That fixed it.

I bet that would fix the problem with the very long startup that another user 
had. That’s a bug in the default solrconfig.xml, it should persist the 
dictionaries.

wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/


On Nov 14, 2014, at 12:42 AM, Michael Sokolov <msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> 
wrote:

> It looks like you have to define "storeDir", and if you don't then the 
> rebuild no longer happens, as you said.  I think that goes in the config 
> block you showed, but I haven't tested this (we use a different suggester 
> with its own persistence strategy).
> 
> -Mike
> 
> On 11/14/14 2:01 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
>> We get no suggestions until we force a build with suggest.build=true. Maybe 
>> we need to define a spellchecker component to get that behavior?
>> 
>> wunder
>> Walter Underwood
>> wun...@wunderwood.org
>> http://observer.wunderwood.org/
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 13, 2014, at 10:56 PM, Michael Sokolov 
>> <msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I believe the spellchecker component persists these indexes now and reloads 
>>> them on restart rather than rebuilding.
>>> 
>>> -Mike
>>> 
>>> On 11/13/14 7:40 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
>>>> We have to manually rebuild the suggest dictionaries after a restart. This 
>>>> seems odd, since someone else had a problem because they did rebuild after 
>>>> restart.
>>>> 
>>>> We’re running 4.7 and our dictionaries are configured like this. We do 
>>>> this for several fields.
>>>> 
>>>>     <lst name="suggester">
>>>>       <str name="name">fieldName</str>
>>>>       <str name="lookupImpl">FuzzyLookupFactory</str>
>>>>       <str name="dictionaryImpl">DocumentDictionaryFactory</str>
>>>>       <str name="field">fieldName</str>
>>>>       <str name="weightField">qualityScore</str>
>>>>       <str name="suggestAnalyzerFieldType">string</str>
>>>>       <str name="buildOnCommit">true</str>
>>>>     </lst>
>>>>  wunder
>>>> Walter Underwood
>>>> wun...@wunderwood.org
>>>> http://observer.wunderwood.org/
>>>> 
>>>> 
> 

Reply via email to