e are plans to release a LucidWorks for Solr 3.1/.x certified
distribution too - I can't speak to the timeline of such a release though]
Erik
Try using AND (or set q.op):
q=car+AND+_val_:marketValue
On Apr 12, 2011, at 07:11 , Marco Martinez wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> My situation is the next, I need to sum the value of a field to the score to
> the docs returned in the query, but not to all the docs, example:
>
> q=car returns 3
What does the parsed query look like with debugQuery=true for both scenarios?
Any difference? Doesn't make any sense that echoParams would have an effect,
unless somehow your search client is relying on parameters returned to do
something with them.?!
Erik
On Apr 13, 2011, at
0, 0 and position increment 1. Could this be a problem?
Best regards,
Erik
Am 19.05.2011 16:07, schrieb Yonik Seeley:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Erik Fäßler wrote:
I have a few questions concerning the field cache method for faceting.
The wiki says for enum method: "This was the default (and only) method for
faceting multi-valued fields prior to Sol
For this to work, _val_:"" goes *in* the q parameter, not as a separate
parameter.
See here for more details:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax#Differences_From_Lucene_Query_Parser
Erik
On Jun 2, 2011, at 07:46 , Savvas-Andreas Moysidis wrote:
> Hello,
&g
ou could have a standard tokenization
chain, and put it all back together at the end.
Erik
On Jun 8, 2011, at 10:59 , Matt Mitchell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an "autocomplete" fieldType that works really well, but because
> the KeywordTokenizerFactory (if I understand co
Rather than reinventing wheels here, I think that fronting the conf/ directory
with a WebDAV server would be a great way to go. I'm not familiar with the
state-of-the-art of WebDAV servers these days but there might be something
pretty trivial that can be configured in Tomcat to do this? Or ma
etter way to go?
Erik
On Jun 16, 2011, at 14:55 , Gabriele Kahlout wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm testing out different Similarity implementations, and to do that I
> restart Solr each time I want to try a different similarity class I change
> the class attributed of
olr/api/org/apache/solr/common/SolrDocument.html>
Erik
On Jun 21, 2011, at 12:18 , okayndc wrote:
> hello,
>
> i'm not sure of the correct velocity syntax to link, let's say a title
> field, to the actual document itself. i have a hostname, a category (which
Jamie - there is a JIRA about this, at least one:
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-218>
Erik
On Jun 15, 2011, at 10:12 , Jamie Johnson wrote:
> So simply lower casing the works but can get complex. The query that I'm
> executing may have things like ran
nts.
Curious though... why uninstall it? Solr makes a mighty fine hammer to have
around :)
Erik
On Jun 30, 2011, at 19:49 , GAURAV PAREEK wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> How to *uninstall* Solr completely ?
>
> Any help will be appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Gaurav
Put an OR between your two nested queries to ensure you're using that operator.
Also, those hl params in your first dismax don't really belong there and
should be separate parameters globally.
Erik
On Jul 1, 2011, at 06:19 , joelmats wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Is it
I wouldn't share the same index across two Solr webapps - as they could step on
each others toes.
In this scenario, I think having two Solr instances replicating from the same
master is the way to go, to allow you to scale your load from each application
separately.
Erik
O
lds to facet on, set those into the request context, and the rest is
magic.
Erik
On Jul 5, 2011, at 13:15 , Way Cool wrote:
> Hi, guys,
>
> We have more than 1000 attributes scattered around 700K docs. Each doc might
> have about 50 attributes. I would like Solr to retur
e (long live Solr Flare!) was a startup
request to Solr's luke request handler (/admin/luke?numTerms=0) and got the
list of field names. Then, and I used *_facet similar to you, kept a list of
all *_facet actual field names and used those in all subsequent search requests.
Erik
ere.
I've done this in various one-off cases, but nothing handy to share at the
moment (I'm traveling), but maybe in a week or so I'll be able to dig something
out or re-craft the voodoo.
Erik
On Jul 13, 2011, at 14:23 , okayndc wrote:
> Thanks Eric.
>
> So if
On Jul 13, 2011, at 15:34 , Mourad K wrote:
> Are there any good podcasts for beginners in SOLR
There's a bunch of stuff we've created and posted to our site here:
<http://www.lucidimagination.com/devzone/videos-podcasts>
Erik
I'm a bit confused by what you're asking for, but maybe it's as simple as
making a fq=facet_field:facet_value&fl=id request? You'd have to do this for
each value in the field.
Erik
On Jul 16, 2011, at 09:59 , Jeff Schmidt wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I have
Query=true and see how
queries parse.
Erik
a new little tinkering I've started a while back that might be good
food for thought for the same sorts of ideas as the above but in a slightly
different direction - https://github.com/lucidimagination/Prism
Erik
On Jul 19, 2011, at 10:00 , serenity wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Just a hunch, ;), but I'm guessing you don't have a price field defined. qt is
for selecting a request handler you have defined in your solrconfig.xml - you
need to customize the parameters to your schema.
Erik
On Jul 19, 2011, at 04:32 , Yusniel Hidalgo Delgado wrote:
&g
Ian -
What does your solr-ruby using code look like?
Solr::Connection is light-weight, so you could just construct a new one of
those for each request. Are you keeping an instance around?
Erik
On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:03 , Ian Connor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have seen some of the
As far as I know, there isn't a patch for pivot faceting for 3.x. It'd require
extracting the code from trunk and porting it. Perhaps as easy as applying the
diff from the pivot commit from trunk to the 3.x codebase? (but probably not
quite that easy)
Erik
On Aug 3, 2011
You could use Solr's distributed (shards parameter) capability to do this.
However, if you've got somewhat different schemas that isn't necessarily going
to work properly. Perhaps unify your schemas in order to facilitate this using
Solr's distributed search feature?
Great question. But how would that get returned in the response?
It is a drag that the header is lost when results are written in CSV, but there
really isn't an obvious spot for that information to be returned.
Erik
On Aug 4, 2011, at 01:52 , Pooja Verlani wrote:
> Hi,
Because you've got a stemmer in your analysis chain for those fields. If you
want unstemmed terms, remove the stemmer, or copyField to a different field to
use for the terms component.
Erik
On Aug 9, 2011, at 10:20 , Royi Ronen wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using the terms compon
perly into a single term query.
I am a little confused below since you're faceting on MyField entirely
(addFacetField) where you'd get the values of each URI facet query in that list
anyway.
Erik
On Aug 10, 2011, at 13:42 , Simon, Richard T wrote:
> I take it back. I didn
You can set default="true" in solrconfig on the JSON response writer, like this:
Or you can add json to any request handler definitions.
Erik
On Aug 11, 2011, at 07:36 , nagarjuna wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> when ever i enter search term in solr i am able to gett
ow seen by the
SolrResourceLoader). This is something that hasn't really been tried out (to
my knowledge) so we might need to tinker a little to get custom tools to get
injected smoothly the way it ideally should work.
Erik
On Aug 12, 2011, at 14:17 , Stéphane Campinas wrote:
Though I think you could get the Dedupe feature to do this:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Deduplication
On Aug 13, 2011, at 11:52 , Erick Erickson wrote:
> If you mean just throw the new document on the floor if
> the index already contains a document with that key, I don't
> think you can do tha
Does instantiating a Solr::Connection for each request make things better?
Erik
On Aug 14, 2011, at 11:34 , Ian Connor wrote:
> It is nothing special - just like this:
>
>conn = Solr::Connection.new("http://#{LOCAL_SHARD}";,
> {:timeout =>
Sounds like you aren't using SolrJ, which will return a Java object back to you
natively. Give that a try and let us know how it fairs against the jaxb
method.
Erik
On Aug 12, 2011, at 02:58 , Tri Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My results from solr returns about 982 docum
What do you mean you don't want to "display" it? Generally you'd just
navigate to solr_response['response'] to ignore the header and just deal with
the main body.
But, there is an omitHeader parameter -
<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#omit
For the record, I'm starting work now on moving the Velocity response writer
back to a contrib module so these dependencies won't be embedded in the WAR
file (after I make the commit this week some time, most likely).
Erik
On Aug 17, 2011, at 15:35 , Chris Hoste
Good idea. However response writers can't control HTTP response headers
currently... Only the content type returned.
Erik
On Aug 24, 2011, at 8:52, Jon Hoffman wrote:
> What about the HTTP response header?
>
>
>>> Great question. But how would that get r
Is the field stored? Do you see it on documents when you do a q=*:* search?
How is that field defined and populated? (exact config/code needed here)
Erik
On Aug 25, 2011, at 23:07 , deniz wrote:
> hi all...
>
> i have added a new field to index... but now when i check solr
erently for each source:
Be sure you have a datasource (string field type) field in your schema.
Reindex.
Then you can fq=datasource:datasource-1 and facet on it and so on since it is a
normal field on all documents.
Erik
On Aug 26, 2011, at 05:41 , vighnesh wrote:
> hi al
The way folks have addressed this situation to date is to model the
"multivalued fields" as additional documents too.
On Aug 26, 2011, at 09:32 , wrote:
>
> Many thanks Erick.
>
> I think a good feature to add to Solr to address this is
> to allow a query to return either the "document" as
On Aug 26, 2011, at 17:49 , Lord Khan Han wrote:
> We are indexing news document from the various sites. Currently we have
> 200K docs indexed. Total index size is 36 gig. There is also attachement to
> the news (pdf -docs etc) So document size could be high (ie 10mb).
>
> We are using some com
;> 8638.0
>>
>> 4473.0
>>
>>
>> 0.0
>>
>>
>> 0.0
>>
>>
>> 42.0
>>
>>
>> 0.0
>>
>>
>> 1.0
>>
>>
>> 4122.0
>>
>>
>>
>> The funny thing is if
I'm not sure what the issue could be at this point. I see you've got
qt=search - what's the definition of that request handler?
What is the parsed query (from the debugQuery response)?
Have you tried this with Solr 3.3 to see if there's any appreciable difference?
e names.
Please feel free to share our openings with any of your colleagues or friends
that fit our needs.
Thanks,
Erik
elds are never loaded.
But if highlighting were enabled on those warming queries, it'd fill in the
document cache, right?
Erik
Debugging this you can add &debugQuery=true&wt=xml to get the full classic Solr
XML output that drives it all.
Erik
On Jun 30, 2012, at 7:36, Giovanni Gherdovich wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this morning I was very proud of myself since I managed
> to set up solritas ( ht
Interestingly, I just logged the issue of it not showing the right error in the
UI here: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3591>
As for your specific issue, not sure, but the error should at least also show
in the admin view.
Erik
On Jul 2, 2012, at 18:59 , Briggs Th
contained the
data I was adding to Solr in an XML format.
Is there a possibility to change the temporary directory for this action?
I use an Iterator with the HttpSolrServer's add(Iterator)
method for performance. So I can't just do commits from time to time.
Best regards,
Erik
Ah - allright, that's it! Thank you!
Erik
Am 04.07.2012 um 17:59 schrieb Jack Krupansky:
> Solr is probably simply using Java's temp directory, which you can redefine
> by setting the java.io.tmpdir system property on the java command line or
> using a system-specific e
nning firing of that might be an option worth considering
(though I'm not sure if it does incremental and picks up where it left off?)
Erik
On Jul 9, 2012, at 18:49 , Jay Hill wrote:
> I may have found a good solution. I implemented my own SolrEventListener:
>
/json will re-emerge in the 4.0 final release example configuration?
Always be careful when comparing blogs/articles written about one version to a
different version you're using.
Erik
On Jul 17, 2012, at 06:01 , Nils Abegg wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> I'm trying to ge
Winfried -
It's absolutely fine to add a non-required field to the schema (and restart).
No reindexing necessary.
It can be handy to find documents without a field by using q=-fieldname:[* TO *]
Erik
On Jul 23, 2012, at 05:44 , Winfried Umbrath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
solr/FunctionQuery#Sort_By_Function> and build up
the expression from there. I still encourage you to aim towards computing as
much of this at index-time as possible to minimize the functions (and thus
caches) you need at query time.
Erik
On Jul 26, 2012, at 03:47 , lavesh wrote:
> am worki
new UnsupportedOperationException("TODO unimplemented");//TODO
}
});
server.request( request );//runs request
//request.process(server); but we don't have a NamedList response
assertTrue(readFile.get());
}
So... you can read the JSON, but you'll need to do something like the above.
I hate to also add:
6. Use DataImportHandler
It can index Solr XML, and could add field values, either statically or by
template glue if you need to combine multiple field values somehow.
And in 4.0 you'll be able to use:
7: scripting update processor
Erik
On Aug 3, 2012,
Lakschmi - The field(s) used for querying needs to be specified somewhere,
either as a default field or as a qf parameter to (e)dismax, etc.
Erik
On Aug 6, 2012, at 10:48 , Lakshmi Bhargavi wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I have a question on the default search field defined in schema.
Alex - what you're looking for is called "replication" -
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
Erik
On Aug 16, 2012, at 04:48 , Alex King wrote:
> Hi all,
> We use Solr to build a search service for our customers. We have got one
> core on one physica
reindex to distribute the
documents.
Erik
On Aug 17, 2012, at 02:21 , Sujatha Arun wrote:
> Hello,
>
> One of the Index in a multicore set up has a 3GB+ index ,and it seems to
> take around 5000ms+ to return simple boolean queries . The Index is
> not optimized
> Woul
your "standard" request handler look like? Doing anything custom in
there?
What are the timings of the components in the debugQuery=true response?
Is the server under load when you're issuing these queries? What about RAM?
Again, what version of Solr?
Erik
On Aug 17,
Sujatha - that query debug output shows only 218ms, so it isn't representative
of the issue you're reporting.
Also, what's the query parse output? I imagine you're doing a boolean OR
query across all those terms (include "a"), yes? Maybe you'd rather the
an AND'ing it to a q(uery)
parameter.
The advice to make a separate has_ field (or field_size) is the best
advice, but when dealing with low cardinality fields it's not really an issue
to use something like category:* where there are only a handful of category
values in use.
arked for
4.0 so we can be sure to fix it before final release.
Thanks,
Erik
On Aug 22, 2012, at 16:32 , Tom Burton-West wrote:
> Thanks Markus!
>
> Should the README.txt file in solr/example be updated to reflect this?
> Is that something I need to enter a JIRA issue for?
>
mounted servers?
Thanks for sharing anything you can about this.
Erik
On Sep 5, 2012, at 13:26 , Nicolas de Saint-Aubert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently share a single solr read index on an nfs accessed by
> various solr instances from various devices which gives us a high
Pivot facets currently only work with individual terms, not ranges.
The response you provided does look odd in that there are duplicate timestamps
listed, but pivots were only implemented for textual (string being the most
common type) fields initially.
Erik
On Sep 6, 2012, at 19:04
On Sep 7, 2012, at 08:36 , Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>> Pivot facets currently only work with individual terms, not ranges.
>>
>> The response you provided does look odd in that there are duplicate
>> timestamps l
On Sep 7, 2012, at 09:29 , Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
>> Ranges won't work at all pivots are purely by individual term currently.
>>
>> If you want to pivot by ranges, and you can define those ranges during
>
In order for Solr to use this parser, you'll need to wrap it with a QParser and
QParserPlugin implementations, then wire your implementation into
solrconfig.xml. There is no current built in support for this parser in Solr
at the moment.
Erik
On Sep 10, 2012, at 09:47 , Maciej P
That's definitely a bug. dismax=true is not the correct parameter to send.
Should be defType=dismax
Erik
On Sep 13, 2012, at 12:22 , Tom Burton-West wrote:
> Just want to check I am not doing something obviously wrong before I file a
> bug ticket.
>
> In Solr 4.0B
Solr Cell can already do this. See the stream.file parameter and content steam
info on the wiki.
Erik
On Sep 18, 2012, at 19:56, "Zhang, Lisheng"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I just sent out an unfinished message!
>
> Reading Solr cell, we indexing a file by fir
dex a PDF file, you don't retrieve the file back from Solr, you
retrieve search results. The original file is where it was indexed from, not
inside Solr. What you'll get back is the file name (if you stored it, that is).
Erik
On Sep 19, 2012, at 10:40 , wrote:
How are you triggering an infinite loop in your requests to Solr?
Erik
On Sep 19, 2012, at 11:12 , Mike Gagnon wrote:
> [ I am sorry for breaking the thread, but my inbox has neither received my
> original post to the mailing list, nor Otis's response (so I can't reply t
s are pushed to the replicas as they come in, then
that's when the SolrCloud capabilities will come into play.
But, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Erik
On Sep 20, 2012, at 14:51 , Petersen, Robert wrote:
> Hello solr user group,
>
> I am evaluating the new
y, as you'll be able to out of the box set up
crawling of your sites and indexing of relational data (and other built-in
connector data sources) and of course also be able to use it as plain ol' Solr
as well. See <http://www.lucidworks.com/lucidworks-product-suite> for more
details.
double-quotes in it,
so simply surround by double-quotes can be problematic.
Erik
How is your request handler defined? Using store_slug for anything but fl?
Erik
On Oct 1, 2012, at 10:51, "giovanni.bricc...@banzai.it"
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to put a multivalued field into a qt definition as output field.
> to do this I edit the
a params construct
automatically.
Erik
On Oct 6, 2012, at 10:44 , Prithu Banerjee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have developed a payload queryparser similar to:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpane
ase you're probably using the FieldCache).
Faceting performance doesn't depend on the filters or query the caches that
need to be built are indeed across the entire index.
Erik
On Oct 8, 2012, at 16:26 , kevinlieb wrote:
> I am doing a facet query in Solr (3.4) and getting
://velocity.apache.org/engine/releases/velocity-1.7/vtl-reference-guide.html>
(geeky and maybe slightly tricky at first, but fairly straightforward once you
know what object types you're dealing with)
Erik
On Oct 9, 2012, at 02:33 , Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Lance,
>
>
<http://lucidworks.lucidimagination.com/display/lweug/Release+Notes+for+v2.1>
where that is mentioned in the Release Notes. To correct, simply reinstall in
a directory without spaces.
Erik
On Oct 17, 2012, at 07:38 , Leena Jawale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed lucidworks enterprise v2.1
index? If you simply press search (with an empty query) do
you see documents? (best, again, to respond to these questions at the
LucidWorks support site)
Erik
On Oct 19, 2012, at 05:54 , Leena Jawale wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I made a Solr XML data source in lucidworks enterp
again, it
depends on many factors what's the Right choice for your environment.
You can learn more about Blacklight at http://projectblacklight.org/, and see
many examples of it deployed in production here:
<https://github.com/projectblacklight/blacklight/wiki/Examples>
Eri
You did get results though! Press search :) You're just not showing any
initial facets, but that's a config option.
What University do you work for? I don't know whether you meant to imply Hull
below or not, but Hull is using Blacklight within their Hydra project among
sending to reverse engineer what's going on.
Erik
On Oct 23, 2012, at 10:06 , Muwonge Ronald wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>> Ronny -
>>
>> Your best bets will be to engage the Blacklight team at their mailing list
>> or in
;ve seen this trick employed at the Smithsonian first hand, where
there are so many different attributes across the documents that it's hard to
know what the best facets are for the result set.
Erik
On Oct 27, 2012, at 04:09 , Lance Norskog wrote:
> Nope! Each document comes bac
pt have to explicitly
> include distributed search support?
>
> ----- Original Message -
> | From: "Erik Hatcher"
> | To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> | Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 4:14:12 AM
> | Subject: Re: Get metadata for query
> |
> | Lance Lance
There's an open issue (with a patch!) that enables this, it seems:
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3911>
Erik
On Nov 5, 2012, at 07:41 , deniz wrote:
> Michael Della Bitta-2 wrote
>> No, RAMDirectory doesn't work for replication. Use MMapDirectory
And you can also do it all entirely from a browser URL bar using stream.file
parameter.
Erik
On Nov 10, 2012, at 13:17, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> My guess is that this might have to do with the fact that you are on
> Windows, and shell escaping is different (i.e. curl isn't getti
But what is your schema version? See the top of schema.xml.
On Nov 14, 2012, at 4:17, Peter Kirk wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for the reply. It is strange, because when I index to a field defined
> like:
>
> name="*_string"
> stored="true"
>
Did you also restart Solr after changing things?
On Nov 16, 2012, at 10:04, Reik Schatz wrote:
> I am using Solr 4.0 (new admin interface) and I am sure I don't have
> anything left in my index because I empty the data directory every time
> before testing.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:39 P
ed term per
document. A "string" with indexed=true is one option. Use copyField
to copy your text field to a string version if it is as simple as that
for your sorting needs.
Erik
Rather than trying to get all document id's in one call to Solr,
consider paging through the results. Set rows=1000 or probably
larger, then check the numFound and continue making requests to Solr
incrementing start parameter accordingly until done.
Erik
On Jul 23, 2009, at
Give it is a small number of terms, seems like just excluding them
from use/visibility on the client would be reasonable.
Erik
On Jul 23, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Bill Au wrote:
I want to exclude a very small number of terms which will be
different for
each query. So I think my best
h
some clever configuration capabilities be able to remotely move/
replicate indexes around if you need to move them to scale
separately. You'll be most of the way there already with Solr and
what is currently available.
Erik
e, in indexing multiple
databases typically the data source identifier is prefixing the
primary key value... "product-1234", "customer-567", etc.
Erik
so at
indexing AND query time. Just doing it at query time is not going to
find anything except purely by coincidence.
Erik
alysis process (and likely have some copyFields to
analyze text different ways). Experiment with the analysis.jsp of
Solr's admin to see how various tweaks to analyzers and field types
change what gets indexed and queried for.
Erik
# All advertisements must at least be in the form of executable code ;)
require 'solr'
Solr::Connection.new('http://localhost:8983/
solr', :autocommit=>:on).add({ :id => "SolrCourses",
:text => '
Lucid Imagination is now offering Solr Essentials Online Sessions, a
s
arios).
* DataImportHandler can reload its configuration files with an HTTP
command. And some other files can be picked up dynamically (like
VelocityResponseWriter templates).
Erik
getting bitten by admin handlers being cached by your
browser. Fixed on trunk: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1243
Erik
query
match exactly the content of a field?
You can use set dismax to have a qs (query slop) factor which will
boost documents where the users terms are closer together (within the
number of terms distance specified).
Erik
ld be converted to "&" This should look familiar if
you've
ever written any HTML.
I dont understand this
i musst change even & to & ?
Yes, if you need an ampersand in an XML element, it must be escaped:
Harold & Maude
Erik
601 - 700 of 1860 matches
Mail list logo
