Hi - you do understand may case - we tried what you suggested but as the relevancy is very precise we couldn't get it it to do a dual-sort.
I like the idea of using one of the dismax parameters (bf) to in-effect increase the boost on a newer document. Thanks for all replies, most useful. -----Original Message----- From: Savvas-Andreas Moysidis [mailto:savvas.andreas.moysi...@googlemail.com] Sent: Tue 30/11/2010 09:26 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Boost on newer documents hi, I might not understand your case right but can you not add an extra publishedDate field and then specify a secondary (after relevance) sort by that? On 30 November 2010 08:05, <jan.kure...@nokia.com> wrote: > You could also put a short representation of the data (I suggest days since > 01.01.2010) as payload and calculate boost with payload function of the > similarity. > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: ext Jason Brown [mailto:jason.br...@sjp.co.uk] > >Sent: Montag, 29. November 2010 17:28 > >To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > >Subject: Boost on newer documents > > > > > >Hi, > > > >I use the dismax query to search across several fields. > > > >I find I have a lot of documents with the same document name (one of the > fields that the dismax queries) so I wanted to adjust the > >relevance so that titles with a newer published date have a higher > relevance than documents with the same title but are older. Does > >anyone know how I can achieve this? > > > >Thank You > > > >Jason. > > > >If you wish to view the St. James's Place email disclaimer, please use the > link below > > > >http://www.sjp.co.uk/portal/internet/SJPemaildisclaimer > If you wish to view the St. James's Place email disclaimer, please use the link below http://www.sjp.co.uk/portal/internet/SJPemaildisclaimer
