To sum it up, there is no way for bulk loading in solr, due to the lack
of preserving the order of operation.
Solr can only supply bulk loading if you really have unique data, right?
By the way, the queue used is java.util.concurrent.BlockingQueue.
Changing that to ArrayBlockingQueue (to force FIF
On 1/11/2018 1:38 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
To sum it up, there is no way for bulk loading in solr, due to the lack
of preserving the order of operation.
Solr can only supply bulk loading if you really have unique data, right?
Bulk loading implies that every document is inserted exactly once and
On 1/10/2018 11:00 PM, manish tanger wrote:
As we are connecting through zookeeper my understanding was routing will
done by a zookeeper, Thanks for the clarification.
CloudSolrClient doesn't actually connect through ZK. When you create
the client using ZK info, the client reads information a
Hi,
As announced on Berlin Buzzwords we (that is Isabel Drost-Fromm, Stefan
Rudnitzki as well as the eventing team over at newthinking communications GmbH)
are working on a new conference in summer in Berlin. The name of this new
conference will be "FOSS Backstage". Backstage comprises all things
Yes, i made sure the large test segment had just over 10 % deleted documents.
But all that expungeDeletes did was merging that segment with itself, making it
just 10 % smaller. It makes sense though. Optimizing with maxSegments is also
not a possibility, it will just merge the cheapest segments
Hi Leila,
You should be able to pass score parameter that will tell how to combine
children’s scores to parent’s score:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/other-parsers.html#OtherParsers-Scoring
Maybe you could change approach and index each cell as a separate doc with
layer field and use
Solution that I implemented currently is:
Since we have a web application which takes the solr results and display in
the UI and I need LTR enabled for only one of the group,
I am executing two parallel queries to Solr from web app.
1st query Get grouped results without LTR
2nd query Get results wi
Thank you very much for the reply Shawn. Is the jmeter running on a different
machine from Solr or on the same machine?
Solr is running on a dedicated VM. And I’ve tried to split the client requests
from multiple machines but the result was not different. So, I don’t think the
bottleneck is with
When you say "multiple machines", was these all local machines or vms or
something else? I worked with a group once that used laptops to benchmark a
service and it was a WiFi network limit that caused weird results. LAN
connections or even better a dedicated client machine would help push more
docu
Thank you for the reply Kevin. I was using 6 vms from our private cloud. 5
among them, I was using as clients to ingest data on 5 independent cores. One
vm is hosting the Solr which is where all ingest requests are received for all
cores. Since they are all on same network, I think they should n
Hi Rick,
Quoting Robert Muir’s comments on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2167 (he’s referring to the word
break rules in UAX#29[1] when he says “the standard”):
> i actually am of the opinion StandardTokenizer should follow unicode standard
> tokenization. then we can throw sub
Roopa, did you try collapsing instead of grouping? it would work with ltr..
From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 01/11/18 16:48:26To:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Learning to Rank (LTR) with grouping
Solution that I implemented currently is:
Since we have a web application which t
Hi Diego,
I tried collapsing, unfortunately we are using a third party tool for Query
processing, that does not support collapsing. Hence I am unable to go that
route.
Thank you,
Roopa
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Diego Ceccarelli (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <
dceccarel...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> R
On 1/11/2018 11:50 AM, Shashank Pedamallu wrote:
> Thank you for the reply Kevin. I was using 6 vms from our private cloud. 5
> among them, I was using as clients to ingest data on 5 independent cores. One
> vm is hosting the Solr which is where all ingest requests are received for
> all cores.
Hi Team,
Could you please let me know how to handle the below scenario.
I have Two Collections *Accounts & Content.*
I am trying to search term *"biodata". *
from Accounts Collections I am getting the output *sample : your biodata*
from Content Collections I am getting the output *title :
I believe it supports collection=accounts,content param, but can't find it
in documentation.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Fiz Newyorker wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Could you please let me know how to handle the below scenario.
>
> I have Two Collections *Accounts & Content.*
>
> I am trying to se
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for replying to my questions.
So is it correct to assume that exposing merge metrics is not known to
cause any performance degradation?
-suresh
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 1/10/2018 11:08 AM, S G wrote:
>
>> Last comment by Shawn on SOLR-10130 is:
Yes Mikhail, even I couldn't find it.
Hi Solr-user team,
Requesting your support.
Thanks
Fiz.
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 8:06 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> I believe it supports collection=accounts,content param, but can't find it
> in documentation.
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Fiz Newy
Try using solr streaming api.
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/streaming-expressions.html
Sample query:
innerJoin(
select(search(, q=, fl=, sort=, qt="/export"), ),
select(search(search(, q=,
fl=, sort=, qt="/export"),
),
on=)
Note : Both collections must have at least one common field to
19 matches
Mail list logo
