Roman,
My bet is that number of indexed fields doesn't impacts the search time,
and number of queried fields does linearly increase the search time.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Roman Slavik wrote:
> Hi guys,
> what is relation between number of indexed fields and searching speed?
>
> For
DIH threads is my favorite point. My vision to this problem is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3585 be aware of the following:
- i never run it with DIH, but it should work
- you've got a speedup only if the Solr indexing is bottleneck now, ie.
it's strongly dependent from your config eg
I have done some more testing with different examples.
It's really the worddelimiter that influence the fieldnorm. When i search
for "Barcelona" the doc with "FC Barcelona" scores higher than
"FC-Barcelona".
Fieldnorm for "FC Barcelona" = 0.625 and the fieldnorm for "FC-Barcelona" =
0.5.
Analyz
Dear Sir,
I am not able to files to SOLR using post.jar. I am getting the following
message. I get 0 results upon querying:-
C:\Developer\solr-4.1.0\example\exampledocs>java -Durl=/update
-jar post.jar *.xml
SimplePostTool version 1.5
Posting files to base url /solr/updat
e using content-t
On 28 January 2013 15:30, Neha Jatav wrote:
[...]
> I am not able to files to SOLR using post.jar. I am getting the following
> message. I get 0 results upon querying:-
>
>
>
> C:\Developer\solr-4.1.0\example\exampledocs>java -Durl=/update
> -jar post.jar *.xml
[...]
Please read and follow the in
Dear Gora Mohanty,
I am not using literally. I am using the localhost url slash
solr.
On Monday, January 28, 2013, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On 28 January 2013 15:30, Neha Jatav wrote:
> [...]
>> I am not able to files to SOLR using post.jar. I am getting the following
>> message. I get 0 results
On 28 January 2013 16:11, Neha Jatav wrote:
> Dear Gora Mohanty,
>
> I am not using literally. I am using the localhost url slash
> solr.
Again, please read the documentation. As mentioned earlier: (a) You
do not need -Durl=... if using built-in Jetty, (b) and the URL should include
the 8983 por
(a) I am not using jetty, I am using tomcat as mentioned in the subject line
(b) I am using some other port number and that I have included in the url
On Monday, January 28, 2013, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On 28 January 2013 16:11, Neha Jatav wrote:
>> Dear Gora Mohanty,
>>
>> I am not using litera
Hello!
What Gora says is valid. Just point the SimplePostTools to the correct
host, core name and handler and it should work just fine, of course if
Solr is up and running. For example the following works just fine with
Solr running on 8080:
java -Durl=http://localhost:8080/solr/collection1/updat
Neha
One thing that made me think is the line "SimplePostTool: WARNING: Solr
returned an error #302 Found" - Status Code 302 is no real error .. it's a
forward/redirect to another url. so, you want to check the used url with
curl/wget/or maybe even a normal browser, to see where it gets redirec
Got it! There's an authenticator with the tomcat and the cookies are
missing when I do an update. Thanks all.
On Monday, January 28, 2013, Stefan Matheis
wrote:
> Neha
>
> One thing that made me think is the line "SimplePostTool: WARNING: Solr
returned an error #302 Found" - Status Code 302 is no
What field type were you using in 3.1 vs 4.x? If you were using some default
field type, maybe it changed. If you do need to achieve exactly the same
results as in 3.1, maybe you need to use the same field-type/analyzer. In
some cases there may have been bugs that got fixed.
-- Jack Krupansky
Hello Jack,
I'm using exactly the same fieldtype:
It looks like the catenatewords has another influence in solr 4.1 than in
previous version.(3.1)
The analyze i
As I said, maybe there might have been bugs fixed since 3.1. WDF has changed
over time. Expecting it to give identical results across releases is a
classic Fool's Errand. Ditto for scoring in general - it's subject to change
across major releases.
I mean, sure, we could track down what specifi
Hello.
I have a crawler that sends documents to a Solr trunk instance via
the ExtractingRequestHandler.
I can search on title and content and everything is OK.
The documents usually contain among others text like:
- "...location: London, ..." or
- "...in Brighton..." or
- "...to Birmingham"
Hello Jack,
Thanks for your answer. It's clear, i think it was a bug in 3.1. The
difference in fieldnorm was just not what i expected. I will tweak the
schema to get it closer to the expected results.
Thanks Jack,
Roy
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Fieldno
Good morning,
I used this post here to join to search 2 different cores and return one
data set.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2139030/search-multiple-solr-cores-and-return-one-result-set
The good news is that it worked!
The bad news is that one of the cores is Opentext and the ManifoldCF
secu
Hello,
Can you post this question to u...@manifoldcf.apache.org too?
--- On Mon, 1/28/13, eShard wrote:
> From: eShard
> Subject: Multicore search with ManifoldCF security not working
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Monday, January 28, 2013, 6:16 PM
> Good morning,
> I used this po
I'm sorry, I don't know what you mean.
I clicked on the hidden email link, filled out the form and when I hit
submit;
I got this error:
Domain starts with dot
Please fix the error and try again.
Who exactly am I sending this to and how do I get the form to work?
--
View this message in context
Hello!
I haven´t found Solr 4.1 maven artifacts to update my Solr projects
dependencies. Are they published in the public Mvn repositories?
Thank you!
In your case, since there is no co-current queries, adding replicas won't
help much on improving the response speed. However, break your index into
a few shards do help increase query performance. I recently break an index
with 30 million documents (30G) into 4 shards, and the boost is pretty
impr
Well, My index is already broken to 16 shards...
The behaviour I supposed - It absolutely doesn't happen... Right?
Does it make sense somehow as an improvement request?
Technically, Can multiple Lucene responses be intersected this way?
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Mingfeng Yang wrote:
> In
Hi,
I need to build a UI that can access multiple cores. And combine them all on
an Everything tab.
The solrajax example only has 1 core.
How do I setup multicore with solrajax?
Do I setup 1 manager per core? How much of a performance hit will I take
with multiple managers running?
Is there a bett
: You can also do it on a more straightforward way: preprocess docs to derive
: a number_or_colors field, eg. via UpdateProcessor and filter for this field
: as usual.
i think this is definitely the more natural way for users to address this
use case, and requires no custom code...
https://luce
Hi,
I want to change the name in the result json file from solr. Like i want
numFound to be be totalNumRecords etc. Any hint how i can do that?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Modify-result-json-file-tp4036853.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archi
All I had to do was put a wildcard before and after the search term and it
would succeed. (*Maritime*)
Searching multi value fields wouldn't work any other way.
Like so:
http://localhost:8080/solr/Blogs/select?q=title%3A*Maritime*&wt=xml
but I'll check out those other suggestions...
Thanks,
-
Hi Lu:
Look at
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/solr/
;-)
El 28/01/2013 20:10, "Luis Cappa Banda" escribió:
> Hello!
>
> I haven´t found Solr 4.1 maven artifacts to update my Solr projects
> dependencies. Are they published in the public Mvn repositories?
>
>
On 29 January 2013 01:50, hassancrowdc wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to change the name in the result json file from solr. Like i want
> numFound to be be totalNumRecords etc. Any hint how i can do that?
This requirement seems a little strange: Could you
explain why you would want this?
Along the lines
I've got a process that is replacing about 180K documents that are all
similar (I'm actually just adding one field to each of them). This is
mostly working fine, but occasionally (perhaps 100 times), I get this error:
409 Conflict
Error:
{'responseHeader'=>{'status'=>409,'QTime'=>1},'error'=>{'msg
On 29 January 2013 02:41, hassancrowdc wrote:
> i want smething like
> {current page:#
> totalNumRecords:#
> records:[]
> }
> because everything else in my website fllow this format.
> instead of:
> {response
> {numFound:
> start:
> docs:[]
> }
> }
> before someone responded me to skip the startin
Hi,
If you add security constraint for /admin/*, SolrCloud will not work. At
least that's what I had in Solr4.0. I have not tried the same with Solr4.1,
but I guess it is the same.
Also I found some issues with URL patterns in webdefault.xml
This:
/core/update
works, but for some reason this
Hi,
We are looking at putting our Product Catalog into Solr. Our Product
Catalog involves a Product, and a number of [Name, Value] pairs – which
represent attributes of a particular product. The attribute names are
standard along a certain Product Category, but they are too numerous to put
Hi O.O.,
You don't need to add them all into the schema. You can use the wildcard
fields like to hold them. You can then have the attribute name be the
part of the wildcard and the attribute value be the field contents. So you
could have fields like Function_s:Scanner etc and then you could
Ok, I did get a little more information about it from here:
http://yonik.com/solr/optimistic-concurrency/ but I really don't know why
the version number is conflicting. I'm running the only process that is
changing documents, and my process is to read the document, add a field,
and write the docume
Or on Central:
http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.solr%22
On Jan 28, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Miguel Ángel Martín
wrote:
> Hi Lu:
>
> Look at
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/solr/
>
> ;-)
> El 28/01/2013 20:10, "Luis Cappa Banda" esc
Thank you Robi. Your idea seems good but I have a few questions:
1. From your description, I would create a field “Function_s” with the
value
“Scanner” and “Function_s” with the value “Printer” for my two Products.
This seems good. Is it possible for you give me a query for this dynamic
fie
I think this has come up on the mailing list before. I don't remember the
details, but you want to restrict the admin UI but not the CoreAdmin url -
/admin/cores.
- Mark
On Jan 28, 2013, at 4:37 PM, Marcin Rzewucki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you add security constraint for /admin/*, SolrCloud will
For this second report, it's easy: switching from a single query server
to a sharded query is going to be slower. Virtual machines add jitter to
the performance and response time of the front-end vs the query shards.
Distributed search does 2 round-trips for each sharded query. Add these
all up
I guess, response time increased, because I use master-slave configuration in
Solr 4.0 and Solr 4.1: if there are no termVectors, the full index is
replicated; if there are termVectors, only modified segments of the index
are transferred from the master to slaves. Am I right?
--
View this messag
Just add a config attribute `convertType="true"` in the db-data-config.xml
will solve my problem. like below:
2013/1/22 nanyang cai
> Hi,
>
> DIH is really handy. But I found it interpret "Tinyint(1) unsigned" values
> as "Boolean" values. In my case, we have a column 'status tinyint(1)',
40 matches
Mail list logo
