Yes, it appeared in 4.8 but you could use PatternReplaceFilterFactory to simulate the same behavior.
Markus -----Original message----- > From:PeterKerk <petervdk...@hotmail.com> > Sent: Monday 29th September 2014 21:08 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Flexible search field analyser/tokenizer configuration > > Hi Ahmet, > > Am I correct that his this is only avalable in Solr4.8? > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.TruncateTokenFilterFactory > > > Also, I need to add your lines to both "index" and "query" analyzers? making > my definition like so: > > <fieldType name="searchtext" class="solr.TextField" > positionIncrementGap="100"> > <analyzer type="index"> > <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/> > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> > <filter class="solr.TruncateTokenFilterFactory" > prefixLength="3"/> > </analyzer> > <analyzer type="query"> > <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/> > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> > <filter class="solr.TruncateTokenFilterFactory" > prefixLength="3"/> > </analyzer> > </fieldType> > > Your solution seems much easier to setup than what is proposed by > Alexandre...for my understanding, what is the difference? > > Thanks! > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Flexible-search-field-analyser-tokenizer-configuration-tp4161624p4161778.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
