No, multiselect is not wired into /browse. That'd be a nice addition though.
Erik
On Dec 8, 2011, at 16:30 , PJ Shimmer wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I see that we can query multiple facets for a search with a syntax like
> "fq=grade:A OR grade:B". However, I
h? No UI technology constraints?
Erik
On Dec 9, 2011, at 10:15 , PJ Shimmer wrote:
> Thanks Erik.
>
> Is there any available UI that supports multi-select faceting?
>
>
>
>
> From: Erik Hatcher
> To: solr-user@lucene.apach
/SOLR-2718 to get it
backported to 3.x in time for a Solr 3.6 release. I'll tackle this in a couple
of weeks.
I'm also going to start a new solr-user thread about the VelocityResponseWriter
and solicit folks opinions regarding its future.
Erik
On Dec 8, 2011, at 06:03 , Ki
her and maintained elsewhere (say my personal or Lucid's
github).
I appreciate your candid thoughts on this.
Erik
but
you could cobble together a Velocity template that output CSV if that is your
only need for this custom multiplication.
Erik
On Dec 9, 2011, at 16:17 , Gabriel Cooper wrote:
> Is there a way to manipulate the results coming back from SOLR?
>
> I have a SOLR 3.5 index that
adjust those
either). Point taken that it certainly could be implemented/documented better
though.
Erik
On Dec 9, 2011, at 16:38 , Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Erik,
>
> The VelocityResponseWriter has solved a need by me: provide an interface that
> shows off an amount of t
s/choice templating languages/template language choices/
Also, meant to include
* http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2003/12/16/velocity.html
On Dec 9, 2011, at 17:07 , Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Paul -
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> As for JSP... the problem with JSP's
But if
/browse doesn't work literally out of the box when copying the example
configuration files (and as I said in a previous e-mail, neither does Solr
Cell, etc) then we don't really have "out-of-the-box"'ness - it requires moving
JARs or adjusting solrconfig.xml to mak
Aleksander -
Looks like you've experienced the issue described with fixes here:
<http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/48b9e75fe68be4b7>
Erik
On Dec 29, 2011, at 08:40 , Aleksander Akerø wrote:
> Hi!
>
> So I've decided try out Solr 3.5.0.
>
&g
As I understand it, the document and filter caches add value *intra* request
such that it keeps additional work (like fetching stored fields from disk more
than once) from occurring.
Erik
On Jan 3, 2012, at 16:26 , Jason Rutherglen wrote:
> *Laugh*
>
> I stand by what
I'd recommend what Andy said, but if all you're interested in is a single term
combined, you can do and you'll
get the "merged" count.
Erik
On Jan 4, 2012, at 07:51 , Andrew Ingram wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> I'd probably have another field calle
You're using a string field type, I imagine. Use a numeric field type instead.
wc-search.xml? That's not a solr config file; must be something specific to
your app.
Erik
On Jan 4, 2012, at 08:40 , umaswayam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We want to sort our records based on
Also note that an EmbeddedSolrServer is for a specific core, not for all cores
(and thus solr.xml is not used). My hunch is that you need to point to the
core's home directory, not to the parent of solr.xml.
Erik
On Jan 6, 2012, at 03:06 , Sven Maurmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
s for a single core. If you want multiple cores supported... created
multiple EmbeddedSolrServer instances. You point the instance to the core's
"home".
Erik
stop-word block?). If
not, if you're storing that content it could be returned to the searching
client. If you aren't anonymizing before sending to Solr, how are you using
the stop word filtering to do this?
Erik
On Jan 8, 2012, at 23:08 , Michael Lissner wrote:
> I&#x
Because you're using the lucene query parser which doesn't use qf. Add
&defType=dismax to get the effect you want.
Erik
On Jan 11, 2012, at 12:22, Matthias Müller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I request a query to solr with
> /solr/select?q=query&debugQuery=t
Perhaps this the known issue with the 3.5 example schema being used in Tomcat
and the VelocityResponseWriter issue? I'm on my mobile now so don't have easy
access to a pointer with details but check the archives if this seems to be the
issue on how to resolve it.
Erik
On Ja
/browse is defined solrconfig.xml. Its details need adjusting for datasets
other than the example data that ships with Solr. Templates may also need
adjusting, but does handle arbitrary facet fields automatically.
Erik
On Jan 19, 2012, at 7:56, remi tassing wrote:
> I can get the er
tion. Let me know if you start from scratch and try the suggestions
mentioned in that link.
Erik
Steve - sorry... yeah, that one. I missed your backport as of yesterday. I'll
give it a whirl, but I'm confident all is well. Thanks!
Erik
On Jan 20, 2012, at 16:34 , Steven A Rowe wrote:
> Erik,
>
> I've already backported SOLR-2718 - is that what you were
The downloads definitely include an -example- configuration. Look under
example/solr/conf
Erik
On Jan 21, 2012, at 10:51, remi tassing wrote:
> In the Solr-3.5 zip file I downloaded there was no solrconfig.xml
>
> On Friday, January 20, 2012, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>>
>
But hacking configuration is reasonable, I think, for adding in
plugins. I guess you're aiming for some kind of Spring-like auto-
discovery of plugins? Yeah, maybe, but I'm pretty -1 on Spring coming
into Solr. It's overkill and ugly, IMO. But you like it :) And
that's cool by me, to each their own.
Oh, and Hi Mark! :)
Erik
And when you do that, a best practice for fq'ing on a string field is:
fq={!raw f=field_name}value
That avoids query parsing and the hassles associated with escaping
special characters.
Erik
On Jun 17, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Joe Calderon wrote:
use a copyField and index the
o so. I even suspect that it
might be already possible if the instantiation and binding of the
objects that form a Solr application are sufficiently separate from
those configuration classes in the first place. A good area to
explore.
No doubt. +1 again.
Oh, and Hi Mark! :)
Your Solr Blackbelt at code4lib was excellent, as were our
conversations afterward. :-)
Why thank you!
Erik
dismax does not support the operator AND. It uses +/- only.
set mm=100% (not 1), as Hoss said, and try your query again.
Erik
On Jun 17, 2010, at 8:08 PM, Tommy Chheng wrote:
I don't think setting the mm helps.
I have mm to 1 which means the query terms should be in at leas
is query handler
supports an extremely simplified subset of the Lucene QueryParser
syntax. Quotes can be used to group phrases, and +/- can be used to
denote mandatory and optional clauses". Only special single
characters are escaped. So AND/OR must work. Learn something new
every day
first step is to do an &debugQuery=true and see where the time is
going on the server-side. If you're doing highlighting of a stored
field, that can be a biggie. The timings will be in the debug output
- be sure to look at both sections of the timings.
Erik
On Jun 17,
ake care of
adding segments you'll generally reduce what is replicated.
Erik
d it to also send the same value as
terms.prefix - but this could be an issue if hitting a different
request handler where q is used for the actual query for filtering
terms on.
Cool?! I think so! :)
Erik
On Jun 17, 2010, at 8:03 PM, Ken Krugler wrote:
I don't believe So
he better way, as you have.
Erik
On Jun 18, 2010, at 3:32 AM, Chantal Ackermann wrote:
Hi,
here is my solution. It has been some time since I last looked at it,
but it works fine. :-)
<tt>src="/solr/epg/admin/file?file=/velocity/
</tt><tt>jquery-1.4.min.js&co
ggest
> return exactly what the suggest component likes natively,
suggestions textually one per line:
ipod
in
Erik
mode would be the way to build it in.
Erik
On Jun 18, 2010, at 9:09 AM, abhay kumar wrote:
Hi,
I am working with solr in production which is configured on remote
server .
I need to delete some documents from solr index.
I know this can be done by curl by calling solr "updat
do you mean sorting facets? or sorting search results? you can't
sort search results by a multivalued field - which value would it use?
Erik
On Jun 18, 2010, at 12:45 PM, Marc Sturlese wrote:
hey there!
can someone explain me how impacts to have multivalued fields when
so
r
- I have run "ant compile" from the top, but didn't realize it was
necessary first.
Erik
ce that? Or have it run successfully?
Erik
eld in the response?
And also, ideally, there'd be a /suggest handler mapped with the field
name specified there. I simply used what was already available to put
suggest in there easily.
Erik
On Jun 18, 2010, at 7:54 PM, Ken Krugler wrote:
Hi Erik,
On Jun 17, 2010, at 8:34p
on after other parameters where
the ? has already been added.
Erik
On Jun 19, 2010, at 8:46 PM, Ken Krugler wrote:
I ran into one minor problem, where if I clicked a facet, and then
tried a search, I'd get a 404 error.
I think the problem is with the fqs Velocity macro in
ice'))$!
number.currency($price)#end
Note that in your scenario it isn't returning a string with brackets
(except to the UI) - it's truly an array within the template.
Though maybe what you want in your schema is a single valued price
field? :)
Erik
On Jun 19,
Solritas is a way to view Solr responses in a more user friendly way,
it isn't going to help with the underlying suggest mechanism, just the
presentation of it.
Erik
On Jun 19, 2010, at 3:28 AM, Andy wrote:
Hi,
I've seen some posts on using SOLR-1316 or So
Or even better for an exact string query:
q={!raw f=field_name}sony vaio
(that's NOT URL encoded, but needs to be when sending the request over
HTTP)
Erik
On Jun 21, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent wrote:
Hi,
You either need to quote your string: http://loca
Sounds like what you want is to override Solr's "query" component.
Have a look at the built-in one and go from there.
Erik
On Jun 22, 2010, at 1:38 PM, sarfaraz masood wrote:
I am a novice in solr / lucene. but i have gone
thru the documentations of both.I have e
core stuff adjusted to suit this plugin.
Erik
On Jun 22, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Martijn v Groningen wrote:
I checked your stacktrace and I can't remember putting
SolrIndexSearcher.getDocListAndSet(...) in the doQuery(...) method. I
guess the patch was modified before it was applied.
I
You need to share with us the Solr request you made, any any custom
request handler settings that might map to. Chances are you just need
to twiddle with the highlighter parameters (see wiki for docs) to get
it to do what you want.
Erik
On Jun 22, 2010, at 4:42 PM, n
CSV format.
I'd imagine you have the orginal data in a relational database though?
Erik
On Jun 23, 2010, at 7:59 AM, scr...@asia.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to solr. It looks great.
I would like to add a XML document in the following format in solr:
st left-over CSS cruft.
4. It seems silly to open JIRA issues for these types of things, but
I also don't want to add to noise on the list.
Which approach is preferred?
JIRA is ultimately the right place, for tracking and IP sign-off
purposes. My inbox can't keep track of these things for long.
Erik
Solr has 304 support with the last-modified and etag headers.
Erik
On Jun 30, 2010, at 7:52 PM, Jason Chaffee wrote:
In that case, being able to use Accept headers and conditional GET's
would make them more powerful and easier to use. The Accept header
could be used, if pr
is navigate to /solr/browse and you
get a "google-like" UI that does highlighting, faceting, spell-
checking, etc.
There's a partial screenshot (of the debug feature) attached to this
issue:
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1957>
Erik
On Jun
less you beat me to it and
provide a patch :) It'll be pretty trivial to do so.
It also needs to support date range faceting too.
Erik
Please provide us some details. What and how did you index? What
request did you make to Solr?
Erik
On Jul 1, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Moises Muratalla wrote:
I am getting incomplete search results with solr 1.4.0.
Any suggestions on how to fix or debug this?
arked immutable...
You have to create an account and log in in order to edit wiki pages.
Erik
brought up.
Erik
On Jul 13, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Tommy Chheng wrote:
Hi,
Which next version of solr is the csv response writer set to be
included in?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1925
--
@tommychheng
Programmer and UC Irvine Graduate Student
Find a great grad school based o
This is simple faceting, doesn't even have to be a multi-valued
field. Just index your description field with the desired stop word
removal and other analysis that you want done, and
&facet.field=description
Erik
On Jul 15, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Peter Karich wrote:
Dear
Consider using the dismax query parser instead. It has more
sophisticated capability to spread user queries across multiple fields
with different weightings.
Erik
On Jul 20, 2010, at 4:34 AM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote:
Hi all,
I have two simple questions:
I have an Item entity with
not is an unrelated concern.
Is it possible to use dismax query parser using solrJ, since this is
how I'm
going to access solr?
Yes, all of Solr's HTTP capabilities are available through SolrJ.
Erik
re of first, to generalize this to N fields levels and
maybe some other must/nice-to-haves.
Erik
On Jul 23, 2010, at 3:45 AM, Eric Grobler wrote:
Thanks I saw the article,
As far as I can tell the trunk archives only go back to the middle
of March
and the 2 patches are from the b
a copy/
paste/i18n issue.
Also looks like you're on Solr 1.3 - so it's likely quite worth
upgrading to 1.4.1 (don't know if that directly affects this
highlighting issue, just a general recommendation).
Erik
On Jul 27, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Nathaniel Grove wrote:
I
I use patch -p0, not -p1. But otherwise that looks the same as what I
do.
Can you try again with -p0 and see if it's still an issue? (or have
you gotten past this and I've just not caught up with mails yet?)
Erik
On Jul 23, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Eric Grobler wrote:
H
ou can get
Solr's response in a number of formats, such as Ruby, JSON, Python,
PHP, XSLT'd, via Velocity templates, and more.
Erik
On Aug 3, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Hando420 wrote:
The default style of search results is raw xml. If i want to make it
more
user friendly do i have
think you are to a misunderstanding about some text not
being analyzed (like wildcard clauses).
Erik
On Aug 3, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Justin Lolofie wrote:
Hello,
I have found the analysis tool in the admin page to be very useful in
understanding my schema. I've made changes to my sche
Did you reindex after changing the schema?
On Aug 3, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Justin Lolofie wrote:
Hi Erik, thank you for replying. So, turning on debugQuery shows
information about how the query is processed- is there a way to see
how things are stored internally in the index?
My query is "
from pretty much any
context you're in) is the way to go.
Erik
On Aug 9, 2010, at 3:43 AM, Aparna Chaudhary wrote:
Hi,
I need access to solr schema definition(schema.xml) file to perform
some
validations while constructing the document. I see there is a
class IndexSchem
leased to pass along the blurb below. See you there!
Erik
* http://lucene-eurocon.org/sessions-track2-day2.html#3
Lucid Imagination presents a free webinar
Wednesday, August 18, 2010 10:00 AM PST / 1:00 PM EST / 19:00 CET
Sign up at http://www.eventsvc.com/lucidimagination/0818
tom update processor could do this for you automatically.
Erik
On Aug 27, 2010, at 8:19 AM, Brad Dewar wrote:
Hi
In a multiValued field, I want to write a query that returns all the
documents that actually have more than 1 value in that field.
(don't care what the value is).
Maybe
Be sure to issue a commit after updates (either with a separate
or append ?commit=true to your update requests).
Out of curiosity are you using any Ruby library to speak to Solr? Or
hand rolling some Net::HTTP stuff?
Erik
On Sep 16, 2010, at 9:29 AM, maggie chen wrote:
Dear
<http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/?q=%22find+similar%22> (then narrow to
wiki to find things in "documentation")
which will get you to <http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThisHandler>
Erik
On Sep 22, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Li Li wrote:
> It seems ther
Matt - <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2145>
Erik
On Oct 7, 2010, at 23:38 , Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> If you are going to put explict phrase quotes in the query string like that,
> an ordinary text field will match fine, on phrase searches or other searches.
contributed) is crude and not "Solrized" (not schema
aware, etc), so it will be reworked before being something we'll commit to Solr
proper.
Erik
On Nov 25, 2012, at 15:18 , Anirudha Jadhav wrote:
> played around with the surround query parser, while its good. Its no
in digging deeper
into what's going on.
Erik
On Dec 2, 2012, at 08:15 , Bernd Fehling wrote:
> Hi Hoss,
> my config has definately not changed and it worked with 3.6 and 3.6.1.
> Yes I have a custom plugin and if q was empty with 3.6 it picked
> automatically q.alt
/update being more easily dangerous
than it probably should be. But let's also be clear always that Solr is meant
to be behind the firewall as it's primary and default place in the world.
Erik
* One I'll share: There is a real-world use case of a (relatively big) compa
On Dec 4, 2012, at 08:21 , Jack Krupansky wrote:
> "let's also be clear always that Solr is meant to be behind the firewall"
>
> Absolutely, but we are NOT doing that when we provide the Velocity-based
> /browse UI.
> Erik, your email example sounds reasonable
t I don't even
mention. A new top-level wiki page seems warranted from this discussion from
<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FrontPage> to list off all the various front-ends
available.
Erik
On Dec 4, 2012, at 12:11 , Upayavira wrote:
> That's an interesting take.
>
. loads of quiet computer time to
roll up my sleeves and tackle some of the many TODOs I have on the Velocity
response writer, Prism, and so on. There's good stuff there, so I'll aim to do
lots of polishing to get this stuff more presentable than ever.
Erik
On Dec 7, 2012, a
This is probably due to stemming. Removing the stemming (porter or snowball)
from you analysis chains should do the trick. (And reindex)
Erik
On Dec 17, 2012, at 2:57, Sangeetha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have not done anything in my schema.xml for phonetics search. But it
> searches
You need to reindex :)
Erik
On Dec 17, 2012, at 03:59 , Sangeetha wrote:
>
>
> I have docs which contains the word July. If i search with juli also it
> return July.
>
> I have removed in my
> schema.xml. Now it return nothing when i search July. It return July
I don't know of an "official" guarantee of maintaining order but it's
definitely guaranteed an relied upon to retain order. Many will scream if this
changed.
Indexed doesn't matter here because what you get back are the stored values no
matter if the field is inde
Set text to be unstored (stored="false") and / or don't put that field in your
query-time fl parameter.
Erik
On Dec 22, 2012, at 18:23, uwe72 wrote:
> i dont want to load the part:
>
>
> where is the indexed content of the origin pdf
>
>
>
doing specifically, and maybe we can guide you
to a more elegant way to plug in any custom logic you want.
Erik
On Dec 26, 2012, at 11:21 , Nalini Kartha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to figure out how to convert the fq params that are being passed
> to Solr into someth
so that the hit count that the
extended results is inclusive of the filters.
Maybe I'm missing something though, sorry.
Erik
On Dec 27, 2012, at 14:09 , Nalini Kartha wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Sorry, I think I wasn't very clear in explaining what we need to do.
Looks like you're being hit by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3377,
which is marked as fixed in 4.0, but not any version of 3.x
Erik
On Dec 28, 2012, at 13:06 , François Schiettecatte wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just ran into this bug while playing around with 3.6. Usi
/localhost:8983/solr/collection1/browse
:)
Erik
On Dec 29, 2012, at 16:54 , d_k wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm setting up Solr inside an intranet without an internet access and
> I was wondering if there is a way to obtain the data dump of the Solr
> Wiki (http://wiki.ap
ite the same sort of thing as a UpdateProcessor in Java and
plugged into Solr more natively and surely also more performantly (but ideally
only marginally so ultimately).
Erik
On Jan 8, 2013, at 15:21 , eShard wrote:
> I'll certainly ask manifold if they can send the date in the correct fo
, h.query(req("q","*:*",
"wt","velocity","v.template","test")));
}
And I added a conf/velocity/test.vm file with just this in it:
$response.response.response.numFound
So there ya go... I'll commit these in hopefully the near future along
that
down to numFound through NamedLists and so on is pretty ridiculous looking.
Erik
On Jan 9, 2013, at 19:54 , Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Marcos -
>
> I just happen to be tinkering with VrW over the last few days (to get some
> big improvements across the board with it and th
Tim -
You've likely been bitten by <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4286>,
which is now fixed and will be in 4.1 coming up soon.
Erik
On Jan 10, 2013, at 15:03 , Timothy Potter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using Solr 4.0, I'm sending a partial document upd
whitespace and
newlines in the actual XML source (browsers render it ugly though)
Erik
On Jan 10, 2013, at 15:35 , Petersen, Robert wrote:
> Hi Solr Users,
>
> Can someone give me some good parsing rules of thumb to make the debug
> explain output human readable? I found this co
That should be all you need to change
for that.
Check your Solr log/console output and see what the actual requests being made
to Solr are formed as, and give those a try directly through your browser to
see what is returned to troubleshoot it further.
Erik
On Jan 10, 2013, at 12:23 , an
Look at the extractOnly parameter.
But doing this in your client is the more recommended way of doing this to keep
Solr from getting beat up too bad.
Erik
On Jan 11, 2013, at 15:55, uwe72 wrote:
> i have a bit strange usecase.
>
> when i index a pdf to s
It's an ExtractingRequestHandler parameter (see the wiki). Not quite sure the
Java incantation to set that but definitely possible.
Erik
On Jan 11, 2013, at 17:14, uwe72 wrote:
> Erik, what do u mean with this parameter, i don't find it..
>
>
>
> --
>
20update%22>
Erik
On Jan 13, 2013, at 19:49 , Upayavira wrote:
> This is present in 4.0. Not sure if there re ny improvements in 4.1.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013, at 07:35 PM, Uwe Clement wrote:
>> Thanks Yonik.
>>
>> Is this already worki
ou wanted to suggest from 'text', substitute 'text' for
'name' in the spots just mentioned.
Erik
On Jan 11, 2013, at 01:21 , anurag.jain wrote:
> in solrconfig.xml
>
>
> edismax
>
> text^0.5 last_name^1.0 f
Solr fell back to the XML response writer
as you experienced.
Erik
On Jan 14, 2013, at 14:05 , Ramirez, Paul M (388J) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been unable to get the velocity response writer to work in a multicore
> environment. Working from the examples that are distrib
pod
GB
The Velocity templates (facet_queries.vm in this case) dynamically generates
the link and count display for all facet.query's in the request.
Erik
Thanks Arcadius!
Looks very promising and will have a look at it.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Arcadius Ahouansou wrote:
> Hi Erik.
>
> You way want to have a look at:
>
> http://www.cominvent.com/2012/01/25/super-flexible-autocomplete-with-solr/
>
> Arcadius.
>
>
How was your facet.field defined in the request handler? My guess is it needs
to be moved to an "appends" section.
Erik
On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:11, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> If you want to override facet.field through the query, you have to override
> ALL facet.field's
custom
field type. Or of course easily from your indexer probably too.
Erik
On Feb 9, 2013, at 1:15, Cool Techi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to facet results on an hourly basis, the following query gives me an
> hourly breakdown, but with the date part. I want just the hour part a
explicit somewhere?)
Here's the current hit template:
<div class="entry">
<b>{{title}}</b><br>
{{text}}
</div>
And finally... GPL?! ewww, why?! (-1) :)
Well played, Fergus!
Erik
On Feb 17, 2013, at 05:35 , Fergus McDo
I've added a Lucene meetup to the Wednesday night meetup proposed schedule.
I'm speaking on Wednesday morning.
Let's get the word spread to the Portland tech community as well, making it a
good way to bring in folks in the area that may not be also attending ApacheCon.
You need to use not , that's all :)
Erik
On Feb 20, 2013, at 4:06, Erik Dybdahl wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm currently assessing lucene/solr as a search front end for documents
> currently stored in an rdbms.
> The data has been made searchable to clients, in a way so that
Excellent, works like a charm!
Though embarassing, it's still a good thing the only problem was me being
blind :-)
Thank you, Toke and Erik.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 10:06 +0100, Erik Dybdahl wrote:
> > However, af
more details:
<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultitermQueryAnalysis>
Erik
On Mar 5, 2013, at 07:39 , Carlos Alexandro Becker wrote:
> Hi Jack, I've updated the gist:
> https://gist.github.com/caarlos0/4ad53583fb2b30ef0bec
>
> I'm give you the wrong browser tab resu
401 - 500 of 1860 matches
Mail list logo
