What field type were you using in 3.1 vs 4.x? If you were using some default
field type, maybe it changed. If you do need to achieve exactly the same
results as in 3.1, maybe you need to use the same field-type/analyzer. In
some cases there may have been bugs that got fixed.
-- Jack Krupansky
-----Original Message-----
From: roySolr
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 4:11 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fieldnorm solr 4 -> specialchars(worddelimiter)
I have done some more testing with different examples.
It's really the worddelimiter that influence the fieldnorm. When i search
for "Barcelona" the doc with "FC Barcelona" scores higher than
"FC-Barcelona".
Fieldnorm for "FC Barcelona" = 0.625 and the fieldnorm for "FC-Barcelona" =
0.5.
Analyze:
fc | barcelona
fc | barcelona | fcbarcelona
So it's 2 terms against 3 and this explains the difference in score. In solr
3.1 the score is the same, fieldnorm is 0.625 for both docs. It looks like
the catenatewords has no influence in solr 3.1.
I want that the score is the same, with or without the catenatewords, like
it's in solr 3.1. Is this possible?
Thanks
Roy
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Fieldnorm-solr-4-specialchars-worddelimiter-tp4036248p4036679.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
