Solution that I implemented currently is: Since we have a web application which takes the solr results and display in the UI and I need LTR enabled for only one of the group, I am executing two parallel queries to Solr from web app. 1st query Get grouped results without LTR 2nd query Get results with no grouping + LTR Merge 1) & 2) in web app. Doing a performance test now. Since there are only 10 results for these queries and the queries are executed in parallel, I don't foresee any problems.
Thanks! Roopa On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Roopa Rao <roop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Any guidance on this would be helpful. > > Thank you, > Roopa > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Roopa Rao <roop...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Diego, >> >> Thank you for looking into it further. >> We recently ported over to 6.6 version solely to use LTR feature as it is >> critical for us. >> >> Since its not working with grouping in the base version, I am trying to >> evaluate if there is any alternative way to make it work in 6.6 versus >> upgrading to 7.0. >> >> Any guidance you could provide on what can be done to use 6.6 with >> grouping + LTR or any alternatives would be helpful. Do I read your >> response as needing to go to 7.0 when you say upstream? >> >> Thank you, >> Roopa >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Diego Ceccarelli < >> diego.ceccare...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Roopa, unfortunately I can't port the patch to the branch_6_6, but >>> soon I'll update to upstream. Sorry about that. >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Roopa Rao <roop...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Hi - >>> > >>> > I merged the code from the bloomberg master-solr-8776 branch to >>> branch_6_6 >>> > on Solr. >>> > >>> > When I tried to compile the solr source code, I am getting multiple >>> > compilation errors (Attached), which seems to be due to the fact that >>> the >>> > branch master-solr-8776 may not be compatible with branch_6_6. >>> > >>> > Could you please provide your input if master-solr-8776 is compatible >>> with >>> > branch_6_6? >>> > >>> > If this is not the case then how to proceed with using fix in >>> > master-solr-8776 with branch_6_6 can a new patch be created for this? >>> > >>> > Thank you, >>> > Roopa >>> > >>> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Roopa Rao <roop...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi Diego, >>> >> >>> >> Thank you, >>> >> >>> >> I am interested in reranking the documents inside one of the groups. >>> >> >>> >> I will try the options you mentioned here. >>> >> >>> >> Thank you, >>> >> Roopa >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Diego Ceccarelli (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) >>> >> <dceccarel...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Roopa, >>> >>> >>> >>> If you look at the diff: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/162/files >>> >>> >>> >>> I didn't change much in SolrIndexSearcher, you can try to skip the >>> file >>> >>> when applying the patch and redo the changes after. >>> >>> >>> >>> Alternatively, the feature branch is available here: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/bloomberg/lucene-solr/commits/master-solr-8776 >>> >>> >>> >>> you could try to merge with that or cheery-pick my changes. >>> >>> >>> >>> Are you interested in reranking the groups or also in reranking the >>> >>> documents inside each group? >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Diego >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: solr-user@lucene.apache.org At: 12/09/17 19:07:25To: >>> >>> solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>> >>> Subject: Re: Learning to Rank (LTR) with grouping >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi I tried to apply this JIRA SOLR-8776 as a patch as this feature is >>> >>> critical. >>> >>> >>> >>> Here are the steps I took on my mac: >>> >>> >>> >>> On branch branch_6_5 >>> >>> >>> >>> Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/branch_6_5' >>> >>> >>> >>> patch -p1 -i 162.patch --dry-run >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> I am getting Failures for certain Hunks >>> >>> >>> >>> Example: >>> >>> >>> >>> patching file >>> >>> solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexSearcher.java >>> >>> >>> >>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1471. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Could you please give your input on how to apply this ticket as a >>> patch >>> >>> for >>> >>> branch_6_5 ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> >>> >>> Roopa >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Roopa Rao <roop...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > Hi Diego, >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Thank you, I will look into this and see how I could patch this. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Thank you for your quick response, >>> >>> > Roopa >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Diego Ceccarelli < >>> >>> > diego.ceccare...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > >>> >>> >> Hi Roopa, >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> LTR is implemented using RankQuery, and at the moment grouping >>> doens't >>> >>> >> support RankQuery. >>> >>> >> I opened a jira item time ago >>> >>> >> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8776) and I would be >>> happy >>> >>> >> to receive feedback on that. You can find the code here >>> >>> >> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/162. >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Cheers, >>> >>> >> diego >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Roopa Rao <roop...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >> > Hi, >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > I am using grouping and LTR together and the results are not >>> getting >>> >>> >> > re-rank as it does without grouping. >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > I am passing &rq parameter. >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > Does LTR work with grouping on? >>> >>> >> > Solr version 6.5 >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > Thank you, >>> >>> >> > Roopa >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >
