Hi there,
I am struggling with the syntax for boosting.
My scenario is that we have an algorithm that gives weightings to particular
keywords.
When a person searches for keywords eg value1 value2 value3 we want to apply
boosting so that a document is boosted according to which of the keywords it
Hi,
I have a field that is a text field eg: R500,000-550,000 Per Annum,
R350,000-550,000 Per Annum Cost To Company etc.
I would like to facet on the salary range.
I have created a new field type
kirsty wrote:
>
> Hi there,
> I am struggling with the syntax for boosting.
> My scenario is that we have an algorithm that gives weightings to
> particular keywords.
> When a person searches for keywords eg value1 value2 value3 we want to
> apply boosting so that a document is boosted accordin
Sorry I missed it in the solrconfig.xml (my bad). I wasn't looking for
it in the right place.
Thijs
On 27-5-2010 6:41, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: So now I wonder why BinaryRequestWriter (and BinaryUpdateRequestHandler)
: aren't turned on by default. (eps considering some threads on the dev-list
Thanks. I'll take a look at this
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: 27 May 2010 01:54
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr configuration for Subversion
: I've seen the info about SvnQuery & wondered if anyone has a Solr
: config
Hi to everyone, I'm really sorry for the s3tupid question I'm doing, but I
didn't understand how to set the java system property solr.solr.home to my
solr home.
Can someone help me ?
Thanks in advanca
* Set the java system property solr.solr.home to your solr home.
(On linux - use something like export solr.solr.home=/my/solr/home.
On Windows - see
http://vlaurie.com/computers2/Articles/environment.htm
to set an environment variable named solr.solr.home .)
(You can also use the two other op
On 05/27/2010 10:30 AM, Antonello Mangone wrote:
Hi to everyone, I'm really sorry for the s3tupid question I'm doing, but I
didn't understand how to set the java system property solr.solr.home to my
solr home.
Can someone help me ?
Thanks in advanca
it should be something like
System.setPr
But where I have to write this command ???
System.setProperty("solr.solr.home",
> "whateverpathyou'dliketosetonyourfilesystem");
>
> Claudio
>
Hi,
When you start the tomcat, you can specify the properties, it will be
something like this -Dsolr.solr.home=path/to/your/solr/home. For example, in
linux ./startup.sh -Dsolr.solr.home=path/to/your/solr/home
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Át
Just set the pre and post tags to be empty strings and you'll get the
result you want, I think. No?
Erik
On May 26, 2010, at 8:36 PM, Blargy wrote:
What are the correct for settings to get highlighting excerpting
working?
Original Text: "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy
On May 26, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Dennis Gearon wrote:
I thought that if entries were COMMITed to the index, they were
immediately visible?
Is this true, or am I smoking Java coffee beans?
They're visible after a commit AND warming are complete, yes. But
there could be a potentially substa
(10/05/27 16:11), kirsty wrote:
Hi,
I have a field that is a text field eg: R500,000-550,000 Per Annum,
R350,000-550,000 Per Annum Cost To Company etc.
I would like to facet on the salary range.
I have created a new field type
Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
>
> (10/05/27 16:11), kirsty wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have a field that is a text field eg: R500,000-550,000 Per Annum,
>> R350,000-550,000 Per Annum Cost To Company etc.
>> I would like to facet on the salary range.
>> I have created a new field type
>> > sortMissingLast="true"
Yes you are right, I get that type of result. I guess my wording was wrong.
My field looks like this in the index:
R500,000-550,000 Per Annum
R500,000-550,000 Per Annum
How would I search for say salaries in the range of 500,000 - 550,000?
Trying fq=Rumeration_strip:500,000-550,00 doesn't bring
Hi to all, I have a question for you ...
Can someone exaplain me the differences between a unique solr application
multicore and multiple solr webapps ???
Thank you all in advance
There will never be any need to search the actual HTML (tags, markup, etc) so
as far as functionality goes it seems like the DIH HTMLStripTransformer is
the way to go.
Are there any significant performance differences between the two?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nab
Can someone explain to be what the state of Solr/Lucene is... didn't they
recently combine?
I know I am running version 1.4 but I keep seeing version numbers out there
that are 3.0, 4.0??? Can someone explain what that means.
Also is the state of trunk (1.4 or 4.0??) "good enough" for production
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Blargy wrote:
> Can someone explain to be what the state of Solr/Lucene is... didn't they
> recently combine?
Yes, it started in March. Development is combined (committers, dev
list, etc), but separate downloads and user lists will remain.
> I know I am running
Hi to all,
I have a question on query analyzers.
How do we make sure that when searches for terms like A&M does not match
docs which have some thing like 5a.m etc
On analysis in admin page, it looks like WordDelimiterFilterFactory, is
splitting on &, how can i make it work so that i can use fe
Yonik Seeley-2-2 wrote:
>
> Lots of other stuff has changed. For example, trunk is now always the
> next *major* version number.
> So the trunk of the combined lucene/solr is 4.0-dev
>
> There is now a branch_3x that is like trunk for all future 3.x releases.
>
> The next version of Solr will
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Blargy wrote:
> What version is (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/)? Im
> guessing its 4.0-dev
Yes.
> but then where does 3.1 fit in?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/
> Say I am running 1.4 and want to upgrade, whic
Hi Antonello,
In multicore you get richer fuctionality including core discovery,
core config reload, alias, core
swap and (soon to be) core create. Under a single webapp you get
control over memory allocation threads etc. Personally I would chose
multicore and I believe in solr 1.5 they ar
So correction as per a different thread the next verison of solr will
be 3.1 as per the merge with the luence tpl
David Stuart
On 27 May 2010, at 15:44, Antonello Mangone
wrote:
Hi to all, I have a question for you ...
Can someone exaplain me the differences between a unique solr
appli
The two approaches solve different needs. In 'multicore' you have a
single webapp with multiple indexes. This means they are all running
in the same JVM. This may be an advantage or a disadvantage depending
on what you are doing.
ryan
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Antonello Mangone
wrot
I'm a big fan of plain old text facets (or tags), displayed in some logical
order, perhaps with a bit of indenting to help convey context. But as you
may have noticed, I don't rule the world. :-)
Suppose you took the opposite approach, rending facets in non-traditional
ways, that were still funct
Something like sliders perhaps?
Of course only numerical ranges can be put into sliders. (or a concept that
may be logically presented as some sort of ordening, such as "bad, hmm,
good, great"
Use Solr's Statscomponent to show the min and max values
Have a look at tripadvisor.com for good uses/im
Hi all,
I have a query need that requires multiple OR conditions, and, there must be
a match in each condition for the query to provide a result.
The search would be * (A or B) AND (C or D)* and the only valid results it
could turn up are:
A B
A C
B C
B D
Can anyone provide guidance as to how t
On 27.05.2010, at 23:32, Geert-Jan Brits wrote:
> Something like sliders perhaps?
> Of course only numerical ranges can be put into sliders. (or a concept that
> may be logically presented as some sort of ordening, such as "bad, hmm,
> good, great"
>
> Use Solr's Statscomponent to show the min a
Leading wildcards don't work.
word* is supported
word? is supported
word*x or word?x should be supported, but something strange happens
involving boolean queries.
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:31 PM, dotriz
wrote:
>
> Here is my schema.xml file
>
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n847355/sc
I'd like to warn people about the default configuration of Jetty in the Solr
trunk release (not present in Solr 1.4 and prior). There is a difference in
the jetty configuration which is for the latest Solr to use the
QueuedThreadPool (as seen in jetty.xml). Previously, it had used a
BoundedTh
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:34 PM, efr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a query need that requires multiple OR conditions, and, there must
> be a match in each condition for the query to provide a result.
>
> The search would be * (A or B) AND (C or D)* and the only valid results it
> could
> I have a query need that requires multiple OR conditions,
> and, there must be
> a match in each condition for the query to provide a
> result.
>
> The search would be * (A or B) AND (C or D)* and the only
> valid results it
> could turn up are:
>
> A B
> A C
> B C
> B D
>
> Can anyone provid
Funny enough, I've been looking for my own solution too. The Zoie plugin does
not work on multi-core setups, so that's bust for me. Once you commit
something to index, you need to "warm" a new searcher (load all the data from
disk into memory/cache) like Erik says. On a smaller index, this is
Perhaps you could show the 'nr of items left' as a tooltip of sorts when the
user actually drags the slider.
If the user doesn't drag (or hovers over ) the slider 'nr of items left'
isn't shown.
Moreover, initially a slider doesn't limit the results so 'nr of items left'
shown for the slider would
> How do we make sure that when searches for terms like
> A&M does not match
> docs which have some thing like 5a.m etc
>
> On analysis in admin page, it looks like
> WordDelimiterFilterFactory, is
> splitting on &, how can i make it work so that i can
> use features of word
> delimiter as well m
Thank you. That seems to be working well, except when I included a wild card
for any of the terms, the wildcard term isn't being found out.
My searches are actually:
q=+(A A*) +(C C*)&q.op=OR
When I do a regular search on "A*" or "C*" I get matches but not in the
context of the above query. The a
> Thank you. That seems to be working
> well, except when I included a wild card
> for any of the terms, the wildcard term isn't being found
> out.
>
> My searches are actually:
> q=+(A A*) +(C C*)&q.op=OR
>
> When I do a regular search on "A*" or "C*" I get matches
> but not in the
> context of
You can get a lot of mileage out of the admin
analysis page and the "full interface" page, especially
by turning on the "debug" option on the admin
"full interface" page.
It takes a bit of practice to read the debug output, but
it's really, really, really worth it
Best
Erick
On Thu, May 27,
Hi Ahmet,
Thanks for the response again. The best way I could illustrate our live
search feature is an example implementation:
http://www.krop.com/
Notice when you search the word "senior" in the keywords field, the results
filter down to just the job postings with that word in it.
So it's not
Hi,
I want to verify a bug if someone can help. I have a text field:
I use to store text that I highlight on. If the field contains more than
one text value, highlighting does not seem to work.
No highlights are returned, even though the text exists in one of the
field values returned from
> Thanks for the response again. The best way I could
> illustrate our live
> search feature is an example implementation:
>
> http://www.krop.com/
>
> Notice when you search the word "senior" in the keywords
> field, the results
> filter down to just the job postings with that word in it.
>
>
Thanks, I found full interface :)
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> You can get a lot of mileage out of the admin
> analysis page and the "full interface" page, especially
> by turning on the "debug" option on the admin
> "full interface" page.
>
> It takes a bit of practic
Responses in blue
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>
> > Thanks for the response again. The best way I could
> > illustrate our live
> > search feature is an example implementation:
> >
> > http://www.krop.com/
> >
> > Notice when you search the word "senior" in the keyword
> > We don't mind the order of terms. We basically are
> sorting by two variables
> that are independent of relevency. So I would assume
> the order doesn't
> matter... we just need to make sure any results we filter
> down to (as you
> saw in the krop.com example) contain the words the user has
>
(10/05/28 8:16), Darren Govoni wrote:
Hi,
I want to verify a bug if someone can help. I have a text field:
I use to store text that I highlight on. If the field contains more than
one text value, highlighting does not seem to work.
No highlights are returned, even though the text exists
Hi Koji,
Well, its quite simple. Here is the field returned from my query:
"fox"
The bird flies in the sky.
The quick brown fox jumped over the fence.
No highlighting.
If the field only has one value "The quick brown fox jumped over the
fence." It works.
Interesting
Hi Ahmet,
Thanks again for the feedback. We will be searching several fields of each
object in the index (title, description, tags). The matches on keywords need
to be in any of these fields and there will be no different weights.
Does this affect your solution?
I'm trying to understand it as be
Hi, I'm trying to build from source to apply the field collapsing patch.
'Ant dist' runs just fine, no errors, but at startup I get a
"NoSuchFieldError: submap" exception (stack trace:
http://pastebin.com/NXsf0KJS ). This is before sending any requests. I don't
have any 'submap' field defined anywh
: Hi Koji,
:Well, its quite simple. Here is the field returned from my query:
: "fox"
Actually what Koji was asking for was the declaration for
"text" (you posted the but not the so we only have
half a picture of hte settings involved)
That said: the subject of this thread caught my eye
50 matches
Mail list logo
