Re: Solr 1.3 highlighting problem

Have you recently change its type from unstored to stored? if so you have to reindex . - Thanx: Grijesh www.gettinhahead.co.in -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-1-3-highlighting-problem-tp2918089p2922117.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list arc

Re: edismax available in solr 3.1?

See this http://www.gettingahead.co.in/blogwp/2011/03/technical/solr/shalini/some-info-about-extended-dismax-query-parser/ - Thanx: Grijesh www.gettinhahead.co.in -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/edismax-available-in-solr-3-1-tp2910613p2922128.html Sent f

Indexing Mails

Hallo.. I search a Way to indexing e-Mails fast and easy to safe in Solr A lot of users do this too, but i cant find a howTo or something like that. when you have or know where i can find a HowTo.. it will nice if you can help me.. King

RE: Solr 3.1 / Java 1.5: Exception regarding analyzer implementation

Hi, > On 09.05.11 11:04, Martin Jansen wrote: > > I just attempted to set up an instance of Solr 3.1 in Tomcat 5.5 > > running in Java 1.5. It fails with the following exception on start-up: > > > >> java.lang.AssertionError: Analyzer implementation classes or at least > >> their tokenStream() an

Re: Replication Clarification Please

Ravi, as far as I remember, this is how the replication logic works (see SnapPuller class, fetchLatestIndex method): > 1. Does the Slave get the whole index every time during replication or > just the delta since the last replication happened ? It look at the index version AND the index generat

Re: Indexing Mails

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Jörg Agatz wrote: > Hallo.. > > I search a Way to indexing e-Mails fast and easy to safe in Solr > A lot of users do this too, but i cant find a howTo or something like that. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Indexing_Emails which directs one to: http

Re: Indexing Mails

will the E-Mail ID, and the recent E-Mail Ids, indext too? and witch fiels i have to create in schema.xml?

Facet Count Based on Dates

I have a schema which has field Polarity which is of type "text" and it can have three values 0,1 or -1 and CreatedAt which is of type "date". *How can I get count of polarity based on dates. For example, it gives the output that on 5/1/2011 there were 10 counts of 0, 10 counts of 1 and 10 cou

Re: How to set a common field to several values types ?

Yes you can but one doc will contain one type of data other wise it will be overwritten by latest one - Thanx: Grijesh www.gettinhahead.co.in -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-set-a-common-field-to-several-values-types-tp2922192p2922206.html Sent fr

Re: Solr 1.3 highlighting problem

I indeed changed the type from unstored to stored. But I did do a reindex (several times already) and a commit, restarted Tomcat, restarted PC, nothing works. When I do a search the text field shows up in the results. But that is the only thing that has changed. tag only shows id's. I have no idea

Re: Solr 1.3 highlighting problem

You're using the string fieldType to get highlighting to work but it must be tokenized. Use a fieldType with a tokenizer. See also: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase > Hi, > > I'm using the "old" 1.3 Solr version on one of my sites and I decided to > add a highlighting feature.

Re: Solr 1.3 highlighting problem

Oh! I did't see the "string" - Thanx: Grijesh www.gettinhahead.co.in -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-1-3-highlighting-problem-tp2918089p2922532.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Facet Count Based on Dates

Have you looked at Pivot Faceting http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HierarchicalFaceting http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Pivot_.28ie_Decision_Tree.29_Faceting-1 - Thanx: Grijesh www.gettinhahead.co.in -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Facet-Cou

Re: Indexing Mails

Look at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MailEntityProcessor http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MailEntityProcessor it will give you the all informations You may have to create the fields as single valued fields : messageId subject from sentDate xMailer multi valued fields allTo flags : possible flags are

Re: tomcat and multicore processors

I think OS will manage it when required OS will use other core of your CPU also. Also you can use some memory management(GC Options) settings with java. You can see about memory management a blog posted by "Mark Miller" at Lucidimagination.com http://www.gettingahead.co.in/blogwp/2011/03/technic

Re: How to set a common field to several values types ?

Thanks for your answer! It is pretty weird because all my tries are wrong. If I try to index data with this field in the schema : It works perfectly (in the case of indexing extract from file (via solr cell/tika)), but it fails if I try to index plain text data! Is there something wrong ? And

Boosting score of a document without deleting and adding another document

I want to add score for documents dynamically. For this, the method that I know right now is to use "add". Using this method, everytime I need to get the contents of that document, and then add another record with the boost field. Is there a way in which I can just specify the boost attribute

Re: How to set a common field to several values types ?

Which way you are using to index the Plain text data? As I see your both the fields are same then why not use same field for both the data. What is the need of extracting request handler if you are not going to extract any document? - Thanx: Grijesh www.gettinhahead.co.in -- View this messa

Re: Boosting score of a document without deleting and adding another document

NO, You have to update the whole document .There is no way to update only some of fields or any field attribute in solr/Lucene currently. - Thanx: Grijesh www.gettinhahead.co.in -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boosting-score-of-a-document-without-deletin

RE: Boosting score of a document without deleting and adding another document

Any other workaround? Maybe by fiddling around with the source? > From: kvs_cheezy_...@hotmail.com > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Boosting score of a document without deleting and adding another > document > Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 16:17:25 +0530 > > > > I want to add score for do

Re: Solr 3.1 Upgrade - Reindex necessary ?

>1. Do we have to reindex all content again to use Solr 3.1 ? >2. If we don't reindex all content are there any potential issues ? (I >read somewhere that first commit would change the 1.4.1 format to 3.1. >have the analyzer's behavior changed which warrants reindexing ?) >3. Apart from deploy

RE: Boosting score of a document without deleting and adding another document

You can add the boost at the time of indexing the doc at first time. You can see the function queries at query time to boost the documents dynamically. You can see around DefaultSimilarityClass to tweak around scores - Thanx: Grijesh www.gettinhahead.co.in -- View this message in context:

RE: Boosting score of a document without deleting and adding another document

What I want to do is : everytime an item is searched, I get the ID of that document, and now I want to increase this document's score.Function queries at query time won't really help with this. Any way to do this other than adding the entire document again? > From: kvs_cheezy_...@hotmail.com >

RE: Boosting score of a document without deleting and adding another document

Perhaps the query elevation component is what you are looking for : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryElevationComponent Ludovic. - Jouve France. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boosting-score-of-a-document-without-deleting-and-adding-another-document-tp29

RE: Boosting score of a document without deleting and adding another document

Nope can't do, you can keep the counter at application end and update the time-stamp of documents which have been searched then update/index the document with counter or assign the boost to document being updated. if keeping counter then by using function query you can influence the score of hir

Re: Solr 1.3 highlighting problem

Hi Markus, thanks for the tip. I replaced the string field with a tokenizer field and now it works. Thank you! Kind regards, Nick -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-1-3-highlighting-problem-tp2918089p2922785.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list arch

Re: How to set a common field to several values types ?

Grijesh wrote: > > Which way you are using to index the Plain text data? > I'm using Solr in a Php application, and have to index documents (with tika) and plain text data. The php interface uses curl to send xml data to the solr server. Grijesh wrote: > > As I see your both the fields are sa

Building hierarcies of query object instead of flat string queries

Is it possible to create hierarchies of query operator objects and pass that to solr instead of constructing a long string query? This would enable client applications to construct complex queries and have them verified by the compiler, example (psuedo code): q = BooleanQuery( minNumberShouldMa

DIH entity threads (multithreading)

Hallo, I have a problem using threads option in entity in DIH it just does not work, it either hangs it self or fails to import anything. Does this feature even work ? Without threads the import works fine, just too slow ** Di

Re: Is it possible to build Solr as a maven project?

> sorry, this was not the target I used (this one should work too, but...), > Can we expand on the but...? $ wget http://apache.panu.it//lucene/solr/3.1.0/apache-solr-3.1.0-src.tgz $ tar xf apache-solr-3.1.0-src.tgz $ cd apache-solr-3.1.0 $ ant generate-maven-artifacts *generate-maven-artifacts:

Re: Solr security

The WIKI has a loose interpretation of how to set-up Jetty securely. Please take a look at the article I wrote here: http://anthonyw.net/2011/04/securing-jetty-and-solr-with-php-authentication/. Even if PHP is not your language that sits on top of Solr you can still use the first part of the

Re: DIH entity threads (multithreading)

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Jamroz Marcin wrote: > Hallo, > > I have a problem using threads option in entity in DIH it just does not work, > it either hangs it self or fails to import anything. > > Does this feature even work ? > > Without threads the import works fine, just too slow [...]

Re: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error loading class 'org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandler'

now its working gr8, thanks stefan,scott -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/org-apache-solr-common-SolrException-Error-loading-class-org-apache-solr-handler-dataimport-DataImpo-tp2865625p2922985.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

how to do offline adding/updating index

Hello all, indexing with dataimporthandler runs every hour (new records will be added, some records will be updated) note :large data requirement is when indexing is in progress, searching (on already indexed data) should not affect so should i use multicore-with merge and swap or delta query or

RE: Boosting score of a document without deleting and adding another document

> What I want to do is : everytime an item is searched, I get > the ID of that document, and now I want to increase this > document's score.Function queries at query time won't really > help with this. Any way to do this other than adding the > entire document again? Looks like you need ExternalF

RE: how to do offline adding/updating index

One approach is to use Solr's replication features. Index to a 'master', periodically replicate to 'slave' on which all the searching is done. That's what I do; my master and slave are in fact on the same server (one with a bunch of CPUs and RAM however), although not alternate cores in a mult

RE: Is it possible to build Solr as a maven project?

Hi Gabriele, There are some Maven instructions here (not in Lucene/Solr 3.1 because I just wrote the file a couple of days ago): My recommendation, since the Solr 3.1 source tarball does not includ

Re: how to do offline adding/updating index

Under the hood, Lucene can support this by keeping multiple commit points in the index. So you'd make a new commit whenever you finish indexing the updates from each hour, and record that this is the last "searchable" commit. Then you are free to commit while indexing the next hour's worth of cha

Re: Is it possible to build Solr as a maven project?

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote: > Hi Gabriele, > > There are some Maven instructions here (not in Lucene/Solr 3.1 because I > just wrote the file a couple of days ago): > < > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_1/dev-tools/maven/README.maven > >

Re: Is it possible to build Solr as a maven project?

Very nice Steve ! Thanks again. (I'm building from svn so that's perfect for me) Is this file referenced somewhere in the wiki ? Ludovic. - Jouve France. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-build-Solr-as-a-maven-project-tp2898068p2923151.html

RE: Is it possible to build Solr as a maven project?

Hi Ludovic, On 5/10/2011 at 10:02 AM, lboutros wrote: > Very nice Steve ! Thanks again. (I'm building from svn so that's perfect > for me) > Is this file referenced somewhere in the wiki ? Not yet, no. Probably should be linked from the HowToContribute pages for Lucene and Solr. Feel free to a

RE: Is it possible to build Solr as a maven project?

On 5/10/2011 at 9:57 AM, Gabriele Kahlout wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote: > > [...] > > svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_3_1 > > I di

RE: SolrQuery API for adding group filter

I recently set up a solrj application that uses Solr Trunk and grouping. I didn't see where there was any explicit support in solrj for grouping (in Trunk...Maybe there is in the old SOLR-236 version). But you can set any parameters on the request like this: SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery(".

SolrHome ends with /./ - is this normal?

Hello, I'm having trouble getting Solr 3.1 to work with nutch-1.3. I'm not sure where the problem is, but I'm wondering why does the solrHome path end with /./. cwd=/Applications/NetBeans/apache-tomcat-7.0.6/bin SolrHome=/Users/simpatico/apache-solr-3.1.0/solr/./ In the web.xml of solr:

RE: Is it possible to build Solr as a maven project?

Steve, I'm not used to update wikis, but I've added a small part after the IntelliJ part here : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute Ludovic. - Jouve France. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-build-Solr-as-a-maven-project-tp2898068

Re: SolrHome ends with /./ - is this normal?

It apparently is normal, and my issue is indeed with nutch. I've modified post.sh from the example docs to use the solr in http://localhost:8080/apache-solr-3.1-SNAPSHOT and now finally data made it to the index. $ post.sh solr.xml monitor.xml With nutch I'm at: $ svn info Path: . URL: http://sv

Re: SolrHome ends with /./ - is this normal?

>From solr logs: May 10, 2011 4:33:20 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log *SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: ERROR:unknown field 'content' * at org.apache.solr.update.DocumentBuilder.toDocument(DocumentBuilder.java:321) at org.apache.solr.update.processor.RunUpdateProce

Re: SolrHome ends with /./ - is this normal?

There is a working example schema in Nutch' conf directory. On Tuesday 10 May 2011 16:40:02 Gabriele Kahlout wrote: > From solr logs: > > May 10, 2011 4:33:20 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log > *SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: ERROR:unknown field > 'content' * > at >

Re: SolrHome ends with /./ - is this normal?

I don't get you, are you talking about conf/schema.xml? That's what I'm referring to. Am i supposed to do something with the nutch's conf/schema.xml? On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote: > There is a working example schema in Nutch' conf directory. > > On Tuesday 10 May 2011 16:4

Re: Solr 3.1 Upgrade - Reindex necessary ?

Thanks Grijesh for responding. I meant that I will use the Lucene 3.1 jars for indexing also from now on. My current index already has a million docs indexed with solr 1.4.1 version, I read somewhere that once server is upgraded to 3.1, it is said that the first commit will change the indexes to 3.

Re: SolrHome ends with /./ - is this normal?

You need to use the schema.xml shipped with Nutch in Solr. It provides most fields that you need. On Tuesday 10 May 2011 17:31:33 Gabriele Kahlout wrote: > I don't get you, are you talking about conf/schema.xml? That's what I'm > referring to. Am i supposed to do something with the nutch's > conf

Re: SolrHome ends with /./ - is this normal?

You mean that I should copy it from nutch into solr? $ cp $NUTCH_HOME/conf/schema.xml $SOLR_HOME/conf/schema.xml After restarting tomcat, and re-executing the script nothing changed. On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote: > You need to use the schema.xml shipped with Nutch in Sol

Re: SolrHome ends with /./ - is this normal?

actually something changed, I managed to crawl and index some pages (the other must have to do with regex-urls). Thank you! Was this always necessary? Any pointer discussing why it's needed? On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Gabriele Kahlout wrote: > You mean that I should copy it from nutch into

Re: SolrHome ends with /./ - is this normal?

Yes, that schema is configured for the fields Nutch can generate. It's recommended to remove the Solr index after changing the schema. Then you must reindex. The On Tuesday 10 May 2011 17:40:39 Gabriele Kahlout wrote: > You mean that I should copy it from nutch into solr? > > $ cp $NUTCH_HOME/

Re: Solr security

Great posts all. I will give these a look and come up with something based on these recommendations. I'm sure as I begin implementing something, I will have more questions arise. On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Anthony Wlodarski < anth...@tinkertownlabs.com> wrote: > The WIKI has a loose interpr

RE: SolrQuery API for adding group filter

I'm actually using php but I get what you're saying. I think I understand what I need to do. Thanks a lot man! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrQuery-API-for-adding-group-filter-tp2921539p2923701.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabbl

RE: Synonym Filter disable at query time

Just a heads up on a solution. copyField wasn't need, but a new fieldType and a non-indexed, non-stored field was added. Within a new Synonym processor that executes right before the AnalyzerQueryNodeProcessor, I was able to modify the field name for each node to point at the new field. Therefor

Re: Replication Clarification Please

Hello Mr. Kanarsky, Thank you very much for the detailed explanation, probably the best explanation I found regarding replication. Just to be sure, I wanted to test solr 3.1 to see if it alleviates the problems...I dont think it helped. The master index version and generation are gr

RE: Synonym Filter disable at query time

Very nice! Good job! :) -Original Message- From: mtraynham [mailto:mtrayn...@digitalsmiths.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 9:44 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Synonym Filter disable at query time Just a heads up on a solution. copyField wasn't need, but a new fieldType

Re: Boosting score of a document without deleting and adding another document

Lucene also lets you change the norms directly, from an IndexReader. In theory this could do what you're seeking, I believe. But it's rather expert... and I don't think it's exposed through to Solr (?). Mike http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote: >

Solrj Questions

Hi, I am trying to use solrj for my application, my code is given below, query.add("q", "simplify360"); query.add("facet", "true"); query.add("facet.range", "createdOnGMTDate"); query.add("facet.range.start", "2010-08-01T00:00:00Z+330MINUTE

Re: edismax available in solr 3.1?

It's already much better than the old dismax, and probably more stable. If you do not require the ability to lock down what fields people should be allowed to search for, I suggest you start using it right away. If you require to lock that down, I suggest you help out finishing that part of eDism

Re: edismax available in solr 3.1?

Jan, is there already an issue for that? > It's already much better than the old dismax, and probably more stable. > If you do not require the ability to lock down what fields people should be > allowed to search for, I suggest you start using it right away. If you > require to lock that down, I s

Re: Total Documents Failed : How to find out why

OK, then your log is probably just coming out to the console. you can start it as "java -jar start.jar > file.log 2>&1" and keep a permanent record of the log if you're on windows Best Erick On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Rohit wrote: > Hi Erick, > > Thats exactly how I am starting solr. >

Re: edismax available in solr 3.1?

: It's already much better than the old dismax, and probably more stable. : If you do not require the ability to lock down what fields people should : be allowed to search for, I suggest you start using it right away. If : you require to lock that down, I suggest you help out finishing that : p

RE: SolrQuery API for adding group filter

I actually have another question unrelated to this (but related to grouping). I'm wondering if I can do a more complex grouping, such as grouping by a field and also making sure it matches some other criteria (such as date). For example, currently it might group 5 items from some field, but the 5

Re: Solr 3.1 Upgrade - Reindex necessary ?

: Thanks Grijesh for responding. I meant that I will use the Lucene 3.1 : jars for indexing also from now on. My current index already has a : million docs indexed with solr 1.4.1 version, I read somewhere that : once server is upgraded to 3.1, it is said that the first commit will : change the in

RE: Solr 3.1 / Java 1.5: Exception regarding analyzer implementation

: The reason why this assert hits you in one of your tomcat installations : could also be related to some instrumentation tools you have enabled in this : tomcat. Lot's of instrumentation tools may dynamically change class bytecode : and e.g. make them unfinal. In that case the assertion of course

Re: Total Documents Failed : How to find out why

: Subject: Total Documents Failed : How to find out why : References: <96637.83834...@web121717.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> : <1304627391.29391.156.ca...@lysdexic.healthline.com> : In-Reply-To: <1304627391.29391.156.ca...@lysdexic.healthline.com> http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack Thread H

Re: Controlling webapp startup

: 2) Use the usual Solr servlet apparatus, but defer its startup until : other code in the webapp makes up its mind about configuration and : calls System.setProperty to locate the solr home and data directories. I would suggest that route ... basically just create your own war, and subclass Sol

Multiple character wildcard searches looks for 0 or more characters

Hello, I am using solr search application, try to search text with wildcard character getting some weird result. Case :- 1 q=tes* Result: test, test1, test2 Case:- 1 q=test* Result: NONE Kindly help me to solve above problem. Thanks & Regards, Satyam

Re: Solrj Questions

: Subject: Solrj Questions : References: : <19898929-d0b9-47fb-b62a-5fd0437a8...@cominvent.com> : <4dc936de.9050...@tinkertownlabs.com> : : In-Reply-To: http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists When starting a new discussion on a mailing list,

Re: Solr 3.1 Upgrade - Reindex necessary ?

Hoss, Thank you very much for clearly delineating the difference. Just to be clear - My intent to move to 3.1 was driven by my desire to improve my replication performance - Deducing from your explanation, I believe the replication/indexing related changes/bug fixes like the following will

Re: how to do offline adding/updating index

I think the key question here is what's the best way to perform indexing without affecting search performance, or without affecting it much. If you have a batch of documents to index (say a daily batch that takes an hour to index and merge), you'd like to do that on an offline system, and then

Re: Multiple character wildcard searches looks for 0 or more characters

> I am using solr search application, try to search text with > wildcard > character getting some weird result. > > Case :- 1 q=tes* > > Result: test,  test1, test2 > > Case:- 1 q=test* > > Result: NONE > > Kindly help me to solve above problem. Do you have stemming filter defined in your ana

Re: how to do offline adding/updating index

Master/slave replication does this out of the box, easily. Just set the slave to update on Optimize only. Then you can update the master as much as you want. When you are ready to update the slave (the search instance), just optimize the master. On the slave's next cycle check it will refresh itsel

Test Post

Hi, all. Sorry for the 'spam' - I'm just testing that my posts are actually being seen. I've sent a few queries over the past couple of weeks and haven't had a single response :( Anyways - if one or two would respond to this, I'd appreciate it - just to let me know that I'm being ignored, vs

Re: Test Post

Hi Bob I just joined Solr Mailing List and I can see your post :) Hope your query get solved. Regards Jasneet Sabharwal On 11-05-2011 01:59, Bob Sandiford wrote: Hi, all. Sorry for the 'spam' -- I'm just testing that my posts are actually being seen. I've sent a few queries over the past c

Re: how to do offline adding/updating index

Thanks - that sounds like what I was hoping for. So the I/O during replication will have *some* impact on search performance, but presumably much less than reindexing and merging/optimizing? -Mike Master/slave replication does this out of the box, easily. Just set the slave to update on Opti

Re: how to do offline adding/updating index

Replication large files can be bad for OS page cache as files being written are also written to the page cache. Search latency can grow due to I/O for getting the current index version back into memory. Also, Solr cache warming can casue a doubling of your heap usage. Frequent replication in an

search by url in Solr?

Hello everyone, My Query q=google.com should give the ouput as http://www.googe.com In my search engine when i put q=google.com, it does not give the above output, rather it shows no result. but putting q=url:google.com gives the correct output as http://www.google.com Now my question how can i mak

Re: search by url in Solr?

Hello. One option is to specify a default search field in your schema.xml. If your query doesn´t include an specific field the query parser will use the default one to launch the query. You should include in your schema.xml something like this: url

Re: search by url in Solr?

thanks! , it worked. Can i mention url,content to inlcude two default fields.? On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Rakudten [via Lucene] < ml-node+2924686-576776982-146...@n3.nabble.com> wrote: > Hello. > > One option is to specify a default search field in your schema.xml. If your > > query doesn´

Re: Replication Clarification Please

OK let me rephrase. In solrconfig.xml there is a setting called mergeFactor. The default is usually 10. Practically it means there are 10 segments. If you are doing fast delta indexing (adding a couple documents, then committing), You will cycle through all 10 segments pretty fast. It appears tha

Re: tomcat and multicore processors

This is fine. Solr needs lots of memory though... :) It may not be as fast as you need, but you can test that. On 5/9/11 2:33 AM, "solr_begin...@onet.pl" wrote: >Hi, > >Is that possible that solr on tomcat on windows 2008 is using only one >core of processor? Do I need configure something to us

AW: search by url in Solr?

Hello, if you want to have more than one searchfield, you can use the Dismax or eDismax Queryparser. There you can set more than one field to search. Example: dismax explicit *,score text^1.0 title^0.05 author^0.2 shi_quell

RE: Boosting score of a document without deleting and adding another document

Is the keyField over here the same thing as the "score" of the field? > Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 06:39:32 -0700 > From: iori...@yahoo.com > Subject: RE: Boosting score of a document without deleting and adding another > document > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > > What I want to do is : eve