Yeah.
Under an entry like so:
fields
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, 13:00 Anil wrote:
> you mean default fl ?
>
> On 16 February 2016 at 12:57, Binoy Dalal wrote:
>
> > Oh wait. We don't append the fl parameter to the query.
> > We've configured it in the request handler in solrconfig.xml
> > Maybe that
David, thanks for getting back to me. SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType
seems to be what I need, and the default search seems appropriate. This
is for entries in an astronomical catalog, so great circle distances on a
perfect sphere is what I¹m after.
I am having a bit of difficulty though.
Looks like the only issue was that I did not have an alias for SourceRpt
field in the SQL.
With that in place, everything seems to work more or less as expected.
SourceRpt shows up where it should.
Queries like
http://localhost:8983/solr/spatial/select?q=*:*&fq={!geofilt%20sfield=Sour
c
The "other" collection (destination of the import) is the collection where that
data import handler definition resides.
Erik
> On Feb 16, 2016, at 01:54, vidya wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have gone through documents to define data import handler in solr. But i
> couldnot implement it.
> I have cr
Binoy, the omitTermFreqAndPositions is set only for text_ws which is used
only on the "indexed_terms" field.
The text_general fields seem fine to me.
Are you omitting norms on purpose ? To be fair it could be relevant in
title or short topic searches to boost up short field values, containing a
lo
@Nitin
Why are you phrase boosting on string fields?
More often than not, it won't do anything because the phrases simply won't
match the entire string.
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, 15:36 Alessandro Benedetti
wrote:
> Binoy, the omitTermFreqAndPositions is set only for text_ws which is used
> only on th
My debugQuery=true returns related to the NOT:
0.06755901 = (MATCH) sum of: 0.06755901 = (MATCH) MatchAllDocsQuery,
product of: 0.06755901 = queryNorm
I tried changing v='(*:* -DocType:pdf)' to v='(-DocType:pdf)'
and it worked.
Anyone could explain the difference?
Thanks
Sergo
On 15 February
You are absolutely right Binoy..!!
But my problem is; We don't want the term frequency to take into account for
index term as well as drug. (i.e. Don't want to consider the no. of
occurrences of search term for both of these fields.)
Is it possible that i can omit the term frequency for these two
Hi Emir,
I tried using the boost parameters for phrase search by removing the
omitTermFreqAndPositions from the multivalued field type but somehow while
searching phrases; the documents that have exact match are not coming up in
the order. Instead; in the content field, it is considering the mutua
Based on a quick look at the documentation, I think that you should use
termPositions=true to achieve what you want.
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, 16:08 Nitin.K wrote:
> Hi Emir,
>
> I tried using the boost parameters for phrase search by removing the
> omitTermFreqAndPositions from the multivalued field
On 16 February 2016 at 06:09, Midas A wrote:
> Susheel,
>
> Is there any client available in php for solr cloud which maintain the same
> ??
>
>
No there is none. I recommend HAProxy for Non SolrJ clients and
loadbalancing SolrCloud.
HAProxy makes it also easy to do rolling updates of your SolrCl
Nithin, have you read my reply ?
kindly let me know, how can i first search the phrase and then go to the
> individual words (i.e word-1 AND word-2)
>
On 16 February 2016 at 10:45, Binoy Dalal wrote:
> Based on a quick look at the documentation, I think that you should use
> termPositions=true
Hi Nitin,
Not sure if you changed what fields you use for phrase boost, but in
example you sent, all fields except content are "string" fields and
content is boosted with 6 while topic_title in qf is boosted with 100.
Try setting same field you use in qf in pf2 and you should see the
differenc
Actually you can get it with the edismax.
Just set mm to 100% and then configure a pf field ( or more) .
You are going to search all the search terms mandatory and boost phrases
match .
@Alessandro Thanks for your insight.
I thought that the document will be boosted if all of the terms appear in
c
If I remember well , it is going to be as a phrase query ( when you use the
"quotes") .
So the close proximity means a match of the phrase with 0 tolerance ( so
the terms must respect the position distance in the query).
If I remember well I debugged that recently.
Cheers
On 16 February 2016 at 1
Hi
Dataimport section in web ui page still shows me that no data import handler
is defined. And no data is being added to my new collection.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Data-Import-Handler-Usage-tp4257518p4257576.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing li
In that case will a phrase with a given slop match a document having the
terms of the given phrase with more than the given slop in between them
when pf field and mm=100%? Per my understanding as a phrase it will not
match for sure.
Best,
Modassar
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Alessandro Bene
By my understanding, it will depend on whether you're explicitly running
the phrase query or whether you're also searching for the terms
individually.
In the first case, it will not match.
In the second case, it will match just as long as your field contains all
the terms.
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, 17:
You can describe the pf field as an exact phrase query : ""~0 .
But
You can specify the slop with :
The ps Parameter
Default amount of slop on phrase queries built with pf, pf2 and/or pf3 fields
(affects boosting).
Just take a look to the edismax page in the wiki, it seems well described :
http
Sorry for the misleading mail, actually if you play with the slop factor,
that is going to be easy.
A proximity search can be done with a sloppy phrase query. The closer
> together the two terms appear in the document, the higher the score will
> be. A sloppy phrase query specifies a maximum "slop
Is there any way to tell timeAllow to just affect query component and not the
others?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/doubt-about-timeAllowed-tp4257363p4257622.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Actually I was wrong this doesn't work. (-DocType:pdf)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/join-and-NOT-together-tp4257411p4257620.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
We are using solr cloud with 1 shard and replication factor as 3. We are
noticing that the time for data to become available across all replicas from
the leader is very high.
The data rate is not very high, is there anyway to control this. In
master-slave setup with give a replication time.
Rega
Hi
I am building a Solr 5 architecture with 3 Solr nodes and 1 zookeeper.
The database backend is postgresql 9 on RHEL 6.
I am looking for a free open-source crawler which use SolrJ.
What do you guys recommend ?
Best regards
Victor d'Agostino
Ce message et les éventuels do
Hi,
It is most common to use Nutch as crawler, but it seems that it still
does not have support for SolrCloud (if I am reading this ticket
correctly https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1662). Anyway, I
would recommend Nutch with standard http client.
Regards,
Emir
On 16.02.2016 16:02
Nutch has Solr 5 cloud support in trunk, i committed it earlier this month.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-2197
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Emir Arnautovic
> Sent: Tuesday 16th February 2016 16:26
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Which open-source craw
Hi,
Thanks for your help.
Nutch is exactly what i'm looking for and i'm feeling lucky the solr
cloud support has just been comited !
I'll try the trunk version and wait until the 1.12 version is released.
Regards
Victor
Nutch has Solr 5 cloud support in trunk, i committed it earlier this mo
Markus,
Ticket I run into is for Nutch2 and NUTCH-2197 is for Nutch1.
Haven't been using Nutch for a while so cannot recommend version.
Thanks,
Emir
On 16.02.2016 16:37, Markus Jelsma wrote:
Nutch has Solr 5 cloud support in trunk, i committed it earlier this month.
https://issues.apache.org/j
I'm far, far from an expert on this sort of thing, but my personal experience
1-year ago was that Nutch-1 was easier to use, and the blog post I link below
suggests that the abstraction layer in Nutch-2 really costs some time.I
expect that Nutch-2 has matured some since then, but going with
I found the issue: as soon as I restart Solr, the index size goes down.
My index and data size must have been at a border line where some segments
are not released on my last document commit.
Steve
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/15/2016 1:12 PM, Steven White wrote
Further we have noticed that the delay increase a couple of hours after
restart. Details related to sorlconfig.xml are given below,
15000
25000
false
1000
Regards,Rohit
> From: cooltec...@outlook.com
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Delay in replic
On 2/16/2016 9:37 AM, Steven White wrote:
> I found the issue: as soon as I restart Solr, the index size goes down.
>
> My index and data size must have been at a border line where some segments
> are not released on my last document commit.
I think the only likely thing that could cause this beha
Here is how I was testing: stop Solr, delete the "data" folder, start Solr,
start indexing, and finally check index size.
I used the same pattern for the before and after my (see my original email)
and each time I run this test, the index size ended up being larger;
restarting Solr did the trick.
: I'm testing this on Windows, so that maybe a factor too (the OS is not
: releasing file handles?!)
specifically: Windows won't let Solr delete files on disk that have open
file handles...
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ#Why_doesn.27t_my_index_directory_get_smaller_.28immediately.29_when_i_de
Does literally nobody else see this error in their logs? I see this error
hundreds of times per day, in occasional bursts. Should I file this as a
bug?
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Joseph Hagerty wrote:
> After migrating from 3.5 to 4.10.3, I'm seeing the following error with
> alarming regu
Hello - Nutch 1.x is much more feature rich than 2.x, both can do tremendous
large crawls with ease. I haven't tried all others mentioned except ManifoldCF,
which is very good in retrieving data from shared file systems and stuff like
filenet.
We use Nutch 1.x for most of our crawls, small and
I just want to interject to say one thing:
You *can* sort on multi-valued fields as-of recent Solr 5 releases. it's
done using the "field" function query with either a "min" or "max" 2nd
argument:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Function+Queries
Of course it'd be nicer to simply s
I am having problem configuring Solr to read Nutch data or Integrate with
Nutch.
Does anyone able to get SOLR 5.4.x to work with Nutch?
I went through lot of google's article any still not able to get SOLR 5.4.1
to searching Nutch contents.
Any howto or working configuration sample that you can
Ah; I saw that. I'm glad you figured it out. Yes, you needed the SQL
alias. I'm kinda surprised you didn't get an error about a field by the
name of your expression not existing... but maybe you have a catch-all
dynamic field or maybe you're in data-driven mode. In either case, I'd
expect a qui
Hello Tom - Nutch 2.x has iirc old SolrServer client implemented. It should
just send an HTTP request to a specified node. The Solr node will then forward
it to a destination shard. In Nutch, you should set up indexer-solr as an
indexing plugin in the plugin.includes configuration directive and
On 2/15/2016 9:22 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> I should also have noted that your full query:
>
> (-persons:*)AND(-places:*)AND(-orgs:*)
>
> can be written as:
>
> -persons:* -places:* -orgs:*
>
> Which may work as is, or can also be written as:
>
> *:* -persons:* -places:* -orgs:*
Salman,
One fac
Hi Shawn,
Please correct me If I'm wrong here, but don't the all inclusive range
query [* TO *] and an only wildcard query like the one above essentially do
the same thing from a black box perspective?
In such a case wouldn't it be better to default an only wildcard query to
an all inclusive range
42 matches
Mail list logo
