Yeah. Under <lst name="defaults"> an entry like so: <str name="fl">fields</str>
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, 13:00 Anil <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote: > you mean default fl ? > > On 16 February 2016 at 12:57, Binoy Dalal <binoydala...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Oh wait. We don't append the fl parameter to the query. > > We've configured it in the request handler in solrconfig.xml > > Maybe that is something that you can do. > > > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, 12:39 Anil <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Thanks for your response Binoy. > > > > > > Yes.I am looking for any alternative to this. With long number of > fileds, > > > url will become long and might lead to "url too long exception" when > > using > > > http request. > > > > > > On 16 February 2016 at 11:01, Binoy Dalal <binoydala...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Filling in the fl parameter with all the required fields is what we > do > > at > > > > my project as well, and I don't think there is any alternative to > this. > > > > > > > > Maybe somebody else can advise on this? > > > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, 10:30 Anil <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Any help on this ? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > On 15 February 2016 at 19:06, Anil <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. But i have long list of fields. > > > > > > > > > > > > i feel adding all the fileds in fl is not good practice unless > one > > > > > > interested in few fields. In my case, i am interested in all > fields > > > > > except > > > > > > the one . > > > > > > > > > > > > is there any alternative approach ? Thanks in advance. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 15 February 2016 at 17:27, Binoy Dalal < > binoydala...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> If I understand correctly, you have already highlighted the > field > > > and > > > > > only > > > > > >> want to return the highlights and not the field itself. > > > > > >> Well in that case, simply remove the field name from your fl > list. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, 17:04 Anil <anilk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > HOw can highlighted field excluded in the main result ? as it > is > > > > > >> available > > > > > >> > in the highlight section. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > In my scenario, One filed (lets say commands) of the each solr > > > > > document > > > > > >> > would be around 10 mg. I dont want to fetch that filed in > > response > > > > > when > > > > > >> its > > > > > >> > highlight snippets available in the response. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Please advice. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > On 15 February 2016 at 15:36, Evert R. <evert.ra...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Hello Mark, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > Thanks for you reply. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > All text is indexed (1 pdf file). It works now. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > Best regard, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > *--Evert* > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > 2016-02-14 23:47 GMT-02:00 Mark Ehle <marke...@gmail.com>: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > is all the text being indexed? Check to make sure that > > there's > > > > > >> actually > > > > > >> > > the > > > > > >> > > > data you are looking for in the index. Is there a setting > in > > > > tika > > > > > >> that > > > > > >> > > > limits how much is indexed? I seem to remember confronting > > > this > > > > > >> problem > > > > > >> > > > myself once, and the data that I wanted just wasn't in the > > > index > > > > > >> > because > > > > > >> > > it > > > > > >> > > > was never put there in the first place.Something about > > > > > >> > setMaxStringLength > > > > > >> > > > orsomething. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Binoy Dalal < > > > > > >> binoydala...@gmail.com> > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > What you've done so far will highlight every instance of > > > > > "nietava" > > > > > >> > > found > > > > > >> > > > in > > > > > >> > > > > the field, and return it, i.e., your entire field will > > > return > > > > > with > > > > > >> > all > > > > > >> > > > the > > > > > >> > > > > "nietava"s in <em> tags. > > > > > >> > > > > If you do not want the entire field, only portions of > your > > > > field > > > > > >> > > > containing > > > > > >> > > > > the matched terms, then use hl.snippets parameter = the > > > number > > > > > of > > > > > >> > > > snippets > > > > > >> > > > > you want, in this particular case 3, along with the > > > > hl.fragsize > > > > > >> > > parameter > > > > > >> > > > > set to the same number as your hl.mazAnalyzedChars (or a > > > > really > > > > > >> large > > > > > >> > > > > number). > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > I suggest you go through the wiki documentation for > > > > highlighting > > > > > >> > once ( > > > > > >> > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/solr/HighlightingParameters). > It > > > > should > > > > > >> > answer > > > > > >> > > > all > > > > > >> > > > > of your questions regarding the use of the standard > > > > highlighter > > > > > >> that > > > > > >> > > you > > > > > >> > > > > might have. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > As an additional note, I also suggest that you look into > > the > > > > > >> > > > > PostingsHighlighter ( > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Postings+Highlighter > > > > > >> > > ), > > > > > >> > > > > since you seem to be running highlighting on pretty big > > > fields > > > > > and > > > > > >> > > > postings > > > > > >> > > > > is much more efficient at highlighting huge fields as > > > compared > > > > > to > > > > > >> the > > > > > >> > > > > standard highlighter. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:15 AM Evert R. < > > > > evert.ra...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Binoy, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > You are the man! =) > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Would you by chance know how could I get the second > > > > highlight > > > > > of > > > > > >> > the > > > > > >> > > > same > > > > > >> > > > > > word in the same file? > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Like: file_1.pdf (has three words "nietava") so..., > how > > > can > > > > I > > > > > >> bring > > > > > >> > > the > > > > > >> > > > > > highlighs for the three occurrences? > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I am pretty new around, should I send (open) another > > > > subject? > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks again! > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > *--Evert* > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > 2016-02-14 16:40 GMT-02:00 Binoy Dalal < > > > > > binoydala...@gmail.com > > > > > >> >: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Are you sure you've typed in the parameters > correctly? > > > > > >> > > > > > > In your response it says flagsize instead of > fragsize > > > and > > > > > >> > > > > > maxanalzyedchars > > > > > >> > > > > > > instead of maxanalyzedchars. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Ohh wait, I see that I made the analyzed typo. > Awfully > > > > sorry > > > > > >> for > > > > > >> > > > that, > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm > > > > > >> > > > > > > using my phone to send the mail out. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, 23:53 Evert R. < > > > > evert.ra...@gmail.com> > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi Binoy, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > thanks! > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Still not working, check the output: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > { > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "responseHeader":{ > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "status":0, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "QTime":58, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "params":{ > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "q":"nietava", > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "hl":"true", > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "hl.simple.post":"</em>", > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "indent":"true", > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "fl":"id", > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "hl.flagsize":"0", > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "hl.fl":"content", > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "hl.maxAnalzyedChars":"208400", > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "wt":"json", > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "hl.simple.pre":"<em>"}}, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "response":{"numFound":1,"start":0,"docs":[ > > > > > >> > > > > > > > { > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > "id":"/home/solr/dados/teste/Emmanuel.pdf"}] > > > > > >> > > > > > > > }, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "highlighting":{ > > > > > >> > > > > > > > "/home/solr/dados/teste/Emmanuel.pdf":{}}} > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > *--Evert* > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 2016-02-14 14:31 GMT-02:00 Binoy Dalal < > > > > > >> binoydala...@gmail.com > > > > > >> > >: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Don't add this parameter to the searchComponent > > > > > >> definition, > > > > > >> > > > because > > > > > >> > > > > > the > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > components where you've added it, GapFragmenter > > and > > > > > >> > > > > RegexFragmenter, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > simply > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > don't use it. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Instead, add it to your request handler (/select > > > etc.) > > > > > if > > > > > >> > > you've > > > > > >> > > > > > > > configured > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > highlighting in the handler or append it to your > > > > query: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > *&hl.maxAnalzyedChars=<some_really_big_number>*. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Additionally also set the *hl.fragsize parameter > > to > > > > 0*, > > > > > if > > > > > >> > your > > > > > >> > > > > text > > > > > >> > > > > > is > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > larger than 51200 chars which it mostly is, in a > > > > similar > > > > > >> > > fashion. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 9:02 PM Evert R. < > > > > > >> > > evert.ra...@gmail.com> > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi Binoy, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I could not find this option in my > > solrconfig.xml > > > > > file. > > > > > >> ] > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I tryied to add this setting and nothing > > > changed... > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Here is the code, I might miss placed: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <code> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <searchComponent > class="solr.HighlightComponent" > > > > > >> > > > > name="highlight"> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <highlighting> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <!-- Configure the standard fragmenter > --> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <!-- This could most likely be commented > > out > > > > in > > > > > >> the > > > > > >> > > > > "default" > > > > > >> > > > > > > > case > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > --> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <fragmenter name="gap" > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > default="true" > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > class="solr.highlight.GapFragmenter"> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <lst name="defaults"> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <int name="hl.fragsize">400</int> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <int > > > > name="hl.maxAnalyzedChars">409600</int> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > </lst> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > </fragmenter> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <!-- A regular-expression-based > fragmenter > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > (for sentence extraction) > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > --> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <fragmenter name="regex" > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> class="solr.highlight.RegexFragmenter"> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <lst name="defaults"> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <!-- slightly smaller fragsizes work > > > > better > > > > > >> > because > > > > > >> > > > of > > > > > >> > > > > > slop > > > > > >> > > > > > > > --> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <int name="hl.fragsize">200</int> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <int > > > > name="hl.maxAnalyzedChars">409600</int> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <!-- allow 50% slop on fragment > sizes > > > --> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <float > > name="hl.regex.slop">0.5</float> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <!-- a basic sentence pattern --> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <str name="hl.regex.pattern">[-\w > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > ,/\n\"']{20,200}</str> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > </lst> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > </fragmenter> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > </code> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > thanks! > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > *--Evert* > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 2016-02-14 12:14 GMT-02:00 Binoy Dalal < > > > > > >> > > binoydala...@gmail.com > > > > > >> > > > >: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > From the solr wiki: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > hl.maxAnalyzedChars > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > How many characters into a document to look > > for > > > > > >> suitable > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > snippets  Solr1.3. This parameter makes > sense > > > for > > > > > the > > > > > >> > > > original > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Highlighter > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > only. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > The default value is "51200". > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > You can assign a large value to this > parameter > > > and > > > > > use > > > > > >> > > > > > > hl.fragsize=0 > > > > > >> > > > > > > > to > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > return highlighting in large fields that > have > > > size > > > > > >> > greater > > > > > >> > > > than > > > > > >> > > > > > > 51200 > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > characters. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I think this might be your hiccup. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 14 Feb 2016, 17:11 Evert R. < > > > > > >> > evert.ra...@gmail.com > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry my late reply. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > All the content is inside de docs. It > brings > > > the > > > > > >> docs > > > > > >> > and > > > > > >> > > > the > > > > > >> > > > > > pdf > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > file > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > has the search word in it. But the > highlight > > > is > > > > > not > > > > > >> > > showing > > > > > >> > > > > if > > > > > >> > > > > > > the > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > search > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > word is after a few pages. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Evert > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > *--Evert* > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-02-14 8:36 GMT-02:00 Paul Libbrecht < > > > > > >> > > > p...@hoplahup.net > > > > > >> > > > > >: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > This looks like the stored content is > > > > shortened. > > > > > >> Can > > > > > >> > it > > > > > >> > > > be? > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you see that inside the docs? > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > paul > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Evert R. <mailto: > evert.ra...@gmail.com> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 14 February 2016 at 11:26 > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi There, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have a situation where started a > > > > > techproducts, > > > > > >> > > > without > > > > > >> > > > > > any > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > modification, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > post a pdf file. When searching as: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > q=text:search_word > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hl=true > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hl.fl=content > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It show the highlight accordingly! =) > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > BUT... *if the "search_word" is after > > the > > > > > first > > > > > >> > > pages* > > > > > >> > > > in > > > > > >> > > > > > my > > > > > >> > > > > > > > pdf > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > file, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > such > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > as page 15... > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It simply *does not show* *the > > > HIGHLIGHT*... > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone has faced this situation > > > before? > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > *--Evert* > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Binoy Dalal > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Binoy Dalal > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > > >> > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > >> > > > > > > Binoy Dalal > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > -- > > > > > >> > > > > Regards, > > > > > >> > > > > Binoy Dalal > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > >> Regards, > > > > > >> Binoy Dalal > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > Binoy Dalal > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Binoy Dalal > > > -- Regards, Binoy Dalal
