Hi Niranjan,
you should setup it up so the query matches the elevation criteria, for
example elevating "ipod" and "apple ipod" as well or changing the "string" accordingly
Remi
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Niranjan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have implemented a sponsor search where I have to e
I read that if I add the string "score" in the fl field, I should be able to
see the score within the retuned documents.
As I understand "score" is a "special/reserved" word and I don't have to define
in the schema (right)?
I did so, but in the returned fields' list I see no score field...
Her
The optimize should, indeed, reduce the index size. Be aware that it
may consume 2x the disk space. You may also try expungedeletes, see
here: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Vinay Pothnis wrote:
> Another update:
>
> I removed the rep
So how can we answer this in a meaningful way? You haven't told us
anything except the number of docs. Are you running on a laptop or a
monster server? What kinds of queries are you executing? How much
memory to the JVM? What kinds of faceting are you doing? How many
unique fields per facet field?
What version of Solr? Works fine for me.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Croci Francesco Luigi (ID SWS)
wrote:
> I read that if I add the string "score" in the fl field, I should be able to
> see the score within the retuned documents.
>
> As I understand "score" is a "special/res
Also, "*:*" is a constant score query, so the score will always be 1.0. Not
a terribly good example to request the score.
Please provide the Solr query response, with the debug=true parameter so we
can see for ourselves that no score is returned.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
1. did you re-index after changing schema?
2. Why do use KeywordTokenizerFactory and not StandardTokenizerFactory? KTF
treats entire field contents as one token. Does it do what you really want?
[1]
3. If you'd use STF, TrimFilterFactory would be obsolete, as tokenization
has been done already.
[
Hi there
i am trying to deply the solr.war on glassfish server while deploying
those war file i get the following error. can some one please guide me
for this same. that how can i deploy solr.war in galssfish server.
Error occurred during deployment:
Exception while loading the app :
CDI deplo
Are distributed commits also done in parallel across shards?
Peter
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Inline responses below.
> --
> Mark Miller
> about.me/markrmiller
>
> On April 15, 2014 at 2:12:31 PM, Peter Keegan (peterlkee...@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> I have a SolrCloud
>Are distributed commits also done in parallel across shards?
I meant 'sequentially' across shards.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Peter Keegan wrote:
> Are distributed commits also done in parallel across shards?
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
>> Inline
What does server log actually says? At this point, this is very
glassfishy. I'd look for mentions of missing jars, e.g. for logging.
Also, which version of Solr.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr
Hello Erik,
Solr 4.7.1
Francesco
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 16. April 2014 14:01
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Show the score in the search result
What version of Solr? Works fine for me.
Best,
Erick
On Wed,
Solr Version is 4.7.1 and glassfish version is 4 .
On Wednesday 16 April 2014 06:39 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
What does server log actually says? At this point, this is very
glassfishy. I'd look for mentions of missing jars, e.g. for logging.
Also, which version of Solr.
Regards,
A
Hello Jack,
here is the query:
http://localhost:7001/solr/collection1/select?q=*%3A*&rows=5&fl=*%2Cscore&wt=json&indent=true&debugQuery=true
and here the response:
{
"responseHeader": {
"status": 0,
"QTime": 0
},
"response": {
"numFound": 842,
"start": 0,
"docs": [
Hello Jack,
I know it's not the best example, but I just wanted to see the score field
"printed out"... :)
Francesco
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 16. April 2014 14:32
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Show the score
Shawn Heisey-4 wrote
> What are you trying to achieve with your restart? Can you just reload
> the collections one by one instead?
We restart when we update a handler, schema, or solrconfig for our cores.
I’ve tried just shutting down both nodes. Updating both, and restarting
both. With a 1,000
Thanks for the information. I will look into this but I`m curious to know why
something this basic requires an external script...
Anyone knows why we can`t have an analysis chain on a numeric field ? Looks to
me like it would be very useful to be able to manipulate/transform a value
without an
On 4/15/2014 10:44 PM, Mukesh Jha wrote:
> In my solr cluster I've multiple shards and each shard containing
> ~500,000,000 documents total index size being ~1 TB.
>
> I was just wondering how much more can I keep on adding to the shard before
> we reach a tipping point and the performance starts
On 4/16/2014 6:51 AM, Ajay Patel wrote:
> i am trying to deply the solr.war on glassfish server while deploying
> those war file i get the following error. can some one please guide me
> for this same. that how can i deploy solr.war in galssfish server.
>
> Error occurred during deployment:
> Exce
On 4/16/2014 8:02 AM, Rich Mayfield wrote:
> However there doesn’t appear to be a way to force leadership to/from a
> particular replica.
I would have expected that doing a core reload on the current leader
would force an election and move the leader, but on my 4.2.1 SolrCloud
(the only version I
Thanks for replying,
1.Yes,I re-indexed data after the changes.
2.Changing to STF, did not help..
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Autocomplete-with-Case-insensitive-feature-tp4131182p4131499.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thank you Erick!
Yes - I am using the expunge deletes option.
Thanks for the note on disk space for the optimize command. I should have
enough space for that. What about the heap space requirement? I hope it can
do the optimize with the memory that is allocated to it.
Thanks
Vinay
On 16 April 2
Ideally we could get good approximates for all of them, including any of
our custom caches (of which we have about five). The RAM size estimator
spreadsheet [1] is helpful but we'd love to get accurate live size metrics.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/trunk/dev-tools/size-estimator
I am trying Solr for the first time, and I am stuck at the error "SEVERE:
Error filterStart"
My setup:
- Centos 6.x
- OpenJDK 1.7
- Tomcat 7
>From reading [1] I believe the issue is missing JAR files, but I have no
idea where to put them, even the wiki is a bit vague on that.
Lib directories
Hello,
If I use very basic tokenizers, e.g. space based and no filters, can I
reconstruct the text from the tokenized form?
So, "This is a test" -> "This", "is", "a", "test" -> "This is a test"?
I know we store enough information, but I don't know internal API
enough to know what I should be loo
Logically if you tokenize and put the results in a multivalued field, you
should be able to get all values in sequence?
On 16 Apr 2014 16:51, "Alexandre Rafalovitch" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If I use very basic tokenizers, e.g. space based and no filters, can I
> reconstruct the text from the tokenize
For learning purposes, I would just download the distribution from the
website, unzip it and run from there. Using built-in Jetty. Then, once
you are happy , go back to Tomcat and figure it out.
If that's not an option, you need to find what classpath your tomcat
is using. Have you actually tried
Why? I want stored=false, at which point multivalued field is just offset
values in the dictionary. Still have to reconstruct from offsets.
Or am I missing something?
Regards,
Alex
On 16/04/2014 10:59 pm, "Ramkumar R. Aiyengar"
wrote:
> Logically if you tokenize and put the results in a mu
You need to copy /example/lib/ext/*.jar into your tomcat lib
directory (/usr/share/tomcat/lib)
Also make sure a /usr/share/tomcat/conf/log4j.properties is there as well.
... then restart.
HTH
David
On 4/16/2014 11:47 AM, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
I am trying Solr for the first time, and I
: Anyone knows why we can`t have an analysis chain on a numeric field ?
: Looks to me like it would be very useful to be able to
: manipulate/transform a value without an external resources.
Analysis only affects *indexed* terms -- it has no impact on the stored
values (or things like docValue
: here is the query:
:
http://localhost:7001/solr/collection1/select?q=*%3A*&rows=5&fl=*%2Cscore&wt=json&indent=true&debugQuery=true
:
:
: and here the response:
that's bizare.
Do me a favor, and:
* post the results of
.../select?q=*%3A*&rows=1&fl=score&wt=json&indent=true&echoParams=true
And try it with wt=xml ... maybe there's something odd with JSON.
And also with echoParams=all so we can be sure what's really passed.
I suppose if you had an "invariant" for "fl", then fl would be ignored,
but... that would be a less likely scenario.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
Thanks Erick, this is helpful information!
So it sounds like, at minimum the cache size (at least for filterCache and
queryResultCache) should be the sum of the autowarmCount for that cache and the
number of queries defined for the newSearcher listener. Otherwise some items
in the caches will
Thank you. I had evidently misunderstood where it needed to be copied to.
That helped, though that directory already contained all but one file.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:45 PM, David Santamauro <
david.santama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You need to copy /example/lib/ext/*.jar into your tomcat li
mukh@gmail.com [mukh@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mukesh Jha
[me.mukesh@gmail.com] wrote:
> In my solr cluster I've multiple shards and each shard containing
> ~500,000,000 documents total index size being ~1 TB.
> I was just wondering how much more can I keep on adding to the shard before
We actually have a similar scenario, we have 64 cores per machine, and even
that sometimes has issues when we shutdown all cores at once. We did start
to write a "force election for Shard X" tool but it was harder than we
expected, its still on our to-do list.
Some context, we run 256 shards spre
bq. before any of Solr gets to do its shutdown sequence
Yeah, this is kind of an open issue. There might be a JIRA for it, but I cannot
remember. What we really need is an explicit shutdown call that can be made
before stopping jetty so that it’s done gracefully.
--
Mark Miller
about.me/markrm
Could you show the updated field definition?
Does analysis page show sensible output for your query on indexing/querying
sides?
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Sunayana wrote:
> Thanks for replying,
> 1.Yes,I re-indexed data after the changes.
> 2.Changing to STF, did not help..
>
>
>
>
> --
>
Hi Furkan,
Thanks for the reply. I understand the intent. However, in the case I
described, the follower is blocked on looking for a leader (throws the
pasted exception because it can't find the leader) before it participates
in election; therefore, it will never come up while the leader waits for
Shawn Heisey-4 wrote
> I can envision two issues for you to file in Jira. The first would be
> an Improvement issue, the second would be a Bug:
>
> * SolrCloud: Add API to move leader off a Solr instance
> * SolrCloud: LotsOfCollections takes a long time to stabilize
I've created:
* SOLR-5990 -
What version are you testing? Thought we had addressed this.
--
Mark Miller
about.me/markrmiller
On April 16, 2014 at 6:02:09 PM, Jessica Mallet (mewmewb...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi Furkan,
Thanks for the reply. I understand the intent. However, in the case I
described, the follower is blocked
Hello,
Couple of follow up questions:
* When the optimize command is run, looks like it creates one big segment
(forceMerge = 1). Will it get split at any point later? Or will that big
segment remain?
* Is there anyway to maintain the number of segments - but still merge to
reclaim the deleted d
I am seeing odd behavior from WordDelimiterFilterFactory (WDFF) when used in conjunction with StandardTokenizerFactory (STF). If I use the following configuration:
On 4/16/2014 8:37 PM, Bob Laferriere wrote:
>> I am seeing odd behavior from WordDelimiterFilterFactory (WDFF) when
>> used in conjunction with StandardTokenizerFactory (STF).
>> I see the following results for the document of “wi-fi”:
>>
>> Index: “wi”, “fi”
>> Query: “wi”,”fi”,”wifi”
>>
>
Typically the white space tokenizer is the best choice when the word
delimiter filter will be used.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 11:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: WordDelimiterFilterFactory and StandardToke
You can specify maxSegments parameter e.g. maxSegments=5 while optimizing.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Vinay Pothnis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Couple of follow up questions:
>
> * When the optimize command is run, looks like it creates one big segment
> (forceMerge = 1). Will it get split at any
good.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wait-Flush-Wait-Searcher-and-commit-Scenarios-tp491509p4131651.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
mark
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/waitFlush-and-waitSearcher-tp476887p4131653.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
48 matches
Mail list logo
