I have two fields, one is copy field. I have to get Exact match results first
along with entire result of fuzzy search.
Its filed definition is given below
Hi Alessandro Benedetti ,
What i meant is that suppose if i have items like this
dell laptop with bag
dell laptop
dell laptop without bag
dell inspiron laptop with bag
if i query for "dell laptop", the result should be like this
dell laptop
dell laptop with bag
dell laptop without bag
dell inspir
Hi, I have to search on the field product_name.It is found that in order to
get exact matches first, I made one copy field named as dummy_name with the
above field definition.And while query, just boost the copy field. I done
this. So as to get exact matches I need to put quotes around the search
w
The quoted search words will be different and it will be any word or more
than one word. In the query it's just example
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Exact-match-boost-Reduce-the-results-tp4211352p4211410.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list ar
As explained above, actually I have around 10 lack data not 5 row. It's not
about synonyms . When I checked in the FAQ page of Solr wiki, it is found
that if we need to get exact match results first, use a copy field with
different configuration. That's why I followed this way.
--
View this mes
Hi chillra,
I have changed the index and query filed configuration to
But still my problem not solved , it won't resolve my problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Exact-match-boost-Reduce-the-results-tp4211352p4211788.html
Sent from the Solr - U
Hi Alessandro Benedetti,
The query is
http://localhost:8983/solr/MYDBCORE/select?q=product_name:(laptop+bag)&wt=json&indent=true
1.Dell Inspiron 3542 Laptop (Black) without Laptop Bag
2.Dell 3542 15-inch Laptop with Laptop Bag by Dell
3.Dell Inspiron N3137 11-inch Laptop without Laptop Bag by De
Hi Alessandro Benedetti,
Its my Analysis value index
WT
text
raw_bytes
start
end
positionLength
type
position
laptop
[6c 61 70 74 6f 70]
0
6
1
word
1
bag
[62 61 67]
7
10
1
word
2
SF
text
raw_bytes
start
end
positionLength
type
position
laptop
[6c 61 7
Hi Alessandro Benedetti,
I have changed the query like this.
/select?q=("dell+laptop"~13+OR+"dell+laptop")&df=product_name&defType=edismax&qf=product_name^0.001+dummy_product_name^2&fl=product_name&wt=json&indent=true&debug=true
The corresponding results also given in the below link.Now am
Hi Alessandro Benedetti,
Can you check what happens to the below given product_name , just check its
score
"product_name":"LAPTOP BATTERY DELL Inspiron 6400 1501 E1505 RD859 UD267
XU937"
How is this product comes , ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Ex
I am using Solr 5.0.0, I have one question in relevance boost:
If I search for laptop table like words, is there any way to boost results
search word before the words like by with or without etc.
I used this query:
? defType = dismax
& q = foo bar
& bq = (*:* -by)^999
But, this will
Hi Ahmet,
Can you elaborate it more?
Is it possible to solve my problem in Solr 5.0.0?
if yes can just explain how?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Boost-Search-word-before-Specific-Content-tp4216072p4216257.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list a
Hi Li Li,
I am experiencing the same problem. can you Explain little detailed?
Where do i change these methods?
I am using Solr 5.0.0, And How do i query this? Is there any change while
query?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Ranking-based-on-term-position-tp
t from
the whole corpus, or, simply to enumerate all indexed terms.
Maybe solor doesn't expose this data, but I can use Lucene jar to get
them? Since I am not familiar with Lucene, either, any pointer is
helpful.
Thanks,
jack
Interesting. Patents are valid for 20 years so it expires next year? :)
PLSA does not seem to have been patented, at least not mentioned in
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probabilistic_latent_semantic_analysis
On Nov 26, 2007 6:58 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> LSA (http://en.wikip
en another
query for the previous 24 hours ... but this really isn't very
efficient. Maybe OK for news because I may need to serve for up to 7
days. Still, 7 solr queries for a front-end query doesn't sound ideal.
So I'm still in search for a better way ...
Thanks,
Jack
On Tue, May 13
I think I'll give it a try. I haven't done this before. Are there any
instructions regarding how to apply the patch? I see 9 files, some
displayed in gray links, some in blue links; some named as .diff, some
.patch; one has 1.3 in file name, one has 1.3, I suppose the other
files are for both versi
update
has various caveats so that it is only useful in a subset of use cases.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I have a use case where we only need to append some fields to a document.
> To retrieve the full representation is very expensive but I can
or to return a large bulk of documents?
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a field f which is defined as follows.
> omitNorms="true"/>
>
> Solr-5.2.1 is used. The index is spread across 12 shards (no replic
the exact practical limit
depends on your particular hardware and your particular data model and the
data itself.
How large is each document, roughly? Hundreds, thousands, or millions of
bytes? Are some documents extremely large?
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Toke Eskild
formance is consumed when you have a lot of fields which are
not present for a particular data source.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Susheel Kumar
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am going thru few use cases where we have kind of multiple disparate data
> sources which in
,
making more copies of the index that can each be searched in parallel.
How long do queries take when the site is operating normally?
Make sure that you have enough system memory to cache the index, otherwise
the machine wish be thrashing with lots of I/O for competing requests.
-- Jack Krupansky
On
itself (other than raw JMX and ping.)
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Emir Arnautovic <
emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote:
> Hi Shail,
> As William mentioned, our SPM <https://sematext.com/spm/index.html>
> allows you to monitor all main Solr/Jvm/Host me
abase. Was someone telling you something different?
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Salman Ansari
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am facing an issue where I need to change Solr schema but I have crucial
> data that I don't want to delete. Is there a way where I can chan
Is the field multivalued?
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> What is the difference of adding a field with the same value twice or
> adding it once and boosting the field on add? Is there a situation where
> one approach is preferred?
>
> Jamie
>
need function queries there as well.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 6:50 PM, William Bell wrote:
> We are getting weird results with if(exists(a),b,c). We are getting b+c!!
>
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/providersearch/select?q=*:*&wt=json&state=state:%22CO%22&stat
ctory should contain a solr.xml file,
unless solr.xml exists in ZooKeeper. The default value is server/solr.
"
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Solr+Start+Script+Reference
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Mugeesh Husain wrote:
> you could start solr
://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/search-percolate.html
-- Jack Krupansky
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Allison, Timothy B.
wrote:
> Might want to look into:
>
> https://github.com/flaxsearch/luwak
>
> or
> https://github.com/OpenSextant/Solr
ork, be sure to provide detail of what the symptom
is rather than simply saying that it doesn't work.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:43 AM, marotosg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to add a new field to my schema to add the number of items of a
> multivalued field.
&g
ption.*"
So that's a second reason - to avoid the max clause count limitation of
Boolean Query.
See:
https://lucene.apache.org/core/5_4_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/MultiTermQuery.html#CONSTANT_SCORE_REWRITE
https://lucene.apache.org/core/5_4_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/WildcardQuery
and invest
significant effort in a custom request handler when simpler techniques may
suffice.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Ahmet Arslan
wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Yes this is possible. Better, you can use a custom SearchComponent for
> this task too.
> You retri
e considered a fresh
new distributed Solr deployment with anything other than SolrCloud.
(Hmmm... have any of the committers considered deprecating the old
non-SolrCloud distributed mode features?)
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Shivaji Dutta
wrote:
> - SolrCloud uses
I recall a couple of previous discussions regarding some sort of
filter/field cache change in Lucene where they removed what had been an
optimization for Solr.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> It's quite surprising that you're getting
t" indicates success or
"Exception while creating snapshot" indicates failure. If only that first
message appeals, it means the backup is still in progress.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Gian Maria Ricci - aka Alkampfer <
alkamp...@nablasoft.com> wro
That sounds like it. Sorry my memory is so hazy.
Maybe Yonik can either confirm that that Jira is still outstanding or close
it, and confirm if these symptoms are related.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Jack:
>
> I think that was for facet
Which release of Solr are you using? Last year (or so) there was a Lucene
change that had the effect of keeping all terms for WDF at the same
position. There was also some discussion about whether this was either a
bug or a bug fix, but I don't recall any resolution.
-- Jack Krupansky
O
although even that should not be a big problem.
And make sure the ID field is string or numeric, not tokenized text.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 1/14/2016 5:20 PM, Shivaji Dutta wrote:
> > I am working with a customer that has abou
ng parsing of the query) to send the request to exactly the node
(or replica) that owns that token/ID.
But if you really just trying to "query by ID", that should really have a
nice clean API so you don't have to build query syntax.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:41 P
shard, let alone all shards. Should
backups be collection-based as well?
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Gian Maria Ricci - aka Alkampfer <
alkamp...@nablasoft.com> wrote:
> Yes, I've checked that jira some weeks ago and it is the reason why I was
> telling
the entire index. If you actually don't need minimal latency, then of
course you can feel free to trade off RAM for lower latency.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Gian Maria Ricci - aka Alkampfer <
alkamp...@nablasoft.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> When it
.
Plenty of doc for you to start reading. Once you get the basics, then you
can move on to more specific and advanced details:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Understanding+Analyzers%2C+Tokenizers%2C+and+Filters
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:58 PM, sara hajili
ogether.*" They must also be updated together.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:01 PM, sairamkumar <
> sairam.subraman...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This is a
ients
that automatically send requests to all the shards in a collection (or
multiple collections) and then merge the sorted sets any way they wish."
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Susheel Kumar
wrote:
> Hello Salman,
>
> Please checkout the export fu
te the doc for this stored field
restriction, right?!)
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> CloudSolrStream is available in Solr 5. The "search" streaming expression
> can used or CloudSolrStream can be used in directly.
>
> https://cwi
issue for Solr. The only issue there is
assuring that you have enough Solr shards and replicas to handle the
aggregate request load.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Gian Maria Ricci - aka Alkampfer <
alkamp...@nablasoft.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’ve
complex wildcard is used - should an
exception be thrown, or... what?
I suppose it might be simplest to have a Solr option to limit the number of
wildcard characters used in a term, like to 4 or 8 or something like that.
IOW, have Solr check the term before the WildcardQuery is generated.
-- Jack
Just to be clear, are you talking about a single app that does SolrJ calls
to both your CMS and your free text search index? So, one Java app that is
simultaneously sending requests to two Solr instances (once 4, one 5)?
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 1:57 AM,
wrote:
> Hi,
>
), the app
should work fine. So... if you stick with SolrJ 4 and use the Solr 4 doc as
your guide, you should be okay. That's the theory.
Worst case, you would have to deploy a Solr 4 server. That's not the
preferred choice, but is a decent backup plan.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Jan 22, 201
nts aren't using
any new features there would be a reasonable expectation that they should
continue to work.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:40 AM,
wrote:
> Yeah, sort of. Solr isn't bundled in the CMS, it is in a separate Tomcat
> instance. But our code is running
To be clear, having separate Solr servers on different versions should
definitely not be a problem. The only potential difficulty here is the
SolrJ vs. server back-compat issue.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:57 AM,
wrote:
> Shawn wrote:
> >
> > If you are NOT ru
ll as HA availability requirements.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> Aswath Srinivasan (TMS) wrote:
> > * Totally about 2.5 million documents to be indexed
> > * Documents average size is 512 KB - pdfs and htmls
>
> &g
Just escape them with a backslash. Or put each term in quotes.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Jian Mou wrote:
> Hi Jack，
>
> Thanks! Do you know how to disable wildcards, What I want is if input is
> wildcards, just treat it as a normal char. I other words,
>
What exacting are you merge policy settings in solrconfig? They control
when the background merges will be performed. Sometimes they do need to be
tweaked.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:50 PM, James Mason
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve have a large index that has been adde
doc, which for Tiered is here:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/5_4_0/core/org/apache/lucene/index/TieredMergePolicy.html
I did doc all of these options (as of Solr 4.4) in my Solr 4.x Deep Dive
e-book and I don't think much of that has changed since then:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupans
Just be to sure, please post the lines of code or command line that you are
using to issue the query.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:47 PM, diyun2008 wrote:
> > Hi Yonik
> >
> >I do actually en
would never be a
need to "re" score them. Are you simply looking for a way to shift/boost
the scores somehow? Again, tell us more about what you are actually trying
to achieve.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:52 AM, vitaly bulgakov
wrote:
> I have Solr 4.2. Is it p
sing curl, please post the full curl command.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:03 AM, diyun2008 wrote:
> The query is rather simple:
> http://127.0.0.1:8080/solr/collection1/select?q=title:#7654321*
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://l
A simple boost query (bq) might do the trick, using edismax:
q=dvd bracket
bq=spp_keyword_exact:"dvd bracket"^100
qf=P_VeryShortDescription P_ShortDescription P_CatConcatKeyword
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> bq: if you are interested
block must be written to a new segment.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:13 AM, Sathyakumar Seshachalam <
sathyakumar_seshacha...@trimble.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am trying to investigate the possibility of using Block Join query parser
> in a many-to-many
have room to expand and handle spikes.
8. Run that final config for an extended period (days) with as realistic a
load as possible
9. If it too hits OOM or frequent GC, you may have to bump up the heap some
more, like another 10%.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Erick Eri
d not be possible with a limit
of only 15GB.
Maybe you could clue us in as to what effect you are trying to achieve. I
mean, why should any app care whether segments are 10GB or 15GB?
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 1/30/2016 7:31 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin
of 5GB. If you want to get a lot
above that, you're in uncharted territory. Besides, if you start pushing
your index well above the amount of available system memory your query
performance will suffer. I'd watch for the latter before pushing on the
former.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sun, Jan
Or try the terms query parser that lets you eliminate all the OR operators:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+Parsers#OtherParsers-TermsQueryParser
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> How about using POST?
>
> paul
>
://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/IndexConfig+in+SolrConfig
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 1:59 PM, abhi Abhishek wrote:
> Hi All,
> any suggestions/ ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Abhishek
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:16 PM, abhi Abhishek
> wrote:
>
> >
At the bottom (the fine print!) it says: lineNumber: 15; columnNumber: 7;
The element type "meta" must be terminated by the matching end-tag
"".
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Gian Maria Ricci - aka Alkampfer <
alkamp...@nablasoft.com> wrote:
>
Some people prefer to use Stack Overflow, but this mailing list is still
the definitive "forum" for Solr users.
See:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/solr
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/1/2016 1:13 AM, Jean-Jacques MONOT wr
does
not exist.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:18 AM, alkampfer wrote:
>
>
> From: outlook_288fbf38c031d...@outlook.com
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Cc:
> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:59:02 +0100
> Subject: Error configuring UIMA
>
> I've solv
Yeah, that's exactly the kind of innocent user error that UIMA simply has
no code to detect and reasonably report.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Gian Maria Ricci - aka Alkampfer <
alkamp...@nablasoft.com> wrote:
> It was a stupid error, I've mi
.
Besides, the general goal is to avoid app clients talking directly to Solr
anyway.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:57 AM, Derek Poh wrote:
> Hi Erick
>
> <<
> The manual way of doing this would be to construct an elaborate query,
> like q=spp_keyword_e
uot;, definitely not "quite long."
That said, the starting point for any data modeling effort is to look at
the full range of desired queries and that should drive the data model. So,
give us more info on queries, in terms of plain English descriptions of
what the user is trying to achieve.
://docs.mongodb.org/manual/reference/program/mongofiles/
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Arnett, Gabriel
wrote:
> Anyone have any experience indexing pdfs stored in binary form in mongodb?
>
> .
> Gabe Arnett
> Senior Dir
And you're sure that you can't use the terms query parser, which was
explicitly designed for handling a very long list of terms to be implicitly
ORed?
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Salman Ansari
wrote:
> It looked like there was another issue with my query. I
can
execute them or if they require fanout to other shards and then aggregation
of results from those other shards.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Short form: You really have to prototype. Here's the long form:
>
>
> https://lucidwo
;t require
fanout to other shards, which effectively turns each incoming query into n
queries where n is the number of shards.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> So is there any aging or TTL (in database terminology) of older docs?
>
> And do all o
, then that one node should be replaced. There are indeed plenty of
good reasons to prefer SolrCloud over traditional master-slave replication,
but so far you haven't touched on any of them.
How much data (number of documents) do you have?
What is your typical query latency?
-- Jack Krup
Is this a scenario that was working fine and suddenly deteriorated, or has
it always been slow?
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:33 AM, Matteo Grolla
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to optimize a solr application.
> The bottleneck are queries that request 100
wildcards or function
queries, or is it very simple keywords? How many operators?
Have you used the debugQuery=true parameter to see which search components
are taking the time?
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Matteo Grolla
wrote:
> Hi Yonic,
> after the first q
Good to know. Hmmm... 200ms for 10 rows is not outrageously bad, but still
relatively bad. Even 50ms for 10 rows would be considered barely okay.
But... again it depends on query complexity - simple queries should be well
under 50 ms for decent modern hardware.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Feb 11
Again, first things first... debugQuery=true and see which Solr search
components are consuming the bulk of qtime.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Matteo Grolla
wrote:
> virtual hardware, 200ms is taken on the client until response is written to
> disk
> qtime o
?
How many fields are in fl?
Any function queries in fl?
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Matteo Grolla
wrote:
> Hi Jack,
> tell me if I'm wrong but qtime accounts for search time excluding the
> fetch of stored fields (I have a 90ms qtime and a ~30s time
"knowledge graph" is kind of vague - what did you have in mind? An example
would help.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Midas A wrote:
> Please suggest how to create query knowledge graph for e-commerce
> application .
>
>
> please describe in detail
Due to a bug (or poorly designed feature), you need to explicitly include a
non-negative query term in a purely negative sub-query. Usually this means
using *:* to select all documents. Note that the use of parentheses
introduces a sub-query. So, (-persons:*) s.b. (*:* -persons:*).
-- Jack
pf stands for phrase boosting, which implies tokenized text...
spp_keyword_exact sounds like it is not tokenized.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Derek Poh wrote:
> Hi
>
> Correct me If I am wrong, edismax is an extension of dismax, so it will
> support "p
term.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Derek Poh wrote:
> It is using KeywordTokenizerFactory. It is still consider as tokenized?
>
> Here's the field definition:
> type="gs_keyword_exact" multiValued="true&
I should also have noted that your full query:
(-persons:*)AND(-places:*)AND(-orgs:*)
can be written as:
-persons:* -places:* -orgs:*
Which may work as is, or can also be written as:
*:* -persons:* -places:* -orgs:*
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Salman Ansari
wrote
pothetical similarity schema could both
specify any number of document categories. But that's speculation on my
part.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Chris Morley wrote:
> Hey Solr people:
>
> Suppose that we did not want to break up our document set into separate
&g
won't
give anybody grief for using it as a way of compensating for the
brain-damaged way that Lucene and Solr handle single-asterisk and negated
single-asterisk queries.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/15/2016 9:22 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
positive or false negative as new documents are added to the index
that are no longer in the same pattern as the old results by still within
the pattern of the original Oracle query. The trick may be whether the
delta is meaningful for the actual application use case.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Feb 18
Your statement makes no sense. Please clarify. Express your requirement(s)
in plain English first before dragging in possible solutions. Technically,
path elements can have embedded spaces.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Anil wrote:
> HI,
>
> i need to
enize all of the elements of a
path or IP as separate terms. Ditto for a query, so you can effectively do
bth keyword and phrase queries to match individual terms (e.g., path
elements) or phrases or sequences of path elements or IP address components.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:
0.1 is a fractional boost - all intra-query boosts are multiplicative, not
additive, so term^0.1 reduces the term by 90%.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:29 AM, shamik wrote:
> Binoy, 0.1 is still a positive boost. With title getting the highest
> weight,
> this won&#
. IOW, it de-boosts occurrences of
the term.
The point remains that you do not need a "negative boost" to de-boost a
term.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:01 AM, Emir Arnautovic <
emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote:
> Hi Jack,
> I just checked on 5.5 and
See:
https://lucene.apache.org/core/5_5_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/RegexpQuery.html
https://lucene.apache.org/core/5_5_0/core/org/apache/lucene/util/automaton/RegExp.html
I vaguely recall a Jira about regex not working at all in Solr. I don't
recall reading about a resolution.
--
in the bq parameter do you need to use negative boost values - in
all the other contexts a fractional boost is sufficient.
It's unfortunate that the ref guide isn't more clear about this key
distinction.
Now hopefully we (and others!) are on the same page.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sun, Feb
handler in solrconfig.xml.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 2:42 PM,
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to setup ExtendedDisMax in our solr 4.6 server, but I can't seem to
> find any example configuration for this. Ie the configuration needed in
> solrconfig.xml. In the wiki page
list of fields to
query (qf) and your actual query text (q).
I know, I know... some people just can't handle automatic. (Some people
hate DisneyLand/World!)
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 5:16 PM,
wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I am still confused. I'm expecting
So, all this hard work that people have put into Solr to make it more like
a Disney theme park is just... wasted... on you? Sigh. Okay, I guess we
can't please everyone.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 5:40 PM,
wrote:
> I have no problem with automatic. It is "automa
arted with the current Solr Reference Guide.
The old edismax wiki should in fact have a tombstone warning that indicates
that it is obsolete and redirect people to the new doc. Out of curiosity,
how did you get to that old wiki page in the first place?
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:20
It is indeed a problem that the old edismax wiki is result #1 from Google.
I find that annoying as well since I also use Google search as my first
step in accessing doc on everything.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:03 AM,
wrote:
> Thanks Shawn,
>
> I had more or less ass
es in old emails.
In any case, a proper tombstone is probably the best step at this point.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> It is indeed a problem that the old edismax wiki is result #1 from Google.
> I find that annoying as well since I also use
1 - 100 of 2693 matches
Mail list logo
