Re: sort by function

Can you please do some math to show the principle? Do you want to do something like this: finalScore = score * rank finalScore = rank ??? If the first is the case, than it is done by default (have a look at the wiki-example for making more recent documents more relevant). If the second is the

Re: sort by function

Forget what I said about the second case. The second case is a simple sort on your field. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/sort-by-function-tp814380p821252.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Connection Pool

Sorry for hijacking the thread, but I have an additional question Is there a way to achieve similar performance (SUSS like) when targeting extract request handler (/update/extract)? I guess one way can be to extract content on the client side and then use SUSS to send update request but then extrac

match to non tokenizable word ("helloworld")

I get no match when searching for "helloworld", even though I have "hello world" in my index. How do people usually deal with this? Write a custom analyzer, with help from a collection of all dictionary words? thanks for suggestions/comments. __

Re: bi-directional replication on solr 1.4?

On 5/14/10 8:08 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : It looks like SnapPuller.java doesn't allow for the possibility of the : slave having a later index version than the master. It only checks : whether the versions are equal. : : It's easy enough to add that check and prevent the index fetch when : the

Re: match to non tokenizable word ("helloworld")

You might want to look at ngrams and/or shingles. In this case I suspect that ngrams are better suited, I don't think shingles applies with the direction you stated, but your problem description is so short I thought I'd mention it. Although your collection of words can work (think synonyms) if yo

Re: date slider

> Now I also want to offer a slider to define the range to > include in the result set. However here I do not want to do > faceting, instead I just want to find out the min and max > date values in the result (without any of the facet filters > applies) so I know the start and end points for the s

Connection Reset Errors on a Distributed Index

Hello, For reference, I've posted about this before (but have new information now): http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Connection-reset-errors-during-commits-optimize-td484058.html#a484058 and have seen other similar posts as well: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-on-Solr-Distributed-

Re: date slider

> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/StatsComponent can give you > min and max values. Sorry my bad, I just tested StatsComponent with tdate field. And it is not working for date typed fields. Wiki says it is for numeric fields.

Re: date slider

On 16.05.2010, at 21:01, Ahmet Arslan wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/StatsComponent can give you min and max values. Sorry my bad, I just tested StatsComponent with tdate field. And it is not working for date typed fields. Wiki says it is for numeric fields. ok thx for checking. i

RE: Solr Deployment Question

They are two web applications running on a single Tomcat instance. Thanks Madu -Original Message- From: findbestopensource [mailto:findbestopensou...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 14 May 2010 4:38 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr Deployment Question Please explain how y

Solr Search problem; cannot search the existing word in the index content

Hi, I'm working on the index/search project recently and i found solr which is very fascinating to me. I followed the test successful from the tutorial page. Starting up jetty and run adding new xml (user:~/solr/example/exampledocs$ *java -jar post.jar *.xml*) so far so good at this stage. Now i