Found it on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrLogging!
Thx
On 05/07/2013 08:40 AM, Arkadi Colson wrote:
Any tips on what to do with the configuration files?
Where do I have to store them and what should they look like? Any
examples?
May 07, 2013 6:16:27 AM org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycl
Hi Otis;
I've read at somewhere says that if you have one replica and 1000 query per
second search rate and if you switch to 5 replica you may get 200 qps
search rate. What do you think about that and how Solr parallelize
searching within replicas? By the way when you say replica do you mean both
We have synonym files bigger than 5MB so even with compression that would
be probably failing (not using solr cloud yet)
Roman
On 6 May 2013 23:09, "David Parks" wrote:
> Wouldn't it make more sense to only store a pointer to a synonyms file in
> zookeeper? Maybe just make the synonyms file acces
Can I use Transformers for my purpose?
2013/5/3 Furkan KAMACI
> I think this looks like what I search for:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4465
>
> How about post filter for Lucene, can it help me for my purpose?
>
> 2013/5/3 Otis Gospodnetic
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> You should use search mo
Hi,
SolrCloud is designed with an assumption that you should be able to upload your
whole disk-based conf folder into ZK, and that you should be able to add an
empty Solr node to a cluster and it would download all config from ZK. So
immediately a splitting strategy automatically handled by ZkS
Hi Erick,
Thanks for the tip.
Will docValues help with memory usage? It seemed a bit complicated to set
up..
The index size saving was nice because that means that potentially I could
use smaller provisioned IOP volumes which cost less...
Thanks.
On 3 May 2013 18:27, Erick Erickson wrote:
Thanks Erik,
For the reply ! I know about 'set' but that's not my goal, i had to give a
better example.
I want this and if i have to add another list_c
user a[
id:a
liists[
list_a,
list_b
]
]
It Should look like:
user a[
id:a
liists[
list_a,
list_b,
list
Hi,
I was exploring the UI interface and in the analysis section I had a lazy
load error.
The logs says:
INFO - 2013-05-07 11:52:06.412; org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore; []
webapp=/solr path=/admin/luke params={_=1367923926380&show=schema&wt=json}
status=0 QTime=23
ERROR - 2013-05-07 11:52:06
Hi,
It depends(TM) on what kind of search performance problems you are seeing.
If you simply have so high query load that the server starts to kneal, it will
definitely not help to shard, since ALL the shards will still be hit with
ALL the queries, and you add some extra overhead with sharding as
Hi Yan,
Thanks for the quick reply.
Thus, replication seems to be the preferable solution. QTime decreases
proportional to replications number or there are any other drawbacks?
Just to clarify, what amount of documents stands for "tons of documents" in
your opinion? :)
2013/5/7 Jan Høydahl
>
P.S. Sorry for misspelling your name, Jan
2013/5/7 Stanislav Sandalnikov
> Hi Yan,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> Thus, replication seems to be the preferable solution. QTime decreases
> proportional to replications number or there are any other drawbacks?
>
> Just to clarify, what amount
Hi,
I am using distributed query to fetch records. Distributed Search Document
on wiki says , Distributed Search support distributed query. but I m getting
error while querying. Not sure if I am doing anything wrong.
below is my Query to fetch Term Vector with Distributed Search.
http://localho
hi - this is a known issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4479
-Original message-
> From:meghana
> Sent: Tue 07-May-2013 14:28
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: How to get Term Vector Information on Distributed Search
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using distributed query
I have an index built using Solr 1.4 with one field.
I was able to run proximity search (Ex: word1 within5 word2) but no where in
the configuration I see any information about storing/indexing the positions
or offsets of the terms.
My understanding is that we need to store/index termvectors
positi
Hi - they are indexed by default but can be omitted since 3.4:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Common_field_options
-Original message-
> From:KnightRider
> Sent: Tue 07-May-2013 14:41
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Solr 1.4 - Proximity Search - Where is configurati
Some clarifications :
1) *lots of docs, few queries* : If you have a high number of documents
(+dozen millions) and lowish number of queries per second (say less than
10), replicas will not help to reduce the Qtime. For this kind of task
it is better to shard the index, as each query will effecti
I have a string field containing values such as "1khz" "1ghz" "1mhz" etc.
I use this field to show a facet, currently I'm showing results in
facet.sort=count order. Now I'm asked to reorder the facet according to the
unit of measure (khz/mhz/ghz).
I also have 3/4 other custom sorting to implement
Thanks Markus.
-
Thanks
-K'Rider
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-1-4-Proximity-Search-Where-is-configuration-for-storing-positions-tp4061315p4061325.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Dear All
I am using Apache SOLR 3.6.2 version for my search engine in a job site.
I am observing for a solr query taking around 15 seconds to complete. I am
sure there is something wrong in my approach or I am doing indexing
wrongly. I need assistance/pointer to resolve this issue. I am providing
On May 6, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Son Nguyen wrote:
> I did some researches on internet and found out that because Zookeeper znode
> size limit is 1MB. I tried to increase the system property "jute.maxbuffer"
> but it won't work.
> Does anyone have experience of dealing with it?
Perhaps hit up the
Yes, that's what the 'start' and 'rows' parameters do in the query
string. I would check the queries Solr sees when you do that long
request. There is usually a delay in retrieving items further down the
sorted list, but 15 seconds does feel excessive.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParame
On May 7, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On May 6, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Son Nguyen wrote:
>
>> I did some researches on internet and found out that because Zookeeper znode
>> size limit is 1MB. I tried to increase the system property "jute.maxbuffer"
>> but it won't work.
>> Does a
Hi,
I'm using the Suggester component in Solr, and if I search for "iPhone 5"
the suggestions never give me the same phrase, that is "iPhone 5." Is there
any way to alter this behaviour to return "iPhone 5" as well?
A backup option could be to always display what the user has entered in the
UI, b
Thanks a lot Alex.
I will go and try to make use of start filter and update.
Meantime, if I need to know, how many total search records are there.
Example: Lets say I am searching key word "java".
There might be 1000 documents having java keyword. I need to show only 100
records at a time.
When
On 5/7/2013 8:45 AM, Kamal Palei wrote:
> When user clicks, 4, I will set "start" filter as 300, "rows" filter as 100
> and do the query. As query result, I am expecting row count as 1000, and
> 100 records data (row number 301 to 400).
This is what using the start and rows parameter with Solr wil
I see that Lucene 4.x has FieldInfo.IndexOptions that can be used to tell
lucene whether to Index Documents/Frequencies/Positions/Offsets.
We are in the process of upgrading from Lucene 2.9 to Lucene 4.x and I was
wondering if there was a way to tell lucene whether to index
docs/freqs/pos/offsets
Thank you, everything seems clear.
07.05.2013 20:17 пользователь "Andre Bois-Crettez"
написал:
> Some clarifications :
>
> 1) *lots of docs, few queries* : If you have a high number of documents
> (+dozen millions) and lowish number of queries per second (say less than
> 10), replicas will not h
: I am using the Lucene FieldCache with SolrCloud and I have "insane" instances
: with messages like:
FWIW: I'm the one that named the result of these "sanity checks"
"FieldCacheInsantity" and i have regretted it ever since -- a better label
would have been "inconsistency"
: VALUEMISMATCH: Mul
Mark,
I tried to set that property on both ZK (I have only one ZK instance) and Solr,
but it still didn't work.
But I read somewhere that ZK is not really designed for keeping large data
files, so this solution - increasing jute.maxbuffer (if I can implement it)
should be just temporary.
Son
Jan,
Thank you for your answer.
I've opened a JIRA issue with your suggestion.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4793
Son
-Original Message-
From: Jan Høydahl [mailto:jan@cominvent.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 4:16 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Cl
Hi
I am computing lots of stats as part of a query…
looks like the solr caching is not helping here…
Does solr caches stats of a query?
./zahoor
Hi
is there a limit for facet pivot like we have in facet.limit?
./zahoor
I'm not so worried about the large file in zk issue myself.
The concern is that you start storing and accessing lots of large files in ZK.
This is not what it was made for, and everything stays in RAM, so they guard
against this type of usage.
We are talking about a config file that is loaded o
Hi,
Yes, in the query cache. You should see it in your monitoring tool or
your Solr Stats Admin page. Doesn't help if queries don't repeat or
cache settings and poor.
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
SOLR Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
Can someone please tell me the usecase for storing term positions and offsets
in the index?
I am trying to understand the difference between storing positions/offsets
vs indexing positions/offsets.
Thanks
KR
-
Thanks
-K'Rider
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble
bq: Will docValues help with memory usage?
'm still a bit fuzzy on all the ramifications of DocValues, but I
somewhat doubt they'll result in index size savings, they _really_
help with loading the values for a field, but the end result is still
the values in memory
People who know what they'
No, DocTransformers work on a single document at a time, which is
pretty clear if you look at the methods you must implement.
Really, you'd do yourself a favor by doing a little more research
before asking questions, you might review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
and consider that
It looks like you have old jars in the classpath somewhere, class not found
just shouldn't be happening.
If this can be reproduced on a fresh install (and even better on a machine
that's never had Solr installed) it would be something we'd need to pursue...
Best
Erick
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:56
For someone link me, who want to follow dev discussions but not JIRA, having a
separate mailing list subscription for each would be ideal. The incoming mail
traffic would be cut drastically (for me, I get far more non relevant emails
from JIRA vs. dev).
-- MJ
-Original Message-
Fro
Hmmm, R. Muir did some work here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3143, note that it's 4.0 or
later. I haven't implemented this, but this is a common problem so if
you do dig into it and get it to work (warning, I haven't a clue) it'd
be a great contribution to the Wiki.
Best
Erick
On
Email filters? I mean, you may have a point, but the cost of change at
this moment is probably too high. Personal email filters, on the other
hand, seems like an easy solution.
Regards,
Alex.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:01 PM, wrote:
> For someone link me, who want to follow dev discussions but
Hello,
I am about to index identfier fields containing blanks (shelfmarks) eg. G 23/60
12
The field type is set to Solr.string. To get the exact matching hit (the doc
with shelfmark mentioned above) the user must quote the search term. Is there a
way to omit the quotes?
Best,
Silvio
On 5/7/2013 9:50 AM, KnightRider wrote:
I see that Lucene 4.x has FieldInfo.IndexOptions that can be used to tell
lucene whether to Index Documents/Frequencies/Positions/Offsets.
I really don't like giving unhelpful responses like this, but I don't
think there's any other way to go.
This is
In the data import handler I have multiple entities. Each one
generates a date in the
dataimport.properties i.e. entityname.last_index_time.
How do I reference the specific entity time in my delta queries?
Thanks
Eric
Hi Barani,
This identical question was posed at the same time on StackOverflow, and I
answered it there already:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16407110/solr-4-2-solr-latlontype-type-v
s-solr-spatialrecursiveprefixtreefieldtype/16409327#16409327
~ David
On 5/6/13 12:28 PM, "bbarani" wrote:
This is resolved, I switched in the 4.2.1 jars and also corrected a mismatch
between the compile and runtime JDKs, for some reason the system was
overriding my JAVA_HOME setting (6.1) and running the client with a 5.0 JVM.
I did not have to use setParser.
I did try running the 'new' 4.2.1 SolrJ c
Hi
I need to store and retrieve some custom java objects using Solr and I have
used ByteField and java serialisation for this. Using the embedded jetty
server I can see these byte data but when I use Solrj api to retrieve the
data they are not available. Details are below:
My schema:
We have a fairly large (in the order of 10s of TB) indices built using Solr
3.5. We are considering migrating to Solr 4.3 and was wondering what the
policy is on maintaining backward compatibility of the indices? Will 4.3
work with my 3.5 indexes? Because of the large data size, I would ideally
lik
We have a fairly large (in the order of 10s of TB) indices built using Solr
3.5. We are considering migrating to Solr 4.3 and was wondering what the
policy is on maintaining backward compatibility of the indices? Will 4.3
work with my 3.5 indexes? Because of the large data size, I would ideally
lik
On 5/7/2013 3:11 PM, Skand Gupta wrote:
We have a fairly large (in the order of 10s of TB) indices built using Solr
3.5. We are considering migrating to Solr 4.3 and was wondering what the
policy is on maintaining backward compatibility of the indices? Will 4.3
work with my 3.5 indexes? Because o
Using ${dih..last_index_time} should work. Make sure you put
it in quotes in your query.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Eric Myers wrote:
> In the data import handler I have multiple entities. Each one
> generates a date in the
> dataimport.properties i.e. entityname.last_index_time.
>
> H
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:48 PM, J Mohamed Zahoor wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am computing lots of stats as part of a query…
> looks like the solr caching is not helping here…
>
> Does solr caches stats of a query?
No. Neither facet counts or stats part of a request are cached. The
query cache only cache
Thank you Shawn. This was detailed and very helpful.
Skand.
On May 7, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/7/2013 3:11 PM, Skand Gupta wrote:
>> We have a fairly large (in the order of 10s of TB) indices built using Solr
>> 3.5. We are considering migrating to Solr 4.3 and was wonderin
Hello,
I'm look for a way to detect solr index corruption using a http get
command. I've look at the /admin/ping and /admin/luke request handlers but
not sure if the their status provide guarantees that everything is all
right. The idea is to be able to tell a load balancer to put a given solr
ins
Thanks Shawn. I'll reach out to Lucene discussion group.
-
Thanks
-K'Rider
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Storing-positions-and-offsets-vs-FieldType-IndexOptions-DOCS-AND-FREQS-AND-POSITIONS-AND-OFFSETS-tp4061354p4061457.html
Sent from the Solr - User ma
Thank you.
However, fq is already in use.
In my opinion, it is to think that it might be slow data of 70 million
reviews is contained in the core of one, but do you have examples of
performance of a certain number or more may decrease maybe?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066
: I am about to index identfier fields containing blanks (shelfmarks) eg. G
: 23/60 12
: The field type is set to Solr.string. To get the exact matching hit (the doc
: with shelfmark mentioned above) the user must quote the search term. Is there
: a way to omit the quotes?
whitespace has to be qu
: Email filters? I mean, you may have a point, but the cost of change at
: this moment is probably too high. Personal email filters, on the other
: hand, seems like an easy solution.
The reason for having Jira notifications go to the devs list is that all
of the comments & discussion in jira are
On Wed, May 8, 2013, at 02:07 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : I am about to index identfier fields containing blanks (shelfmarks) eg.
> G
> : 23/60 12
> : The field type is set to Solr.string. To get the exact matching hit
> (the doc
> : with shelfmark mentioned above) the user must quote the s
"ab_1eb83ef9bc0896":"
0.17063755 = (MATCH) sum of:
3.085E-4 = (MATCH) MatchAllDocsQuery, product of:
3.085E-4 = queryNorm
0.009742409 = (MATCH) product of:
0.019484818 = (MATCH) sum of:
0.016588148 = (MATCH) sum of:
0.0034696688 = (MATCH) weight(articleTopic:Food^1
60 matches
Mail list logo
