudes). Currently we store the multiple points for a
> given document in the db and query the db to find all of the docum
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
matt connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my site, I have a document, which may have multiple comments.
>
> For each comment, I would like to know several pieces of information, like:
> text, author, and date.
Matt,
please read the documentation abou
On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:19:45 -0300
Leonardo Dias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Everyone exhibits "your search for x has returned y results" on the top
> of the results page, but we need something else, which would be
> something like "your search for x returned y results in z records",
> being z
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 09:29:30 -0700
Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If there is a still room for new log design for Solr and the
> > community is
> > open for it then I can try to come up with some proposal. Doing logo
> > for
> > Mahout was really interesting experience.
> >
>
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 21:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Vicky_Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we get solr 1.3 release as soon as possible? Otherwise some interim
> release (1.2.x) containing DataImportHandler will also a good option.
>
> Any Thoughts?
have you tried one of the nightly builds? I've been f
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 11:43:44 -0500
"Kashyap, Raghu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Kashyap,
please don't hijack topic threads.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking
thanks!!
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Software QA is like cleaning my cat's litter box:
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:41:08 -0300
"Scott Swan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I currently have multiple documents that i would like to index but i would
> like to combine two fields to produce the unique key.
>
> the documents either have 1 or the other fields so by combining the two
> fields i w
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 18:58:42 -0300
Leonardo Dias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I'm looking for a Ferrari. CarStore says that there are 5 ads for
> Ferrari, but one ad has 2 Ferraris being sold, the other ad has 3
> Ferraris and all the others have 1 Ferrari each, meaning that there are
> 5 ad
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:02:51 -0400
Stephen Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My issue with the logos presented was they made solr look like a
> school project instead of the powerful tool that it is. The tricked
> out font or whatever just usually doesn't play well with the business
> type
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 20:21:28 -0400
"Ian Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In order to preserve case for the data, but not for indexing, I have
> created two fields. One is type Author that is defined as:
>
> sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true">
>
>
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 21:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> 2 Tokenizers?
i wondered about that too, but didn't have the time to test...
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Always listen to experts. They'll t
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 00:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
matt connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Where do I file a bug report?
https://issues.apache.org/jira
thanks!
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It just happens to be very
sele
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
SoupErman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I needed to run a search with a query containing the word "not", so I removed
> "not" from the stopwords.txt file. Which seemed to work, at least as far as
> parsing the query. It was now successfully searching for tha
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:25:34 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:41:08 -0300
> "Scott Swan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I currently have multiple documents that i would like to index but i would
> > like to c
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 06:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
Vj Ali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i also sends tag as well.
maybe you need
instead of
?
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a
good idea. It is h
Hello :)
I *think* i know the answer, but i'd like to confirm :
Say I have
1old
already indexed and commited (ie, 'live' )
What happens if I issue:
1
1new
will delete happen first, and then the add, or could it be that the add happens
before delete, in which case i end up with no more doc
hi :)
I'm trying to use SAXON instead of the default XSLT parser. I was pretty sure i
had it running fine on 1.2, but when I repeated the same steps (as per the
wiki) on latest nightly build, i cannot see any sign of it being loaded or use,
although the classpath seems to be pointing to them (see b
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:21:50 -0700
Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > will delete happen first, and then the add, or could it be that the
> > add happens before delete, in which case i end up with no more doc
> > id=1 ?
>
> As long as you are sending these requests on the same thread
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:53:12 -0400
"Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What happens if I issue:
> >
> > 1
> > 1new
> >
> >
> > will
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:44:42 -0400
"Steven A Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Solr is Unicode aware. The ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory handles diacritics
> for the ISO Latin-1 section of the Unicode character set. UTF (do you mean
> UTF-8?) is a (set of) Unicode serialization(s), and once Sol
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:26:26 -0700
"Jake Conk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) I want to search only within a specific field, for instance
> `category`. Is there a way to do this?
of course. Please see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax (in
particular, follow the link to Lucene syntax..
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:21:13 +0530
"Shalin Shekhar Mangar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The SpellCheckerRequestHandler is now deprecated with Solr 1.3 and it has
> been replaced by SpellCheckComponent.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent
which works quite well with dismax.
B
__
( 2 in 1 reply)
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:59:21 -0700
Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stripping accents doesn't quite work. The correct translation
> is language-dependent. In German, o-dieresis should turn into
> "oe", but in English, it shoulde be "o" (as in "co__perate" or
> "M__tle
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:34:47 -0400
"Steven A Rowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> The kind of filter Walter is talking about - a generalized language-aware
> character normalization Solr/Lucene filter - does not yet exist. My guess is
> that if/when it does materialize, both the Solr and th
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:36:32 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi :)
> I'm trying to use SAXON instead of the default XSLT parser. I was pretty sure
> i
> had it running fine on 1.2, but when I repeated the same steps (as per the
> wiki) on latest n
hi guys,
First of all, thanks for DIH - it's great :)
One thing I noticed during my tests ( nightly, 2008-08-16) is that, if the DB
is not available during SOLR startup time, the whole core won't initialise .-
the error is shown below.
I was wondering,
1) would it be possible to have DIH bomb o
Guys + gals,
just a question of form - would DIH itself be the right place to implement a
"URLS to call after successfully completing a DIH full or partial load" - for
example, to rebuild spellchecker when new items have been added? Or should
that be part of my external process (cron -> shell
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 20:22:26 +0530
"Shalin Shekhar Mangar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it is only SpellCheckComponent that you are interested in, then see
> SOLR-622.
>
> You can add this to your SCC config to rebuild SCC after every commit:
> true
ah great stuff , thanks Shalin.
B
Hi again,
I see in the DIH wiki page :
[...]
full-import [..]
commit: (default 'true'). Tells whether to commit+optimize after the operation
[...]
but nothing for delta-import... I think it would be useful , a 'commit'
(default=true) , 'optimize' (default=false) for the delta-import - these sh
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:14:32 +0800
"finy finy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i use solr for 3 months, and i find some question follow:
Please do not hijack mail threads.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Ask not what's inside
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:34:56 +0530
"Shalin Shekhar Mangar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually we have commit and optimize as separate request parameters
> defaulting to true for both full-import and delta-import. You can add a
> request parameter optimize=false for delta-import if you want to c
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:33:02 +0800
"finy finy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the name field is text,which is analysed, i use the query
> "name:ibmT63notebook"
why do you search with no spaces? is this free text entered by a user, or is it
part of a link which you control ?
PS: please dont top-po
hi :)
does anyone have a .wsdl definition for the example bundled with SOLR?
if nobody has it, would it be useful to have one ?
cheers,
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Intelligence: Finding an error in a Knuth text.
Stupidity: Cashing that $2.56 check you got.
I spe
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:07:19 +0800
"finy finy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> because i use chinese character, for example "ibm___"
> solr will parse it into a term "ibm" and a phraze "_ __"
> can i use solr to query with a term "ibm" and a term "_" and a term
> "__
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:08:24 -0300
"Alexander Ramos Jardim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you wanna a full web service for SOLR example? How a .wsdl will help you?
> Why don't you use the HTTP interface SOLR provides?
>
> Anyways, if you need to develop a web service (SOAP compliant) to access
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:23:48 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:08:24 -0300
> "Alexander Ramos Jardim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do you wanna a full web service for SOLR example? How a .wsdl will help you?
>
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:18:12 +1200
"Gene Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this interpreted as meaning, there are 10 documents that will match
> with 'car' in the title, and likewise 6 'boat' and 2 'bike'?
Correct.
> If so, is there any way to get counts for the *number times* a value
>
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:58:50 -0300
"Alexander Ramos Jardim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A tiny but really explanation can be found here
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
thanks Alexander - indeed, quite short, and focused on shingles ... which , if
I understand corr
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:09:11 -0700
"Jake Conk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought if I used to copy my string field to a text
> field then I can search for words within it and not limited to the
> entire content. Did I misunderstand that?
but you need to search on the fields that are defined
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:21:53 -0700
"Lance Norskog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently the ZFS (Silicon Graphics
> originally) is great for really huge files.
hi Lance,
You may be confusing Sun's ZFS with SGI's XFS. The OP referred, i think, to
ZFS.
B
_
{Beto|Nor
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:11:47 +0200
Walter Ferrara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Launching a multicore solr with dataimporthandler using a mysql driver,
> (driver="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver") works fine if the mysql connector jar
> (mysql-connector-java-5.0.7-bin.jar) is in the classpath, either jdk
> c
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:15:21 +0300
Aleksey Gogolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I'm new to solr and I need to make a search suggest (like google
> suggestions).
>
Hi Aleksey,
please search the archives of this list for subjects containing 'autocomplete'
or 'auto-suggest'. that sho
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
sanraj25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to index two different files in solr.(for ex) I want to store
> two tables like, job_post and job_profile in solr. But now both are stored
> in same place in solr.when i get data from job_post, data come from
>
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
sanraj25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But still i cant maintain two index.
> please help me how to create two cores in solr
What specific problem do you have ?
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Always listen to experts. They'll
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
sanraj25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to store two independent datas in solr index. so I decided to create
> two index.But that's not possible.so i go for multicore concept in solr
> .can u give me step by step procedure to create multicore in solr
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:17:12 +
zzh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I think this is a stupid method, because the search conditions is too
> long, and the search efficiency will be low, we hope you can help me to solve
> this problem.
Hi,
IMHO,a long set of conditions doesn't make it stupid. Yo
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:53:39 +0530
"Sanjay Suri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of my field values has the name "R__ikk__nen" which contains a special
> characters.
>
> Strangely, as I see it anyway, it matches on the search query 'x' ?
>
> Can someone explain or point me to the solution/doc
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:46:54 +0530
"Jacob Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to write a testing suite to gauge the performance of solr
> searches. To do so, I'd like to be able to find out what keywords
> will get me search results. Is there anyway to programaticaly do this
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:39:44 -0700
"Chris Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> So finally I modified the Lucene ShingleFilter class to add an
> "outputUnigramIfNoNgram option". Basically, if you set that option,
> and also set outputUnigrams=false, then the filter will tokenize just
> as in
Hello,
I've seen references to this in the list, but not completely explained...my
apologies if this is FAQ (and for the length of the email).
I am using dismax across a number of fields on an index with data about music
albums & songs - the fields are quite full of stop words. I am trying to
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:46:57 -0400
Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. You will def see a speed increasing by avoiding http (especially
> doc at a time http) and using the direct csv loader.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateCSV
and the obvious reason that if, for whatever reason,
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What happens if you change ps from 100 to 1 and comment out that ord function?
>
>
> Otis
Hi Otis,
no luck - without " " :
smashing pumpkins
smashing pumpkins
+((DisjunctionMaxQuery((genre:smash^0.2 | title
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
