Hi
How can I filter records using filter query on multiValued field. Here are
two records
{
"sub_count":8,
"long_name":"Mike",
"first_name":"John",
"id":45949,
"sym":"TEST",
"type":"T",
"last_name":"Account",
"person_id":"3613
In the SOLR-7133 issue hard commit and auto commit are being differentiated,
but aren't they the same? Doesn't the following setting apply a hard commit?
${solr.autoCommit.maxTime:15000}
false
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7133
Which database is to be integrated? Solr provides Data Import Handlers for
several databases including Oracle and MySQL.
On Mon, 8/7/17, sg1973 wrote:
Subject: Storing data in Solr
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received: Monday, August 7, 2017,
Solr indexes data for search and if search is the main criterion Solr should be
used.
On Mon, 8/7/17, sg1973 wrote:
Subject: Storing data in Solr
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received: Monday, August 7, 2017, 6:55 PM
Hello All,
I am new to
Use Docker with Kubernetes, which has autoscaling of Docker containers based on
load. Docker image for Solr is https://hub.docker.com/_/solr/
On Thu, 10/12/17, Jay Potharaju wrote:
Subject: book on solr
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received: Th
Provide the url to the data source on a different server.
dataConfig>
On Thu, 11/9/17, Karan Saini wrote:
Subject: Quick Query about
To: solr-user@
Is the Docker container still running, which may be listed with docker ps?
Solr may be started with:
docker exec -it my_solr start
On Fri, 12/15/17, Buckler, Christine wrote:
Subject: How to restart solr in docker?
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.o
)Why is my sort clause specified by me (based on fq
conditions score and distance) not being applied correctly?
ii) Is my approach to fix the problem correct?
iii) Please let me know the corrective action.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Deepak
The
)Why is my sort clause specified by me (based on fq
conditions score and distance) not being applied correctly?
ii) Is my approach to fix the problem correct?
iii) Please let me know the corrective action.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Deepak
The
5 00:13:06.888 INFO (qtp1348949648-16) [ x:provider_collection]
o.a.s.c.S.Request [provider_collection] webapp=/solr path=/admin/ping
params={wt=javabin&version=2} status=0 QTime=0
2018-01-05 00:13:06.891 INFO (qtp1348949648-19) [ x:yelp_collection]
o.a.s.c.S.Request [yelp_collecti
"939" out of 10. It works fine by releanvence.
But Now I want "939" course result first then other result.So Please let me how
can I do that.
Thanks & Regards,
Deepak G.
Hello All,
if there is any way to set threshold memory to the solr indexing process.
My computer is hung and the indexing process is killed by the OS.
So , I was wondering if there is any way to set threshold memory usage to
solr indexing process in linux environments.
Thank you in advance.
n this context? In other words, how to
implement short-circuiting as in boolean algebra where an expression A || B
|| C returns true if A is true without even looking into whether B or C
could be true.
-Deepak
trying to extend it
so I can achieve the same behavior for multiple attributes. I am trying to
use multiple _val_, where the query returns an error.
How do I make a query with multiple _val_ clauses?
-Deepak
g queries differ in any
way?
C && B && A
A && B && C
Does Lucene/Solr pick the best query execution plan in terms of both space
and time for a given query?
-Deepak
know if there's a way I can point my Solr instance to read lucene
segments distributed across different disks attached to the same machine.
Thanks!
-Deepak
@Greg - Are you suggesting RAID as a replacement for Solr or making Solr
work with RAID? Could you elaborate more on the latter, if that's you
meant?
We make use of solr's advanced text processing features which would be hard
to replicate just using RAID.
-Deepak
On Wed, Sep 11, 201
Are you suggesting a multi-core setup, where all the cores share the same
schema, and the cores lie on different disks?
Basically, I'd like to know if I can distribute shards/segments on a single
machine (with multiple disks) without the use of zookeeper.
-Deepak
On Wed, Sep 11, 20
ey - Could you elaborate more about the "broker" core and
delegating the requests to other cores?
-Deepak
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 9/11/2013 1:07 PM, Deepak Konidena wrote:
>
>> Are you suggesting a multi-core setup, where all the cores s
of
the RAM and less than 10% is available for OS caching ( since replica takes
another 40%). Why does unallocated RAM help? How does it impact performance
under load?
-Deepak
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 9/11/2013 2:57 PM, Deepak Konidena wrote:
>
>> I
Very helpful link. Thanks for sharing that.
-Deepak
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 9/11/2013 4:16 PM, Deepak Konidena wrote:
>
>> As far as RAM usage goes, I believe we set the heap size to about 40% of
>> the RAM and less than 10% is availa
I am using solr 3.1.0 and running solr using multicore.
this is solr import URL which is working yesterday *
http://localhost:8983/solr/jobs/dataimport?command=delta-import&wt=json*
now its not working
what was the issue.
thanks
s a pretty decent review. But the
current version of Solr is 3.5, so should I proceed with David Smiley's book or
is there a better text available.
Thanks,
Shiv Deepak
Hey Brendan, Hey Hector,
That was very helpful. :)
Thanks,
Shiv Deepak
On 17-Dec-2011, at 07:52 , Hector Castro wrote:
> Hi Shiv,
>
> For me, a combination of the following has helped me learn a lot about Solr
> in a short period of time:
>
> * Apache Solr 3 Enterp
Hi,
I have one Text fileld in our schema i want to do the sorting for that column.
I have these two columns i want to use the SORT for these two columns.
any one can please suggest what should i need to do for that.
I am currently using Solr1.4.
--
DEEPAK AGRAWAL
+91-9379433455
GOOD LUCK.
ed "initials" field actually has only a
> single value which is a string that contains keywords delimited by blanks.
> You have two choices: 1) make "initials" a tokenized/text field, or 2) be
> sure to add the second set of initials as a separate value, such as:
> "
I m new in solr search i want to change schema for search in database and
documents.
I want 2 index in same solr server.
How to create 2 index and its schema for two different search result
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Amel Fraisse wrote:
> Hello every body,
>
> referring to the link : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin.
>
> I've created a solr.xml file as follows:
>
>
te/extract/?stream.file=path_of_filename&commit=true<http://localhost:8983/solr/core1/admin/>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Amel Fraisse wrote:
>
>
> 2011/3/31 Deepak Singh
>
>>
>> I want 2 index in same solr server.
>> How to create 2 index and it
version.
any one can please suggest why that particular record is not indexing.I am
not getting any error from Catalina log file also.
Thanks in advance.
--
DEEPAK AGRAWAL
+91-9379433455
GOOD LUCK.
server.
Thanks
Deepak H
.
--
DEEPAK AGRAWAL
+91-9379433455
GOOD LUCK.
ectory which contains the
> solr.xml
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:00 PM, deepak agrawal wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am having a solr single instance.Now i just want to use Solr Multi
> Core.
> > So for this i just change solr.xml -
> >
> >
> >
Can some one help me how we can sort the text field.
--
DEEPAK AGRAWAL
+91-9379433455
GOOD LUCK.
Hi All,
My Solr Search query is too long so i am not able to put it through get
method.
So i want to post it through POST method.
is there any way through i can POST the Search Query through POST Method.
--
DEEPAK AGRAWAL
+91-9379433455
GOOD LUCK.
*puts comes like put*
*series comes like seri*
*settled comes like settl*
**
*So Please help me how can i get the exact words in More Interesting Tirms.*
--
DEEPAK AGRAWAL
+91-9379433455
GOOD LUCK.
uti
puts comes like put
series comes like seri
settled comes like settl
*
So Please help me how can i get the exact words in More Interesting Tirms.
--
DEEPAK AGRAWAL
+91-9379433455
GOOD LUCK.
.
**
--
DEEPAK AGRAWAL
+91-9379433455
GOOD LUCK.
Hi,
i want to boost the result through query.
i have 4 fields in our schema.
If i search *deepak* then result should come in that order -
All *UPDBY* having deepak then
All *To* having deepak then
All *CC* having deepak
All *BCC* having deepak
I am using Standard request handler. Please
old index in Solr v1.4.
--
DEEPAK AGRAWAL
+91-9379433455
GOOD LUCK.
field type to your schema:
>
>
>
> You'll see more about this in Solr's example schema.xml comments.
>
> Erik
>
>
>
> On Feb 24, 2010, at 3:15 AM, deepak agrawal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I upgrade Solr v1.3 to v1.4 but in new
Please check if there is a deadlock happening by taking heap dumps
Deepak
"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are
treated. Please consider stopping the cruelty by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicoo
Are you getting errors in Jmeter?
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, 21:49 Amjad Khan, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We recently moved to Solr Cloud (Google) with 4 nodes and have very
> limited number of data.
>
> We are facing very weird issue here, solr cluster response time for query
> is high when we have less number
problem)
Last, what is the nature of your request. Are the queries the same? Or they
are very random? Random queries would need more tuning than if the queries
the same.
> Thanks!
> --
>
> *Sofiia Strochyk *
>
>
> s...@interlogic.com.ua
> [image: InterLogic]
> www.interlogic.com.ua
&
What are your hardware utilisations (cpu, memory, disk, network)?
I think you might have to tune lucene too
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, 14:33 Mugeesh Husain, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are running 3 node solr cloud(4.4) in our production infrastructure, We
> recently moved our SOLR server host softlayer to d
I would then suspect performance is choking in memory disk layer. can you
please check the performance?
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, 20:30 Sofiya Strochyk, wrote:
> Hi Deepak and thanks for your reply,
>
> On 27.10.18 10:35, Deepak Goel wrote:
>
>
> Last, what is the nature of you
Yes. Swapping from disk to memory & vice versa
Deepak
"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are
treated. Please consider stopping the cruelty by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: ww
Please see inline...
Deepak
"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are
treated. Please consider stopping the cruelty by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
&qu
Please see inline for my thoughts
Deepak
"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are
treated. Please consider stopping the cruelty by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/
I would start by monitoring the hardware (CPU, Memory, Disk) & software
(heap, threads) utilization's and seeing where the bottlenecks are. Or what
is getting utilized the most. And then tune that parameter.
I would also look at profiling the software.
Deepak
"The greatness of a
You might have to use a APM tool (AppDynamics) to debug the busy solr
instance
Deepak
"The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are
treated. Please consider stopping the cruelty by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.fa
Document is not being passed. It has zero content.
It could be due to no memory in heap. For this please check GC logs
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019, 08:54 Schaum Mallik I am seeing this error in our logs. Our Solr heap is set to more than 10G.
> Any clues which anyone can provide will be very helpful.
>
Thanks Susheel / Shawn for the suggestions.
We are working on the proposed changes.
Regards,
Deepak
-Original Message-
From: Susheel Kumar [mailto:susheel2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2018 7:19 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Venkata MR ; Segar Soundiramourthy
n any document. What mistake am I making?*
Thank You
Deepak
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
"Plant a Tree, Go Green"
<http://w
_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.co
Got it . Thank You for your help
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
"Plant a Tree, Go Green"
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:48 PM
ot;line_id":1,"play_name":"Henry IV",
"speech_number":"","line_number":"","speaker":"","text_entry":"ACT I"}
{"index":{"_index":"shakespeare","_id":1}}
{&quo
should be the RAM, Heap size etc.
Thanks,
Deepak
speech_number":"13", "line_number":"3.3.37", "speaker":"HENRY
BOLINGBROKE", "text_entry":"Henry Bolingbroke", "id":
"9428c765-a4e8-4116-937a-9b70e8a8e2de", "_version_":1588569205789163522, "
;:"13",
"line_number":"3.3.37",
"speaker":"HENRY BOLINGBROKE",
"text_entry":"Henry Bolingbroke",
"id":"9428c765-a4e8-4116-937a-9b70e8a8e2de",
"_version_":1588569205789163522,
"speaker_str":[
are not getting build the suggest data.
Any configuration mismatch?
Thanks a lot.
Thanks & Regards
Deepak
::DISCLA
FYI. I recently did a study on 'Performance of Solr'
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/performance-comparison-solr-elasticsearch-deepak-goel/?trackingId=N2j9xWvVEQQaZYa%2BoEsy%2Bw%3D%3D
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...
e problem?
Any inputs would be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Deepak
The information contained in this email message and any attachments is
confidential and intended only for the addressee(s). If you are not an
addressee, you may not copy or disclose the information, or
i.e location in our case.
Any pointers / suggestions to index/retrieve the suggestions would be really
helpful.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Deepak
The information contained in this email message and any attachments is
confidential and intended only for the addressee(s). If you are not an
Hi all,
Any response on the below would be really helpful.
Thanks,
Deepak
-Original Message-
From: Deepak Udapudi [mailto:dudap...@delta.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2018 2:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: lat/long (location ) field context filters for
Can you please give the configuration of your server?
On 11 Feb 2018 19:17, "~$alpha`" wrote:
> I have upgraded Solr4.0 Beta to Solr6.6. The Cache results look Awesome but
> overall the CPU load on solr6.6 is double the load on solr4.0 and hence I
> am
> not able to roll solr6.6 to 100% of my tr
Two things trouble me:
1. It is a shared resource, so results are unreliable
2. Since cache results have increased, memory access will increase and it
will result in an increase in cpu usage. However response times will also
improve
To support more load you will have to increase server capacity
Yup. Improvement of response time would hurt the cpu usage. The other thing
is more memory usage (cache) which gets included into the cpu usage.
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.c
Also can you please post the throughputs for both of your tests
On 12 Feb 2018 00:35, "Deepak Goel" wrote:
> Yup. Improvement of response time would hurt the cpu usage. The other
> thing is more memory usage (cache) which gets included into the cpu usage.
>
>
>
> D
I would suggest to keep the load same both for solr4 and solr6. And then
test. Also please post exact concurrent hits
On 12 Feb 2018 12:48, "~$alpha`" wrote:
When both solr4 and solr6 have concurrent hits:
1. 30 to 40 :
Avg response time 470ms vs 380ms
Load 6 vs 10
1. 80 to
Please test for higher number of hits till cpu load reaches 100%
On 12 Feb 2018 19:44, "~$alpha`" wrote:
> Hits 41 :
> Avg response time470ms vs 380ms
> CPU Load reaches6 vs 10
>
> Hits 82:
> Avg response time 500ms vs 620ms (solr6 performing bad on peak
This would then mean that solr6 is reaching some kind of saturation (number
of threads, etc) at about loads of 60 Hits which then drives the
performance of it to be very bad !
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Faceb
If the community cannot help, the only way i can think is either to profile
Solr (java) under a load test to find the problem. You could also use an
APM.
On 12 Feb 2018 23:00, "~$alpha`" wrote:
> Yes, but how to move ahead now.
> Its strange solr4 is better behaving than solr6
>
>
>
> --
> Sent
One more idea could be is to have multiple vm's (8 cpu each) on your server
and load balance them. That would help Solr6 scale nicely
On 12 Feb 2018 23:05, "Deepak Goel" wrote:
> If the community cannot help, the only way i can think is either to
> profile Solr (java) unde
alues? Please suggest.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Deepak
-Original Message-
From: Emir Arnautović [mailto:emir.arnauto...@sematext.com]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 12:14 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: lat/long (location ) field context filters for autosuggestion
Can you please post all the errors? The current error is only for the node
'solr-2d'
On 23 Feb 2018 09:42, "Tom Peters" wrote:
I'm trying to debug why indexing in SolrCloud 7.1 is having so many issues.
It will hang most of the time, and timeout the rest.
Here's an example:
time curl -s 'm
ons indices to propagate to all the solr instances
automatically.
So, request for suggestions/solutions for the same.
Thanks,
Deepak
The information contained in this email message and any attachments is
confidential and intended only for the addressee(s). If you are not an
addressee, you m
Using the solr collection/suggest?suggesttrue&suggest.buildAlltrue URL for
populating the index.
Regards,
Deepak
-Original Message-
From: Deepak Udapudi [mailto:dudap...@delta.org]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 5:42 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Balakrishna Sudabat
gt; On Feb 23, 2018, at 4:15 PM, Deepak Goel wrote:
>
> Can you please post all the errors? The current error is only for the node
> 'solr-2d'
>
> On 23 Feb 2018 09:42, "Tom Peters" wrote:
>
> I'm trying to debug why indexing in SolrCloud 7.1 is
To rephrase your Question
"Does Solr do well with Scale-up or Scale-out?"
Are there any Performance Benchmarks for the same out there supporting the
claim?
On 11 Mar 2018 23:05, "BlackIce" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some questions regarding performance.
>
> Lets says I have a dual CPU with a tota
lization in modern times is really good, so the difference
*might* be minimal, but there is ALWAYS overhead.
*Deepak*
I doubt this. It would be great if someone can subtantiate this with hard
facts
*Deepak*
I used to create virtual machines in my hardware for Solr. Initially with
vmware e
found this for running multiple apache servers on multiple VMs as
compared to a single instance (not Solr). But i am pretty sure it would be
same for Solr too
On 12 Mar 2018 12:42, "Shawn Heisey" wrote:
> On 3/11/2018 7:39 PM, Deepak Goel wrote:
>
>> I doubt this. It would b
solrconfig.xml
> > and I'm just diving into a bit more deeper stuff!
> >
> > Greetz
> >
> > RRK
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Deepak Goel wrote:
> >
> >> To rephrase your Question
> >>
> >> "Does Solr do
tilisation metrics)
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
"Plant a Tree, Go Green"
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:57 PM, BlackIce wrot
en do some testing further down the
> road.
> > For now just get the sucker up and running.
> >
> > Thanks all
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 7:23 PM, Deepak Goel wrote:
> >
> >> I am not sure if I understand your question
> >>
> >>
Have you measured the overhead of VM anytime? Or have you read it somewhere?
On 14 Mar 2018 18:10, "BlackIce" wrote:
> but it should be possible, without the overhead of VM's
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Deepak Goel wrote:
>
> > The OS resources would
Please see inline...
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
"Plant a Tree, Go Green"
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 6:04 PM, Black
>I think there is no benefit in having multiple Solr instances on a single
>server, unless the heap memory required by the JVM is too big.
Deepak***
I would try multiple Solr instances rather a single Solr instance (it
definitely will give a performance boost)
Deepak***
>And reme
since I'm at
>> it
>> I may give solr a few instances as well
>>
>
> ***Deepak***
I did a performance study of Solr a while back. And I found that it does
not scale beyond a particular point on a single machine (could be due to
the way its coded). Hence multiple instance
> On Mar 16, 2018, at 6:26 AM, Deepak Goel wrote:
>
> I would try multiple Solr instances rather a single Solr instance (it
> definitely will give a performance boost)
> I would avoid multiple Solr instances on single machine. I can use all 36
cores on our servers with one Solr pr
osoft Windows.)
> Windows has very different handling for threads, memory, and files
compared to Unix. I had to do a lot of Windows-specific tuning for > >
Ultraseek Server to get decent performance. For example, merge speed was
terrible unless I opened files with a Windows-specific > >
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 1:06 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/16/2018 7:38 AM, Deepak Goel wrote:
> > I did a performance study of Solr a while back. And I found that it does
> > not scale beyond a particular point on a single machine (could be due to
> > the way its c
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 2:56 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/16/2018 2:21 PM, Deepak Goel wrote:
> > I wanted to test how many max connections can Solr handle concurrently.
> > Also I would have to implement an 'connection pooling' of the
> client-object
> >
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 3:11 AM, Walter Underwood
wrote:
> > On Mar 16, 2018, at 1:21 PM, Deepak Goel wrote:
> >
> > However a single client object with thousands of queries coming in would
> > surely become a bottleneck. I can test this scenario too.
>
> No it i
On 17 Mar 2018 05:19, "Walter Underwood" wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2018, at 3:26 PM, Deepak Goel wrote:
>
> Can you please post results of your test?
>
> Please tell us the tps at 25%, 50%, 75%, 100% of your CPU resource
I could, but it probably would not be useful f
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
"Plant a Tree, Go Green"
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 2:56 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
"Plant a Tree, Go Green"
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 2:40 AM, Walter Underwood
wrote:
> >
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
"Plant a Tree, Go Green"
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 1:25 AM, Deepak Goel wrote:
>
>
&
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
"Plant a Tree, Go Green"
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:32 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/
Deepak
"Please stop cruelty to Animals, help by becoming a Vegan"
+91 73500 12833
deic...@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deicool
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/deicool
"Plant a Tree, Go Green"
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:38 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/2
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
