Hi DavidPhilip, What are your memory configs: xms and xmx values, available ram size? > I'm using Solr 5.3.0, so I've only set the -Xmx value at 14g. My available RAM size is 64GB
Were you also indexing at the time when the search response was so slow? In the sense, were you committing often with openSearcher=true, in any case? > I wasn't doing any indexing at that time the search response was so slow. What is the QTime for consequent searches? Are the caches enabled? > The QTime for consequent searches are quite fast, usually less than 500ms. The caches are enabled. Regards, Edwin On 30 December 2015 at 16:40, davidphilip cherian < davidphilipcher...@gmail.com> wrote: > Few questions: > > What are your memory configs: xms and xmx values, available ram size? > > Were you also indexing at the time when the search response was so slow? In > the sense, were you committing often with openSearcher=true, in any case? > > What is the QTime for consequent searches? Are the caches enabled? > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Binoy Dalal <binoydala...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > If I understand the cloud setup correctly having a replica will serve for > > redundancy and won't slow your searches down. > > In your case for the slow response times, are you returning any large > > stored fields? > > > > On Wed, 30 Dec 2015, 13:26 Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to find out, will having a replica slow down the search > for > > > Solr? > > > > > > Currently, I'm having 1 shard and a replicationFactor of 2 using Solr > > > 5.3.0. I'm running SolrCloud, with 3 external ZooKeeper using ZooKeeper > > > 3.4.6, and my index size is 183GB. > > > > > > I have been getting QTime of more than 3000ms for my basic search > > function, > > > even without adding other things like faceting or highlighting. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Edwin > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Binoy Dalal > > >
