Hi Erick, Debug=all posted on http://justpaste.it/davidqhogdebug. Can't see anything obvious myself....but then I'm not an expert!
Regards, DQ -----Original Message----- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: 20 February 2013 02:02 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Edismax odd results When you get back to this tomorrow, also try and paste the parsed query bits you get back when you append &debug=all. Sometimes it's surprising what the parsed query _really_ looks like.... Best Erick On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:13 PM, David Quarterman <da...@corexe.com> wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > Now finished for the day but will post the schema tomorrow. Thanks for > the help (and Jack too). > > Regards, > > DQ > > P.S. did reindex after changing schema and the analyzer/query stuff > matches precisely!! > > Shawn Heisey <s...@elyograg.org> wrote: > > On 2/19/2013 11:16 AM, David Quarterman wrote: > > This is definitely driving us mad now! Changed to PorterStemming and > there's very little difference. > > > > If we add fq=engineer, we get 0 results. Add fq=engineer* and we get > > the > 90 in the system. Try with fq=ankle* and we get 2. Correct. Try with > fq=harness* and we get 0! > > > > The stemming reduces 'engineer' to 'engin' so I'd have expected a > > lot > more results. > > > > Anyone got any ideas? > > Did you completely reindex when you changed your schema? You must reindex. > > Does the index analysis match the query analysis? Some specific > differences are allowed (and sometimes encouraged), but stemming must > be done to both. Can you share your schema? Use a paste website like > pastie.org for that. > > Thanks, > Shawn > >
