I am retrieving facet counts against a specific column in my index and these
look accurate. The query for retrieving these counts is also running a dismax
search using the q param (against 4 columns in my index, 1 of which I am facet
counting on as mentioned above).
So far, so good.
Yes, by adding fq back into the main query you will get results increasingly
filtered each time.
You may run into an issue if you are displaying facet counts, as the facet part
of the query will also obey the increasingly filtered fq, and so not display
counts for other categories anymore from
Not related to the opening thread - but wante to thank Eric for his book.
Clarified a lot of stuff and very useful.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Pugh [mailto:ep...@opensourceconnections.com]
Sent: Thu 14/10/2010 15:34
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: What is the maximum numb
-Original Message-
From: Jason Brown
Sent: Tue 19/10/2010 13:45
To: d...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Dismax phrase boosts on multi-value fields
Hi - I have a multi-value field, so say for example it consists of
'my black cat'
'my white dog'
'my blue rabbit&
Hi - I have a multi-value field, so say for example it consists of
'my black cat'
'my white dog'
'my blue rabbit'
The field is whitespace parsed when put into the index.
I have a phrase query boost configured on this field which I understand kicks
in when my search term is found entirely in
in it",
then query "my blue rabbit" will also match as a phrase, for phrase
boosting or query purposes.
Jonathan
Jason Brown wrote:
>
>
> Hi - I have a multi-value field, so say for example it consists of
>
> 'my black cat'
> 'my white dog'
>
ent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 7:11 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dismax phrase boosts on multi-value fields
Well, it all depends (tm). your example wouldn't match, but if you
didn't have an increment gap greater than 1, "black cat his blue" #would#
match
I am aware of the facet.prefix facility. I am using SOLR to return a facetted
fields contents - I use the facet.prefix to restrict what returns from SOLR -
this is very useful for predictive search functionality (autocomplete).
My only issue is that the field I facet on is a string and could ha
Is it possible to filter my search results by relevance? For example, anything
below a certain value shouldn't be returned?
I also retrieve facet counts in my search queries, so it would be useful if the
facet counts also respected the filter on the relevance.
Thank You.
Jason.
If you wish to
I have 3 fields in my index that I use in a dismax query with boosts and phrase
boosts.
I've realised that 1 field I'm not really interested in at all, unless the
search term is in that field as a phrase.
Is it realistic to set the normal boost to zero for this field, but the phrase
boost to
the problem, some other suggestions may be in the offing
Best
Erick
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Jason Brown wrote:
> Is it possible to filter my search results by relevance? For example,
> anything below a certain value shouldn't be returned?
>
> I also retrieve facet c
Good Morning - I will explain my current config/fucntionality.
I have 4 fields in my index...
1) Doc Title - a text field
2) Keyword Phrase, e.g. fund manager, a text field (with some edge n gram
functionality at index time)
3) Keyword Phrase, e.g. fund manager, a string field (for facetting)
4
I have the following field type set up in my schema. The idea is to fire
phrases of text such as 'fund manager summary' (without the quotes) at it, and
for the synonym processing to recognise this, and add the rest of the synonyms
(index-time synonym processing with expansion) to the index from
ren't getting picked up. You might
be
getting fooled by seeing the stored value. Look in the admin page under
"schema
browser" to see the terms in the index, which would have the synonyms. Just
selecting the document via search will only show you the stored values which
would
NOT ha
Hi,
I use the dismax query to search across several fields.
I find I have a lot of documents with the same document name (one of the fields
that the dismax queries) so I wanted to adjust the relevance so that titles
with a newer published date have a higher relevance than documents with the
s
/DisMaxQParserPlugin#bf_.28Boost_Functions.29
Mat
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:28, Jason Brown wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I use the dismax query to search across several fields.
>
> I find I have a lot of documents with the same document name (one of the
> fields that the dismax queries) so I
al Message-----
> >From: ext Jason Brown [mailto:jason.br...@sjp.co.uk]
> >Sent: Montag, 29. November 2010 17:28
> >To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >Subject: Boost on newer documents
> >
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I use the dismax query to search across s
I have configured de-duplication according to the Wiki..
My signature field is defined thus...
and my updateRequestProcessor as follows
true
false
signature
content
org.apache.solr.update.processor.Lookup3Signature
I am using
Can anyone tell me hoe the dismax score is computed? Is it the maximum score
for any of the component fields that are searched? Thank You.
If you wish to view the St. James's Place email disclaimer, please use the link
below
http://www.sjp.co.uk/portal/internet/SJPemaildisclaimer
Hi - I have the SOLR deduplication configured and working well.
Is there any way I can tell which documents have been not added to the index as
a result of the deduplication rejecting subsequent identical documents?
Many Thanks
Jason Brown.
If you wish to view the St. James's Place
20 matches
Mail list logo
