It looks like you have to define "storeDir", and if you don't then the
rebuild no longer happens, as you said. I think that goes in the config
block you showed, but I haven't tested this (we use a different
suggester with its own persistence strategy).
-Mike
On 11/14/14 2:01 AM, Walter Under
Patrick Henry [patricktheawesomeg...@gmail.com] wrote:
>I am working with a Solr collection that is several terabytes in size over
> several hundred millions of documents. Each document is very rich, and
> over the past few years we have consistently quadrupled the size our
> collection annually.
Hello
I am considering to start using Solr Cloud and to share a single ZooKeeper
between different Solr clouds and eventually other software.
In all the examples I see online, the configuration of a Solr cloud is
stored in the root node of ZooKeeper.
I was wandering if it is possible to specify t
Hello Enrico,
you may use the chroot feature of Zookeeper to root the different
SolrCloud instances differently. Instead of zoohost1:2181, you can use
zoohost1:2181/cluster1 as the Zookeeper location. Unless there is a load
issue with high rates of updates and other data traffic, a single
Zookeep
Thank you very much, Jürgen.
2014-11-14 13:51 GMT+01:00 "Jürgen Wagner (DVT)" <
juergen.wag...@devoteam.com>:
> Hello Enrico,
> you may use the chroot feature of Zookeeper to root the different
> SolrCloud instances differently. Instead of zoohost1:2181, you can use
> zoohost1:2181/cluster1 a
Hi guys,
How do I search only a subset of my corpus based on a large list of non
consecutive unique key ids (cannot do a range query).
Is there a way around doing this q=id:(id1 OR id2 OR id3 OR id4 ... OR
id4 ) AND name:*
Also what is the limit of "OR"s i can apply on the query if that is th
bq: We routinely store images and pdfs in Solr. There *is* a benefit, since
you don't need to manage another storage system, you don't have to worry
about Solr getting out of sync with the other system, you can use Solr
replication for all your assets, etc.
Do the same holds good for large Blobs l
Is it possible to add another integer dyanmicField to the selected doc ids?
If yes, further can add update incremental/same values to these docs now
search can be done to this subset using range/filter query.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:21 PM, henry cleland
wrote:
> Hi guys,
> How do I search onl
Hi guy,
there's not much of a search operation here. Why not store the
documents in a key/value store and simply fetch them by matching ids?
Another approach: as there is no query, you could easily partition the
set of ids and fetch the results in multiple batches.
The maximum number of clause
Just skimming, so maybe I misinterpreted.
ExternalFileField and ExternalFileFieldReloader
refer to storing values for each doc in an external file, they have
nothing to do with storing _files_.
The usual pattern is to have Solr store just enough data to have the
system-of-record return the actual
There is a binary type
-Mike
On 11/14/2014 12:21 PM, Anurag Sharma wrote:
bq: We routinely store images and pdfs in Solr. There *is* a benefit, since
you don't need to manage another storage system, you don't have to worry
about Solr getting out of sync with the other system, you can use Solr
r
On 11/14/2014 01:43 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Just skimming, so maybe I misinterpreted.
ExternalFileField and ExternalFileFieldReloader
refer to storing values for each doc in an external file, they have
nothing to do with storing _files_.
The usual pattern is to have Solr store just enough da
Right, a more nuanced comment involves what _type_ of docs you're
storing, and what the ratio of searchable-to-overall size is. Consider
an image. The searchable data may be 0.01% of the file size. Or even
worse, a movie.
As always, "it depends". I guess that personally I'm not a fan of
using Solr
That fixed it.
I bet that would fix the problem with the very long startup that another user
had. That’s a bug in the default solrconfig.xml, it should persist the
dictionaries.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/
On Nov 14, 2014, at 12:42 AM, Michael
Thanks Michael & Eric for the succinct response.
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Michael Sokolov <
msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote:
> There is a binary type
>
> -Mike
>
> On 11/14/2014 12:21 PM, Anurag Sharma wrote:
>
>> bq: We routinely store images and pdfs in Solr. There *is* a benefit
Hi
Getting the following exception when using fl renaming with unique key in
the schema.
http:///solr//select?q=dress&fl=a1:p1
where p1 is the unique key for
For collections with single shard, this works flawlessly but results in the
following exception in case of multiple shards.
How do we fix
Yeah - I would want it fixed as a default setting of some sort, maybe
in-built in the Suggester class, so you wouldn't be required to have
something in config to make it work in a reasonable way. Glad my
insomnia went to some purpose.
-MIke
On 11/14/2014 02:12 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
Tha
Hi folks,
I have a DelegatingCollector installed via a PostFilter (kind of like an
AnalyticsQuery) that needs the document score to a) add to a collection of
score-based stats, and b) decide whether to keep the document based on the
score.
If I keep the document, I call super.collect() (where sup
Hello,
I'm trying to setup Solr for fetching hierarchical facets.
Please advice which of the below approaches should be followed for my
scenario.
*Scenario:
*
NonFic
Hist
HistBook1
HistBook2
Sci
Phy
Quantum
On 11/14/2014 9:51 AM, henry cleland wrote:
> How do I search only a subset of my corpus based on a large list of non
> consecutive unique key ids (cannot do a range query).
> Is there a way around doing this q=id:(id1 OR id2 OR id3 OR id4 ... OR
> id4 ) AND name:*
>
> Also what is the limit o
Hi Rashmi,
I believe you are looking for PathHierarchyTokenizer,
see
https://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0/analyzers-common/org/apache/lucene/analysis/path/PathHierarchyTokenizer.html
Oleg
2014-11-14 17:53 GMT-05:00 rashmy1 :
> Hello,
> I'm trying to setup Solr for fetching hierarchical facets.
Is this correct link to Solr IRC -
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#solr
I tried couple of times using the IRC, the list of online users are always
good but never get any response on the query and also don't see any
communication/discussion.
Hi Rashmi,
Here is some more details on how to use PathHierarchyTokenizer that Oleg
provided the link to.
If this is your document:
> *Sample document*
>
> name=Pbook1
> category=NonFic/Sci/Phy/Quantum
> author=ABC
> price=20.00
>
Then, in your schema.xml:
If you tried this week it is because everybody was at the conference. Try
again mid next week.
Regards,
Alex
On 14/11/2014 11:35 pm, "Anurag Sharma" wrote:
> Is this correct link to Solr IRC -
> http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#solr
> I tried couple of times using the IRC, the list of
I tried couple of weeks earlier as well. As suggested, will try again after
mid next week.
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> If you tried this week it is because everybody was at the conference. Try
> again mid next week.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
> On 14/11/2014 11
Also like know, is this the only IRC or there are other's as well like solr
dev, lucene dev etc
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Anurag Sharma wrote:
> I tried couple of weeks earlier as well. As suggested, will try again
> after mid next week.
>
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Alexandre R
Could you let me know version of the solr?
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Suchi Amalapurapu
wrote:
> Hi
> Getting the following exception when using fl renaming with unique key in
> the schema.
> http:///solr//select?q=dress&fl=a1:p1
>
> where p1 is the unique key for
> For collections with s
27 matches
Mail list logo
