Some versions of the OpenJDK doesn´t include the Rhino Engine to run javascript
dataimport. You have to use the Oracle JDK.
Juampa.
De: randolf.julian [randolf.jul...@dominionenterprises.com]
Enviado el: martes, 20 de marzo de 2012 5:41
Para: solr-user@luc
Hi Ramdev,
add() is a blocking call. Otherwise it had to start an own background
thread which is not what a library like Solrj should do (how many
threads at most? At which priority? Which thread group? How long keep
them pooled?)
And, additionally, you might want to know whether the transmi
Dear all,
I want to generate compound type index instead of files contain fdt,fdx etc.
I follow the suggestion to change the "useCompoundFile" parameter to true
(both in indexDefaults and mainIndex) in solrconfig.xml, but when i use
post.jar to post example xml file, i find the index is the same
I tried that, and it seems like "recharging" and "rechargeable", for example,
actually do stem to the same root (recharg). So why is it not working when I'm
searching on my indexed sampledocs? The stemming works when I search for
"videos" and it's actually "video" in the document, etc., but not for
I am playing with an index that is sharded many times, between 64 and 128. One
thing I noticed is that with replication set to happen every 5 minutes, it
means that each slave hits the master at the same moment asking for updates:
:00:00, :05:00, :10:00, :15:00 etc. Replication takes very li
Faceting is orthogonal to grouping, so be careful what you
ask for. So adding faceting would be easy, the only reason
I suggested grouping is your requirement that your brands be
just a count of the number of distinct ones found, not the
number of matching docs.
So a really simple solution would b
Also consider StreamingUpdateSolrServer if you want multiple threads
to operate from your client.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:12 AM, Michael Kuhlmann wrote:
> Hi Ramdev,
>
> add() is a blocking call. Otherwise it had to start an own background thread
> which is not what a library like S
Hmm nice feature Erik
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-the-SolrJ-call-to-add-collection-of-documents-a-blocking-function-call-tp3839387p3842232.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I received it...sometimes it just needs some time.
2012/3/20 怪侠 <87863...@qq.com>
> I send email to :solr-user@lucene.apache.org, but I always receive the
> rejected email. It can't send successful.
--
**
*Travis Low, Director of Development*
** * *
*Centurion Research Solutions, LLC*
I'm trying to figure out how it's possible for 2 solr instances (1
which is leader 1 is replica) to be out of sync. I've done commits to
the solr instances, forced replication but still the solr instances
have different info. The relevant snippet from my clusterstate.json
is listed below.
\
Thanks Mikhail and Juampa. How can I prove to our Systems guys that the Rhino
Engine is not installed? This is the only way that I can prove that it's not
installed and we have to have it for SOLR data importhandler script to run.
Thanks again.
- Randolf
--
View this message in context:
http://l
On 3/19/2012 11:55 PM, Ankita Patil wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to know whether it is feasible to query on all the shards even if
the query yields data only from a few shards n not all. Or is it better to
mention those shards explicitly from which we get the data and only query
on them.
for example :
I
Taking a quick look at the code, it seems this exception could have been thrown
for four reasons:
(see org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.ScriptTransformer#initEngine)
1. Your JRE doesn't have class "javax.script.ScriptEngineManager" (pre 1.6,
loaded here via reflection)
2. Your JRE doesn't
Do you have the logs for this? Either around startup or when you are forcing
replication. Logs around both would be helpful.
Also the doc counts for each shard?
On Mar 20, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out how it's possible for 2 solr instances (1
> which is lea
DocCounts are the same. I am going to disable my custom component to
see if that is mucking with something but it seems to be working
properly.
After looking at the results a little closer (expanding the number of
results coming back) it seems that the same information is in both but
the order in
ok, with my custom component out of the picture I still have the same
issue. Specifically, when sorting by score on a leader and replica I
am getting different doc orderings. Is this something anyone has
seen?
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> DocCounts are the same. I a
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> ok, with my custom component out of the picture I still have the same
> issue. Specifically, when sorting by score on a leader and replica I
> am getting different doc orderings. Is this something anyone has
> seen?
This is certainly poss
HmmmOk, I don't see how it's possible for me to ensure that there
are no ties. If a query were for *:* everything has a constant score,
if the user requested 1 page then requested the next the results on
the second page could be duplicates from what was on the first page.
I don't remember ever
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> HmmmOk, I don't see how it's possible for me to ensure that there
> are no ties. If a query were for *:* everything has a constant score,
> if the user requested 1 page then requested the next the results on
> the second page could be d
I use the solrJ to index a pdf file.
File file = new File("1.pdf");
String urlString = constant.getUrl();
StreamingUpdateSolrServer solr = new
StreamingUpdateSolrServer(
urlString, 1, 1);
I believe we're using replication to only duplicate the index
(standard SolrCloud nothing special on our end) so I don't see why the
docids wouldn't be the sameam I missing something that is
happening there that I am unaware of?
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Tue,
Thanks ..
i need to index data from one solr to another solr with different analyser
..
Now i am able to do this by querying from solr which will be index into
another solr
NOTE: As the field which i need to reindex is stored so it is easy by as my
index has 31 lakh record it is taking lot of time
Thanks Yonik, I really appreciate the explanation. It sounds like the
best solution for me to solve this is to add the additional sort
parameter. That being said is there a significant memory increase to
do this when sorting by score? I don't see how with SolrCloud I can
avoid doing this, and ho
I also applied a fix to both Trunk/4.x and the 3.x branch (will be in 3.6 when
it is released). This should give you better error messages when something
goes wrong when ScriptTransformer is invoked. It will tell you that you need
>1.6 only if the functionality is absent (case #1 in my last me
Hi:
We have been keen on using polyfields for a while. But we have been
restricted from using it because they do not seem to support Multi-values
(yet). I am wondering if there are any Custom implementations or is there any
ETA on the Solr releases to include Multivalued PolyFields .
Thank
Thanks for taking the time to help me Erick!
Just to clarify my desired behavior from the facets. This is the index, notice
color is multivalued to represent a model of car that has more than one color:
Audi A4
audi
A4_black
black
white
Audi A4
audi
A4_white
white
Volvo V50
volvo
Volvo_V50
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:17 PM, wrote:
> Hi:
> We have been keen on using polyfields for a while. But we have been
> restricted from using it because they do not seem to support Multi-values
> (yet).
Poly-fields should support multi-values, it's more what uses them may not.
For example LatL
Here is the core of the SOLRJ client that ended up accomplishing what I
wanted
String fileName2 = "C:\\work\\SolrClient\\data\\worldwartwo.txt";
SolrServer server = new
StreamingUpdateSolrServer("http://localhost:8080/solr/",20,8);
UpdateRequest req = new UpdateRequest("/up
Thanks for taking the time to help me Erick!
Just to clarify my desired behavior from the facets. This is the index,
notice color is multivalued to represent a model of car that has more than
one color:
Audi A4
audi
A4_black
black
white
Audi A4
audi
A4_white
white
Volvo V50
volvo
Volvo_V50
b
Hi Hoss,
Thanks for the pointers, and sorry, it was a bug in my code (was some dead code
which was alphabetizing the facet link text and also the parameters themselves
indirectly by reference).
I actually ended up building a servlet and a component to print out the
multi-valued parameters usin
OK, I was thrown off by your use of "schema", I thought
you were talking about schema.xml
Anyway, assuming you have some kind of loop that pages
through the documents via Solr, gets the results and then
sends them to another Solr server... yeah, that'll be slow.
You have the "deep paging" prob
Ok, assuming sku is an un-tokenized field (and if it isn't, use
a copyField) then just facet on that field. Then, at the app layer,
combine them to get your aggregate counts.
So your raw return would have
Audi A4 (2)
Audi A5 (1)
Audi S8 (2)
Volvo V50 (1)
The app would have to be smart enough to s
: To get this to work correctly, the following server side config was needed
: (I started from a barebones solr config)
: 1. Add apache-solr-cell-3.5.0.jar to the /lib directory (or
: wherever solr can access jars) as this contains the class
: ExtractingRequestHandler
: 2. Add the appropriate han
: > Is there any way to get get the threads within SUSS objects to immediately
: > exit without creating other issues? Alternatively, if immediate isn't
: > possible, the exit could take 1-2 seconds. I could not find any kind of
: > method in the API that closes down the object.
you should take
If you build it, they will come!
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:59 PM, vybe3142 wrote:
> I'm still puzzled that there are no readily available alternatives to using
> the Tika based ExtractingRequestHandler in the situation where the input
> data is plain UTF-8 text files that SOLR needs to injest a
For our use case this is a no-no. When the index is updated, we need
all indexes to be updated at the same time.
We put all indexes (slaves) behind a load balancer and the user would
expect the same results from page to page.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Eric Pugh
wrote:
> I am playing with
On 3/20/2012 8:11 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
:> Is there any way to get get the threads within SUSS objects to immediately
:> exit without creating other issues? Alternatively, if immediate isn't
:> possible, the exit could take 1-2 seconds. I could not find any kind of
:> method in the API
37 matches
Mail list logo
