Hi Fabio,
Like Jack says, try the tutorial. But to answer your question, SOLR isn't a
bolt on to SQLServer or any other DB. It's a fantastically fast
indexing/searching tool. You'll need to use the DataImportHandler (see the
tutorial) to import your data from the DB into the indices that SOLR u
obile
---- Original message
From: "David Quarterman [via Lucene]"
Date: 02/07/2013 16:57 (GMT+00:00)
To: fabio1605
Subject: RE: Newbie SolR - Need advice
Hi Fabio,
Like Jack says, try the tutorial. But to answer your question, SOLR isn't a
bolt on to S
Hi Fabio,
Sandeep is right - it'll take time. SOLR isn't straightforward when you first
start out but the tutorial is the best first step. You can then adapt the
various config files in the tutorial to adapt to your situation. I'd recommend
a simple approach to get the hang of it and just index
Hi,
About once a week the admin system comes up with SolrCore Initialization
Failures. There's nothing in the logs and SOLR continues to work in the
application it's supporting and in the 'direct access' mode (i.e.
http://123.465.789.100:8080/solr/collection1/select?q=bingo:*).
The cure is to
m
Yes :-) see SOLR-118, seems an old issue...
On 4 Jul 2013 06:43, "David Quarterman" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About once a week the admin system comes up with SolrCore
> Initialization Failures. There's nothing in the logs and SOLR
> continues to work in the application
Hi Jason,
Assuming you're using DIH, why not build a new, unique id within the query to
use as the 'doc_id' for SOLR? We do something like this in one of our
collections. In MySQL, try this (don't know what it would be for any other db
but there must be equivalents):
select @rownum:=@rownum+1
Hi Henrik,
Try setting up a copyfield in your schema and set the copied field to use
something like 'text_ws' which implements LowerCaseFilterFactory. Then sort on
the copyfield.
Regards,
DQ
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Ossipoff Hansen [mailto:h...@entertainment-trading.com]
Sent:
Hi all,
We have an index of boots which contains harness boots, engineer boots , ankle
boots, etc. An edismax search on the index for 'harness boots' brings back
2,175 boots with 'harness' results at the top. 'Searching 'engineer boots'
brings back everything but 'engineer boots', same for 'ank
ing scored - you may have to add some specific query
phrases to force "engineer boot" into the top results to comparing the scoring.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: David Quarterman
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:21 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Edis
em there, then the Solr log (assuming you haven't
changed the default log level of INFO) should have a record of what parameters
were actually received when the query was made.
Thanks,
Shawn
On 2/19/2013 9:14 AM, David Quarterman wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> Here's q test query we&
Hi Shawn/Jack,
The log shows the query going in okay, nothing gets stripped out so we're still
at a loss to understand this. Could it be theta Snowball stemming is too
invasive?
Regards,
DQ
-Original Message-
From: David Quarterman [mailto:da...@corexe.com]
Sent: 19 February 20
mming reduces 'engineer' to 'engin' so I'd have expected a lot more
results.
Anyone got any ideas?
Regards,
DQ
-----Original Message-
From: David Quarterman [mailto:da...@corexe.com]
Sent: 19 February 2013 17:09
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Edismax od
Hi Shawn,
Now finished for the day but will post the schema tomorrow. Thanks for the help
(and Jack too).
Regards,
DQ
P.S. did reindex after changing schema and the analyzer/query stuff matches
precisely!!
Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 2/19/2013 11:16 AM, David Quarterman wrote:
> This
2013 11:16 AM, David Quarterman wrote:
> This is definitely driving us mad now! Changed to PorterStemming and there's
> very little difference.
>
> If we add fq=engineer, we get 0 results. Add fq=engineer* and we get the 90
> in the system. Try with fq=ankle* and we get 2
rg
Subject: Re: Edismax odd results
When you get back to this tomorrow, also try and paste the parsed query bits
you get back when you append &debug=all. Sometimes it's surprising what the
parsed query _really_ looks like
Best
Erick
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:13 PM, David Quart
ts you get back when you append &debug=all. Sometimes it's
> surprising what the parsed query _really_ looks like
>
> Best
> Erick
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:13 PM, David Quarterman
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Shawn,
> >
> > Now finished for
Hi Marcelo,
Looked through your site and the framework looks very powerful as an
aggregator. We do a lot of data aggregation from many different sources in many
different formats (XML, JSON, text, CSV, etc) using RDBMS as the main
repository for eventual SOLR indexing. A 'one-stop-shop' for all
Hi Erick,
Funnily enough, I cracked it about 5 minutes before your email arrived! Problem
was using WhiteSpaceTokenizer instead of Standard AND had the LowerCaseFilter
after the PorterStemmingFilter. Getting them in the right order has solved all
the problems and we get all our engineer boots,
Hi Alvaro,
I agree with Otis & Alexandre (esp. Windows + PHP!). However, there are plenty
of people using Solr & PHP out there very successfully. There's another good
package at http://code.google.com/p/solr-php-client/ which is easy to implement
and has some example usage.
Regards,
DQ
Fr
Hi,
We've been using V4.x of SOLR since last November without too much
trouble. Our MySQL database is refreshed daily and a full import is run
automatically after the refresh and generally produces around 86,000
products, obviously on unique doc_id's.
So, we upgraded to 4.0 Beta a few days ago
staging_area/lucene-solr-4.0RC1-rev13911
44/solr/
There will be an RC2 sometime, a couple of problems have been found, but
using RC1 should minimize any update to the official 4.0 plus have a lot
of improvements over BETA...
Best
Erick
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:25 AM, David Quarterman
wrote:
We had a similar requirement and found the best solution (unfortunately)
was to spend a small amount of money. Have a look at Sematext's site
(www.sematext.com). Their Autocomplete is awesome and we have a
fantastic looking AC now on our development site, grouped by category,
product & brand with p
Fernando,
Pretty much the problem we came up against. We had a basic AC running
using SpellChecker a while ago but it was the grouping that floored us
and sent us elsewhere. Again, multiple queries seemed like the only
possible answer but in an AC scenario, even with SOLR's speed, probably
too slo
23 matches
Mail list logo