leading and trailing wildcard query

w how expensive such a query would be, but we have the user requirement, nonetheless. If not, any suggestions on how to implement a custom solution using Solr? Using an external data structure? -- A. Steven Anderson

Re: leading and trailing wildcard query

No thoughts on this? Really!? I would hate to admit to my Oracle DBE that Solr can't be customized to do a common query that a relational database can do. :-( On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:01 PM, A. Steven Anderson < a.steven.ander...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've scoured the archives

Re: leading and trailing wildcard query

ave non-Latin characters that may not have whitespace nor punctuation. -- A. Steven Anderson

Re: leading and trailing wildcard query

Thanks for the solution, but could you elaborate on how it would find something like *abc* in a field that contains abc. Steve On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Bernadette Houghton < bernadette.hough...@deakin.edu.au> wrote: > I've just set up something similar (much thanks to Avesh!)- > >

Re: leading and trailing wildcard query

nge to the source. > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-218 > Unfortunately, we can only use official releases (not even snapshots) since it's a government-related project. -- A. Steven Anderson

Re: leading and trailing wildcard query

or is a Solr 1.4 feature only, correct? -- A. Steven Anderson

Re: leading and trailing wildcard query

releases are all that matters, and 12-18 month release cycles are not acceptable. ;-) -- A. Steven Anderson

Re: leading and trailing wildcard query

> Note that N-grams are limited to specific string lengths. I presume that > you need to search for arbitrary strings, not just three-letter ones. > Understood, but that is a limitation that we can live with. Thanks! -- A. Steven Anderson

Re: leading and trailing wildcard query

> Not sure what version it was supported from, but we're on 1.3. Really!? Great answer! Thanks! -- A. Steven Anderson

Retrieve docs with > 1 multivalue field hits

Greetings! I thought I remembered seeing a thread related to retrieving only documents that had more than one hit in a particular multivalue field, but I cannot find it now. Regardless, is this possible in Solr 1.3? Solr 1.4? -- A. Steven Anderson Independent Consultant

Re: Retrieve docs with > 1 multivalue field hits

I thought this would be a quick yes or no answer and/or reference to another thread, but alas, I got no replies. Is it safe to assume the answer is 'no' for both Solr 1.3 and 1.4? On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:48 PM, A. Steven Anderson wrote: > Greetings! > > I thought I remembe

Re: Retrieve docs with > 1 multivalue field hits

xample would be if a schema included a phoneNum mulitValue field and I wanted to return all docs that contained more than 1 phoneNum field value. It sort of like a facet query, but only on a per document count basis. -- A. Steven Anderson Independent Consultant

Re: Retrieve docs with > 1 multivalue field hits

lect * from docs where count(phone) > 1". I was thinking there might be a way with function queries, but I guess not. Thanks for the answer though. -- A. Steven Anderson Independent Consultant

performance question

search process. Thoughts? -- A. Steven Anderson Independent Consultant st...@asanderson.com

DIH optional fields?

-around? Should there be a JIRA for a field-level optional or onError parameter? -- A. Steven Anderson Independent Consultant st...@asanderson.com

Re: DIH optional fields?

> Use &zeroDateTimeBehavior=convertToNull parameter in you sql connection > string. > That worked great! Thanks! -- A. Steven Anderson Independent Consultant A. S. Anderson & Associates LLC P.O. Box 672 Forest Hill, MD 21050-0672 443-790-4269 st...@asanderson.com

Re: performance question

the user was interacting > with the system in a reflective model that selected which fields to search > on. > Our application is as much about discovery as search, so this is good to know. Thanks for the feedback. It was very helpful. -- A. Steven Anderson Independent Consultant st...@asanderson.com

Re: performance question

the index. > If you sort on many of your dynamic fields your memory use will > explode, and the same with index norms and disk space. Thanks for the info. In general, I knew sorting was expensive, but I didn't realize that dynamic fields made it worse. -- A. Steven Anderson

Re: performance question

tions. > Ahh...thanks for the clarification. So, in general, there is no *significant* performance difference with using dynamic fields. Correct? -- A. Steven Anderson Independent Consultant st...@asanderson.com

Re: performance question

he only negative that I've found so far is that you lose the copyField capability, so it makes my ingest a little bigger, since I have to manually copy the values myself. -- A. Steven Anderson Independent Consultant st...@asanderson.com

Re: performance question

using dynamic fields then. ;-) Thanks for all the info! -- A. Steven Anderson Independent Consultant st...@asanderson.com

StreamingUpdateSolrServer URL reset or flush?

he current StreamingUpdateSolrServer just before midnight? -- A. Steven Anderson Independent Consultant