Thanks Erik,
For the reply ! I know about 'set' but that's not my goal, i had to give a
better example.
I want this and if i have to add another list_c
user a[
id:a
liists[
list_a,
list_b
]
]
It Should look like:
user a[
id:a
liists[
list_a,
list_b,
list_c
]
]
However if i again add list_a, it should *not* be:
user a[
id:a
liists[
list_a,
list_b,
list_c,
list_a,
]
]
I am *not* reindexing the documents.
Depends on your goal here. I'm guessing you're using
atomic updates, in which case you need to use "set"
rather than "add" as the former replaces the contents.
See: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateJSON#Solr_4.0_Example
If you're simply re-indexing the documents, just send the entire
fresh document to solr and it'll replace the earlier document
completely.
Best
Erick
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Nikhil Kumar <nikhil.ku...@hashedin.com>wrote:
> Hey,
> I have recently started using solr, I have a list of users, which are
> subscribed to some lists.
> eg.
> user a[
> id:a
> liists[
> list_a
> ]
> ]
> user b[
> id:b
> liists[
> list_a
> ]
> ]
> I am using {"id": a, "lists":{"add":"list_a"}} to add particular list a
> user.
> but what is happening if I use the same command again, it again adds the
> same list, which i want to avoid.
> user a[
> id:a
> liists[
> list_a,
> list_a
> ]
> ]
> I searched the documentation and tutorials, i found
>
> -
>
> overwrite = "true" | "false" — default is "true", meaning newer
> documents will replace previously added documents with the same uniqueKey.
> -
>
> commitWithin = "(milliseconds)" if the "commitWithin" attribute is
> present, the document will be added within that time. [image: <!>]
> Solr1.4 <http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr1.4>. See
> CommitWithin<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommitWithin>
> -
>
> (deprecated) allowDups = "true" | "false" — default is "false"
> -
>
> (deprecated) overwritePending = "true" | "false" — default is negation
> of allowDups
> -
>
> (deprecated) overwriteCommitted = "true"|"false" — default is negation
> of allowDups
>
>
> but using overwrite and allowDups didn't solve the problem either,
> seems because there is no unique id but just value.
>
> So the question is how to solve this problem?
>
> --
> Thank You and Regards,
> Nikhil Kumar
> +91-9916343619
> Technical Analyst
> Hashed In Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
>
--
Thank You and Regards,
Nikhil Kumar
+91-9916343619
Technical Analyst
Hashed In Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
