If I understand the cloud setup correctly having a replica will serve for
redundancy and won't slow your searches down.
In your case for the slow response times, are you returning any large
stored fields?
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015, 13:26 Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to find out, w
Few questions:
What are your memory configs: xms and xmx values, available ram size?
Were you also indexing at the time when the search response was so slow? In
the sense, were you committing often with openSearcher=true, in any case?
What is the QTime for consequent searches? Are the caches ena
Hello,
Have you considered to pass NOT {!join from=prac_spec_code
to=practicing_specialties_codes
fromIndex=autosuggest}*:* as a q and look at debug output.
Also there was a trick for dealing with pure negative queries q=*:*
-foo:bar though it might be obsolete.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 7
Hi,
I am using SOLR 4.10. I have around 350M documents indexed in SOLR. In my
case, i have one multi-valued field to store the generated ids and also
this field is searchable. Would large number of values (100K or 200K or 1M)
in this multi-valued field pose any problem for SOLR or is there any lim
Hi Dennis ,
thanks for your reply. As I wanted this for some production system so may
not be able to upgrade to under-development branch of solr.
but thanks a lot for pointing me to this possible approach.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-achieve-join
I am not aware of a specific limit to the number of values in a
multivalued field. Essentially, a multi-valued field is the same as a
very long tokenised field - so a document containing a full Shakespeare
play for example.
If you are doing searches against a document set of this type, then you
wi
I was taking a look to this article from Yonik [1] .
I like the feature and actually it could useful for some use cases of mine.
Started to play with it in Solr 5.4 .
I verified it is working if you pass both the query and the parameters to
substitute as request parameters.
I verified it is worki
I dunno why that doesn't work but try {!mlt ... v=$master_id} and set a default
value in your config for master_id and that should at least work.
Erik
> On Dec 30, 2015, at 08:37, Alessandro Benedetti wrote:
>
> I was taking a look to this article from Yonik [1] .
> I like the feature and
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Alessandro Benedetti
wrote:
> I was taking a look to this article from Yonik [1] .
> I like the feature and actually it could useful for some use cases of mine.
> Started to play with it in Solr 5.4 .
>
> I verified it is working if you pass both the query and the
Erick,
your suggestion worked :
Hotels Similarity
edismax
5
*,score
active:true
explicit
json
{!boost
b=recip(dist(2,0,star_rating,0,$star_rating),1,10,10)}{!boost
b=recip(geodist(lat_lon,$lat,$lon),2,200,20)}{!mlt
qf=n
debugging I confirm you are right Yonik, but also that the defaults
are already applied at this point :
org/apache/solr/request/json/RequestUtil.java:158
Could be a resolution of properties that happens at solrconfig, xml level ?
It verifies if any java properties is in there when running sol
Reference :
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml#System_property_substitution
On 30 December 2015 at 15:30, Alessandro Benedetti
wrote:
> debugging I confirm you are right Yonik, but also that the defaults
> are already applied at this point :
> org/apache/solr/request/json/RequestUti
Thanks.
Salman
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Binoy Dalal wrote:
> What shalin says is solid and will work with solr 5.x as well as 3.x
> You could do a little poc if you want to be absolutely certain. Shouldn't
> take you very long.
> Your only concern will be that your old docs won't be mat
Right, you may be one of the few people to actually implement your own
multiTerm analyzer function
despite the fact that this has been in the code for years!
If you look at the factories and see if they implement the
"MultiTermAwareComponent" interface,
and PatternReplaceCharFitlerFactory does _no
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Alessandro Benedetti
wrote:
> debugging I confirm you are right Yonik, but also that the defaults
> are already applied at this point :
> org/apache/solr/request/json/RequestUtil.java:158
>
> Could be a resolution of properties that happens at solrconfig, xml
I have gotten Teiid and Solr wired up, but it seems like the only way to query
is with the default Solr Query Engine, and nothing else. In asking Dr. Google,
this is a data black hole. The more I look at it, the more I think I'm going
to end up having to write a custom translator. Is there an
At my organization, I want to create a tool that allows users to keep a solr
configuration as a Git repository. Then, I want my Continuous Integration
environment to take some branch of the git repository and "publish" it into
ZooKeeper/SolrCloud.
Working on my own, it is only a very small pa
Daniel,
Sounds almost like you're reinventing the wheel. Could you possibly automate
this through puppet or Chef? With a VDI environment, then all you would need
to do is build a new VM Node based on original setup. Then you can just roll
out the node as one of the zk nodes.
Just a thought
Your bottom line point is that EmbeddedSolrServer is different, and some
configurations will not work on it where they would work on a SolrCloud. This
is well taken. Maybe creating a new collection on existing dev nodes could be
done.
As far as VDI and Puppet. My requirements are differen
I will preface this with the fact that I am still pretty new to both Solr and
Tomcat, so hopefully this is something obvious to somebody out there. I have
two 4.3.10 Solr servers set up in separate contexts, running on a Tomcat 7
application server on Windows 2012. When I attempt to import dat
On 12/28/2015 5:12 AM, abhi Abhishek wrote:
>i am trying to determine stable version of SOLR 4. is there a blog which
> we can refer.. i understand we can read through Release Notes. I am
> interested in user reviews and challenges seen with various versions of
> SOLR 4.
Here's some informatio
Yeah, the notion of DTDs have gone around several times but always founder
on the fact that you can, say, define your own Filter with it's own set of
parameters etc. Sure, you can make a generic DTD that accommodates
this, but then it becomes so general as to be little more than a syntax checker.
I think of enterprise search as very similar to RDBMS:
- It belongs in the backend behind your app.
- Each project ought to control its own schema and data.
So, I want the configset for each team's Solr collections to be stored in our
Git server just as the RDBMS schema is if a developer is usin
Yeah I ran it. It appears to only have an issue if the field for the core
on the outside is MultiValue, and the inside field is single value, and the
order of the field has the code not as the first entry. Like:
practicing_specialties_codes:
> [
> - "PS1010",
> -
Hi - I'd appreciate if you could add me to the Contributor Group. Here are
my account info :
- Name: Saïd Radhouani
- User name: radhouani
- email: said.radhou...@gmail.com
Thanks,
-Saïd
Done
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Saïd Radhouani
wrote:
> Hi - I'd appreciate if you could add me to the Contributor Group. Here are
> my account info :
>
> - Name: Saïd Radhouani
> - User name: radhouani
> - email: said.radhou...@gmail.com
>
> Thanks,
> -Saïd
I will always look around here for versions / new functionality or fixes /
release notes
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:changelog-panel
Thanks
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 12/28/2015 5:12 AM, abhi Abh
Hi Binoy,
The only large stored field I have is content, which is indexed from the
content of the rich text documents.
Regards,
Edwin
On 30 December 2015 at 16:20, Binoy Dalal wrote:
> If I understand the cloud setup correctly having a replica will serve for
> redundancy and won't slow your s
Hi DavidPhilip,
What are your memory configs: xms and xmx values, available ram size?
> I'm using Solr 5.3.0, so I've only set the -Xmx value at 14g. My
available RAM size is 64GB
Were you also indexing at the time when the search response was so slow? In
the sense, were you committing often with
1) If your stored fields are very large, it will lead to high response
times since solr will have to decompress the field and then return the
whole thing. I had faced such an issue with one of my implementations where
we had stored fields around 100KB of text per document and the response
times wer
How is SOLR 5.4.0 ? I heard there was a quick 5.4.1 coming out?
Any major issues?
--
Bill Bell
billnb...@gmail.com
cell 720-256-8076
I might be just confused here, but I am not sure what your bottle neck
actually is. You seem to know your critical path already, so how can we
help?
Starting new solr core from given configuration directory is easy. Catching
hard errors from that is probably just gripping logs or a custom logger.
Hi,
Would like to find out, is there any changes to the post.jar for Solr 5.4?
I tried to use the post.jar from Solr 5.3.0, and it gives me the following
error during indexing:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.solr.h
andler.extraction.ExtractingDocumentLoader.(Lorg/apache/solr/reques
Are you trying to do federated search? What about carrot? Not the one that
ships with Solr, the parent project.
Regards,
Alex
On 31 Dec 2015 12:21 am, "Mark Horninger"
wrote:
> I have gotten Teiid and Solr wired up, but it seems like the only way to
> query is with the default Solr Query Engi
Did you try using the latest post jar (shipped with 5.4 version) to index
same docs?
What happened? Did you get the same error or no?
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would like to find out, is there any changes to the post.jar for Solr 5.4?
> I tried to u
Well, for us SOLR-8418 is a major issue. I haven't encountered other
issues, but that one was sort of a show-stopper.
--Ere
31.12.2015, 7.27, William Bell kirjoitti:
How is SOLR 5.4.0 ? I heard there was a quick 5.4.1 coming out?
Any major issues?
--
Ere Maijala
Kansalliskirjasto / The Nat
36 matches
Mail list logo
