Hi Peter,
Above analyser should work for your examples. Just use AND operator or mm=100%
Ahmet
On Monday, September 29, 2014 5:51 AM, PeterKerk
wrote:
I have a site which lists companies.
I'm looking to improve my search, but I want to know which available
analysers and token
Dear all,
Hi,
Right now I face with the strange problem related to solJ client:
When I use only incremental partial update. The incremental partial update
works fine. When I use only the add child documents. It works perfectly and
the child documents added successfully. But when I have both of them
I also check both solr log and solr console. There is no error inside that,
it seems that every thing is fine! But actually there is not any child
document after executing process.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Ali Nazemian wrote:
> Dear all,
> Hi,
> Right now I face with the strange problem
That's called phrase query - selecting documents based on the order of the
terms. Just enclose the terms in quotes.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Tomer Levi
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 2:41 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: multiple terms order in query
Yes, expungeDeletes=true will remove all deleted docs from the disk but it
also requires merging all segments that have any deleted docs which, in
your case, could mean a re-write of the entire index. So it'd be an
expensive operation. Usually deletes are removed in the normal course of
indexing as
Solr 4.7.2 went down during a period of little activity. Wondering if
anyone has an idea about what's going on, thanks!
INFO - 2014-09-26 15:35:00.152;
org.apache.solr.cloud.DistributedQueue$LatchChildWatcher; LatchChildWatcher
fired on path: null state: Disconnected type None
then eventually:
Thanks for replying! Is there anything I could be doing to help prevent the
14GB collection with 700k deleted docs before it tries removing them and at
that point running out of memory? Maybe just scheduled off-peak optimize calls
with expungeDeletes? Or is there some other config option I co
Sorry, I believe this can be disregarded. There were changes made to
system time that likely caused this state. Apologies, Ryan
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Ryan Cutter wrote:
> Solr 4.7.2 went down during a period of little activity. Wondering if
> anyone has an idea about what's going o
Hi Ahmet,
Am I correct that his this is only avalable in Solr4.8?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.TruncateTokenFilterFactory
Also, I need to add your lines to both "index" and "query" analyzers? making
my definition like so:
Hello,
I have solr 4.10 running on tomcat 7. I'm doing replication from one master
to about 10 slaves, with standard configuration:
${enable.master:false}
commit
startup
schema.xml,stopwords.txt
Yes, it appeared in 4.8 but you could use PatternReplaceFilterFactory to
simulate the same behavior.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:PeterKerk
> Sent: Monday 29th September 2014 21:08
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Flexible search field analyser/tokenizer configur
Hi,
I'm trying to check if it's possible to include a conditional boosting in
Solr qf field. For e.g. I've the following entry in qf parameter.
text^0.5 title^10.0 ProductLine^5
What I'm looking is to add the productline boosting only for a given Author
field, something in the lines boost Prod
September 2014, Apache Solr™ 4.10.1 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.10.1
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, facete
You can try lowering the mergeFactor in solrconfig.xml to cause more merges
to happen during normal indexing, which should result in more deleted
documents being removed from the index, but there is a trade-off
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors#mergeFactor
On Mon, Sep 29, 201
Hi - you need to use function queries via the bf parameter. The function
exists() and in some cases query() will do the conditional work, depending on
your use case.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Shamik Bandopadhyay
> Sent: Monday 29th September 2014 21:30
> To: solr-user@lucene
Thanks Markus. Well, I tried using a conditional if-else function, but it
doesn't seem to work for boosting field. What I'm trying to do is boost
ProductLine field by 5, if the result documents contain Author = 'Tom'.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-quer
Hi - check the def() and if() functions, they can have embedded functions such
as exists() and query(). You can use those to apply the main query the the
productline field if author has some value. I cannot give a concrete example
because i don't have an environment to fiddle around with. If the
Thanks Markus, let me play around with the functions and see if I can achieve
the results.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-query-field-qf-conditional-boost-tp4161783p4161803.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Peter,
If you are using an older version, you can just copy paste its source code (
back port).
And yes same analysis chain for both index and query. Thats just one
configuration alternative that would work for your examples. It is possible to
create others. You need to give it a try by usin
The difference between TruncateTokenFilterFactory and
EdgeNGramFilterFactory is that Truncate will generate only one token
cut down to that size (3). While Edge... will have multiple tokens for
the same word matching 3-letters, 4-letters, etc. You can specify the
maximum. Usually, you use Edge... d
Hi,
Just wanted to understand if it's possible to limit a searchable field
only to specific documents during query time. Following are my searchable
fields.
text^0.5 title^10.0 country^1.0
What I want is to make country a searchable field only for documents which
contain "author:Robert". For r
You can perform boolean operations using parentheses. So you can OR a
sequence of sub-queries, and each sub-query can be an AND of the desired
search term and the constraining values for other fields.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shamik Bandopadhyay
Sent: Monday, Septem
Tom Chen gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> In the GoLive stage, the MRIT sends the MERGEINDEXES requests to Solr
> instances. The request has a indexDir parameter with a hdfs path to the
> index generated on HDFS, as shown in the MRIT log:
>
> 2014-07-02 15:03:55,123 DEBUG
> org.apache.http.impl.
Thanks Jack for your reply ... I'm sorry but I'm not too clear on the
solution you proposed. Can you please provide a sample on what you suggested
?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-query-certain-fields-filtered-by-a-condition-tp4161815p4161827.html
Sen
Hi Ali,
I don't think Solr has such function OOTB. One way I can think of is that
you can implement UpdateRequestProcessor. In processAdd() method of
the UpdateRequestProcessor, as you can read field values, you can calculate
the total score and copy the total score to a field e.g. total_score.
T
Ah, thanks! Sounds indeed like EdgeNGramFilterFactory is what I need.
I actually upgraded to Solr 4.10.1 (from 4.3.1) while I was at it.
I now have this:
My application typically searches Solr by strictly ANDing all terms.
However in some cases of too few results being returned I'd like to relax
the query by switching to OR and setting an appropriate mm ("min match")
value. The problem is that I want it to be clear to the user which terms
are missin
That gets a bit messy depending on your search configuration, spaces
and other factors. But in your specific question, you can actually DO
the search and see what happens. Enable debug and you get more
information that you think off.
The other tools you may find useful to explain what's going on:
Hi,
Correct me if i am unable to understand your need properly.
*text^0.5 title^10.0 ProductLine^5*
doc1 {
ProductLine = abc,
Author= rahul
text= abcdef
title = jai Ho
}
doc2 {
ProductLine = xyz *Extra boost 10*
Author = Tom,
text = abcdef,
title= Solr Lu
29 matches
Mail list logo
